Discussion:
"I Was Trump?s Ghostwriter. A New Biopic Gets the Most Important Thing Right."
Add Reply
AlleyCat
2024-10-12 00:18:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.

Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.

======================================================================================================================

Draft-Dodging Coward

While first glance at Creepy Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak Joe Biden's long career in politics would give you the
impression of a racist plagiarism and serious pedophile, don't worry, there's far more skeletons in his closet.

In addition to everything we already know is wrong with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, he also seems to
have a history of evading the draft in Vietnam, according to a report from InsideSources.

Of course, the outlet also bashes President Trump over his own deferment during Vietnam, but to compare Trump to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden in this respect, as you will come to learn, is a pretty unfair comparison.

According to the report, after graduating college in 1968, Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was eligible for
the draft, meaning he should have ended up fighting in Vietnam. He earned a 1-Y draft deferment, however, due to
asthma:

That's right-asthma.

There's one little problem with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's "asthma."

Although Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was granted a deferment for "asthma as a teenager"... this didn't
stop him from playing high school football.

Oops.

InsideSources also points out that, in Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's autobiography, Old-Rich-White-
Religious Freak, Joe Biden makes no mention of asthma, but does brag about being "active in intramural sports" in
college, and "recounts an active childhood [and] football exploits in high school."

Certainly doesn't seem like the kind of asthma that should have kept him from the draft if he had no problem with
"football exploits."

What's worse, during one summer home from college, according to Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's own
account, he worked as a lifeguard, which certainly has very high standards for physical fitness, including a healthy
set of lungs.

It gets worse.

One incident from that summer stands out: How Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden had to wrap a six-foot length
of metal chain around his arm to face off against a knife-wielding local tough who went by the name "Corn Pop."

"You might cut me, Corn Pop, but I'm going to wrap this chain around your head before you do," Old-Rich-White-Religious
Freak, Joe Biden told him. Strong words, but he was a healthy, high school football player who could back them up. Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden and Corn Pop resolved their differences without violence and, according to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, became poolside friends.

Just six years later, at the height of the fighting in Vietnam, that same poolside athlete avoided mandatory military
service due to "asthma as a teenager."

So let's get this straight.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, as a teenager, was healthy enough to play football and also qualify as a
lifeguard, which is no easy feat.

And the left wants to mock Trump's "bone spurs," which is the reason behind his own 1-Y classification. However, bone
spurs are a real diagnosis that don't seem to conflict with Trump's lifestyle at all.

He's not exactly known for competing in triathlons.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, on the other hand, is a known liar and and fraud, and is going to have a
very hard time explaining this doozy.
Alan
2024-10-12 21:47:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?

Do you know what "mens rea" means?
Skeeter
2024-10-12 23:12:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Alan
2024-10-12 23:16:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
AlleyCat
2024-10-13 02:01:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.

Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.

"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."

============================================================================

Draft-Dodging Coward

While first glance at Creepy Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak Joe Biden's long career in politics would give you the
impression of a racist plagiarism and serious pedophile, don't worry, there's far more skeletons in his closet.

In addition to everything we already know is wrong with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, he also seems to
have a history of evading the draft in Vietnam, according to a report from InsideSources.

Of course, the outlet also bashes President Trump over his own deferment during Vietnam, but to compare Trump to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden in this respect, as you will come to learn, is a pretty unfair comparison.

According to the report, after graduating college in 1968, Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was eligible for
the draft, meaning he should have ended up fighting in Vietnam. He earned a 1-Y draft deferment, however, due to
asthma:

That's right-asthma.

There's one little problem with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's "asthma."

Although Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was granted a deferment for "asthma as a teenager"... this didn't
stop him from playing high school football.

Oops.

InsideSources also points out that, in Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's autobiography, Old-Rich-White-
Religious Freak, Joe Biden makes no mention of asthma, but does brag about being "active in intramural sports" in
college, and "recounts an active childhood [and] football exploits in high school."

Certainly doesn't seem like the kind of asthma that should have kept him from the draft if he had no problem with
"football exploits."

What's worse, during one summer home from college, according to Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's own
account, he worked as a lifeguard, which certainly has very high standards for physical fitness, including a healthy
set of lungs.

It gets worse.

One incident from that summer stands out: How Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden had to wrap a six-foot length
of metal chain around his arm to face off against a knife-wielding local tough who went by the name "Corn Pop."

"You might cut me, Corn Pop, but I'm going to wrap this chain around your head before you do," Old-Rich-White-Religious
Freak, Joe Biden told him. Strong words, but he was a healthy, high school football player who could back them up. Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden and Corn Pop resolved their differences without violence and, according to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, became poolside friends.

Just six years later, at the height of the fighting in Vietnam, that same poolside athlete avoided mandatory military
service due to "asthma as a teenager."

So let's get this straight.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, as a teenager, was healthy enough to play football and also qualify as a
lifeguard, which is no easy feat.

And the left wants to mock Trump's "bone spurs," which is the reason behind his own 1-Y classification. However, bone
spurs are a real diagnosis that don't seem to conflict with Trump's lifestyle at all.

He's not exactly known for competing in triathlons.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, on the other hand, is a known liar and and fraud, and is going to have a
very hard time explaining this doozy.
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Rudy is the PERFECT liberal.

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:57:47 -0700, Rudy Canoza says... forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a
three sport letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like
me, and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as
many women as me, says...

Whereas *I*:

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)

It's not" bragging" if it upsets Wudy's Wittle World... forever stuck with mommy, now that he's too old and creepy to
work.
Post by Alan
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.

Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.

"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as" Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that" contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Post by Alan
Yes, he did.
No, he didn't.
Yes, he did.
Hur said he didn't.
No, Hur said no such thing.

Why can't Rudy Canoza EVER tell the truth?

======================================================================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil
neck to the amusement of all.

There Are Several Theories For Why Rudy Can't Stop Lying

Rudy's An Undeserved Narcissist

Narcisists are often pathological liars, because they simply don't care about
the truth.

They prefer to tell lies and gain control over people than be honest.

Sometimes, compulsive liars are highly impulsive people who struggle to take
the time to think things through and tell the truth.

Lying doesn't necessarily make you a bad person, but it could be a sign of
something more sinister.

By the age of three or four, we all start to lie. At this point in our brain's
development, we learn that we have an incredibly versatile and powerful tool at
our disposal - our language - and we can use it to actually play with reality
and affect the outcome of what's happening.

Sooner or later we learn that lying is "bad," and we shouldn't really do it.
But if Jim Carey's "Liar Liar" taught us anything, it's that this just isn't
feasible. We all have to lie sometimes.

But some people are pathological liars, meaning they can't stop spreading
misinformation about themselves and others. The psychological reasons for why
some people are this way is a bit of a mystery, but in the third edition of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, pathological lying is a
disorder in its own right, as well as a symptom of personality disorders like
psychopathy and narcissism.

"I think it comes from a defect in the neurological wiring in terms of what
causes us to have compassion and empathy," psychiatrist Judith Orloff, author
of "The Empath's Survival Guide," told Business Insider. "Because narcissists,
sociopaths, and psychopaths have what's called empathy deficient disorder,
meaning they don't feel empathy in the way we would."

The Truth Doesn't Matter to Narcissists

When you don't care about other people, lies don't seem to matter. A lack of
empathy essentially means a lack of conscience, which is a hard concept to
grasp for a lot of people.

"When they lie it doesn't hurt them in the same way it would hurt us," Orloff
said. "So many people get into relationships with pathological liars, or just
can't understand why they're lying, because they're trying to fit these people
into the ordinary standards of what it means to be empathetic."

But they don't fit. In fact, they may not even realize they are lying half the
time, because they're not conscious of it. Orloff said they actually believe
they are telling the truth a lot of the time. It's not so much about the fact
itself, she said, as it is about wanting to have power over somebody.

This is extremely dangerous for highly sensitive people, because they attract
narcissists. Then when they see someone is lying, they try and figure it out,
or blame themselves. Once the lies start, it can end with the victim being
gaslighted, which is essentially when they are told over and over again that
their version of reality is incorrect, and they begin to believe the warped
truth of the abuser.

"The great power of relationships is when you can tell the truth to one
another, and trust each other, and be authentic - and with pathological liars
you can't trust them," Orloff said. "You can't base your life around them. It's
like a moral deficit, and there's no accountability. Someone who is a
pathological liar will not say I'm sorry for doing it. They will say it's your
fault."

The only way to escape the clutches of a pathological liar is to be strong
enough to say "no this is not my fault, this is not ringing true to me, so I
can't really trust you," she said.

Unfortunately, people tend to doubt themselves, because the lies can escalate
subtly. It may start with a small white lie, and a few months later the
victim's life with be a mess of confusion because of the web of tall tales that
has been woven.

"If somebody lies, don't try and make an excuse about it," Orloff said. "A lie
is a lie. And if you bring it up to the person and they say it's your fault, or
no it didn't happen, just know there's something very wrong going on."

Psychologist Linda Blair, an author of many psychology books, told Business
Insider some compulsive liars are simply too impulsive to tell the truth. The
impulsive-reflective scale is ingrained in our genes, and it's very hard for
someone highly impulsive to take the time to think things through, just as it
is a challenge for a reflective person to jump into something head first.

"If you're an impulsive person, it's really hard to break the habit, because
you have this terrible feeling inside you that you have to sort things out
right now," Blair said. "So when it comes to your head, you just say it. That
doesn't mean you necessarily lie, but it's a little harder for you to stop from
lying, more than it is for someone who's more reflective."

Pathological lying and narcissism aren't synonymous, they just sometimes go
hand in hand. In other cases, compulsive liars just might not have the capacity
to stop themselves blurting things out. And Blair said they just need to learn
to control their urges and compulsions. Their lies don't necessarily come from
a bad place.

"I don't think it's something they know how to deal with," she said. "We think
probably it has something to do with actual brain function and the way some
people's brains work, which makes it much harder for them to understand the
effect it will have on other people... We think, but we just don't know yet
for sure."
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Rudy is the PERFECT liberal.

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 09:32:51 -0700, Rudy Canoza... forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three
sport letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me,
and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many
women as me, says...

Whereas *I*:

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)

It's not" bragging" if it upsets Wudy's Wittle World... forever stuck with mommy, now that he's too old and creepy to
work.
Post by Alan
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.

Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.

"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as" Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that" contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Yes, Hur said that Biden didn't steal any documents
He said no such thing.

======================================================================================================================

Rudy, the Compulsive Liar

A compulsive liar excessively lies to fabricate reality. Compulsive liars are those who lie over and over again. The
dishonest behavior is second nature to them, and they may not even realize they're lying half the time (despite
displaying the classic signs of a liar). While compulsively lying isn't classified as a disorder, it can be a sign of
other mental health disorders, such as antisocial personality disorder.

Reasoning: Compulsive liars often make up stories and white lies because they fear criticism. For them, lying is a
defense mechanism to protect them from reality.

How to Deal: Don't engage in a compulsive liar's lies. Instead, state simply, "That's not true," and walk away.
The terms "compulsive" and "habitual" are often used interchangeably.



Rudy, the Pathological Liar

A pathological liar is persistently dishonest for no reason. These liars tell small lies compulsively and habitually-it
comes naturally to them. More often than not, their reality becomes tangled with their lies, mixing fact and fiction.
Perhaps they exaggerate a story or don't tell the truth about what they had for breakfast. A pathological liar can have
such a strong belief in their lies that they believe them to be true.

Reasoning: Pathological liars tend to have low self-esteem and will often lie to boost their ego, seek sympathy, or
cure boredom.

How to Deal: Stop engaging in the conversation if you notice that they're lying. Pathological liars want you to believe
what they believe, and if you don't indulge in the lie, they'll likely move on.

Like compulsive liars, pathological lying may be a sign of a personality or mental-health disorder; however, it's more
difficult to spot a pathological liar.



Rudy, the Sociopathic Liar

A sociopathic liar lies on a routine basis to cause chaos. Their lying doesn't start or end on occasion; it's constant.
Unlike other types of liars, a sociopath lies simply because they want to. There's no rhyme or reason to it, and they
rarely feel remorse for their actions.

Reasoning: Sociopathic liars lie to gratify their own needs. They want what they want and won't hesitate to burn a few
bridges to get it.

How to Deal: Be honest with a sociopathic liar to derail their schemes. Call out their blatant lie with facts you know
to be true with something like, "Really? See, I heard something different."

Sociopathic and psychopathic lying are generally the same thing, with the only difference being the personality
disorder associated with their dishonesty.



Rudy, the Narcissistic Liar

A narcissistic liar seeks attention but denies responsibility. These types of liars use gaslighting to fuel their lies.
They may appear to be a "people person," but their social connections often stem from exaggerations and lies. A
narcissist's lies may seem childish, as their lies are a people-pleasing game.

Reasoning: Narcissistic liars twist the truth to hide themselves. Deep down, they're insecure and will do whatever it
takes not to be vulnerable.

How to Deal: Don't engage in a narcissistic liar's drama. Instead, take what they say with a grain of salt and analyze
the facts. If what they say contradicts what you know, it's probably a lie.
Narcissistic liars are a type of compulsive liar; however, they appear to be a hero or victim when fabricating their
reality.



Rudy, the Intentional Liar

An intentional liar lies for enjoyment. These types of liars love the drama lying creates. They think lying is fun-an
entertaining game they can play whenever they like. More often than not, their white lies, fibs, and exaggerations are
mean-spirited and intended to stir the pot or push someone's buttons.
Reasoning: Intentional liars are deceptive for attention. They're likely insecure and lie to boost their ego and appear
powerful.

How to Deal: Avoid engaging in lies and gossip with an intentional liar. The more you react to their lies, the more
lies they'll create.

Unlike pathological liars, intentional liars are fully aware of the dishonest web they weave.



Rudy, the Careless Liar

A careless liar doesn't care about the implications of lying. This type of liar is often sloppy or careless when it
comes to bending the truth. They likely won't try to hide it or put much thought into forming the "perfect lie."
Instead, they'll spew whatever comes to mind, often leading to further lies or conversational hiccups.

Reasoning: Careless liars typically lie on the spot to cover up a mistake, fear, or insecurity. The lie hastily comes
out to protect themselves from facing the truth.

How to Deal: Call a careless liar out on their lie to halt them in their tracks. They know they're lying, and
confronting them and genuinely asking how they're doing may help them admit it.
A careless liar's lies are usually easy to spot because they don't formulate a clever story or tale beforehand.



Rudy, the Impressive Liar

An impressive liar aims to be the best. This type of liar wants to be the most impressive of the group. They'll
exaggerate stories and tell white lies to look like the hero. For instance, the classic "I caught a fish this big" tale
is often told by an impressive liar.

Reasoning: Impressive liars want to feel self-assured and liked by others and often lie to hide insecurities or
embarrassment.

How to Deal: Let an impressive liar's lie roll off you. If something sounds too good to be true, say, "Yeah, sure," and
walk away or change the topic.

An impressive liar doesn't lie to be malicious or mean-spirited. They lie to fabricate the truth to match their wild
version of reality.



Rudy, the Encouraging Liar

An Encouraging liar lies to welcome conflict. Encouraging liars lie to scheme, manipulate, or intentionally harm; they
lie to keep the argument going. Conflict is their best case scenario, and these liars often dance around the truth to
court confrontation.

Reasoning: Encouraging liars are likely dishonest to further confrontation.

How to Deal: Don't let an Encouraging liar drag you away from an important conversation.

Encouraging liars usually lie every day; however, the more they lie, the easier it'll become and the more often they'll
do it.
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Rudy is the PERFECT liberal.

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:20:55 -0700, Rudy Canoza... forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three
sport letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me,
and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many
women as me, says...

Whereas *I*:

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)
He was.
No, he wasn't.
He was ? and is ? the incumbent president.
He wasn't President in 2017, stupid.

"... BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017..."

"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: BIDEN'S CLAIM THAT NONE OF THE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FOUND IN HIS POSSESSION WAS HIGHLY CLASSIFIED IS
FALSE, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."



=======================================================================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil
neck to the amusement of all.

THIS is why Rudy is Rudy:

When Dad Isn't There

Research has found that when a father is not present it is likely:

The infant was born pre-term or low birth weight or with dwarfism.

Many of these families will be low-income households.

Children may struggle with regulating emotions which can lead to an increase in aggressive behavior and
difficulty with social skills. Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding!

A child will become involved in risky behavior.

Sons have the potential to struggle with gender identity and role confusion.

Even if the biological father role is filled by another, some of these figures become temporary or have the
potential of being abusive.

Children will be left with feelings of blame or emptiness as to why their father left.

Where Did He Go?

What is the reason these fathers are not staying around? Though simply having children can suggest being a father, for
many men there is more a father wants to provide for their family. Unemployment and lack of education can be
contributing factors as to why fathers leave.5 When men feel they are not meeting the social demands that define
fathers, the idea of achieving other fatherly roles decreases and it may seem easier to leave. Other reasons for father
absence can include imprisonment, infidelity, and abuse.

How to Help Children of Absent Fathers

Though the negative consequences of father absence can be disheartening, there is still hope for these children.

Include positive extended male family figures in the child's life. Children can form strong relationships as they have
a safe, stable male figure to rely upon as they grow up. This could come from a grandparent, uncle, or another positive
male family member. When these men are present for monumental moments in life, as well as day-to-day interactions, a
void can be filled, and the child's confidence can grow.4 Including extended family can also provide another resource
for the mother to help reduce stress overload and feelings of loneliness.

If there is no male family member available or near to help, try finding a mentor in the community. When a child is
able to spend time with a successful individual in their community, different doors of potential are opened to them to
see ways that they can become successful.8 Examples of mentors could be coaches, teachers, after school staff,
ecclesiastical leaders, etc.

Find support groups in the local area. Just like children can find mentors, single mothers can find others working
through these difficulties. There truly is strength in numbers. Brainstorm, network, and help each other. Though the
past may not change, the future trajectory can be a positive one. Make time for you.

Growing up without a father brings risks, but that does not determine you or your child's future. Fatherless families
can become resilient in their circumstance. Let those who your child will be interacting with know of their struggles.
Teachers, caretakers, and other community figures can help alleviate the difficulties your child may face. But they
cannot help if they are not aware. Remember, there is hope for brighter tomorrows. There are fathers who chose to stay
in their child's life after growing up without their father. You do not have to let the absentee determine what your
family will become. For stories of hope please visit the references below.
Alan
2024-10-14 17:35:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.

You should read the entire report.
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
But do you stick to your story that it wasn't theft when Trump:

Deliberately took documents.

And denied he had them?
Skeeter
2024-10-14 17:40:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
Alan
2024-10-14 17:51:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
Oh, you poor little Chicken:

'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.

Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
Skeeter
2024-10-14 17:53:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
Alan
2024-10-14 17:54:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
Nope:

'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'

All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
Skeeter
2024-10-14 19:32:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?

Who is Mr. Eiden?
Alan
2024-10-15 01:37:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.

There's the source I used:

<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>

And here's a screenshot of the page:

<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>

Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.

But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 12:32:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
Alan
2024-10-15 16:13:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...

...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.

<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>

<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>

See the text there?

'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'

<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>

You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!

How will I live with myself?!?
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:20:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
Alan
2024-10-15 16:40:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
He said the evidence wouldn't prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Over and over and over...

Page 1:

'However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the
evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'

Page 4:

'Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors
would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons.'

'Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges.'

Page 200:

'But the evidence falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.'

Page 203:

'Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we believe this evidence 1s not
strong enough to establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'

Page 204:

'THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION
OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'

Page 220:

'There is also insufficient evidence that Mr. Biden willfully retained
the handwritten Thanksgiving memo'

Page 227:

'We conclude that this evidence does notestablish Mr. Biden's guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt.'

Page 232:

'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully retained the notebooks'

Page 242:

'We also believe some of the same evidence that supports reasonable
doubt for the classified Afghanistan documents also supports reasonable
doubt for the notebooks, including Mr. Biden's cooperation with the
investigation'

'Finally, the two main sets of evidence summarized above, suggesting Mr.
Biden knew he was not allowed to keep classified notebooks, do not
suffice to prove his willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt.'

Page 244:

'For these reasons, we do not believe the government could prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that Mr. B1den knew it was unlawful to retain his
notebooks at his home after the vice presidency.'

'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully disclosed national defense information in the notebooks to his
ghostwriter'

'But we do not believe the evidence supports charges of willful
disclosure beyond a reasonable doubt.'

Page 247:

'But the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
intended to share classified information.'

Page 304:

'Insufficient evidence exists to prove Mr. Biden willfully retained the
classified information in the EYES ONLY envelope

There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents in the EYES
ONLY envelope after his term as vice president or caused his staff to do
so.'

Page 311:

'Nonetheless, there is reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden willfully
retained documents A9 and A10.'
Skeeter
2024-10-15 17:04:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
He said the evidence wouldn't prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Over and over and over...
Then why was a trial even brought up?
Post by Alan
'However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the
evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors
would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons.'
'Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges.'
'But the evidence falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.'
'Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we believe this evidence 1s not
strong enough to establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION
OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'
'There is also insufficient evidence that Mr. Biden willfully retained
the handwritten Thanksgiving memo'
'We conclude that this evidence does notestablish Mr. Biden's guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully retained the notebooks'
'We also believe some of the same evidence that supports reasonable
doubt for the classified Afghanistan documents also supports reasonable
doubt for the notebooks, including Mr. Biden's cooperation with the
investigation'
'Finally, the two main sets of evidence summarized above, suggesting Mr.
Biden knew he was not allowed to keep classified notebooks, do not
suffice to prove his willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'For these reasons, we do not believe the government could prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that Mr. B1den knew it was unlawful to retain his
notebooks at his home after the vice presidency.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully disclosed national defense information in the notebooks to his
ghostwriter'
'But we do not believe the evidence supports charges of willful
disclosure beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'But the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
intended to share classified information.'
'Insufficient evidence exists to prove Mr. Biden willfully retained the
classified information in the EYES ONLY envelope
There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents in the EYES
ONLY envelope after his term as vice president or caused his staff to do
so.'
'Nonetheless, there is reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden willfully
retained documents A9 and A10.'
Look what I made you do...LOL
Alan
2024-10-15 17:11:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
He said the evidence wouldn't prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Over and over and over...
Then why was a trial even brought up?
Post by Alan
'However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the
evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors
would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons.'
'Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges.'
'But the evidence falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.'
'Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we believe this evidence 1s not
strong enough to establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION
OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'
'There is also insufficient evidence that Mr. Biden willfully retained
the handwritten Thanksgiving memo'
'We conclude that this evidence does notestablish Mr. Biden's guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully retained the notebooks'
'We also believe some of the same evidence that supports reasonable
doubt for the classified Afghanistan documents also supports reasonable
doubt for the notebooks, including Mr. Biden's cooperation with the
investigation'
'Finally, the two main sets of evidence summarized above, suggesting Mr.
Biden knew he was not allowed to keep classified notebooks, do not
suffice to prove his willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'For these reasons, we do not believe the government could prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that Mr. B1den knew it was unlawful to retain his
notebooks at his home after the vice presidency.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully disclosed national defense information in the notebooks to his
ghostwriter'
'But we do not believe the evidence supports charges of willful
disclosure beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'But the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
intended to share classified information.'
'Insufficient evidence exists to prove Mr. Biden willfully retained the
classified information in the EYES ONLY envelope
There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents in the EYES
ONLY envelope after his term as vice president or caused his staff to do
so.'
'Nonetheless, there is reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden willfully
retained documents A9 and A10.'
Look what I made you do...LOL
It was easy and fun.

I don't mind rubbing your nose in it that a Republican special
prosecutor concluded that Biden wasn't guilty.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 18:20:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
He said the evidence wouldn't prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Over and over and over...
Then why was a trial even brought up?
Post by Alan
'However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the
evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors
would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons.'
'Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges.'
'But the evidence falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.'
'Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we believe this evidence 1s not
strong enough to establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION
OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'
'There is also insufficient evidence that Mr. Biden willfully retained
the handwritten Thanksgiving memo'
'We conclude that this evidence does notestablish Mr. Biden's guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully retained the notebooks'
'We also believe some of the same evidence that supports reasonable
doubt for the classified Afghanistan documents also supports reasonable
doubt for the notebooks, including Mr. Biden's cooperation with the
investigation'
'Finally, the two main sets of evidence summarized above, suggesting Mr.
Biden knew he was not allowed to keep classified notebooks, do not
suffice to prove his willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'For these reasons, we do not believe the government could prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that Mr. B1den knew it was unlawful to retain his
notebooks at his home after the vice presidency.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully disclosed national defense information in the notebooks to his
ghostwriter'
'But we do not believe the evidence supports charges of willful
disclosure beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'But the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
intended to share classified information.'
'Insufficient evidence exists to prove Mr. Biden willfully retained the
classified information in the EYES ONLY envelope
There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents in the EYES
ONLY envelope after his term as vice president or caused his staff to do
so.'
'Nonetheless, there is reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden willfully
retained documents A9 and A10.'
Look what I made you do...LOL
It was easy and fun.
You Kanadians are easily amused.
Post by Alan
I don't mind rubbing your nose in it that a Republican special
prosecutor concluded that Biden wasn't guilty.
He didn't and you rubbed nothing You went to work because of me and I
didn't even read it.
Alan
2024-10-15 22:05:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
He said the evidence wouldn't prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Over and over and over...
Then why was a trial even brought up?
Post by Alan
'However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the
evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors
would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons.'
'Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges.'
'But the evidence falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.'
'Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we believe this evidence 1s not
strong enough to establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION
OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'
'There is also insufficient evidence that Mr. Biden willfully retained
the handwritten Thanksgiving memo'
'We conclude that this evidence does notestablish Mr. Biden's guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully retained the notebooks'
'We also believe some of the same evidence that supports reasonable
doubt for the classified Afghanistan documents also supports reasonable
doubt for the notebooks, including Mr. Biden's cooperation with the
investigation'
'Finally, the two main sets of evidence summarized above, suggesting Mr.
Biden knew he was not allowed to keep classified notebooks, do not
suffice to prove his willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'For these reasons, we do not believe the government could prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that Mr. B1den knew it was unlawful to retain his
notebooks at his home after the vice presidency.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully disclosed national defense information in the notebooks to his
ghostwriter'
'But we do not believe the evidence supports charges of willful
disclosure beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'But the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
intended to share classified information.'
'Insufficient evidence exists to prove Mr. Biden willfully retained the
classified information in the EYES ONLY envelope
There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents in the EYES
ONLY envelope after his term as vice president or caused his staff to do
so.'
'Nonetheless, there is reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden willfully
retained documents A9 and A10.'
Look what I made you do...LOL
It was easy and fun.
You Kanadians are easily amused.
Post by Alan
I don't mind rubbing your nose in it that a Republican special
prosecutor concluded that Biden wasn't guilty.
He didn't and you rubbed nothing You went to work because of me and I
didn't even read it.
LOL
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?

Loading Image...

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/biden-classified-documents-report-02-08-24/index.html

============================================================================

Alan's Low Self Esteem FORCES Him To Reply, Even When There's NOTHING To Reply TO

This Is Why Alan Can't Admit He's Wrong

They say it takes a big person to admit their mistakes, but for Alan, saying he's wrong feels impossible.

But why does Alan do it? We've asked psychologist Dr. Tim Sharp, chief happiness officer at The Happiness Institute, to
explain:

They think being wrong means they're unworthy - Yup... Low-Self-Esteem

For Alan, conceding that he's fallible can evoke a deep psychological anxiety regarding "the risks or the consequences
associated with loss or failure," says Sharp.

"I think the reason Alan can't apologize isn't actually because he doesn't like to be wrong, but because it's seen as
an inherent character fault," he explains.

Sharp says that for non-apologists, the irrational need to always be "perfect" rules their ego and they feel their
screw-ups are unforgivable.

"The difficulty in admitting failure largely comes from the unrealistic expectation that 'I should get it right all the
time, or not even try or make it seem as if I am'" he says.

Alan Thinks Never Admitting Fault Makes Him Look Stronger

For Alan, appearing wrong is congruent to appearing weak, but Sharp says they could not be more wrong, because a good
leader admits their mistakes.

"There's some actually very interesting research that leaders who express vulnerability and are more open to being
fallible tend to be more highly regarded," the expert explains.

"This makes sense because if someone is saying, 'I'm 100 percent perfect, I'm 100 percent right all the time,' that's
pretty hard to believe," says the psychologist.

(But, THAT'S Ski Bunny)

"I'd find it hard to trust that person because there's no one I know 100 percent perfect.

Whereas if Alan would say, 'You know, I'm going to do my best but I'll make mistakes sometimes, I'll get it wrong, I'm
sorry but I'll try to fix it,'... to me, that's more believable. I'd be more trusting of that sort of person."

They Don't Value The Truth

(NO liberal does... THAT'S their M.O.)

For Alan, the fact is he "doesn't necessarily value truth and honesty," says Sharp.

"While I personally value truth and honesty, what I've come to learn, which I find hard to understand but it's just a
reality, is that Alan doesn't value those things as highly as me," says Sharp.

Taking political discussion as an example, the expert says Alan, who eats up "fake news" propaganda, doesn't value
facts. When it comes to the truth, the expert warns that Alan "will literally say, 'I don't really care.'"

"Alan doesn't care about it because he values other aspects of what they're perceiving much more," he says.

Citing the upsurge of alt-left political movements around the world, Sharp says how Alan approaches a situation will
often reveal whether facts or feelings will influence them more.

"[Logical people] will look for facts and information and data and make their decisions accordingly," he explains.
"Other people make their decisions based on much more emotion. Now the problem comes when you try to talk logic to an
emotional person because it just won't wear... you're talking different languages.
Alan
2024-10-15 16:16:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?

For instance:

Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.

But he wasn't lying.

He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.

In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.

:-)
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:24:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Post by Alan
:-)
Alan
2024-10-15 16:41:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 17:04:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
Alan
2024-10-15 17:11:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?

Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Skeeter
2024-10-15 18:20:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?
Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
Alan
2024-10-15 22:06:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?
Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
When it comes to politically motivate hearings, it most certainly matters.

Benghazi: remember that?
Skeeter
2024-10-15 23:02:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?
Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
When it comes to politically motivate hearings, it most certainly matters.
Benghazi: remember that?
Yea, when cunt Hillary said "at this point what does it matter" Yea I
remember.
Alan
2024-10-15 23:15:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?
Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
When it comes to politically motivate hearings, it most certainly matters.
Benghazi: remember that?
Yea, when cunt Hillary said "at this point what does it matter" Yea I
remember.
Really? Got a cite for that?

I'm betting not.
Skeeter
2024-10-16 00:53:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?
Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
When it comes to politically motivate hearings, it most certainly matters.
Benghazi: remember that?
Yea, when cunt Hillary said "at this point what does it matter" Yea I
remember.
Really? Got a cite for that?
I'm betting not.
I already told you I'm not wasting time working for you. You started
snipping and twisting so you're not work the work. I saw her say it.
Alan
2024-10-16 01:38:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?
Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
When it comes to politically motivate hearings, it most certainly matters.
Benghazi: remember that?
Yea, when cunt Hillary said "at this point what does it matter" Yea I
remember.
Really? Got a cite for that?
I'm betting not.
I already told you I'm not wasting time working for you. You started
snipping and twisting so you're not work the work. I saw her say it.
You made the claim.

You won't back it.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
So... that's CNN lying?

The special counsel report found that Biden willfully retained classified information, including top secret documents,
and knew he was in possession of some documents as far back as 2017, and shared some of that information with the
ghostwriter of his 2017 memoir. - CNN

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/biden-classified-documents-report-02-08-24/index.html

https://i.imgur.com/Unzl7vu.png

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
Skeeter
2024-10-13 12:30:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
Alan
2024-10-13 18:11:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
Hur's report addressed that:

'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Skeeter
2024-10-13 22:57:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Alan
2024-10-13 23:08:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."

...was just proven false.

Just accept it.
Skeeter
2024-10-14 00:38:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:38:09 -0600, Skeeter says...
Post by Skeeter
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
They claimed he was too senile, forgetful and demented, but didn't use that language.

And they used that as an excuse to implement a Coup d'état and push Biden out.

They did the EXACT thing I begged Republicans to stop doing... trying to impeach Biden and take him out of power,
because that meant that Harris would take over and fuck things up even more.

Every time Republicans spoke of impeachment, I cringed until I was shaking and wishing I had a one-way ticket to
Poland.

======================================================================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
Alan
2024-10-14 17:35:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
In Robert Hur's report, which I just quoted:

'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Skeeter
2024-10-14 17:41:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.

Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
Alan
2024-10-14 17:51:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?

This was a report.
Skeeter
2024-10-14 19:31:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
Alan
2024-10-15 01:39:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...

...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".

And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 12:34:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...
...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".
And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Why even a hearing if everything was on the up and up?
Alan
2024-10-15 16:17:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...
...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".
And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Why even a hearing if everything was on the up and up?
Because Republicans were in charge and wanted to stir up controversy.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:24:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...
...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".
And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Why even a hearing if everything was on the up and up?
Because Republicans were in charge and wanted to stir up controversy.
Bullshit. Who told you that load?
Alan
2024-10-15 16:27:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...
...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".
And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Why even a hearing if everything was on the up and up?
Because Republicans were in charge and wanted to stir up controversy.
Bullshit. Who told you that load?
LOL!
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:55:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...
...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".
And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Why even a hearing if everything was on the up and up?
Because Republicans were in charge and wanted to stir up controversy.
Bullshit. Who told you that load?
LOL!
and away he runs.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.

I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.

I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
Lil dwarf Rudey
2024-10-15 15:18:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
This entire sentence is a lie.
Read it again, little man Ball...you are no more than a failed solar
city installer and Suckramento bungalow trash...

Explain why are you death threat prosecution exempt by the Feds so far?

And after _so many_ public death threats you issued on Trump and Vance...

Let's do our best to change that, shall we:


Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party/Alan Bond/Henry Bodkin/Malte
Runz and a few dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$***@fx11.ams4> <***@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400


Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <***@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$***@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$***@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$***@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-***@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$***@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$***@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$***@dont-email.me>
<***@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$***@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.


https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.


Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california


Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's usenet terrorism here?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan
2024-10-15 16:18:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
where it says that:

<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:25:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
Alan
2024-10-15 16:26:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...

...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...

...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:55:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
I'm not talking about Trump. Why did Joe have documents he wasn't
supposed to have?
Alan
2024-10-15 17:12:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
I'm not talking about Trump. Why did Joe have documents he wasn't
supposed to have?
The Hur report outlines that in great detail.

Why don't you read it. The link is just a few lines above.

:-)
Skeeter
2024-10-15 18:21:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
I'm not talking about Trump. Why did Joe have documents he wasn't
supposed to have?
The Hur report outlines that in great detail.
Why don't you read it. The link is just a few lines above.
:-)
Why don't you just answer?
Alan
2024-10-15 22:06:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
I'm not talking about Trump. Why did Joe have documents he wasn't
supposed to have?
The Hur report outlines that in great detail.
Why don't you read it. The link is just a few lines above.
:-)
Why don't you just answer?
I've already answered it more than either you or your fellow cultists
ever answer any of my questions.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 23:02:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
I'm not talking about Trump. Why did Joe have documents he wasn't
supposed to have?
The Hur report outlines that in great detail.
Why don't you read it. The link is just a few lines above.
:-)
Why don't you just answer?
I've already answered it more than either you or your fellow cultists
ever answer any of my questions.
and away he runs.
AlleyCat
2024-10-16 01:43:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:06:50 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Why don't you just answer?
I've already answered it more than either you or your fellow cultists
ever answer any of my questions.
*I*, personally don't answer your questions, because 99% of the time, they aren't on-topic.

You can't refute the topic, so you choose some little bullshit form of minutiae and argue THAT instead of the topic.

If you would ask PERTINENT questions, maybe you'd get pertinent answers.

Choosing to cry about not being able to find a study MENTIONED IN AN ARTICLE, instead of the FACT that IN that study, a
certain percentage of people were going to do a certain thing, is the main reason.

You are a child when it comes to discussing shit on Usenet. You're here to be a contrarian ONLY, no matter IF you have
a good argument, pro or con, and THAT'S why everyone from MauhMan to Skeeter to me, all think you're a fucking weirdo.

Argue on topic and you will be answered more.

======================================================================================================================

Alan Baker, My Creepy Internet Stalker! - MuahMan

Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.

They should make internet stalking illegal, I think Alan Baker has had
practice researching the little kiddies he likes to molest.

Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker Alan Baker from Vancouver,
BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As according to this website
people that

stalk others on the internet more times than not leads to pedophilia. Alan
Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a child predator.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-security090507.htm

Yikes. If something happens to me please make sure the local, and Canadian
police no that I was being stalked online by Alan Baker, A Macintosh bench
tech from Vancouver, BC.


Please post this every newsgroup so your children know to avoid him and thus
remove themselves from danger.

=====

Do your parents know you harass elderly people at 1am and threaten to kill
them on the phone?
Seriously get over your obsession with me. Find a hobby and quit spending
day and night worrying, stalking, and threatening my family.
Keep bothering my family and you'll have another restraining order against
you.

=====

They actually turned their phone off because of you. Good job psycho. You
have problems.

Since you can't help but obsess over me just go back to reading every post
in every motorcycle forum I've made, every post in every jeep forum, every
post in the 300c forums. That should keep you busy enough to quit bother my
family you nutjob. Don't you have some Macs to fix in the morning? Go to
bed and quit harassing my family.

=====

First. I didn't own a Mac.
Whoops there's a receipt with my name on it.
Then I didn't own a motorcycle....
Whoops there's me in every cycle forum with pics of me taking several bikes
apart.
Then I live in my grandparents house....
whoops it's an over 55 community and that's impossible.
Now, you know the habits of rich people all over the world and our defining
what "mega-rich" is.

Like I said, read more of my other forum posts.... stalker.

So why'd the phone calls to my grandparents stop. Did you finally grow a
conscience? Reach the maturity level of a 8th grader? Don't want to anymore
restraining orders?

=====

Muahahahahahaha

AlleyCat
2024-10-16 01:43:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:26:38 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
NO ONE is denying Trump is guilty, IF they find he did break the law.

The issue is the double standard... the two-tier justice system the DEMOCRATS seem to be able to control, somehow.

Hmmm... makes you wonder.

=====

How many people do you personally know who have died mysteriously?

How about in plane crashes or car wrecks?

Bizarre suicides?

People beaten to death or murdered in a hail of bullets, or hung in a jail cell?

And what about violent freak accidents - like separate mountain biking and skiing collisions in Aspen, Colorado? Or
barbells crushing a person's throat?

Apparently, if you're Bill or Hillary Clinton, the answer to that question is at least 33 - and possibly many more.

"Clinton body count or left-wing conspiracy? Three with ties to DNC mysteriously die."

Ted Koppel, then-anchor of ABC News' "Nightline," routinly had discussions on the issue following the July 20, 1993,
death of White House Deputy Counsel Vince Foster. In fact, he appeared on Koppel's show.

"One of the things I said was, 'Who knows what happened here? But let me ask you a question.' I said, 'Ted, how many
people do you know in your life who've been murdered? Ted, how many people do you know in your life that have died
under suspicious circumstances?'

"Of course, the answer is zilch, zero, nada, none, very few." "Ask the Clintons that question. And it's a significant
number. It's a lot of people that they know who have died, who've been murdered.

"And the same question here from Rachel Alexander. It's amazing the cycle that exists with the Clintons. [Citing
Townhall]: 'What it comes down to is this: how many other politicians have you heard of who have had so many mysterious
deaths associated with them? You don't hear of a Bush body count - not even an Obama body count.' There is a Clinton
body count."

==============================

Barbara Wise - Nov. 29, 1996

Barbara Wise, 48, was a 14-year Commerce Department staff member who worked with Ron Brown (see "Ron Brown" entry
below, killed in a plane crash) and John Huang, who worked at the Worthen Bank in Little Rock, where he met then-Gov.
Bill Clinton. Huang, who was born in China, was also a former executive of the Lippo Group in Indonesia. Huang met with
Clinton at the White House 10 times between June 21 and June 27, 1994. As WND reported in 2000, "Right after that,
Webster Hubbell ... received $100,000 from the Lippo Group. Shortly after the money was given to Mr. Hubbell, Huang
obtained a secret clearance and an executive position as assistant secretary of the Commerce Department. While at the
Commerce Department, Huang obtained secret materials on trade deals with Indonesia, China, Japan, Korea and the Middle
East. Huang also obtained information on U.S. Patriot missile deals with South Korea and mobile artillery for Kuwait."
Asked if he was a spy for Beijing, Huang reportedly took pleaded the Fifth Amendment nearly 2,000 times.

Wise's body was found partially nude and bruised in her office. Her death was attributed to natural causes, as Wise had
reportedly received several blood transfusions for a liver ailment.

Ron Brown - April 3, 1996

Ron Brown, who had served as U.S. secretary of commerce, was killed in a plane crash after Hillary Clinton dispatched
him on a dubious mission to a war-torn corner of the world, as WND reported. Brown and 34 others died when their Air
Force plane crashed into a Croatian mountainside. Brown's flight left the Tuzla airport in Bosnia, a Muslim country
where some were hostile to the American presence there.

"To protect his son Michael from prison, Ron Brown threatened to expose the White House's yet unrevealed Asian
fundraising scheme, in which Brown had played a major role," wrote WND contributor and investigative writer Jack
Cashill. "Just weeks before his death, Brown started going to church for the first time in ages. He was scared for his
life and that of his confidante, Nolanda Hill."

Cashill noted that the Croatian government suddenly insisted on a Dubrovnik stop, a two-mile deviation from the flight
path that the Air Force said was "inexplicable."

"For the first time ever on friendly soil, the White House ordered the Air Force to skip the 'safety' phase of the
investigation and move directly to the 'accident' phase," Cashill wrote. "There would be no consideration other than
accident, even though the airport was near the Bosnian border and in a potential hot fire zone.

"Three days after the crash and two days before his scheduled interview by the Air Force, the Croatian responsible for
the airport's navigation system was found dead with a bullet hole in his chest," Cashill continued.

"A day later, every pathologist who viewed Brown's body back in America concluded that his head wound, at the very
least, looked like a bullet hole."

There would be no autopsy. No forensic testing. No search for an exit wound. Head X-rays were destroyed, or "lost."

"The three Armed Forces pathologists and the forensic photographer who blew the whistle on this case had their careers
destroyed," Cashill wrote. "... [T]he Armed Forces Institute of Pathology brass assured the public that Brown dies of
'multiple blunt force injuries to the head.' He was the only one of the 35 victims to have a reported head wound."

Charles Meissner - April 3, 1996

Charles Meissner, the assistant secretary of commerce, had issued John Huang a security clearance. (See "Ron Miller"
and "Barbara Wise" entries.) He and Ron Brown were killed in a plane crash. (See "Ron Brown" entry.)

Stanley Huggins - June 23, 1994

Stanley Huggins reportedly had been investigating the Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan collapse (see "James McDougal"
entry). Reports indicate he died of viral pneumonia before his 300 pages of findings could be released.

Bill Shelton - June 12, 1994

Bill Shelton was the fiancé of Kathy Ferguson (see "Kathy Ferguson" entry below), and he questioned whether Ferguson
had actually committed suicide.

Shelton, too, was reported to have committed suicide with a gun at Ferguson's grave site.

Kathy Ferguson - May 10, 1994

Kathy Ferguson was reported to have died from a suicide in which she shot herself in the head, though her packed bags
were found next to her body, possibly indicating she planned to leave her home.

Ferguson was the ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, who had been a co-defendant, along with Clinton, in the
Paula Jones lawsuit. Danny Ferguson had escorted Paula Jones to Clinton's hotel room. Kathy Ferguson was a
corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

James Bunch - Feb. 11, 1994

James Bunch, 46, a Texas state employee in Austin who ran a prostitution ring from his office, reportedly died from a
suicide involving a gun. Bunch was said to have owned a "little black book" of influential people, including at least
one "state legislator," from Texas and Arkansas who visited prostitutes. Bunch's files contained descriptions of his
high-profile clients, their sexual preferences, the amount of money they were willing to spend, and whether they were
"good" or "bad" clients who might hurt the escorts. According to a report in the Telegraph, "There [was] a possibility
that juveniles were involved in his business. Police told the Associated Press Bunch was arrested and interrogated, but
he hadn't appeared distraught or suicidal.

Gandy Baugh - Jan. 8, 1994

Gandy Baugh, who had been an attorney for Clinton pal and drug convict Dan Lasater, reportedly killed himself by
leaping from a window of a tall building. Lasater, a figure in the Whitewater controversy, had been convicted of
dealing cocaine and served six months in jail. But Clinton later pardoned him.

In 1984, Lasater had purchased Angel Fire Resort, a ski resort near Taos, New Mexico, and promoted it using Clinton's
name. A U.S. Customs investigative report revealed the resort was used for drug operations and money laundering.

Ed Willey - Nov. 29, 1993

image: Loading Image...
Kathleen Willey

Kathleen Willey

In her book alleging a campaign of slander and intimidation orchestrated chiefly by Hillary Clinton, Kathleen Willey
pointed a finger of suspicion at the former first couple for the death of her husband, Ed Willey, who was believed to
have killed himself.

Kathleen Willey, who said she was groped by President Clinton in the White House, acknowledged in an interview with WND
in November 2007 that she stood by the speculation she posed about her husband's demise in "Target: Caught in the
Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton."

Asked if she suspected her husband Ed, a lawyer and son of a prominent Virginia lawmaker, was murdered, Willey replied,
"Most definitely."

Did she believe the Clintons were involved?

"I do have suspicions," Willey said, "yes."

It was Ed Willey's dire financial straits that prompted Kathleen, then a White House volunteer, to seek a meeting with
President Clinton in the Oval Office to plead for a paying job and any other help the commander-in-chief could give.

But Willey alleges the Nov. 29, 1993, meeting ended abruptly when the president cornered her in a private passageway
and sexually assaulted her.

At the time of that meeting, Clinton and Willey were unaware that Ed Willey was lying dead of a gunshot wound to his
mouth in the woods near his car, parked on a hunting path in rural King and Queen County, Virginia.

What makes a book about Bill and Hillary Clinton so explosive that someone would STEAL it? Kathleen Willey tells
America the shocking story in her book, "Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton."

Kathleen Willey became known in the summer of 1997 after lawyers for Clinton accuser Paula Jones gave her name to a
national magazine reporter. She was scheduled to become one of only three witnesses in the Clinton impeachment trial
until some members of the House and Senate refused to allow her to testify.

In the book, Willey recounts numerous incidents she believes were designed to terrorize her into silence, with the
latest taking place in September, just as the book was in its final stages.

As WND reported, Willey said she was the target of an unusual house burglary over the Labor Day weekend for which she
blames the Clintons. While asleep upstairs in her Virginia home, she said, a copy of a manuscript for "Target" was
stolen.

Willey told WND the break-in at her house reminded her of the widely reported incident 10 years ago in which she
claimed she was threatened near her present Richmond-area home by a "jogger" just two days before she was to testify
against President Clinton in the Jones case.

She contends elements of the autopsy report of her husband's death are inconsistent with suicide, pointing to
similarities to the death of White House aide Vince Foster, also believed to have killed himself. (See "Vince Foster"
entry.)

"I've seen too much evidence regarding other people who have been involved with the Clintons," she told WND.

Facing a deadline to repay hundreds of thousands of dollars he owed to "bad people" who threatened him, Ed Willey had
an apparent motive for suicide, and five notes to loved ones were discovered by his secretary.

But Kathleen Willey writes "she could never understand how he could leave us," noting that while the letters are in his
writing, "I also know that anyone would write anything at gunpoint."

What motive could anyone have to murder him?

Willey writes that after her husband's death, her friend Carole in Colorado told her something she had not known. Ed
had confided to Carole's husband that he had taken a briefcase full of cash to Little Rock, Ark., during the
presidential campaign.

Willey said she was shocked but acknowledged her husband could have done it. Later she found a reference on a blog that
explored illegal fundraising activities by the Clintons and noted Ed Willey was known for "handling large briefcases
full of cash" as part of the 1992 presidential campaign.

She speculates: "I have no idea how anyone other than the Clintons would know that Ed might have carried cash in
briefcases. So why would he be killed? Because he was carrying illegal money? That's probably not enough reason. But
what if, in his desperation, Ed had 'illegally borrowed' from the campaign?"

In the book, Willey says she goes back and forth in her mind on what happened to her husband, and "as I do, the
possibility lingers, logical or not, that Ed was murdered."

Jerry Luther Parks - Sept. 26, 1993

image: Loading Image...
Jerry Luther Parks

Jerry Luther Parks

Two months after White House Deputy Counsel Vince Foster died, Jerry Luther Parks - who had been head of security for
Bill Clinton's headquarters in Little Rock, Arkansas, during the 1992 presidential campaign and gubernatorial years -
was shot through the rear window of his car with a semiautomatic handgun.

As WND reported, Jerry Luther Parks was reportedly watching a news bulletin on the death of Vincent Foster (see "Vince
Foster" entry below) when he turned from the television and muttered, "I'm a dead man." His son, Gary, was with him in
the room. It was July 21, 1993. Foster had just been found dead in Fort Marcy Park, about seven miles from the White
House, across the Potomac River in Virginia. Foster had been shot through the head, said the bulletin, an apparent
suicide. (See "Vince Foster" entry below.)

British journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard interviewed the Parks family extensively. In "The Secret Life of Bill
Clinton," he reported that Parks was a nervous wreck for the next two months. He packed a gun and drove evasively to
shake off any possible pursuers. At one point, Parks told his family that Bill Clinton was "cleaning house" and that he
was "next on the list."

On Sept. 23, 1993, as Parks was driving to his suburban Little Rock home along the Chenal Parkway, a white Chevrolet
Caprice with two men inside drove alongside and peppered Parks' car with semiautomatic gunfire. Parks's car ground to a
halt. A man emerged from the white Chevy, fired two rounds into Parks' chest with a 9-mm pistol, then sped off.

Several witnesses watched the murder. The killers were never found. As with so many other "Arkancides" - the name given
to the long list of suspicious deaths among Arkansas associates of the Clintons - Big Media ignored the event.

One of the last people to see Vincent Foster alive was Linda Tripp, who then worked as a secretary for Foster's boss,
White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum. Tripp testified before Kenneth Starr's grand jury on July 28, 1998, that the
reason she had leaked Monica Lewinsky's story to Michael Isikoff at Newsweek was that Tripp hoped the spotlight of
national publicity might protect her from physical harm.

"I am afraid of this administration," Tripp told the grand jury.

She continued, "I have what I consider to be well-founded fears of what they are capable of ... I had reasons to
believe that the Vince Foster tragedy was not depicted accurately under oath by members of the administration ... I
knew based on personal knowledge, personal observations, that they were lying under oath. So it became very fearful to
me that I had information even back then that was dangerous."

A juror asked, "But do you have any examples of violence being done by the administration to people who were a threat
to them?"

Tripp named Jerry Parks: "[T]he behavior in the West Wing with senior staff to the president during the time the Jerry
Parks [murder report] came over the fax frightened me. He had been killed," she said.

The "flurry of activity," the closed-door meetings and the "hush-hush" atmosphere in the White House all struck her as
ominous and frightening.

"Maybe you had to be there," said Tripp.

"[The news of Parks' death] was something they wanted to get out in front of. There was talk that this would be another
body to add to the list of 40 bodies or something that were associated with the Clinton administration. At that time, I
didn't know what that meant. I have since come to see such a list."

After the murder, Gary Parks told a staffer of the New York Observer his father and Vince Foster had investigated
Clinton's affairs at Hillary's request.

"He said that Vince Foster had called up his father, who was working as a private investigator, to look into Clinton's
romantic life in about 1980, after Bill Clinton had lost the governor's office following his first term. Parks said
Hillary wanted a divorce. It looked like maybe the juggernaut she'd believed in, and married, was over. Clinton had by
then lost two big races and won two. Till the Comeback Kid-boy is Bill Clinton gutsy-won back the governorship in 1982.
But in the early 80s, Parks said, Hillary asked her law partner Vince Foster to prepare a divorce case and Foster
called Parks, who compiled a dossier of women's statements. Parks said that Hillary later decided against a divorce,
but that his father held on to the dossier. Then in 1993, Parks said, after Vince Foster went to Washington, he
demanded the return of the file, and even called Jerry Parks in the days before his, Foster's, death, to demand it. And
that two months later his father was murdered, because, Parks said, he had held out on returning the file. (The L.R.
police never solved his father's murder, not when I was looking into it a few years afterward.)"

Dr. Stanley Heard - Sept. 10, 1993

Dr. Stanley Heard of Hot Springs, Arkansas, had treated Bill Clinton's mother, stepfather and brother and served as
chairman of Clinton's National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee. He was killed, along with his attorney,
Steve Dickson, of Topeka, Kansas, in a plane crash 50 miles west of Washington.

The plane radioed to Dulles that there was a fire before it crashed. That aircraft was the second one to cause problems
for Dickson on the trip.

In 1993, the Washington Post reported, "Dickson flew his own plane from Topeka, but on the way to Washington it
developed problems in St. Louis. There, he left his plane for repair and rented another plane."

The National Transportation and Security Board said the crash was due to " an inadequate annual inspection of the
airplane and non-compliance with airworthiness directives by company maintenance personnel."

Jon Parnell Walker - Aug. 15, 1993

Jon Parnell Walker fell to his death from the top of the Lincoln Towers building in Arlington, Virginia.

On July 10, 1994, Connecticut's The Day newspaper reported, "In March 1992, Walker, and investigator for the Resolution
Trust Corporation (RTC), had contacted the Kansas City RTC regional office for information concerning possible ties
between Whitewater Development, Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan [above] and the Clintons."

Vince Foster - July 20, 1993

image: Loading Image...
Hillary and Vince Foster

Hillary and Vince Foster

Vince Foster was deputy White House counsel and Hillary's friend and law partner who had connections to the Travelgate
and Whitewater scandals. In 1993, Foster was found dead in a park with a fatal gunshot wound to his mouth. As WND
reported, his suicide was the subject of much speculation and three official investigations.

Investigations by the U.S. Park Police, the Department of Justice, the FBI, Congress, Independent Counsel Robert B.
Fiske and Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr concluded Foster's death was a suicide. However, as WND reported in 2003,
one of Starr's key investigators challenged the official line, insisting the probe's result was predetermined, only a
few plotters were required to engineer the result, the crime scene was altered and that major newspaper editors killed
stories by reporters pursuing the truth. The Washington Post reported that federal investigators were not allowed to
enter Foster's office after his death, but "White House aides enter[ed] Foster's office shortly after his death, giving
rise to speculation that files were removed from his office."

In his 2005 book "The Truth about Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, And How Far She'll Go to Become
President," Edward Klein wrote of Hillary's involvement in the effort to remove Foster's files:

The night of [Foster's] death, Hillary launched one of the most shameful - and illegal - cover-ups of her entire
career.

She sent two of her most trusted White House loyalists - Maggie Williams, the First Lady's chief of staff, and
Patsy Thomasson, who was in charge of White House administration - into Foster's office to retrieve embarrassing and
incriminating documents related to Whitewater and Hillary's other personal affairs. While White House Counsel Bernard
Nussbaum barred investigators from entering Foster's office, Maggie Williams, Patsy Thomasson, and Craig Livingston,
Hillary's director of White House security, removed armloads of files and loose-leaf binders.

"In addition, a White House staffer allegedly tampered with the titles of several memos and removed the first
lady's initials in an effort to erase her role in improper behavior."

Jim Wilhite - Dec. 21, 1992

Jim Whilhite, 54, vice chairman of ARKLA (see "Ron Miller" entry), is killed in a one-man skiing accident. He
reportedly "suffered severe head injuries when he skied into a tree on Snowmass Mountain in Aspen, Colorado, while on a
family vacation." He had planned to retire from ARKLA the following April.

C. Victor Raiser II and Montgomery Raiser - July 30, 1992

C. Victor Raiser II, the finance co-chairman of Bill Clinton's presidential campaign, was killed in a plane crash,
along with his son, Montgomery, and three other passengers. Another passenger and the pilot were injured.

Clinton campaign Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers described C. Victor Raiser II as "a major player" in the Clinton
organization, according to the New York Times. He was the national finance co-chairman of Clinton's presidential
campaign and had been a friend of the Clintons for about a decade. He was also previously the national finance chairman
of the Democratic National Committee. He served on the boards of the Democratic Business Council and the Center for
National Policy and the board of advisers of the Democratic Leadership Council.

Susan Coleman - Feb. 15, 1977

Susan Coleman, who was pregnant at the time of her death, was rumored to have had an affair with Clinton while he was
still Arkansas attorney general. Clinton had been Coleman's law professor at the university of Arkansas in
Fayetteville.

Though Coleman died of a gunshot wound to the back of her head, her death was ruled a suicide.

==================================================================

A number of people connected to Bill Clinton have turned up dead.

James McDougal - Clinton's convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary
confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr's investigation. Was James McDougal Murdered In A Federal Prison To
Silence Him?

Ron Brown - Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A
pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown's skull resembling a gunshot
wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with
prosecutors.

The Botched Ron Brown Investigation

An Interview with AFIP Forensic Photographer Kathleen Janoski
by Wesley Phelan

Vince Foster - Former white House counselor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock's Rose law firm. Died of a
gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide. Snippets From The Vince Foster Death Investigation

Mary Mahoney - A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown. The murder
happened just as she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.
Mary C. Mahoney and Eric Butera

Was this just a robbery gone bad? - See: Starbucks Suspect Faces Host of Charges By Bill Miller Washington Post, August
5, 1999

C. Victor Raiser II - & - Montgomery Raiser: Major players in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private
plane crash in July 1992.

Paul Tulley - Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock, September
1992. Described by Clinton as a "Dear friend and trusted advisor".

Ed Willey - Clinton fund raiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in Virginia of a gunshot wound to the head.
Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval
office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.

Jerry Parks - Head of Clinton's gubernatorial security team in Little Rock. Gunned down in his car at a deserted
intersection outside Little Rock. Park's son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton. He allegedly threatened
to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.

James Bunch - Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a "Black Book" of people containing names of
influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas.

James Wilson - Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater.

Kathy Ferguson - Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson died in May 1994 was found dead in her living room with a
gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she was going
somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit. Kathy Ferguson was a
possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

Bill Shelton - Arkansas state Trooper and fiancée of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancée, he
was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave-site of his fiancée.

Gandy Baugh - Attorney for Clinton friend Dan Lassater died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994.
His client was a convicted drug distributor.

Florence Martin - Accountant - Sub-contractor for the CIA related to the Barry Seal Mena Airport drug smuggling case.
Died of three gunshot wounds.

Suzanne Coleman - Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound
to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.

Paula Grober - Clinton's speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one
car accident.

Danny Casolaro - Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit
his wrists, apparent suicide in the middle of his investigation.

Paul Wilcher - Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 "October Surprise" was
found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993 in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks
before his death.

Jon Parnell Walker - Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington,
Virginia apartment balcony August 15,1993 Was investigating Morgan Guarantee scandal.

Barbara Wise - Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died
November 29, 1996. Her bruised nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.

Charles Meissner - Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly
thereafter in a small plane crash.

Dr. Stanley Heard - Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve
Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton's advisory council personally treated
Clinton's mother, stepfather and brother.

Barry Seal - Drug running pilot out of Mena Arkansas, Death was no accident.

Johnny Lawhorn Jr. - Mechanic, found a check made out to Clinton in the trunk of a car left in his repair shop. Died
when his car hit a utility pole.

Stanley Huggins - Suicide. Investigated Madison Guarantee. His report was never released.

Hershell Friday - Attorney and Clinton fund raiser died March 1, 1994 when his plane exploded.

Kevin Ives & Don Henry - Known as "The boys on the track" case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena
Arkansas airport drug operation. Controversial case where initial report of death was due to falling asleep on railroad
track. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died
before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury. see: The Train Deaths - plus some comments from a mother of one
of the boys about the connection to Bill Clinton..
THE FOLLOWING SEVEN PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES / HENRY CASE:

Keith Coney - Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck July, 1988

Keith McMaskle - Died stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988

Gregory Collins - Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.

Jeff Rhodes - He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.

James Milan - Found decapitated. Coroner ruled death due to natural causes.

Jordan Kettleson - Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.

Richard Winters - Was a suspect in the Ives / Henry deaths. Was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.
THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD
Major William S. Barkley Jr.
Captain Scott J. Reynolds
Sgt. Brian Hanley
Sgt. Tim Sabel
Major General William Robertson
Col. William Densberger
Col. Robert Kelly
Spec. Gary Rhode
AlleyCat
2024-10-16 01:43:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:18:08 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
Does it address the times he was neither VP or President, or the documents he wasn't supposed to have at all... ever?

Then, I don't need to read it.

If you're pushing those Afghanistan documents, ONLY, then fuck off. There were FAR many more than just those, and some
he wasn't EVER supposed to have.

I asked Rudy this and maybe someone else did too, but if Biden was "allowed" to have ALL of the documents, WHY did they
take them away, investigate and consider bringing charges, only to "change their minds" because they were protecting
him, using the stupid excuse, that he was too far gone MENTALLY to remember WHY he had the documents in the first
place.

They don't list OPINIONS in those reports, dumb ass, and MUCH of what they were contemplating DID rely on opinion as to
how competent Biden was to be indicted and asked question.

Have you seen him lately?

He's MORE than cogent enough to take questions after being indicted.

Biden is being protected and Trump is not.

Case closed.

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
AlleyCat
2024-10-16 01:43:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
What a psychotic little child does to newsgroups:

alt.fan.rush-limbaurgh(sic), alt.socially(sic).liberalism, alt.athieism(sic), alt.fucknozzles(sic),
alt.poltics(sic).democrats.d, talk.poltics(sic).guns

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

=====

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 07:37:49 -0700, Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport
letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who
was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as
me, says...
Then why did he feel they needed to be returned?
Because he *no longer* was authorized to have the ones in his office in the Penn
Center.
So, WHY'D they take the ones from his houses (plural), PSYCHO?

If he was "allowed" to have them all, why did they take them away and consider charging him with crimes?

Your excuse-making for Joe Bidementia, proves to us how fucked-in-the-head you are from liberalism, psycho runt.

Hence:

=====

White California Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White California Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that White California Liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White California Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" Californians have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White California Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White California Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of White California Liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White California Liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White California Liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-White California Liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
AlleyCat
2024-10-16 01:43:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
THIS is what a pansy-ass pussy faggot of a child does to newsgroups:

alt.fan.rush-limbaurgh(sic), alt.socially(sic).liberalism, alt.athieism(sic), alt.fucknozzles(sic),
alt.poltics(sic).democrats.d, talk.poltics(sic).guns

THIS is what an adult does:

alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, CAN.POLITICS, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats,
alt.politics.usa.republican

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

=====

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:29:34 -0700, Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport
letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who
was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as
me, says...
In a garage?
He is authorized to have them.
In a garage?

So, why didn't he get to keep them, and why was there an investigation and a possible indictment?

Rudy's too stupid to think of these questions before he starts Little Billy Kwan'ing.

https://i.imgur.com/2FCRJj7.mp4

LOL... Rudy relegated to being mommy's booze lackey and living with her, is SOOOO lonely, he makes shit up, JUST so
we'll argue with him on Usenet.

[giggle]

=====

Are Narcissists Lonely? - Yes, But They'll Never Admit It

Here are 5 signs of a narcissist and how they behave:

an excessive need to be adulated

a strong tendency to megalomania

EGOCENTRICITY

a low degree of empathy towards others

AN EXCESSIVE QUEST FOR RECOGNITION.


4 Reasons why narcissists are lonely

https://www.wengood.com/en/psychology/stress/art-are-narcissists-lonely#h2-0
https://www.wengood.com/en/psychology/stress/art-are-narcissists-lonely#h2-5
https://www.wengood.com/en/psychology/stress/art-are-narcissists-lonely#h2-6
https://www.wengood.com/en/psychology/stress/art-are-narcissists-lonely#h2-7
https://www.wengood.com/en/psychology/stress/art-are-narcissists-lonely#h2-9

Do narcissists end up alone?

Do narcissists isolate themselves?

Does the narcissist ever get sad?

Spending time alone is arguably healthy and beneficial for our mental health,
but, regularly feeling lonely, on the other hand, can be very detrimental to
our social and communication skills. When it comes to narcissists, they have a
reputation for feeling superior, which means that they will do anything they
deem necessary in order for people to admire them and never openly talk about
their alleged "weaknesses'. Plus, they believe that being open about their
feelings and admitting to feeling alone and misunderstood, will make them
appear weak, which is why they often choose to flee their emotions. For them,
remaining in the dark about what they feel this a way of saving face, although,
in reality, they are crying out to be loved and to build connections, yet too
proud and afraid to recognize their needs.

Harsh but true...
1) They are unable to connect with people

These folks arguably lack empathy, which means they have no time for heartfelt
discussions, and even less time for genuine connections. They fail to see why
having friends and being able to confide in people are important.


2) Their personalities intimidate people

Whilst people with narcissistic personality disorders can be charming at
points, their bullish and manipulative behavior always shine through
eventually. That's right, the prospect of becoming friends with someone so
devious understandably scares people.


3) They have their walls up

Letting people in is definitely a narcissist's worst nightmare! It's just not
in their nature to make themselves appear vulnerable and let people into their
lives. For them, opening up to someone is a synonym of them relinquishing their
power and losing the upper hand.


4) They are scared to put themselves out there

Despite the facade they hide behind, narcissists are very insecure people and
are constantly scared of judgment. Their fear of being judged prevents them
from creating a solid support base around them, and paradoxically encourages
them to become more devious.


Do narcissists end up alone?

Narcissists frequently end up alone due to the simple fact that they are
incapable of enjoying healthy relationships. Although the most high-functioning
ones may be able to fool someone into sticking around for a set amount of time.
However, generally, their devious ways, lack of empathy, and immeasurable egos
prevent them from ever finding true love. Plus, they are totally against the
idea of changing and working on themselves, which evidently scares potential
suitors away. After all, no one wants to be the only partner making concessions
and sacrifices in a relationship. Now, although they'll never admit it, ending
up alone does in fact terrify these folks, however, the prospect isn't
intimidating enough for them to want to become better people...


Do narcissists isolate themselves?

A narcissist isolates themselves (at home for example without seeing anyone)
WHEN they are too overwhelmed; especially in the instance when he has gone
hunting for new prey, and has received many narcissistic sources. When their
search for new victims has been successful, they are obliged to withdraw
themselves from the situation because otherwise they will implode. Although
narcissists do well for a certain amount of time during their isolation,
they'll soon take up their narcissistic ways again. In fact, their isolation
will not exceed 1 week max, because they cannot fight off temptation to
manipulation any longer.


Does the narcissist ever get sad?

As much as they may like to hide and conceal their emotions, narcissists are
just like anyone else when it comes to their feelings, meaning they do get sad
at points. However, that being said, they'll never openly admit to feeling down
or upset, because they are simply scared of people judging them and looking
upon them as weak. Plus, these personalities never really talk about their
feelings either, or share with those close to them when they are feeling down.
In fact, their behavior gives away when they are sad, because they instantly
become very vindictive and even more relentless in their actions.


Can a narcissist be likable?

At the beginning, narcissists can come across as very friendly, attractive and
fun to be around. However, this is just a technique for them to seduce their
prey and destroy them little by little. Most narcissists are unaware of their
problem and are convinced that they are acting for the good of others (a
minority is sadistic and takes pleasure in making others suffer). The
manipulations of these people can be distinguished from emotional blackmail,
small lies or guilt-tripping of others, which make everyone more or less
manipulative. The signs are similar and usually appear in early adulthood.

Here are 5 signs of a narcissist and how they behave:

an excessive need to be adulated
a strong tendency to megalomania
egocentricity
a low degree of empathy towards others
an excessive quest for recognition.

What do narcissists do when they're alone?

When a narcissist finds themselves alone in their life, they may feel an emotional void or a sense of loneliness, but
this depends on the person and their level of self-awareness. Some people with narcissistic personality disorder may
have difficulty coping with loneliness, as they need the attention and validation of others to feel important and
valued.

However, other people with narcissistic personality disorder may prefer to be alone rather than in the company of
people they consider inferior or uninteresting. These people may have interests or passions that keep them busy and
give them a sense of satisfaction or achievement. In some cases, loneliness can actually reinforce narcissistic
behavior in a person with narcissistic personality disorder. They may be tempted to put themselves forward or boast
more to attract the attention of others, even when they're not in their presence. How a person with this personality
reacts to loneliness depends on many factors, such as the severity of their disorder, their level of self-awareness,
and their other personality traits.
Editor's opinion - Expressing their feelings is impossible for them
We all have certain struggles when it comes to talking about how we feel, but a narcissist's inability to express what
they are going through is definitely more penalizing for them than for anyone else. These personalities are lonely, yet
their innate traits prevent them for breaking the cycle of loneliness, and also dissuades others from attempting to
pull them out of their misery.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Not ALL of those that were found.

There were some that he was NOT supposed to have stolen when he was NOT the President OR Vice President.

=========================================================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
Alan
2024-10-15 16:19:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Not ALL of those that were found.
There were some that he was NOT supposed to have stolen when he was NOT the President OR Vice President.
Leaving aside the gibberish of that sentence for a moment, why don't you
quote it from the source:

<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:25:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Not ALL of those that were found.
There were some that he was NOT supposed to have stolen when he was NOT the President OR Vice President.
Leaving aside the gibberish of that sentence for a moment, why don't you
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He was right.
Alan
2024-10-15 16:27:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Not ALL of those that were found.
There were some that he was NOT supposed to have stolen when he was NOT the President OR Vice President.
Leaving aside the gibberish of that sentence for a moment, why don't you
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He was right.
Who was right, doofus?

Learn to communicate clearly, would you?
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:56:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Not ALL of those that were found.
There were some that he was NOT supposed to have stolen when he was NOT the President OR Vice President.
Leaving aside the gibberish of that sentence for a moment, why don't you
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He was right.
Who was right, doofus?
Learn to communicate clearly, would you?
OK chicken.
Lil dwarf Rudey
2024-10-15 16:27:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
[*all* of shitbag's gratuitous bullshit crossposts removed]
Read it again, scumbag little man Jonathan D Ball...you are no more than
a failed solar city installer and Suckramento bungalow trash pretending
to be Phil Hendrie, but giving blow jobs at the TA glory Hole and
ducking fights at the Jolly Kone like you always do...you gutless troll.

Explain why are you death threat prosecution exempt by the Feds so far?

And after _so many_ public death threats you issued on Trump and Vance...

Let's do our best to change that, shall we:


Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party/Alan Bond/Henry Bodkin/Malte
Runz/Paul S Perso and a few dozen or even more other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$***@fx11.ams4> <***@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400


Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <***@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$***@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$***@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$***@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-***@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$***@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$***@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$***@dont-email.me>
<***@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$***@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.


https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.


Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california


Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's usenet terrorism here?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:11:04 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.

"... BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017..."

"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: BIDEN'S CLAIM THAT NONE OF THE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FOUND IN HIS POSSESSION WAS HIGHLY CLASSIFIED IS
FALSE, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."

============================================================================

Alan's Low Self Esteem FORCES Him To Reply, Even When There's NOTHING To Reply TO

This Is Why Alan Can't Admit He's Wrong

They say it takes a big person to admit their mistakes, but for Alan, saying he's wrong feels impossible.

But why does Alan do it? We've asked psychologist Dr. Tim Sharp, chief happiness officer at The Happiness Institute, to
explain:

They think being wrong means they're unworthy - Yup... Low-Self-Esteem

For Alan, conceding that he's fallible can evoke a deep psychological anxiety regarding "the risks or the consequences
associated with loss or failure," says Sharp.

"I think the reason Alan can't apologize isn't actually because he doesn't like to be wrong, but because it's seen as
an inherent character fault," he explains.

Sharp says that for non-apologists, the irrational need to always be "perfect" rules their ego and they feel their
screw-ups are unforgivable.

"The difficulty in admitting failure largely comes from the unrealistic expectation that 'I should get it right all the
time, or not even try or make it seem as if I am'" he says.

Alan Thinks Never Admitting Fault Makes Him Look Stronger

For Alan, appearing wrong is congruent to appearing weak, but Sharp says they could not be more wrong, because a good
leader admits their mistakes.

"There's some actually very interesting research that leaders who express vulnerability and are more open to being
fallible tend to be more highly regarded," the expert explains.

"This makes sense because if someone is saying, 'I'm 100 percent perfect, I'm 100 percent right all the time,' that's
pretty hard to believe," says the psychologist.

(But, THAT'S Ski Bunny)

"I'd find it hard to trust that person because there's no one I know 100 percent perfect.

Whereas if Alan would say, 'You know, I'm going to do my best but I'll make mistakes sometimes, I'll get it wrong, I'm
sorry but I'll try to fix it,'... to me, that's more believable. I'd be more trusting of that sort of person."

They Don't Value The Truth

(NO liberal does... THAT'S their M.O.)

For Alan, the fact is he "doesn't necessarily value truth and honesty," says Sharp.

"While I personally value truth and honesty, what I've come to learn, which I find hard to understand but it's just a
reality, is that Alan doesn't value those things as highly as me," says Sharp.

Taking political discussion as an example, the expert says Alan, who eats up "fake news" propaganda, doesn't value
facts. When it comes to the truth, the expert warns that Alan "will literally say, 'I don't really care.'"

"Alan doesn't care about it because he values other aspects of what they're perceiving much more," he says.

Citing the upsurge of alt-left political movements around the world, Sharp says how Alan approaches a situation will
often reveal whether facts or feelings will influence them more.

"[Logical people] will look for facts and information and data and make their decisions accordingly," he explains.
"Other people make their decisions based on much more emotion. Now the problem comes when you try to talk logic to an
emotional person because it just won't wear... you're talking different languages.
Alan
2024-10-14 17:36:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:11:04 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...

"then"

That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).

He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.

Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.

You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)

THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
Loading Image...

What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?

A civilian.

He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.

Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
Alan
2024-10-15 16:42:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.

But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Skeeter
2024-10-15 17:05:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Alan
2024-10-15 17:08:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 17:32:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
Alan
2024-10-15 17:36:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.

We dealt this this already.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 18:23:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.
We dealt this this already.
A VP was not allowed to take them. He didn't even know he had them
remember? What a load of shit. What were they doing in a garage? Are you
going to tell me he put a box of papers in the garage without knowing
what was in the box? I know he's stupid but damn.
Alan
2024-10-15 22:15:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.
We dealt this this already.
A VP was not allowed to take them.
Robert Hur's report disagrees:

'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'


Read that last part again:

'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Post by Skeeter
He didn't even know he had them
remember? What a load of shit.'
Some of them were taken home when he was in office and didn't get
returned, some got mixed in with his personal things when others were
packing up his office after his term.

The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
Post by Skeeter
What were they doing in a garage? Are you
going to tell me he put a box of papers in the garage without knowing
what was in the box? I know he's stupid but damn.
It wasn't a box of just classified documents, doofus. It was classified
documents mixed in with other documents and papers.

You don't think that Biden did the moving of his personal papers out of
the VP's office on his own, do you?


The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 23:04:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.
We dealt this this already.
A VP was not allowed to take them.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Post by Skeeter
He didn't even know he had them
remember? What a load of shit.'
Some of them were taken home when he was in office and didn't get
returned, some got mixed in with his personal things when others were
packing up his office after his term.
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
Post by Skeeter
What were they doing in a garage? Are you
going to tell me he put a box of papers in the garage without knowing
what was in the box? I know he's stupid but damn.
It wasn't a box of just classified documents, doofus. It was classified
documents mixed in with other documents and papers.
You don't think that Biden did the moving of his personal papers out of
the VP's office on his own, do you?
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
So "others" were allowed to handle and pack up classified docs? The
moving crew had access to them? Then his crackhead son could read them
in the garage. How responsible is that?
Alan
2024-10-15 23:20:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.
We dealt this this already.
A VP was not allowed to take them.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Post by Skeeter
He didn't even know he had them
remember? What a load of shit.'
Some of them were taken home when he was in office and didn't get
returned, some got mixed in with his personal things when others were
packing up his office after his term.
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
Post by Skeeter
What were they doing in a garage? Are you
going to tell me he put a box of papers in the garage without knowing
what was in the box? I know he's stupid but damn.
It wasn't a box of just classified documents, doofus. It was classified
documents mixed in with other documents and papers.
You don't think that Biden did the moving of his personal papers out of
the VP's office on his own, do you?
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
So "others" were allowed to handle and pack up classified docs? The
moving crew had access to them? Then his crackhead son could read them
in the garage. How responsible is that?
Yes, doofus.

Do you think TRUMP packed up the documents HE took?

I realize this is hard for you, but things get misfiled.
Lil dwarf Rudey
2024-10-16 00:00:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
packing up and transfer
FOAD

Read it again, scumbag little man Jonathan D Ball...you are no more than
a failed solar city installer and Suckramento bungalow trash pretending
to be Phil Hendrie, but giving blow jobs at the TA glory Hole and
ducking fights at the Jolly Kone like you always do...

Explain why are you death threat prosecution exempt by the Feds so far?

And after _so many_ public death threats you issued on Trump and Vance...

Let's do our best to change that, shall we:


Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party/Alan Bond/Henry Bodkin/Malte
Runz and a few dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$***@fx11.ams4> <***@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400


Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <***@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$***@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$***@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$***@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-***@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$***@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$***@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$***@dont-email.me>
<***@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$***@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.


https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.


Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california


Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's usenet terrorism here?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Skeeter
2024-10-16 00:54:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.
We dealt this this already.
A VP was not allowed to take them.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Post by Skeeter
He didn't even know he had them
remember? What a load of shit.'
Some of them were taken home when he was in office and didn't get
returned, some got mixed in with his personal things when others were
packing up his office after his term.
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
Post by Skeeter
What were they doing in a garage? Are you
going to tell me he put a box of papers in the garage without knowing
what was in the box? I know he's stupid but damn.
It wasn't a box of just classified documents, doofus. It was classified
documents mixed in with other documents and papers.
You don't think that Biden did the moving of his personal papers out of
the VP's office on his own, do you?
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
So "others" were allowed to handle and pack up classified docs? The
moving crew had access to them? Then his crackhead son could read them
in the garage. How responsible is that?
Yes, doofus.
Do you think TRUMP packed up the documents HE took?
I realize this is hard for you, but things get misfiled.
But he knew. Joe claims he didn't know. See the difference doofus.

<or is it chicken>
Alan
2024-10-16 01:39:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.
We dealt this this already.
A VP was not allowed to take them.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Post by Skeeter
He didn't even know he had them
remember? What a load of shit.'
Some of them were taken home when he was in office and didn't get
returned, some got mixed in with his personal things when others were
packing up his office after his term.
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
Post by Skeeter
What were they doing in a garage? Are you
going to tell me he put a box of papers in the garage without knowing
what was in the box? I know he's stupid but damn.
It wasn't a box of just classified documents, doofus. It was classified
documents mixed in with other documents and papers.
You don't think that Biden did the moving of his personal papers out of
the VP's office on his own, do you?
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
So "others" were allowed to handle and pack up classified docs? The
moving crew had access to them? Then his crackhead son could read them
in the garage. How responsible is that?
Yes, doofus.
Do you think TRUMP packed up the documents HE took?
I realize this is hard for you, but things get misfiled.
But he knew. Joe claims he didn't know. See the difference doofus.
Yes, Chicken.

KNOWINGLY taking documents is what's actually a crime.
AlleyCat
2024-10-16 01:43:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:15:03 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
A VP was not allowed to take them.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
I want YOU to read THIS part again, you disingenuous piece of faggot:

The pertinent words are capped.

'Both when he served as vice president and when THE AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in
2022, his possession OF THEM in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution because as vice president and
president, he had authority to keep CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS in his home.'

WHO the FUCK said we're talking ONLY about THOSE documents ONLY? THOSE weren't the ONLY documents he had, and many were
documents he wasn't allowed to have, even as VP.

What about all the other documents he was NOT supposed to or allowed to have, as NEITHER VP or President? There WERE
documents that did NOT fall under his purview?

Address those, you pansy.

What about the documents he had after he was VP, but BEFORE he was President? What about pre-2009 and 2017-2021?

I read an article that he was NOT supposed to have had MANY of the documents he had, even with his VP status, and that
he even STOLE documents when he was a Senator.

Give us your best excuse for that.

And before you go off on one of your sissified rants about proving what I said... no... this is NOT worth the bother.
With the right words, I'm sure you can find what I read. I'm pretty sure it was on either NPR, PBS, CNN or another far-
left loon lie-site, like them.

MAYBE even the shit standard in journalism, The New York Times. Use archive.is to get around their paywalls. Or do a
quick copy and paste.

======================================================================================================================

Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, And Sadists Trolls Will Lie, Exaggerate, And Offend TO GET A RESPONSE
[so true]

Loser
AlleyPussyBitch
Pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing
fairy
Pussey

Of course, these never work, AS INTENDED.

=====

An Internet troll is someone who enters an online discussion and posts comments designed to upset or disrupt the
conversation.

"Dark Tetrad" personality traits include narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism.

(someone's been reading my possstss againnnnn)

In a study of 1200 people, Dark Tetrad scores were highest among people who said trolling was their favorite Internet
activity.

In this month's issue of Personality and Individual Differences, a study was published that confirms what we all
suspected: Internet trolls are horrible people.

Let's start by getting our definitions straight: An Internet troll is someone who comes into a discussion and posts
comments designed to upset or disrupt the conversation. Often, in fact, it seems like there is no real purpose behind
their comments except to upset everyone else involved. Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and offend to get a response.

What kind of person would do this? Some Canadian researchers decided to find out.
Study: Internet Trolls and Dark Tetrad Personality Traits

They conducted two online studies with over 1,200 people, giving personality tests to each subject along with a survey
about their Internet commenting behavior. They were looking for evidence that linked trolling with the "Dark Tetrad" of
personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism.

They found that Dark Tetrad scores were highest among people who said trolling was their favorite Internet activity. To
get an idea of how much more prevalent these traits were among Internet trolls, one can refer to tables from the paper
showing low Dark Tetrad scores for everyone in the study ... except the trolls. Their scores for all four traits soar
on the chart. The relationship between trolling and the Dark Tetrad is so significant that the authors write in their
paper:

"... the associations between sadism and GAIT (Global Assessment of Internet Trolling) scores were so strong that it
might be said that online trolls are prototypical everyday sadists." [emphasis added]

Trolls truly enjoy making you feel bad. To quote the authors once more (because this is a truly quotable article):
"Both trolls and sadists feel sadistic glee at the distress of others. Sadists just want to have fun ... and the
Internet is their playground!"

The next time you encounter a troll online, remember:

These trolls are some truly difficult people.
It is your suffering that brings them pleasure, so the best thing you can do is ignore them.
AlleyCat
2024-10-16 01:43:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
THIS is what a pansy-ass pussy faggot of a child does to newsgroups:

alt.fan.rush-limbaurgh(sic), alt.socially(sic).liberalism, alt.athieism(sic), alt.fucknozzles(sic),
alt.poltics(sic).democrats.d, talk.poltics(sic).guns

THIS is what an adult does:

alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, CAN.POLITICS, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats,
alt.politics.usa.republican

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

=====

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:47:02 -0700, Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport
letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who
was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as
me, says...
Post by Skeeter
He was when he took them.
He was *not*. At one second past noon on 01/21/2021, he was no longer president.
*As* the boxes of *stolen* documents were being loaded into vehicles outside the
White House, Trump was not president. He was *stealing* them.
SAME as Biden.

Where's Biden's indictments?

Copypasta alert: Rudy's not worth typing new material.

I want YOU to read THIS part again, you disingenuous piece of faggot:

The pertinent words are capped.

'Both when he served as vice president and when THE AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in
2022, his possession OF THEM in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution because as vice president and
president, he had authority to keep CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS in his home.'

WHO the FUCK said we're talking ONLY about THOSE documents ONLY? THOSE weren't the ONLY documents he had, and many were
documents he wasn't allowed to have, even as VP.

What about all the other documents he was NOT supposed to or allowed to have, as NEITHER VP or President? There WERE
documents that did NOT fall under his purview?

Address those, you pansy.

What about the documents he had after he was VP, but BEFORE he was President? What about pre-2009 and 2017-2021?

I read an article that he was NOT supposed to have had MANY of the documents he had, even with his VP status, and that
he even STOLE documents when he was a Senator.

Give us your best excuse for that.

And before you go off on one of your sissified rants about proving what I said... no... this is NOT worth the bother.
With the right words, I'm sure you can find what I read. I'm pretty sure it was on either NPR, PBS, CNN or another far-
left loon lie-site, like them.

MAYBE even the shit standard in journalism, The New York Times.

=====

BONUS: Why Rudy Is So Childish

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil
neck to the amusement of all.

There are many similarities between the way Rudy the narcissist thinks and processes things and the way children do. In
fact, in many ways, these processes are virtually identical. This is because Rudy the narcissist has arrested emotional
development.

The emotional maturation that most children go through did not occur within Rudy, for whatever reason. Often, this
reason is abuse or neglect during childhood.

These things caused Rudy to focus intensely on himself, to the exclusion of all other things. It also results in the
mind being taken up with trying to defend itself from his abuse.

Rudy's mind is, in a sense, always playing catch up, and because of the trauma that he has experienced, some things are
skipped, so to speak, or don't happen.

(see Rudy's separation from reality)

His mind becomes locked in a pattern of defensive reaction and emotional perception, made up of many different but
related facets, that matures extremely slowly and is extrordinarily resistant to change. We call this reaction/defense
pattern malignant narcissism.

In children, these things are normal. In Rudy, they are evidence of a disorder.

Young children and babies are not capable of understanding the emotions or needs of others. They only know want and
need. They have no way of taking care of their own needs, and they can only scream for someone to do it for them. When
Rudy's mother was exhausted and deathly ill with a fever and vomiting, and she'd been up for three days, and she simply
could not cope anymore, does Rudy sympathize accordingly? Does Rudy stop crying?

No. Rudy does not recognize this. Rudy does not care. Rudy can NOT care. He can only keep screaming out his needs,
regardless of his mother's suffering.

This is, in essence, what you are dealing with when it comes to Rudy the narcissist. He does not recognize, understand
or consider other people's needs.

He sees only his own, and his inability to meet them. The more damaged Rudy is, the more narcissistic he will be, the
more immature he will be and the more childish his way of thinking.

And this is not childish as in, silly. This is immature as in, the emotional maturity and understanding of a toddler.

For example, besides the hysterical tantrum behavior we see in Rudy that is very clearly on par with a very young
child's, Rudy the narcissist generally believes he is immune to the things that happen to "regular" people.

This is an example of something called magical thinking which is a phenomenon we commonly see in very young children.
Rudy sees feelings as facts, the way that children do. Rudy the narcissist sees everything in the world as an extension
of himself, the way that children do and Rudy the narcissist truly believes in his own perceived omnipresence and
immortality as children do.

He has always been, he will always be.

So children believe... so Rudy the narcissist believes.

The view that he is just another person that must fit into a wider world does not occur to young children.

How could it? Rather, Rudy functions under the assumption that the world fits around HIM, and that everything he
experiences or encounters is related to him in some form.

This is the same way Rudy see things. He has never matured past this extremely immature way of looking at things. The
idea that the world does not revolve around them never occurs to children, as it does not occur to Rudy.

For example, children view their parents as only having to do with them and connected only to them, rather than as
separate people with their own lives, needs, wants, feelings, etc. Parents are very one dimensional to young children;
despite the fact that children are only one part of the parent's life, the child does not see this nor understand it in
any way.

To a child, parents only exist as their caretakers. It is the only context children view parents in and the only
context they can understand. This is identical to how Rudy the narcissist views all other people: outside of the
narcissist and the narcissist's needs, these people do not exist.

As children mature, they learn that this viewpoint is not true; they learn to see and appreciate their parents as
individuals that are separate from themselves. Rudy does not.

The development of Rudy is so arrested that this, coupled with such extreme self-focus means he is never able to
separate himself as an authentic individual from the external world.

Because of this, Rudy often feels acted upon by the world and other people or circumstances, rather than as people who
act in the world.

In Rudy's view, he does not act, but rather react to the things that are being done to him. It's as if he never outgrew
the idea of himself as a powerless child, unable to take control or ownership of his own life.

He behaves as though other people are still responsible for his emotions, the way that parents are responsible for a
small child. He seems unable to own his choices or even to recognize that things are choices. And this is also like a
child.

Rudy the narcissist is generally impulsive, irrational and extremely immature. He is careless, irresponsible and
foolhardy. He doesn't seem able to consider consequences or think about things before he does them, just like a child.

When pressed for an answer as to why he's done something, Rudy may seem just as mystified as everyone else. "I don't
know" is a very common answer. It may be the truth. He seems to possess very little insight as to why he does things,
simply reacting on impulse as we see children do.

Like a child, Rudy often feels helpless in a world of more powerful, more competent, more knowledgeable adults.

However, this is also an excuse. It's easier to be a helpless victim. If you are a victim, you can never be blamed. If
you are helpless, you can never be forced to take responsibility.

Children are not blamed for not controlling themselves or for their choices. Rudy doesn't seem to feel he should be
either. He doesn't seem to understand the difference between a child and an adult, and he will often say things to that
effect. These are mostly things that no self-respecting mature adult would ever say.

*FAGGOT!*

He may compare himself to a child, compete with the children, or complain that his spouse (LOL) holds "double
standards" because the kids are allowed to get away with things that they are called out for. Rudy doesn't seem to
realize that adults and children are held to different standards, or why this should be.

For example, the narcissist must be asked repeatedly every single night to bring their plate into the kitchen, or throw
their clothing in the hamper rather than leaving these things on the ground. Instead of simply doing it, the narcissist
responds that little Johnny never does it either but he doesn't get yelled at. Little Johnny is seven. The narcissist
is 40 and is one of Little Johnny's parents.

The discrepancy here is obvious; this is the type of response you would receive from a child that does not want to do
his chores, not an adult. To the narcissist, this is a clear example of favoritism and being attacked for who they are.
It does not seem to enter Rudy's mind that there is a very large difference between a 7-year-old and a 40-year-old.
Regardless of whether or not he actually feels this way, the childishness and absurdity of his argument is really
unbelievable-almost shocking in it's ignorance. There is not only the complete refusal to behave as an adult, there is
an inability to even understand why this would be expected.

The truth is, underneath of all of the horrible things Rudy does, the narcissist is still that 5-year-old child
pretending he is somebody else to escape an abusive situation that ended years ago. When all of Rudy's reasoning is
examined, when all of Rudy's behavior is scrutinized and looked at through the lens of perspective rather than pain,
this is what we are left with: a person with the emotional maturity of a toddler who cannot understand why they are
expected to behave otherwise and who is trying desperately to pretend they are somebody else.

All of Rudy's attention seeking, all of Rudy's manipulations, all of Rudy's gas lighting, all of Rudy's smear
campaigns, all of Rudy's abuse, all of the hurtful things he does, when seen for what they really are, these things are
nothing but childish behaviors that have been perpetrated by an adult.

Every single one of these things is seen in children. Gas-lighting is a 3 year old with chocolate all over his face who
is hiding the chocolate bar behind his back in plain view, saying "What chocolate, Mommy? I don't have chocolate."
Smear campaigns are a 6-year-old telling lies about a girl to all that girl's friends so they won't like her anymore.
Though these behaviors are sometimes seen as sophisticated schemes, they really aren't. They are the same childish and
petty things we all dealt with on the elementary school playground. They are just more confusing and therefore more
dangerous because they are coming from an adult.
AlleyCat
2024-10-16 01:43:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:42:49 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Good, faggot, but you don't REALLY get it.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Uhhh...

=====

Here's Where All The Cases Against Donald Trump Stand | AP News

https://apnews.com/article/trump-indictments-election-january-6-classified-documents-5cb04868bb1cdf91c19 -
Eafdb882af8c0

Feb 28, 2024 - In all, Trump faces 40 felony charges in the classified documents case. The most serious charge carries
a penalty of up to 20 years in prison. Walt Nauta, a valet for Trump, and Carlos De Oliveira, the property manager at
Trump's Florida estate, have been charged in the case with scheming to conceal surveillance footage from federal ...

=====

Read The Full Trump Indictment On Mishandling Of Classified Documents - PBS

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-the-full-trump-indictment-on-mishandling-of-classified-documents

Jul 28, 2023 - UPDATE: Read Trump's new charges in the classified documents case Find more of our coverage on the
arraignment of former President Donald Trump here, including the what to expect from his court ...

=====

These Are The Charges Trump Was Indicted On And What They Mean - NPR

https://www.npr.org/2023/06/09/1181340894/trump-indictment-classified-documents-charges

Jun 9, 2023 - The federal indictment of former President Donald Trump in the classified documents probe has been
unsealed. The indictment lays out 37 federal charges against Trump, including obstruction and ...

=====

Tracking Donald Trump's Indictments - CNN

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2023/07/politics/trump-indictments-criminal-cases/

Oct 2, 2024 - And on July 15, a judge dismissed the classified documents case against Trump, ... The historic
indictment is the fourth criminal case that Trump is facing. The charges, brought in a sweeping ...

=====

11 Revelations From The Trump Classified Documents Indictment - NBC News

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-indictment-document-classified-key-takeaways-rcna88611

Jun 9, 2023 - Now that the Trump indictment document has been unsealed, here are 11 major findings from it, including
the charges Trump faces and where the classified docs were found.

=====

Trump Indicted, Charged With 7 Counts | CNN Politics

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/mar-a-lago-documents-probe-latest/index.html

Jun 8, 2023 - If that was not serious enough, these federal charges - related to classified documents that Trump took
to his Mar-a-Lago resort - are coming down at a moment when Trump is the front-runner ...

=====

Timeline: The Justice Department's Prosecution Of The Trump Documents ...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-documents-case-timeline-justice-department-prosecution/

Jun 20, 2023 - June 9: The indictment filed against Trump is made public, detailing the charges the former president is
facing. The document lists 37 felony violations: The document lists 37 felony violations:

=====

Trump Indicted Trump Is Charged In Classified Documents Inquiry

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/06/08/us/trump-indictment-documents

Jun 9, 2023 - He is facing federal charges after a lengthy investigation of his handling of classified documents. ...
While the nature of a few of the documents found in Mr. Trump's possession is known -

=====

Read Trump's New Charges In The Classified Documents Case

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-trumps-new-charges-in-the-classified-documents-case

Jul 28, 2023 - The charges Trump was already facing stemmed from documents prosecutors say Trump was illegally hoarding
at Mar-a-Lago after the federal grand jury investigation began.

=====

6 Things To Know About Trump's Classified Documents Case : NPR

https://www.npr.org/2023/07/21/1188280400/things-to-know-donald-trump-classified-documents-trial

Jul 21, 2023 - Former President Donald Trump's trial into his handling of classified documents is set for May 20, 2024.
It's one of several criminal and civil cases Trump faces as he runs for president. Trump ...

=====

Things To Know About AP's Report On The Federal Criminal Cases Against ...

https://apnews.com/article/jack-smith-donald-trump-justice-department-jan-6-classified-documents-403 - Dfb2d4b2982210 -
B4896fc72cb9906

1 day ago - WASHINGTON (AP) - A year that began with the prospect of a federal court reckoning for Donald Trump will
conclude without any chance at trial, leaving voters without the finality of an up-or-down jury verdict in the two most
consequential cases against the Republican presidential nominee.. Yet both cases - one charging him with illegally
hoarding classified documents, the other with trying ...

=====

Justice Department Unseals Donald Trump Indictment - CBS News

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/charges-against-donald-trump-indictment-documents/

Jun 9, 2023 - Washington - The historic federal indictment filed against former President Donald Trump was made public
Friday, detailing the charges the former president is facing related to his handling of ...

=====

Trump's 4 Indictments In Detail: A Quick-Look Guide To Charges, Trial ...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-indictments-details-guide-charges-trial-dates-people-case/

Sep 13, 2024 - Federal indictment on classified documents charges in Florida. Trump was accused of keeping classified
documents after leaving the White House and storing them "in various locations at The Mar-a ...

=====

Trump Documents Case: What Are The Charges And How Can He Defend ...

https://www.reuters.com/legal/what-are-charges-against-donald-trump-classified-documents-case-2023-06-09/

Jun 9, 2023 - Here is a look at the charges former President Donald Trump faces and his possible defenses over what
prosecutors say was his illegal retention of classified documents at his Florida estate after ...

=====

The Cases Against Trump: A Guide

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/09/donald-trump-legal-cases-charges/675531/

Sep 13, 2024 - The charges included willful retention of national-security information, obstruction of justice,
withholding of documents, and false statements. Trump took boxes of documents to properties, where ...

=====

Trump's 2024 Trials: Where They Stand And What To Expect

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trumps-2024-trials-where-they-stand-and-what-to-expect

Jul 15, 2024 - Trump was indicted on June 8, 2023, on charges of unlawfully hoarding national security documents after
he left the White House and lying to FBI officials who sought to retrieve them from his Mar ...

=====

With Trump Facing More Charges, Here's What To Know About The Documents ...

https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2023-07-28/with-trump-newly-indicted-heres-what-to-know-about-the-documents-
case-and-whats-next

Jul 28, 2023 - Associated Press. July 28, 2023 1:43 PM PT. Former President Trump has been indicted on three additional
charges in a case that accuses him of illegally possessing classified documents at his Mar ...
Lil dwarf Rudey
2024-10-16 00:01:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
knuckle-dragging squat-to-piss faggot fuck
FOAD

Read it again, scumbag little man Jonathan D Ball...you are no more than
a failed solar city installer and Suckramento bungalow trash pretending
to be Phil Hendrie, but giving blow jobs at the TA glory Hole and
ducking fights at the Jolly Kone like you always do...

Explain why are you death threat prosecution exempt by the Feds so far?

And after _so many_ public death threats you issued on Trump and Vance...

Let's do our best to change that, shall we:


Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party/Alan Bond/Henry Bodkin/Malte
Runz and a few dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$***@fx11.ams4> <***@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400


Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <***@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$***@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$***@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$***@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-***@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$***@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$***@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$***@dont-email.me>
<***@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$***@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.


https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.


Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california


Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's usenet terrorism here?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Rudy is the PERFECT liberal.

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 09:49:56 -0700, Rudy Canoza... forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three
sport letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me,
and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many
women as me, says...

Whereas *I*:

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)

It's not" bragging" if it upsets Wudy's Wittle World... forever stuck with mommy, now that he's too old and creepy to
work.
Yes, Biden was president when the documents made it into his garage.
No, psycho, he wasn't.

"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
"... BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017..."

On every date: Rudy Canoza... forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport letterman, like
me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who was *NEVER* a
lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as me, says...

Whereas *I*:

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)
Yes, Biden was president when the documents made it into his garage.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."

=====

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil
neck to the amusement of all.

Narcissistic Rudy's Sociopathic Alternate Reality

The Narcissist's Reality - How It's SO Different From Yours

Wouldn't it be nice to live in the narcissist's reality? You're always right. You're the best at everything. You're an
expert at all things you do or haven't even tried.

As Dr. Les Carter says, there's an alternate reality and always an agenda when it comes to the narcissist. I thought
it would be interesting to break down the top six ways the narcissist lives in a different reality and how it's not
healthy for you and me.

1) The narcissist is always the victim.

The narcissist has a lot of pain from the past and is skilled at projecting that pain on everyone else. If you call
the narcissist out on a cruel or inappropriate action or response, and he or she feels violated, criticized, demeaned.
The narcissist will become the victim because that keeps the narcissist from having to look within. This is referred to
as a narcissistic injury. And the narcissist can play a very good victim. It takes the focus off what the narcissist
did wrong, and it puts you on the defensive as the perpetrator.

For example, I remember catching a narcissist in my life stealing. I asked him why. The response was, "I didn't grow
up with a silver spook in my mouth like you did, Laura." His reply hurt for two reasons: one, I grew up in a middle-
class family in Arkansas, and secondly, stealing is wrong. No matter how you look at it, it's against the law.

2) It's always your fault.

If anything goes wrong it's your fault, no matter the offender. Remember, narcissists believe they are perfect and
everyone else is not. How could it be his or her fault?

My ex-husband and I were driving south on Interstate 35 one Thanksgiving morning. A car hit us from behind. He was
driving. But guess who got blamed for the accident? Me, even though I was sitting in the passenger seat. You got it.
It was my fault.

When we got into an argument one day, he called me white trash. It wasn't about anything significant of course, but
whatever it was turned out to be MY fault. The narcissist is never to blame.

3) You walk on eggshells because the punishment doesn't fit the crime.

With the narcissist, the punishment never fits the crime. Usually there's not even a crime to begin with. The
narcissist may dole out harsh criticism, the silent treatment or a combination of both to "punish" you and have you
begging for forgiveness. Remember, the narcissist is great at being the injured party, even when the narcissist is
actually the perpetrator.

There's no proportion. The drama doesn't end, no matter how much you tiptoe around your home.

4) The narcissist is the greatest at everything

I remember being in church with the narcissist and listening to the criticism fly. We were listening to a Doctor of
Theology preach. But guess who knew more than the pastor? You got it. The narcissist said he knew more. He also knew
how to dress better than the pastor, he said. It was difficult to focus on the sermon and worshiping due to the
barrage of criticism.

Narcissists also believe they are so good at life, that they shouldn't surround themselves with anyone "less than"
them. (If you'll notice they have few is any good friends.) That's why the narcissist doesn't engage with anyone he
feels inferior or that can't do something for the narcissist.

5) The narcissist always has an agenda.

The narcissist almost does something with the end in mind. The narcissist must get something from a situation or
person, or the narcissist won't take part. The narcissist looks at life like a Monopoly game. There's a strategy or
manipulative tactic put in place in order to gain money, people, and things, regardless if it hurts the other person
financially or emotionally. I've known narcissists who leave an ex-wife and children homeless, while the narcissists
walk away free of guilt and trauma. If it works for the narcissist, then that's how the narcissist believes the game
should be played.

6) There is no peace with a narcissist.

The narcissist takes pride and pleasure in disrupting your world. Seeing you in emotional pain is something the
narcissist relishes. Why? The more pain you carry, the easier it is for the narcissist to control you and those around
you. The narcissist also understands that if you are isolated due to your pain or his control, then that's even
better. He has you at his disposal, broken down, ready to please.

Also, the narcissist likes for your home life, social life and professional life to revolve around him or her. The
narcissist does it by causing disruption, then often fixing the problem he caused. For example, I can recall numerous
arguments the narcissist provoked, only to come back and give an empty apology such as, "I'm sorry, but you push my
buttons. Can you calm down and we talk about this rationally?" The narcissist looks like the hero, and you're left
wondering what just happened.

Life with a narcissist is a rollercoaster. There are so many ups and downs, all orchestrated to have high control. But
there are ways to get off the roller coaster. First of all, don't get on board in the first place. Focus on your
truth. Don't let the narcissist sway your beliefs of what you know to be true. Journal or keep a notebook of
incidents you know occurred.

Secondly, find some peace every day. Take the dog for a walk. Phone a trusted friend. Get grounded in reality. There
are good people out there who want you to be healthy emotionally and physically.

Finally, live your best life. Avoid toxic people. If you can't avoid the narcissist, put strong boundaries in place.
The narcissist won't like it, but you will become stronger. Time away from toxic people helps you heal and see things
clearly. You can more easily live your life. That's the best karma out there. And you accelerate that karma by taking
care of you.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:06:39 -0700, Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport
letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who
was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as
me, says...
Post by AlleyCat
"... BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017..."
A lie.
Prove it, pussy.

A CNN lie?

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/biden-classified-documents-report-02-08-24/index.html

"The special counsel report found that Biden willfully retained classified information, including top secret documents,
and knew he was in possession of some documents as far back as 2017, and shared some of that information with the
ghostwriter of his 2017 memoir."

A painful report for Biden: Hur laid out in detail how Biden mishandled classified materials, writing that FBI agents
discovered materials from 'THE GARAGE, offices, and BASEMENT DEN in Mr. Biden's Wilmington, Delaware, HOME."

I couldn't give a shit less, WHERE the documents were found that Biden had had, since 2017... he HAD them and he wasn't
supposed to have, so if you want to play your bullshit childish semantics games, go ahead, but only faggots do that.
There were *no* documents in his home in 2017.
How the fuck do YOU know?

How the fuck does ANYONE know, stupid?

They found documents in his home. WHEN did they GET there, idiot?

Just because the documents in his house weren't "marked" as 2017 documents, does NOT mean he hadn't had documents in
his home in 2017.

Remember, pussy... they found documents in MORE than ONE home.

======================================================================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil
neck to the amusement of all.

Rudy's Delusion of Grandeur

Rudy's delusions of grandeur, are the false beliefs in his own superiority, greatness, or intelligence. Rudy
experiences delusions of grandeur, not just because he has low self-esteem; instead, Rudy believes in his own greatness
and importance even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Yes.

Rudy might, for example, believe he is destined to be the leader of the Usenet world, despite having no leadership
experience and DIFFICULTIES IN INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS.

Rudy's delusions of grandeur are characterized by their persistence. They are not just moments of fantasy or hopes for
the future.


Symptoms of Rudy's Delusions of Grandeur

Delusions of grandeur vary greatly in their content, but they are similar to one another in that they involve the
persistent believe in one's own grandiosity. Common examples of delusions of grandeur include:

Belief that one has a special relationship with a supernatural entity. Cult leaders, for example, might believe they
can communicate with a god or that they are a manifestation of a god on earth.

Belief that one has a special relationship with a famous person or authority figure, such as the president.

Belief that one has a unique destiny. These destinies often involve power, fame, fortune, or supernatural concepts.

Causes of Delusion of Grandeur

Delusions of grandeur are ASSOCIATED WITH NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER (NPD), which is a mental health diagnosis
listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

A NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY may cause Rudy to greatly overestimate his own importance and belief in his own uniqueness.
THESE DELUSIONS CAN ALSO BE SYMPTOMATIC OF SCHIZOPHRENIA.

Rudy's battle with schizophrenia causes him to experience delusions in which he believe he is a hugely powerful person
and has a great gift to give to the world.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

According to Rudy... that would be himself.
AlleyCat
2024-10-13 02:01:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:47:02 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
https://imgur.com/tUXqgI9

BBC: Joe Biden Willfully Stole Classified Files, Investigation Finds

Not only a thief, but a traitor too.

Special Counsel Finds Biden "WILLFULLY" DISCLOSED Classified Documents

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-special-counsel-report-handling-classified-documents

There were documents marked classified regarding military and foreign policy in Afghanistan and notebooks containing
Mr. Biden's entries about national security and foreign policy matters ...

=====

WHY did they have to be "FOUND"?

More Classified Documents Found At Biden's Home, White House Says - NPR

https://www.npr.org/2023/01/14/1149071576/biden-classified-documents-what-we-know

Jan 14, 2023 - President Biden is facing a Department of Justice investigation after his lawyers found classified
documents at his Delaware residence and an office in Washington, D.C.

============================================================================

Draft-Dodging Coward


While first glance at Creepy Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak Joe Biden's long career in politics would give you the
impression of a racist plagiarism and serious pedophile, don't worry, there's far more skeletons in his closet.

In addition to everything we already know is wrong with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, he also seems to
have a history of evading the draft in Vietnam, according to a report from InsideSources.

Of course, the outlet also bashes President Trump over his own deferment during Vietnam, but to compare Trump to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden in this respect, as you will come to learn, is a pretty unfair comparison.

According to the report, after graduating college in 1968, Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was eligible for
the draft, meaning he should have ended up fighting in Vietnam. He earned a 1-Y draft deferment, however, due to
asthma:

That's right-asthma.

There's one little problem with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's "asthma."

Although Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was granted a deferment for "asthma as a teenager"... this didn't
stop him from playing high school football.

Oops.

InsideSources also points out that, in Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's autobiography, Old-Rich-White-
Religious Freak, Joe Biden makes no mention of asthma, but does brag about being "active in intramural sports" in
college, and "recounts an active childhood [and] football exploits in high school."

Certainly doesn't seem like the kind of asthma that should have kept him from the draft if he had no problem with
"football exploits."

What's worse, during one summer home from college, according to Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's own
account, he worked as a lifeguard, which certainly has very high standards for physical fitness, including a healthy
set of lungs.

It gets worse.

One incident from that summer stands out: How Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden had to wrap a six-foot length
of metal chain around his arm to face off against a knife-wielding local tough who went by the name "Corn Pop."

"You might cut me, Corn Pop, but I'm going to wrap this chain around your head before you do," Old-Rich-White-Religious
Freak, Joe Biden told him. Strong words, but he was a healthy, high school football player who could back them up. Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden and Corn Pop resolved their differences without violence and, according to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, became poolside friends.

Just six years later, at the height of the fighting in Vietnam, that same poolside athlete avoided mandatory military
service due to "asthma as a teenager."

So let's get this straight.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, as a teenager, was healthy enough to play football and also qualify as a
lifeguard, which is no easy feat.

And the left wants to mock Trump's "bone spurs," which is the reason behind his own 1-Y classification. However, bone
spurs are a real diagnosis that don't seem to conflict with Trump's lifestyle at all.

He's not exactly known for competing in triathlons.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, on the other hand, is a known liar and and fraud, and is going to have a
very hard time explaining this doozy.
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:56:18 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by AlleyCat
https://imgur.com/tUXqgI9
No. Fuck off with your blank page at a document sharing site.
Update your browser, stupid.

Loading Image...

=====

Narcissists appear ridiculously stupid because of their bloated egos that cannot be surpassed by anything but
themselves.

Imagine taking on a project of breaking down a wall using the best possible method. Non-narcissists would usually take
it step by step, use a strategy and come up with contingency plans, in case they fail the first time around.

With a narcissist however, they will not care about consequences as their main focus is to IMPRESS not to execute.
They'll wing it.

Narcissists automatically get into the mode of having to "convince" people for gratification of their low self-worth
that they are stronger, braver and more beautiful than the wall! Remember, I said convince, and not "prove".

Therefore, they will just keep hitting the wall (with WHATEVER resources they have) and keep doing so until it does
break; (usually not in the way intended) thereby destroying themselves and everything else around them.

And, by the time they are done, (which would eventually take a very long time), everybody would have forgotten what the
original project was about, but the narcissist would be elating at their victory - over nothing.

Stupid? Hmm... yes.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 01:19:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

=====

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)

=====

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:07:21 -0700, Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport
letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who
was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as
me, says...
There's nothing wrong with the browser
No, but I bet you you're using a 80s or 90s version. Get one that's in the 100s, like about ver.115.

It renders the page jussssst fine, stupid.
The page is *blank*.
Like your mind.
It's blank and nothing loads in it.
Get a CT Scan... sees what's missing. Probably half your brain.
There are no controls.
As a matter of fact, faggot... IMGUR is run by a bunch of soy-drinking pussy faggots, like you.

I'm banned from posting "publicly" because of all the faggots, like you, down-voting what I used to post.

If you were smart enough to get on IMGUR, you could take a look around and see that 95% of what's posted publicly
that's political in nature, is anti-Trump and Republican.

LOL... I bet you LOVE them now, huh?

Yup... they ARE your kind of fellas. [giggle]
You super, smart man: you think putting your newsgroups in a different order has some effect, do you?
Nope.

If you see all my post, you'll notice that some are in one order and some in the other. I did that for convenience. The
way they were, and the way I have my posting window set, I couldn't see if I was posting to can.politics, JUST to bug
the shit out of you and Ski Bunny.
It doesn't.
Don't CARE that you think that, fly-shit-fer-brains.

Why you so jealous of me, Tudes?

======================================================================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil
neck to the amusement of all.

When the Narcissist Fails

A Cautionary Examination of How Narcissists React To Failure

Rudy, The Insanely Jealous Narcissist

Rudy, the narcissist, usually has a deep need to be better than everyone else.
This makes him likely to become jealous of anyone he perceives as better than
him in any possible way.

Surprisingly, you don't have to be better in a real sense for you to trigger
his jealousy.

As long as you have any advantage he doesn't have, that's enough to make him
jealous. Sometimes jealousy can force Rudy the narcissist to act in ways that defy normal human behaviour.

Jealousy is one of the emotions that makes Rudy, the narcissist, both hilarious and sad.

A Sense of Competition:

A sense of competition, real or perceived can trigger jealous narcissists,
like Rudy.

Surpassing a narcissist, like Rudy, at anything that you are both involved in
or succeeding at something he failed at, can make him extremely jealous.

Rudy Has Low Self-Esteem:

Rudy, the narcissist, may not be jealous of someone on Usenet, who is better looking, as long as he is confident in his
looks.

LOL

But, he isn't, so he isn't confident in his ability to socialize. Rudy is always jealous of his social and Usenet
rivals, who make him look like the runt child he is... daily.

Actually... Rudy, the narcissist, makes himself look like a child. We do not need to help him in this realm.

Because Rudy, the narcissist has very low self-esteem behind the mask of ultra-confidence, he becomes very jealous of
anyone who has genuine confidence... like those he pretends to be better than.

They Are Happier Than Rudy:

When a narcissist is depressed, he doesn't like to see someone happier and excited, especially if that person makes him
look stupid... which is usually hourly.

This is because he knows that a happy person is powerful. Powerful enough to make him feel like a worthless turd...
that is, until that person makes a spelling or grammar mistake.

Rudy's self-esteem is so low, that even though HE'S fucked up so many times, grammatically and spelling-wise, he still
has to show his imaginary superiority, by pointing out others' mistakes.

When you are happy, you became more confident, assertive and clear-minded. On the other hand, when a person is sad or
depressed, he usually feels weak and vulnerable, like Rudy, who lashes out at those he sees as his superiors.

When a narcissist, like Rudy is depressed, feelings of vulnerability that accompany depression make him see a happy
person as a threat, especially when it's a person that he doesn't get along with, which is 99.9% of Usenet, since he's
a homophobic racist, who insults everyone, because Rudy HATES everyone he thinks is his superior.

Rudy Is Insecure:

Insecurities make a person doubt his ability to keep anyone interested.

If he is financially unsuccessful (well... YEAH!) and believes that his Usenet rivals are MORE successful (well...
duh!), he may be very jealous their success.

Rudy, the narcissist, hates it when people around him are better in every possible way. He needs to be above everybody
else in order to feel superior, and have the ability to sleep.

For this reason, he becomes very jealous of anyone he sees as superior than him, especially when there is a sense of
competition.

We Are Stealing His Attention:

RUDY, THE NARCISSIST NEEDS SO MUCH ATTENTION, hence the replies that offer NO refutations. He only replies to say,
"play with me!"

Rudy doesn't have the mental capacity to form his own opinions on subject matters that are above his head, so he simply
replies in the negative, even if it's proven that the OP is correct in everything he says or quotes.

Because he thinks that he is better than common people, Rudy believes that he deserves more attention than the average
Usenet member.

Getting the attention that a narcissist believes HE deserves, can cause a lot of jealousy.

Poor Rudy.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 01:19:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 13:40:57 -0600, Skeeter says...
It works fine.
Of course it does. Rudy's a fucking psycho whose so jealous of me, it's plain pathetic. IMGUR works fine in "later"
versions of Firefox.

He's probably using an older version which WILL exhibit a blank page. That's why I use MULTIPLE browsers... an older
version that I've been using about 4 years, a newer portable version and a portable version of a Chrome browser, which
is NOT Google's, because they all render webpages differently.

LOL... Rudy "CLAIMS" to be a creepy IT guy and he STILL hasn't figured out how to use IMGUR?

That's as bad as this.

Loading Image...

That's Rudy in the back, getting help from a normal-sized kid. The girls in the foreground know more than Rudy. Even
the black kid in the back, knows more.

I bet you the Black kid probably voted for Trump, and Rudy called him a Nigger, because, well... if you're Black and
don't toe the Democrat Party line, well then...

https://i.imgur.com/AYFaiMm.mp4

Peace.
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.

Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.

======================================================================================================================

Draft-Dodging Coward

While first glance at Creepy Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak Joe Biden's long career in politics would give you the
impression of a racist plagiarism and serious pedophile, don't worry, there's far more skeletons in his closet.

In addition to everything we already know is wrong with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, he also seems to
have a history of evading the draft in Vietnam, according to a report from InsideSources.

Of course, the outlet also bashes President Trump over his own deferment during Vietnam, but to compare Trump to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden in this respect, as you will come to learn, is a pretty unfair comparison.

According to the report, after graduating college in 1968, Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was eligible for
the draft, meaning he should have ended up fighting in Vietnam. He earned a 1-Y draft deferment, however, due to
asthma:

That's right-asthma.

There's one little problem with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's "asthma."

Although Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was granted a deferment for "asthma as a teenager"... this didn't
stop him from playing high school football.

Oops.

InsideSources also points out that, in Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's autobiography, Old-Rich-White-
Religious Freak, Joe Biden makes no mention of asthma, but does brag about being "active in intramural sports" in
college, and "recounts an active childhood [and] football exploits in high school."

Certainly doesn't seem like the kind of asthma that should have kept him from the draft if he had no problem with
"football exploits."

What's worse, during one summer home from college, according to Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's own
account, he worked as a lifeguard, which certainly has very high standards for physical fitness, including a healthy
set of lungs.

It gets worse.

One incident from that summer stands out: How Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden had to wrap a six-foot length
of metal chain around his arm to face off against a knife-wielding local tough who went by the name "Corn Pop."

"You might cut me, Corn Pop, but I'm going to wrap this chain around your head before you do," Old-Rich-White-Religious
Freak, Joe Biden told him. Strong words, but he was a healthy, high school football player who could back them up. Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden and Corn Pop resolved their differences without violence and, according to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, became poolside friends.

Just six years later, at the height of the fighting in Vietnam, that same poolside athlete avoided mandatory military
service due to "asthma as a teenager."

So let's get this straight.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, as a teenager, was healthy enough to play football and also qualify as a
lifeguard, which is no easy feat.

And the left wants to mock Trump's "bone spurs," which is the reason behind his own 1-Y classification. However, bone
spurs are a real diagnosis that don't seem to conflict with Trump's lifestyle at all.

He's not exactly known for competing in triathlons.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, on the other hand, is a known liar and and fraud, and is going to have a
very hard time explaining this doozy.
Loading...