Discussion:
"I Was Trump?s Ghostwriter. A New Biopic Gets the Most Important Thing Right."
Add Reply
AlleyCat
2024-10-12 00:18:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.

Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.

======================================================================================================================

Draft-Dodging Coward

While first glance at Creepy Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak Joe Biden's long career in politics would give you the
impression of a racist plagiarism and serious pedophile, don't worry, there's far more skeletons in his closet.

In addition to everything we already know is wrong with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, he also seems to
have a history of evading the draft in Vietnam, according to a report from InsideSources.

Of course, the outlet also bashes President Trump over his own deferment during Vietnam, but to compare Trump to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden in this respect, as you will come to learn, is a pretty unfair comparison.

According to the report, after graduating college in 1968, Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was eligible for
the draft, meaning he should have ended up fighting in Vietnam. He earned a 1-Y draft deferment, however, due to
asthma:

That's right-asthma.

There's one little problem with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's "asthma."

Although Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was granted a deferment for "asthma as a teenager"... this didn't
stop him from playing high school football.

Oops.

InsideSources also points out that, in Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's autobiography, Old-Rich-White-
Religious Freak, Joe Biden makes no mention of asthma, but does brag about being "active in intramural sports" in
college, and "recounts an active childhood [and] football exploits in high school."

Certainly doesn't seem like the kind of asthma that should have kept him from the draft if he had no problem with
"football exploits."

What's worse, during one summer home from college, according to Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's own
account, he worked as a lifeguard, which certainly has very high standards for physical fitness, including a healthy
set of lungs.

It gets worse.

One incident from that summer stands out: How Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden had to wrap a six-foot length
of metal chain around his arm to face off against a knife-wielding local tough who went by the name "Corn Pop."

"You might cut me, Corn Pop, but I'm going to wrap this chain around your head before you do," Old-Rich-White-Religious
Freak, Joe Biden told him. Strong words, but he was a healthy, high school football player who could back them up. Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden and Corn Pop resolved their differences without violence and, according to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, became poolside friends.

Just six years later, at the height of the fighting in Vietnam, that same poolside athlete avoided mandatory military
service due to "asthma as a teenager."

So let's get this straight.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, as a teenager, was healthy enough to play football and also qualify as a
lifeguard, which is no easy feat.

And the left wants to mock Trump's "bone spurs," which is the reason behind his own 1-Y classification. However, bone
spurs are a real diagnosis that don't seem to conflict with Trump's lifestyle at all.

He's not exactly known for competing in triathlons.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, on the other hand, is a known liar and and fraud, and is going to have a
very hard time explaining this doozy.
Alan
2024-10-12 21:47:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?

Do you know what "mens rea" means?
Skeeter
2024-10-12 23:12:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Alan
2024-10-12 23:16:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
AlleyCat
2024-10-13 02:01:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.

Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.

"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."

============================================================================

Draft-Dodging Coward

While first glance at Creepy Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak Joe Biden's long career in politics would give you the
impression of a racist plagiarism and serious pedophile, don't worry, there's far more skeletons in his closet.

In addition to everything we already know is wrong with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, he also seems to
have a history of evading the draft in Vietnam, according to a report from InsideSources.

Of course, the outlet also bashes President Trump over his own deferment during Vietnam, but to compare Trump to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden in this respect, as you will come to learn, is a pretty unfair comparison.

According to the report, after graduating college in 1968, Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was eligible for
the draft, meaning he should have ended up fighting in Vietnam. He earned a 1-Y draft deferment, however, due to
asthma:

That's right-asthma.

There's one little problem with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's "asthma."

Although Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was granted a deferment for "asthma as a teenager"... this didn't
stop him from playing high school football.

Oops.

InsideSources also points out that, in Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's autobiography, Old-Rich-White-
Religious Freak, Joe Biden makes no mention of asthma, but does brag about being "active in intramural sports" in
college, and "recounts an active childhood [and] football exploits in high school."

Certainly doesn't seem like the kind of asthma that should have kept him from the draft if he had no problem with
"football exploits."

What's worse, during one summer home from college, according to Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's own
account, he worked as a lifeguard, which certainly has very high standards for physical fitness, including a healthy
set of lungs.

It gets worse.

One incident from that summer stands out: How Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden had to wrap a six-foot length
of metal chain around his arm to face off against a knife-wielding local tough who went by the name "Corn Pop."

"You might cut me, Corn Pop, but I'm going to wrap this chain around your head before you do," Old-Rich-White-Religious
Freak, Joe Biden told him. Strong words, but he was a healthy, high school football player who could back them up. Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden and Corn Pop resolved their differences without violence and, according to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, became poolside friends.

Just six years later, at the height of the fighting in Vietnam, that same poolside athlete avoided mandatory military
service due to "asthma as a teenager."

So let's get this straight.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, as a teenager, was healthy enough to play football and also qualify as a
lifeguard, which is no easy feat.

And the left wants to mock Trump's "bone spurs," which is the reason behind his own 1-Y classification. However, bone
spurs are a real diagnosis that don't seem to conflict with Trump's lifestyle at all.

He's not exactly known for competing in triathlons.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, on the other hand, is a known liar and and fraud, and is going to have a
very hard time explaining this doozy.
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Rudy is the PERFECT liberal.

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:57:47 -0700, Rudy Canoza says... forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a
three sport letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like
me, and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as
many women as me, says...

Whereas *I*:

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)

It's not" bragging" if it upsets Wudy's Wittle World... forever stuck with mommy, now that he's too old and creepy to
work.
Post by Alan
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.

Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.

"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as" Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that" contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Post by Alan
Yes, he did.
No, he didn't.
Yes, he did.
Hur said he didn't.
No, Hur said no such thing.

Why can't Rudy Canoza EVER tell the truth?

======================================================================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil
neck to the amusement of all.

There Are Several Theories For Why Rudy Can't Stop Lying

Rudy's An Undeserved Narcissist

Narcisists are often pathological liars, because they simply don't care about
the truth.

They prefer to tell lies and gain control over people than be honest.

Sometimes, compulsive liars are highly impulsive people who struggle to take
the time to think things through and tell the truth.

Lying doesn't necessarily make you a bad person, but it could be a sign of
something more sinister.

By the age of three or four, we all start to lie. At this point in our brain's
development, we learn that we have an incredibly versatile and powerful tool at
our disposal - our language - and we can use it to actually play with reality
and affect the outcome of what's happening.

Sooner or later we learn that lying is "bad," and we shouldn't really do it.
But if Jim Carey's "Liar Liar" taught us anything, it's that this just isn't
feasible. We all have to lie sometimes.

But some people are pathological liars, meaning they can't stop spreading
misinformation about themselves and others. The psychological reasons for why
some people are this way is a bit of a mystery, but in the third edition of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, pathological lying is a
disorder in its own right, as well as a symptom of personality disorders like
psychopathy and narcissism.

"I think it comes from a defect in the neurological wiring in terms of what
causes us to have compassion and empathy," psychiatrist Judith Orloff, author
of "The Empath's Survival Guide," told Business Insider. "Because narcissists,
sociopaths, and psychopaths have what's called empathy deficient disorder,
meaning they don't feel empathy in the way we would."

The Truth Doesn't Matter to Narcissists

When you don't care about other people, lies don't seem to matter. A lack of
empathy essentially means a lack of conscience, which is a hard concept to
grasp for a lot of people.

"When they lie it doesn't hurt them in the same way it would hurt us," Orloff
said. "So many people get into relationships with pathological liars, or just
can't understand why they're lying, because they're trying to fit these people
into the ordinary standards of what it means to be empathetic."

But they don't fit. In fact, they may not even realize they are lying half the
time, because they're not conscious of it. Orloff said they actually believe
they are telling the truth a lot of the time. It's not so much about the fact
itself, she said, as it is about wanting to have power over somebody.

This is extremely dangerous for highly sensitive people, because they attract
narcissists. Then when they see someone is lying, they try and figure it out,
or blame themselves. Once the lies start, it can end with the victim being
gaslighted, which is essentially when they are told over and over again that
their version of reality is incorrect, and they begin to believe the warped
truth of the abuser.

"The great power of relationships is when you can tell the truth to one
another, and trust each other, and be authentic - and with pathological liars
you can't trust them," Orloff said. "You can't base your life around them. It's
like a moral deficit, and there's no accountability. Someone who is a
pathological liar will not say I'm sorry for doing it. They will say it's your
fault."

The only way to escape the clutches of a pathological liar is to be strong
enough to say "no this is not my fault, this is not ringing true to me, so I
can't really trust you," she said.

Unfortunately, people tend to doubt themselves, because the lies can escalate
subtly. It may start with a small white lie, and a few months later the
victim's life with be a mess of confusion because of the web of tall tales that
has been woven.

"If somebody lies, don't try and make an excuse about it," Orloff said. "A lie
is a lie. And if you bring it up to the person and they say it's your fault, or
no it didn't happen, just know there's something very wrong going on."

Psychologist Linda Blair, an author of many psychology books, told Business
Insider some compulsive liars are simply too impulsive to tell the truth. The
impulsive-reflective scale is ingrained in our genes, and it's very hard for
someone highly impulsive to take the time to think things through, just as it
is a challenge for a reflective person to jump into something head first.

"If you're an impulsive person, it's really hard to break the habit, because
you have this terrible feeling inside you that you have to sort things out
right now," Blair said. "So when it comes to your head, you just say it. That
doesn't mean you necessarily lie, but it's a little harder for you to stop from
lying, more than it is for someone who's more reflective."

Pathological lying and narcissism aren't synonymous, they just sometimes go
hand in hand. In other cases, compulsive liars just might not have the capacity
to stop themselves blurting things out. And Blair said they just need to learn
to control their urges and compulsions. Their lies don't necessarily come from
a bad place.

"I don't think it's something they know how to deal with," she said. "We think
probably it has something to do with actual brain function and the way some
people's brains work, which makes it much harder for them to understand the
effect it will have on other people... We think, but we just don't know yet
for sure."
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Rudy is the PERFECT liberal.

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 09:32:51 -0700, Rudy Canoza... forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three
sport letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me,
and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many
women as me, says...

Whereas *I*:

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)

It's not" bragging" if it upsets Wudy's Wittle World... forever stuck with mommy, now that he's too old and creepy to
work.
Post by Alan
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.

Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.

"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as" Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that" contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Yes, Hur said that Biden didn't steal any documents
He said no such thing.

======================================================================================================================

Rudy, the Compulsive Liar

A compulsive liar excessively lies to fabricate reality. Compulsive liars are those who lie over and over again. The
dishonest behavior is second nature to them, and they may not even realize they're lying half the time (despite
displaying the classic signs of a liar). While compulsively lying isn't classified as a disorder, it can be a sign of
other mental health disorders, such as antisocial personality disorder.

Reasoning: Compulsive liars often make up stories and white lies because they fear criticism. For them, lying is a
defense mechanism to protect them from reality.

How to Deal: Don't engage in a compulsive liar's lies. Instead, state simply, "That's not true," and walk away.
The terms "compulsive" and "habitual" are often used interchangeably.



Rudy, the Pathological Liar

A pathological liar is persistently dishonest for no reason. These liars tell small lies compulsively and habitually-it
comes naturally to them. More often than not, their reality becomes tangled with their lies, mixing fact and fiction.
Perhaps they exaggerate a story or don't tell the truth about what they had for breakfast. A pathological liar can have
such a strong belief in their lies that they believe them to be true.

Reasoning: Pathological liars tend to have low self-esteem and will often lie to boost their ego, seek sympathy, or
cure boredom.

How to Deal: Stop engaging in the conversation if you notice that they're lying. Pathological liars want you to believe
what they believe, and if you don't indulge in the lie, they'll likely move on.

Like compulsive liars, pathological lying may be a sign of a personality or mental-health disorder; however, it's more
difficult to spot a pathological liar.



Rudy, the Sociopathic Liar

A sociopathic liar lies on a routine basis to cause chaos. Their lying doesn't start or end on occasion; it's constant.
Unlike other types of liars, a sociopath lies simply because they want to. There's no rhyme or reason to it, and they
rarely feel remorse for their actions.

Reasoning: Sociopathic liars lie to gratify their own needs. They want what they want and won't hesitate to burn a few
bridges to get it.

How to Deal: Be honest with a sociopathic liar to derail their schemes. Call out their blatant lie with facts you know
to be true with something like, "Really? See, I heard something different."

Sociopathic and psychopathic lying are generally the same thing, with the only difference being the personality
disorder associated with their dishonesty.



Rudy, the Narcissistic Liar

A narcissistic liar seeks attention but denies responsibility. These types of liars use gaslighting to fuel their lies.
They may appear to be a "people person," but their social connections often stem from exaggerations and lies. A
narcissist's lies may seem childish, as their lies are a people-pleasing game.

Reasoning: Narcissistic liars twist the truth to hide themselves. Deep down, they're insecure and will do whatever it
takes not to be vulnerable.

How to Deal: Don't engage in a narcissistic liar's drama. Instead, take what they say with a grain of salt and analyze
the facts. If what they say contradicts what you know, it's probably a lie.
Narcissistic liars are a type of compulsive liar; however, they appear to be a hero or victim when fabricating their
reality.



Rudy, the Intentional Liar

An intentional liar lies for enjoyment. These types of liars love the drama lying creates. They think lying is fun-an
entertaining game they can play whenever they like. More often than not, their white lies, fibs, and exaggerations are
mean-spirited and intended to stir the pot or push someone's buttons.
Reasoning: Intentional liars are deceptive for attention. They're likely insecure and lie to boost their ego and appear
powerful.

How to Deal: Avoid engaging in lies and gossip with an intentional liar. The more you react to their lies, the more
lies they'll create.

Unlike pathological liars, intentional liars are fully aware of the dishonest web they weave.



Rudy, the Careless Liar

A careless liar doesn't care about the implications of lying. This type of liar is often sloppy or careless when it
comes to bending the truth. They likely won't try to hide it or put much thought into forming the "perfect lie."
Instead, they'll spew whatever comes to mind, often leading to further lies or conversational hiccups.

Reasoning: Careless liars typically lie on the spot to cover up a mistake, fear, or insecurity. The lie hastily comes
out to protect themselves from facing the truth.

How to Deal: Call a careless liar out on their lie to halt them in their tracks. They know they're lying, and
confronting them and genuinely asking how they're doing may help them admit it.
A careless liar's lies are usually easy to spot because they don't formulate a clever story or tale beforehand.



Rudy, the Impressive Liar

An impressive liar aims to be the best. This type of liar wants to be the most impressive of the group. They'll
exaggerate stories and tell white lies to look like the hero. For instance, the classic "I caught a fish this big" tale
is often told by an impressive liar.

Reasoning: Impressive liars want to feel self-assured and liked by others and often lie to hide insecurities or
embarrassment.

How to Deal: Let an impressive liar's lie roll off you. If something sounds too good to be true, say, "Yeah, sure," and
walk away or change the topic.

An impressive liar doesn't lie to be malicious or mean-spirited. They lie to fabricate the truth to match their wild
version of reality.



Rudy, the Encouraging Liar

An Encouraging liar lies to welcome conflict. Encouraging liars lie to scheme, manipulate, or intentionally harm; they
lie to keep the argument going. Conflict is their best case scenario, and these liars often dance around the truth to
court confrontation.

Reasoning: Encouraging liars are likely dishonest to further confrontation.

How to Deal: Don't let an Encouraging liar drag you away from an important conversation.

Encouraging liars usually lie every day; however, the more they lie, the easier it'll become and the more often they'll
do it.
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Rudy is the PERFECT liberal.

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:20:55 -0700, Rudy Canoza... forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three
sport letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me,
and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many
women as me, says...

Whereas *I*:

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)
He was.
No, he wasn't.
He was ? and is ? the incumbent president.
He wasn't President in 2017, stupid.

"... BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017..."

"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: BIDEN'S CLAIM THAT NONE OF THE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FOUND IN HIS POSSESSION WAS HIGHLY CLASSIFIED IS
FALSE, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."



=======================================================================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil
neck to the amusement of all.

THIS is why Rudy is Rudy:

When Dad Isn't There

Research has found that when a father is not present it is likely:

The infant was born pre-term or low birth weight or with dwarfism.

Many of these families will be low-income households.

Children may struggle with regulating emotions which can lead to an increase in aggressive behavior and
difficulty with social skills. Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding!

A child will become involved in risky behavior.

Sons have the potential to struggle with gender identity and role confusion.

Even if the biological father role is filled by another, some of these figures become temporary or have the
potential of being abusive.

Children will be left with feelings of blame or emptiness as to why their father left.

Where Did He Go?

What is the reason these fathers are not staying around? Though simply having children can suggest being a father, for
many men there is more a father wants to provide for their family. Unemployment and lack of education can be
contributing factors as to why fathers leave.5 When men feel they are not meeting the social demands that define
fathers, the idea of achieving other fatherly roles decreases and it may seem easier to leave. Other reasons for father
absence can include imprisonment, infidelity, and abuse.

How to Help Children of Absent Fathers

Though the negative consequences of father absence can be disheartening, there is still hope for these children.

Include positive extended male family figures in the child's life. Children can form strong relationships as they have
a safe, stable male figure to rely upon as they grow up. This could come from a grandparent, uncle, or another positive
male family member. When these men are present for monumental moments in life, as well as day-to-day interactions, a
void can be filled, and the child's confidence can grow.4 Including extended family can also provide another resource
for the mother to help reduce stress overload and feelings of loneliness.

If there is no male family member available or near to help, try finding a mentor in the community. When a child is
able to spend time with a successful individual in their community, different doors of potential are opened to them to
see ways that they can become successful.8 Examples of mentors could be coaches, teachers, after school staff,
ecclesiastical leaders, etc.

Find support groups in the local area. Just like children can find mentors, single mothers can find others working
through these difficulties. There truly is strength in numbers. Brainstorm, network, and help each other. Though the
past may not change, the future trajectory can be a positive one. Make time for you.

Growing up without a father brings risks, but that does not determine you or your child's future. Fatherless families
can become resilient in their circumstance. Let those who your child will be interacting with know of their struggles.
Teachers, caretakers, and other community figures can help alleviate the difficulties your child may face. But they
cannot help if they are not aware. Remember, there is hope for brighter tomorrows. There are fathers who chose to stay
in their child's life after growing up without their father. You do not have to let the absentee determine what your
family will become. For stories of hope please visit the references below.
Alan
2024-10-14 17:35:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.

You should read the entire report.
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
But do you stick to your story that it wasn't theft when Trump:

Deliberately took documents.

And denied he had them?
Skeeter
2024-10-14 17:40:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
Alan
2024-10-14 17:51:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
Oh, you poor little Chicken:

'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.

Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
Skeeter
2024-10-14 17:53:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
Alan
2024-10-14 17:54:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
Nope:

'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'

All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
Skeeter
2024-10-14 19:32:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?

Who is Mr. Eiden?
Alan
2024-10-15 01:37:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.

There's the source I used:

<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>

And here's a screenshot of the page:

<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>

Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.

But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 12:32:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
Alan
2024-10-15 16:13:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...

...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.

<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>

<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>

See the text there?

'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'

<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>

You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!

How will I live with myself?!?
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:20:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
Alan
2024-10-15 16:40:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
He said the evidence wouldn't prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Over and over and over...

Page 1:

'However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the
evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'

Page 4:

'Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors
would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons.'

'Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges.'

Page 200:

'But the evidence falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.'

Page 203:

'Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we believe this evidence 1s not
strong enough to establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'

Page 204:

'THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION
OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'

Page 220:

'There is also insufficient evidence that Mr. Biden willfully retained
the handwritten Thanksgiving memo'

Page 227:

'We conclude that this evidence does notestablish Mr. Biden's guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt.'

Page 232:

'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully retained the notebooks'

Page 242:

'We also believe some of the same evidence that supports reasonable
doubt for the classified Afghanistan documents also supports reasonable
doubt for the notebooks, including Mr. Biden's cooperation with the
investigation'

'Finally, the two main sets of evidence summarized above, suggesting Mr.
Biden knew he was not allowed to keep classified notebooks, do not
suffice to prove his willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt.'

Page 244:

'For these reasons, we do not believe the government could prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that Mr. B1den knew it was unlawful to retain his
notebooks at his home after the vice presidency.'

'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully disclosed national defense information in the notebooks to his
ghostwriter'

'But we do not believe the evidence supports charges of willful
disclosure beyond a reasonable doubt.'

Page 247:

'But the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
intended to share classified information.'

Page 304:

'Insufficient evidence exists to prove Mr. Biden willfully retained the
classified information in the EYES ONLY envelope

There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents in the EYES
ONLY envelope after his term as vice president or caused his staff to do
so.'

Page 311:

'Nonetheless, there is reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden willfully
retained documents A9 and A10.'
Skeeter
2024-10-15 17:04:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
He said the evidence wouldn't prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Over and over and over...
Then why was a trial even brought up?
Post by Alan
'However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the
evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors
would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons.'
'Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges.'
'But the evidence falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.'
'Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we believe this evidence 1s not
strong enough to establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION
OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'
'There is also insufficient evidence that Mr. Biden willfully retained
the handwritten Thanksgiving memo'
'We conclude that this evidence does notestablish Mr. Biden's guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully retained the notebooks'
'We also believe some of the same evidence that supports reasonable
doubt for the classified Afghanistan documents also supports reasonable
doubt for the notebooks, including Mr. Biden's cooperation with the
investigation'
'Finally, the two main sets of evidence summarized above, suggesting Mr.
Biden knew he was not allowed to keep classified notebooks, do not
suffice to prove his willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'For these reasons, we do not believe the government could prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that Mr. B1den knew it was unlawful to retain his
notebooks at his home after the vice presidency.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully disclosed national defense information in the notebooks to his
ghostwriter'
'But we do not believe the evidence supports charges of willful
disclosure beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'But the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
intended to share classified information.'
'Insufficient evidence exists to prove Mr. Biden willfully retained the
classified information in the EYES ONLY envelope
There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents in the EYES
ONLY envelope after his term as vice president or caused his staff to do
so.'
'Nonetheless, there is reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden willfully
retained documents A9 and A10.'
Look what I made you do...LOL
Alan
2024-10-15 17:11:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
He said the evidence wouldn't prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Over and over and over...
Then why was a trial even brought up?
Post by Alan
'However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the
evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors
would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons.'
'Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges.'
'But the evidence falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.'
'Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we believe this evidence 1s not
strong enough to establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION
OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'
'There is also insufficient evidence that Mr. Biden willfully retained
the handwritten Thanksgiving memo'
'We conclude that this evidence does notestablish Mr. Biden's guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully retained the notebooks'
'We also believe some of the same evidence that supports reasonable
doubt for the classified Afghanistan documents also supports reasonable
doubt for the notebooks, including Mr. Biden's cooperation with the
investigation'
'Finally, the two main sets of evidence summarized above, suggesting Mr.
Biden knew he was not allowed to keep classified notebooks, do not
suffice to prove his willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'For these reasons, we do not believe the government could prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that Mr. B1den knew it was unlawful to retain his
notebooks at his home after the vice presidency.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully disclosed national defense information in the notebooks to his
ghostwriter'
'But we do not believe the evidence supports charges of willful
disclosure beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'But the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
intended to share classified information.'
'Insufficient evidence exists to prove Mr. Biden willfully retained the
classified information in the EYES ONLY envelope
There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents in the EYES
ONLY envelope after his term as vice president or caused his staff to do
so.'
'Nonetheless, there is reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden willfully
retained documents A9 and A10.'
Look what I made you do...LOL
It was easy and fun.

I don't mind rubbing your nose in it that a Republican special
prosecutor concluded that Biden wasn't guilty.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 18:20:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
He said the evidence wouldn't prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Over and over and over...
Then why was a trial even brought up?
Post by Alan
'However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the
evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors
would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons.'
'Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges.'
'But the evidence falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.'
'Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we believe this evidence 1s not
strong enough to establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION
OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'
'There is also insufficient evidence that Mr. Biden willfully retained
the handwritten Thanksgiving memo'
'We conclude that this evidence does notestablish Mr. Biden's guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully retained the notebooks'
'We also believe some of the same evidence that supports reasonable
doubt for the classified Afghanistan documents also supports reasonable
doubt for the notebooks, including Mr. Biden's cooperation with the
investigation'
'Finally, the two main sets of evidence summarized above, suggesting Mr.
Biden knew he was not allowed to keep classified notebooks, do not
suffice to prove his willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'For these reasons, we do not believe the government could prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that Mr. B1den knew it was unlawful to retain his
notebooks at his home after the vice presidency.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully disclosed national defense information in the notebooks to his
ghostwriter'
'But we do not believe the evidence supports charges of willful
disclosure beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'But the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
intended to share classified information.'
'Insufficient evidence exists to prove Mr. Biden willfully retained the
classified information in the EYES ONLY envelope
There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents in the EYES
ONLY envelope after his term as vice president or caused his staff to do
so.'
'Nonetheless, there is reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden willfully
retained documents A9 and A10.'
Look what I made you do...LOL
It was easy and fun.
You Kanadians are easily amused.
Post by Alan
I don't mind rubbing your nose in it that a Republican special
prosecutor concluded that Biden wasn't guilty.
He didn't and you rubbed nothing You went to work because of me and I
didn't even read it.
Alan
2024-10-15 22:05:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
Yes, he did.
Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
stand trial. WTF is that?
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
A traitorous act.
CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
Deliberately took documents.
And denied he had them?
Nope.
'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
present serious aggravating facts.
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
the investigation.'
So? Biden was just as guilty.
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".
and you buy that fucking story?
It's Robert Hur's account of the events, Chicken.
The same guy that gave Joe a free pass?
The Republican attack dog agrees that Biden probably took the documents
inadvertently when he left office...
How do you "inadvertently" take classified documents? Not to
responsible.
Post by Alan
...and that Trump took documents deliberately.
So?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Who is Mr. Eiden?
An error in the OCR software.
You need that to type a word?
That's the form of the document from which I copied and pasted, doofus.
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u8P0DSw5s5jinA1CRdd4eqoy2ABXazY_/view?usp=sharing>
See the text there?
Not bothering to look. After you started snipping I stop being serious.
Post by Alan
'PDF Producer: Adobe Acrobat Pro (32-bit) 23 Paper Capture Plug-in'
<http://users.wfu.edu/yipcw/atg/adobe/acrobat/adobe-acrobat-paper-capture.htm>
You retype paragraphs and paragraphs, do you?
Not at all. Why do you ask?
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jp2UQlLcebUqwRP9UrbTZkqaNZbPiVUG/view?usp=share_link>
Notice that the text it shows is "Biden" in that sentence.
So you fucked up.
I didn't notice that it OCR'ed a "B" as an "E"!
How will I live with myself?!?
By not being stupid.
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
But it's a PDF with an image of the text in one layer and the OCR result
in a layer beneath so you can copy and paste the text.
What does that have to do with Joe getting a pass for taking documents?
It lays out exactly why Hur (Republican loyalist) didn't recommend charges.
Why didn't he?
He said the evidence wouldn't prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Over and over and over...
Then why was a trial even brought up?
Post by Alan
'However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the
evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'Nevertheless, we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors
would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons.'
'Several defenses are likely to create reasonable doubt as to such charges.'
'But the evidence falls short of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.'
'Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we believe this evidence 1s not
strong enough to establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'THE EVIDENCE FALLS SHORT OF ESTABLISHING MR. BIDEN'S WILLFUL RETENTION
OF THE CLASSIFIED AFGHANISTAN DOCUMENTS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT'
'There is also insufficient evidence that Mr. Biden willfully retained
the handwritten Thanksgiving memo'
'We conclude that this evidence does notestablish Mr. Biden's guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully retained the notebooks'
'We also believe some of the same evidence that supports reasonable
doubt for the classified Afghanistan documents also supports reasonable
doubt for the notebooks, including Mr. Biden's cooperation with the
investigation'
'Finally, the two main sets of evidence summarized above, suggesting Mr.
Biden knew he was not allowed to keep classified notebooks, do not
suffice to prove his willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'For these reasons, we do not believe the government could prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that Mr. B1den knew it was unlawful to retain his
notebooks at his home after the vice presidency.'
'The evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden
willfully disclosed national defense information in the notebooks to his
ghostwriter'
'But we do not believe the evidence supports charges of willful
disclosure beyond a reasonable doubt.'
'But the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
intended to share classified information.'
'Insufficient evidence exists to prove Mr. Biden willfully retained the
classified information in the EYES ONLY envelope
There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
Mr. Biden intentionally retained the classified documents in the EYES
ONLY envelope after his term as vice president or caused his staff to do
so.'
'Nonetheless, there is reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden willfully
retained documents A9 and A10.'
Look what I made you do...LOL
It was easy and fun.
You Kanadians are easily amused.
Post by Alan
I don't mind rubbing your nose in it that a Republican special
prosecutor concluded that Biden wasn't guilty.
He didn't and you rubbed nothing You went to work because of me and I
didn't even read it.
LOL
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?

Loading Image...

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/biden-classified-documents-report-02-08-24/index.html

============================================================================

Alan's Low Self Esteem FORCES Him To Reply, Even When There's NOTHING To Reply TO

This Is Why Alan Can't Admit He's Wrong

They say it takes a big person to admit their mistakes, but for Alan, saying he's wrong feels impossible.

But why does Alan do it? We've asked psychologist Dr. Tim Sharp, chief happiness officer at The Happiness Institute, to
explain:

They think being wrong means they're unworthy - Yup... Low-Self-Esteem

For Alan, conceding that he's fallible can evoke a deep psychological anxiety regarding "the risks or the consequences
associated with loss or failure," says Sharp.

"I think the reason Alan can't apologize isn't actually because he doesn't like to be wrong, but because it's seen as
an inherent character fault," he explains.

Sharp says that for non-apologists, the irrational need to always be "perfect" rules their ego and they feel their
screw-ups are unforgivable.

"The difficulty in admitting failure largely comes from the unrealistic expectation that 'I should get it right all the
time, or not even try or make it seem as if I am'" he says.

Alan Thinks Never Admitting Fault Makes Him Look Stronger

For Alan, appearing wrong is congruent to appearing weak, but Sharp says they could not be more wrong, because a good
leader admits their mistakes.

"There's some actually very interesting research that leaders who express vulnerability and are more open to being
fallible tend to be more highly regarded," the expert explains.

"This makes sense because if someone is saying, 'I'm 100 percent perfect, I'm 100 percent right all the time,' that's
pretty hard to believe," says the psychologist.

(But, THAT'S Ski Bunny)

"I'd find it hard to trust that person because there's no one I know 100 percent perfect.

Whereas if Alan would say, 'You know, I'm going to do my best but I'll make mistakes sometimes, I'll get it wrong, I'm
sorry but I'll try to fix it,'... to me, that's more believable. I'd be more trusting of that sort of person."

They Don't Value The Truth

(NO liberal does... THAT'S their M.O.)

For Alan, the fact is he "doesn't necessarily value truth and honesty," says Sharp.

"While I personally value truth and honesty, what I've come to learn, which I find hard to understand but it's just a
reality, is that Alan doesn't value those things as highly as me," says Sharp.

Taking political discussion as an example, the expert says Alan, who eats up "fake news" propaganda, doesn't value
facts. When it comes to the truth, the expert warns that Alan "will literally say, 'I don't really care.'"

"Alan doesn't care about it because he values other aspects of what they're perceiving much more," he says.

Citing the upsurge of alt-left political movements around the world, Sharp says how Alan approaches a situation will
often reveal whether facts or feelings will influence them more.

"[Logical people] will look for facts and information and data and make their decisions accordingly," he explains.
"Other people make their decisions based on much more emotion. Now the problem comes when you try to talk logic to an
emotional person because it just won't wear... you're talking different languages.
Alan
2024-10-15 16:16:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?

For instance:

Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.

But he wasn't lying.

He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.

In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.

:-)
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:24:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Post by Alan
:-)
Alan
2024-10-15 16:41:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 17:04:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
Alan
2024-10-15 17:11:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?

Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Skeeter
2024-10-15 18:20:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?
Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
Alan
2024-10-15 22:06:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?
Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
When it comes to politically motivate hearings, it most certainly matters.

Benghazi: remember that?
Skeeter
2024-10-15 23:02:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?
Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
When it comes to politically motivate hearings, it most certainly matters.
Benghazi: remember that?
Yea, when cunt Hillary said "at this point what does it matter" Yea I
remember.
Alan
2024-10-15 23:15:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
So... CNN is lying?
You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
Pussey?
Name calling?
Post by Alan
Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
But he wasn't lying.
He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
that's what he based his tweet on.
In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
wrong.
If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
Hur told them there was nothing there.
Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
How so?
Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
When it comes to politically motivate hearings, it most certainly matters.
Benghazi: remember that?
Yea, when cunt Hillary said "at this point what does it matter" Yea I
remember.
Really? Got a cite for that?

I'm betting not.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
False.
You should read the entire report.
So... that's CNN lying?

The special counsel report found that Biden willfully retained classified information, including top secret documents,
and knew he was in possession of some documents as far back as 2017, and shared some of that information with the
ghostwriter of his 2017 memoir. - CNN

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/biden-classified-documents-report-02-08-24/index.html

https://i.imgur.com/Unzl7vu.png

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
Skeeter
2024-10-13 12:30:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
Alan
2024-10-13 18:11:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
Hur's report addressed that:

'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Skeeter
2024-10-13 22:57:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Alan
2024-10-13 23:08:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."

...was just proven false.

Just accept it.
Skeeter
2024-10-14 00:38:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:38:09 -0600, Skeeter says...
Post by Skeeter
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
They claimed he was too senile, forgetful and demented, but didn't use that language.

And they used that as an excuse to implement a Coup d'état and push Biden out.

They did the EXACT thing I begged Republicans to stop doing... trying to impeach Biden and take him out of power,
because that meant that Harris would take over and fuck things up even more.

Every time Republicans spoke of impeachment, I cringed until I was shaking and wishing I had a one-way ticket to
Poland.

======================================================================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
Alan
2024-10-14 17:35:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
In Robert Hur's report, which I just quoted:

'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Skeeter
2024-10-14 17:41:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.

Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
Alan
2024-10-14 17:51:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?

This was a report.
Skeeter
2024-10-14 19:31:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
Alan
2024-10-15 01:39:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...

...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".

And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 12:34:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...
...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".
And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Why even a hearing if everything was on the up and up?
Alan
2024-10-15 16:17:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...
...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".
And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Why even a hearing if everything was on the up and up?
Because Republicans were in charge and wanted to stir up controversy.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:24:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...
...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".
And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Why even a hearing if everything was on the up and up?
Because Republicans were in charge and wanted to stir up controversy.
Bullshit. Who told you that load?
Alan
2024-10-15 16:27:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...
...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".
And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Why even a hearing if everything was on the up and up?
Because Republicans were in charge and wanted to stir up controversy.
Bullshit. Who told you that load?
LOL!
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:55:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Post by Skeeter
Stop defending the crooked left. Why the hearing if it was all legit?
What hearing, Chicken?
This was a report.
You need to pay closer attention to what's going on. Why were they going
to have a trial but said he was to feeble to go to trial?
They weren't going to have a trial...
...because Hur cited numerous issues that raised "reasonable doubt".
And a hearing isn't necessarily a trial.
Why even a hearing if everything was on the up and up?
Because Republicans were in charge and wanted to stir up controversy.
Bullshit. Who told you that load?
LOL!
and away he runs.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.

I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.

I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
Lil dwarf Rudey
2024-10-15 15:18:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
This entire sentence is a lie.
Read it again, little man Ball...you are no more than a failed solar
city installer and Suckramento bungalow trash...

Explain why are you death threat prosecution exempt by the Feds so far?

And after _so many_ public death threats you issued on Trump and Vance...

Let's do our best to change that, shall we:


Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party/Alan Bond/Henry Bodkin/Malte
Runz and a few dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$***@fx11.ams4> <***@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400


Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <***@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$***@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$***@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$***@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-***@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$***@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$***@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$***@dont-email.me>
<***@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$***@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.


https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.


Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california


Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's usenet terrorism here?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan
2024-10-15 16:18:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
where it says that:

<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:25:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
Alan
2024-10-15 16:26:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...

...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...

...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:55:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
I'm not talking about Trump. Why did Joe have documents he wasn't
supposed to have?
Alan
2024-10-15 17:12:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
I'm not talking about Trump. Why did Joe have documents he wasn't
supposed to have?
The Hur report outlines that in great detail.

Why don't you read it. The link is just a few lines above.

:-)
Skeeter
2024-10-15 18:21:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
I'm not talking about Trump. Why did Joe have documents he wasn't
supposed to have?
The Hur report outlines that in great detail.
Why don't you read it. The link is just a few lines above.
:-)
Why don't you just answer?
Alan
2024-10-15 22:06:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
I'm not talking about Trump. Why did Joe have documents he wasn't
supposed to have?
The Hur report outlines that in great detail.
Why don't you read it. The link is just a few lines above.
:-)
Why don't you just answer?
I've already answered it more than either you or your fellow cultists
ever answer any of my questions.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 23:02:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
The report literally says the opposite.
Skeeter's correct.
I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He is guilty and got away with it.
That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
I'm not talking about Trump. Why did Joe have documents he wasn't
supposed to have?
The Hur report outlines that in great detail.
Why don't you read it. The link is just a few lines above.
:-)
Why don't you just answer?
I've already answered it more than either you or your fellow cultists
ever answer any of my questions.
and away he runs.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Not ALL of those that were found.

There were some that he was NOT supposed to have stolen when he was NOT the President OR Vice President.

=========================================================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
Alan
2024-10-15 16:19:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Not ALL of those that were found.
There were some that he was NOT supposed to have stolen when he was NOT the President OR Vice President.
Leaving aside the gibberish of that sentence for a moment, why don't you
quote it from the source:

<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:25:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Not ALL of those that were found.
There were some that he was NOT supposed to have stolen when he was NOT the President OR Vice President.
Leaving aside the gibberish of that sentence for a moment, why don't you
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He was right.
Alan
2024-10-15 16:27:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Not ALL of those that were found.
There were some that he was NOT supposed to have stolen when he was NOT the President OR Vice President.
Leaving aside the gibberish of that sentence for a moment, why don't you
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He was right.
Who was right, doofus?

Learn to communicate clearly, would you?
Skeeter
2024-10-15 16:56:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:56 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
Do you know what "mens rea" means?
BUTWHATABOUT
Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
and they wanted him to stand trial but said he was to old and shit. Why
would there even be a trial?
Your claim that "He wasn't even president when he took them which is
illegal."
...was just proven false.
Just accept it.
Where was it proven false? He took them. They were going to even have a
trial and decided he was to frail to stand trial.
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Not ALL of those that were found.
There were some that he was NOT supposed to have stolen when he was NOT the President OR Vice President.
Leaving aside the gibberish of that sentence for a moment, why don't you
<https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
He was right.
Who was right, doofus?
Learn to communicate clearly, would you?
OK chicken.
Lil dwarf Rudey
2024-10-15 16:27:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
[*all* of shitbag's gratuitous bullshit crossposts removed]
Read it again, scumbag little man Jonathan D Ball...you are no more than
a failed solar city installer and Suckramento bungalow trash pretending
to be Phil Hendrie, but giving blow jobs at the TA glory Hole and
ducking fights at the Jolly Kone like you always do...you gutless troll.

Explain why are you death threat prosecution exempt by the Feds so far?

And after _so many_ public death threats you issued on Trump and Vance...

Let's do our best to change that, shall we:


Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party/Alan Bond/Henry Bodkin/Malte
Runz/Paul S Perso and a few dozen or even more other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$***@fx11.ams4> <***@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400


Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <***@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$***@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$***@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$***@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-***@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$***@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$***@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$***@dont-email.me>
<***@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$***@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.


https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.


Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california


Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's usenet terrorism here?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:11:04 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.

"... BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017..."

"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: BIDEN'S CLAIM THAT NONE OF THE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FOUND IN HIS POSSESSION WAS HIGHLY CLASSIFIED IS
FALSE, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."

============================================================================

Alan's Low Self Esteem FORCES Him To Reply, Even When There's NOTHING To Reply TO

This Is Why Alan Can't Admit He's Wrong

They say it takes a big person to admit their mistakes, but for Alan, saying he's wrong feels impossible.

But why does Alan do it? We've asked psychologist Dr. Tim Sharp, chief happiness officer at The Happiness Institute, to
explain:

They think being wrong means they're unworthy - Yup... Low-Self-Esteem

For Alan, conceding that he's fallible can evoke a deep psychological anxiety regarding "the risks or the consequences
associated with loss or failure," says Sharp.

"I think the reason Alan can't apologize isn't actually because he doesn't like to be wrong, but because it's seen as
an inherent character fault," he explains.

Sharp says that for non-apologists, the irrational need to always be "perfect" rules their ego and they feel their
screw-ups are unforgivable.

"The difficulty in admitting failure largely comes from the unrealistic expectation that 'I should get it right all the
time, or not even try or make it seem as if I am'" he says.

Alan Thinks Never Admitting Fault Makes Him Look Stronger

For Alan, appearing wrong is congruent to appearing weak, but Sharp says they could not be more wrong, because a good
leader admits their mistakes.

"There's some actually very interesting research that leaders who express vulnerability and are more open to being
fallible tend to be more highly regarded," the expert explains.

"This makes sense because if someone is saying, 'I'm 100 percent perfect, I'm 100 percent right all the time,' that's
pretty hard to believe," says the psychologist.

(But, THAT'S Ski Bunny)

"I'd find it hard to trust that person because there's no one I know 100 percent perfect.

Whereas if Alan would say, 'You know, I'm going to do my best but I'll make mistakes sometimes, I'll get it wrong, I'm
sorry but I'll try to fix it,'... to me, that's more believable. I'd be more trusting of that sort of person."

They Don't Value The Truth

(NO liberal does... THAT'S their M.O.)

For Alan, the fact is he "doesn't necessarily value truth and honesty," says Sharp.

"While I personally value truth and honesty, what I've come to learn, which I find hard to understand but it's just a
reality, is that Alan doesn't value those things as highly as me," says Sharp.

Taking political discussion as an example, the expert says Alan, who eats up "fake news" propaganda, doesn't value
facts. When it comes to the truth, the expert warns that Alan "will literally say, 'I don't really care.'"

"Alan doesn't care about it because he values other aspects of what they're perceiving much more," he says.

Citing the upsurge of alt-left political movements around the world, Sharp says how Alan approaches a situation will
often reveal whether facts or feelings will influence them more.

"[Logical people] will look for facts and information and data and make their decisions accordingly," he explains.
"Other people make their decisions based on much more emotion. Now the problem comes when you try to talk logic to an
emotional person because it just won't wear... you're talking different languages.
Alan
2024-10-14 17:36:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:11:04 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
So explain the ones found in his garage. He wasn't even president when
he took them which is illegal.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...

"then"

That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).

He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.

Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.

You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)

THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
Loading Image...

What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?

A civilian.

He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.

Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
Alan
2024-10-15 16:42:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.

But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Skeeter
2024-10-15 17:05:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Alan
2024-10-15 17:08:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 17:32:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
Alan
2024-10-15 17:36:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.

We dealt this this already.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 18:23:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.
We dealt this this already.
A VP was not allowed to take them. He didn't even know he had them
remember? What a load of shit. What were they doing in a garage? Are you
going to tell me he put a box of papers in the garage without knowing
what was in the box? I know he's stupid but damn.
Alan
2024-10-15 22:15:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.
We dealt this this already.
A VP was not allowed to take them.
Robert Hur's report disagrees:

'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'


Read that last part again:

'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Post by Skeeter
He didn't even know he had them
remember? What a load of shit.'
Some of them were taken home when he was in office and didn't get
returned, some got mixed in with his personal things when others were
packing up his office after his term.

The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
Post by Skeeter
What were they doing in a garage? Are you
going to tell me he put a box of papers in the garage without knowing
what was in the box? I know he's stupid but damn.
It wasn't a box of just classified documents, doofus. It was classified
documents mixed in with other documents and papers.

You don't think that Biden did the moving of his personal papers out of
the VP's office on his own, do you?


The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
Skeeter
2024-10-15 23:04:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.
We dealt this this already.
A VP was not allowed to take them.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Post by Skeeter
He didn't even know he had them
remember? What a load of shit.'
Some of them were taken home when he was in office and didn't get
returned, some got mixed in with his personal things when others were
packing up his office after his term.
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
Post by Skeeter
What were they doing in a garage? Are you
going to tell me he put a box of papers in the garage without knowing
what was in the box? I know he's stupid but damn.
It wasn't a box of just classified documents, doofus. It was classified
documents mixed in with other documents and papers.
You don't think that Biden did the moving of his personal papers out of
the VP's office on his own, do you?
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
So "others" were allowed to handle and pack up classified docs? The
moving crew had access to them? Then his crackhead son could read them
in the garage. How responsible is that?
Alan
2024-10-15 23:20:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by Skeeter
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:47 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
That were amassed and kept when he was not. He has ZERO authority to have them, when he was neither VP OR President.
One word will help you out, that I left out...
"then"
That were amassed (before Trump's administration) and THEN kept when he was not (President). He has ZERO authority to
have them, when he was neither VP OR President (BECAUSE he was neither from 2017 - 2021).
He was supposed to have handed them over when he was neither VP or President.
Yes, AS either, he could have held SOME of them, but not all, and NONE of them when he was neither.
You can't hold onto those kinds of documents, when you are a civilian... same as Trump. Joe Biden had NO authority to
have ANY kind of Top Secret or classified documents, when he was not VP or President. (2017 - 2021)
THAT'S the law, moron.
Post by Alan
How did he AMASS them when he was out of office, Pussey?
https://i.imgur.com/onj03oo.png
What was Joe Biden in 2017 to 2021?
A civilian.
He did NOT have the authority to have ANY documents from 2017 to 2021.
Get it now, Ski Bunny liberal?
I get that fine, Pussey.
Name calling? Hypocrite.
Post by Alan
But if that applies to Biden, how does it NOT apply to Trump?
Trump was president. Biden wasn't. Idiot.
Trump wasn't president when he was keeping classified documents in
Mar-a-Lago, doofus.
He was when he took them. Stop playing spin games.
And Biden was a VP when he took those documents home, doofus.
We dealt this this already.
A VP was not allowed to take them.
'Both when he served as vice president and when the Afghanistan
documents were found in Mr. Biden's Delaware garage in 2022, his
possession of them in his Delaware home was not a basis for prosecution
because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
'because as vice president and president, he had authority to keep
classified documents in his home.'
Post by Skeeter
He didn't even know he had them
remember? What a load of shit.'
Some of them were taken home when he was in office and didn't get
returned, some got mixed in with his personal things when others were
packing up his office after his term.
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
Post by Skeeter
What were they doing in a garage? Are you
going to tell me he put a box of papers in the garage without knowing
what was in the box? I know he's stupid but damn.
It wasn't a box of just classified documents, doofus. It was classified
documents mixed in with other documents and papers.
You don't think that Biden did the moving of his personal papers out of
the VP's office on his own, do you?
The report deals with all of this. You should read it.
So "others" were allowed to handle and pack up classified docs? The
moving crew had access to them? Then his crackhead son could read them
in the garage. How responsible is that?
Yes, doofus.

Do you think TRUMP packed up the documents HE took?

I realize this is hard for you, but things get misfiled.
Lil dwarf Rudey
2024-10-16 00:00:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
packing up and transfer
FOAD

Read it again, scumbag little man Jonathan D Ball...you are no more than
a failed solar city installer and Suckramento bungalow trash pretending
to be Phil Hendrie, but giving blow jobs at the TA glory Hole and
ducking fights at the Jolly Kone like you always do...

Explain why are you death threat prosecution exempt by the Feds so far?

And after _so many_ public death threats you issued on Trump and Vance...

Let's do our best to change that, shall we:


Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party/Alan Bond/Henry Bodkin/Malte
Runz and a few dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$***@fx11.ams4> <***@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400


Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <***@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$***@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$***@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$***@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-***@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$***@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$***@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$***@dont-email.me>
<***@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$***@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.


https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.


Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california


Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's usenet terrorism here?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lil dwarf Rudey
2024-10-16 00:01:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
knuckle-dragging squat-to-piss faggot fuck
FOAD

Read it again, scumbag little man Jonathan D Ball...you are no more than
a failed solar city installer and Suckramento bungalow trash pretending
to be Phil Hendrie, but giving blow jobs at the TA glory Hole and
ducking fights at the Jolly Kone like you always do...

Explain why are you death threat prosecution exempt by the Feds so far?

And after _so many_ public death threats you issued on Trump and Vance...

Let's do our best to change that, shall we:


Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party/Alan Bond/Henry Bodkin/Malte
Runz and a few dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$***@fx11.ams4> <***@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <***@earthlink.com>
<***@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: ***@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400


Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <***@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$***@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$***@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$***@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-***@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$***@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$***@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$***@dont-email.me>
<***@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$***@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-***@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.


https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this
case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
handling the prosecution.


Those can be reported here:

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california


Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's usenet terrorism here?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Rudy is the PERFECT liberal.

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 09:49:56 -0700, Rudy Canoza... forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three
sport letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me,
and who was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many
women as me, says...

Whereas *I*:

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)

It's not" bragging" if it upsets Wudy's Wittle World... forever stuck with mommy, now that he's too old and creepy to
work.
Yes, Biden was president when the documents made it into his garage.
No, psycho, he wasn't.

"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
"... BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017..."

On every date: Rudy Canoza... forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport letterman, like
me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who was *NEVER* a
lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as me, says...

Whereas *I*:

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)
Yes, Biden was president when the documents made it into his garage.
"Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
and disclosed classified military and national security information."

"The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."

A traitorous act.

CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."

=====

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil
neck to the amusement of all.

Narcissistic Rudy's Sociopathic Alternate Reality

The Narcissist's Reality - How It's SO Different From Yours

Wouldn't it be nice to live in the narcissist's reality? You're always right. You're the best at everything. You're an
expert at all things you do or haven't even tried.

As Dr. Les Carter says, there's an alternate reality and always an agenda when it comes to the narcissist. I thought
it would be interesting to break down the top six ways the narcissist lives in a different reality and how it's not
healthy for you and me.

1) The narcissist is always the victim.

The narcissist has a lot of pain from the past and is skilled at projecting that pain on everyone else. If you call
the narcissist out on a cruel or inappropriate action or response, and he or she feels violated, criticized, demeaned.
The narcissist will become the victim because that keeps the narcissist from having to look within. This is referred to
as a narcissistic injury. And the narcissist can play a very good victim. It takes the focus off what the narcissist
did wrong, and it puts you on the defensive as the perpetrator.

For example, I remember catching a narcissist in my life stealing. I asked him why. The response was, "I didn't grow
up with a silver spook in my mouth like you did, Laura." His reply hurt for two reasons: one, I grew up in a middle-
class family in Arkansas, and secondly, stealing is wrong. No matter how you look at it, it's against the law.

2) It's always your fault.

If anything goes wrong it's your fault, no matter the offender. Remember, narcissists believe they are perfect and
everyone else is not. How could it be his or her fault?

My ex-husband and I were driving south on Interstate 35 one Thanksgiving morning. A car hit us from behind. He was
driving. But guess who got blamed for the accident? Me, even though I was sitting in the passenger seat. You got it.
It was my fault.

When we got into an argument one day, he called me white trash. It wasn't about anything significant of course, but
whatever it was turned out to be MY fault. The narcissist is never to blame.

3) You walk on eggshells because the punishment doesn't fit the crime.

With the narcissist, the punishment never fits the crime. Usually there's not even a crime to begin with. The
narcissist may dole out harsh criticism, the silent treatment or a combination of both to "punish" you and have you
begging for forgiveness. Remember, the narcissist is great at being the injured party, even when the narcissist is
actually the perpetrator.

There's no proportion. The drama doesn't end, no matter how much you tiptoe around your home.

4) The narcissist is the greatest at everything

I remember being in church with the narcissist and listening to the criticism fly. We were listening to a Doctor of
Theology preach. But guess who knew more than the pastor? You got it. The narcissist said he knew more. He also knew
how to dress better than the pastor, he said. It was difficult to focus on the sermon and worshiping due to the
barrage of criticism.

Narcissists also believe they are so good at life, that they shouldn't surround themselves with anyone "less than"
them. (If you'll notice they have few is any good friends.) That's why the narcissist doesn't engage with anyone he
feels inferior or that can't do something for the narcissist.

5) The narcissist always has an agenda.

The narcissist almost does something with the end in mind. The narcissist must get something from a situation or
person, or the narcissist won't take part. The narcissist looks at life like a Monopoly game. There's a strategy or
manipulative tactic put in place in order to gain money, people, and things, regardless if it hurts the other person
financially or emotionally. I've known narcissists who leave an ex-wife and children homeless, while the narcissists
walk away free of guilt and trauma. If it works for the narcissist, then that's how the narcissist believes the game
should be played.

6) There is no peace with a narcissist.

The narcissist takes pride and pleasure in disrupting your world. Seeing you in emotional pain is something the
narcissist relishes. Why? The more pain you carry, the easier it is for the narcissist to control you and those around
you. The narcissist also understands that if you are isolated due to your pain or his control, then that's even
better. He has you at his disposal, broken down, ready to please.

Also, the narcissist likes for your home life, social life and professional life to revolve around him or her. The
narcissist does it by causing disruption, then often fixing the problem he caused. For example, I can recall numerous
arguments the narcissist provoked, only to come back and give an empty apology such as, "I'm sorry, but you push my
buttons. Can you calm down and we talk about this rationally?" The narcissist looks like the hero, and you're left
wondering what just happened.

Life with a narcissist is a rollercoaster. There are so many ups and downs, all orchestrated to have high control. But
there are ways to get off the roller coaster. First of all, don't get on board in the first place. Focus on your
truth. Don't let the narcissist sway your beliefs of what you know to be true. Journal or keep a notebook of
incidents you know occurred.

Secondly, find some peace every day. Take the dog for a walk. Phone a trusted friend. Get grounded in reality. There
are good people out there who want you to be healthy emotionally and physically.

Finally, live your best life. Avoid toxic people. If you can't avoid the narcissist, put strong boundaries in place.
The narcissist won't like it, but you will become stronger. Time away from toxic people helps you heal and see things
clearly. You can more easily live your life. That's the best karma out there. And you accelerate that karma by taking
care of you.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 03:59:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:06:39 -0700, Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport
letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who
was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as
me, says...
Post by AlleyCat
"... BIDEN KNEW ABOUT THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS HOME AS FAR BACK AS 2017..."
A lie.
Prove it, pussy.

A CNN lie?

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/biden-classified-documents-report-02-08-24/index.html

"The special counsel report found that Biden willfully retained classified information, including top secret documents,
and knew he was in possession of some documents as far back as 2017, and shared some of that information with the
ghostwriter of his 2017 memoir."

A painful report for Biden: Hur laid out in detail how Biden mishandled classified materials, writing that FBI agents
discovered materials from 'THE GARAGE, offices, and BASEMENT DEN in Mr. Biden's Wilmington, Delaware, HOME."

I couldn't give a shit less, WHERE the documents were found that Biden had had, since 2017... he HAD them and he wasn't
supposed to have, so if you want to play your bullshit childish semantics games, go ahead, but only faggots do that.
There were *no* documents in his home in 2017.
How the fuck do YOU know?

How the fuck does ANYONE know, stupid?

They found documents in his home. WHEN did they GET there, idiot?

Just because the documents in his house weren't "marked" as 2017 documents, does NOT mean he hadn't had documents in
his home in 2017.

Remember, pussy... they found documents in MORE than ONE home.

======================================================================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil
neck to the amusement of all.

Rudy's Delusion of Grandeur

Rudy's delusions of grandeur, are the false beliefs in his own superiority, greatness, or intelligence. Rudy
experiences delusions of grandeur, not just because he has low self-esteem; instead, Rudy believes in his own greatness
and importance even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Yes.

Rudy might, for example, believe he is destined to be the leader of the Usenet world, despite having no leadership
experience and DIFFICULTIES IN INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS.

Rudy's delusions of grandeur are characterized by their persistence. They are not just moments of fantasy or hopes for
the future.


Symptoms of Rudy's Delusions of Grandeur

Delusions of grandeur vary greatly in their content, but they are similar to one another in that they involve the
persistent believe in one's own grandiosity. Common examples of delusions of grandeur include:

Belief that one has a special relationship with a supernatural entity. Cult leaders, for example, might believe they
can communicate with a god or that they are a manifestation of a god on earth.

Belief that one has a special relationship with a famous person or authority figure, such as the president.

Belief that one has a unique destiny. These destinies often involve power, fame, fortune, or supernatural concepts.

Causes of Delusion of Grandeur

Delusions of grandeur are ASSOCIATED WITH NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER (NPD), which is a mental health diagnosis
listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

A NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY may cause Rudy to greatly overestimate his own importance and belief in his own uniqueness.
THESE DELUSIONS CAN ALSO BE SYMPTOMATIC OF SCHIZOPHRENIA.

Rudy's battle with schizophrenia causes him to experience delusions in which he believe he is a hugely powerful person
and has a great gift to give to the world.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

According to Rudy... that would be himself.
AlleyCat
2024-10-13 02:01:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:47:02 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.
So Trump didn't steal documents, Pussey?
https://imgur.com/tUXqgI9

BBC: Joe Biden Willfully Stole Classified Files, Investigation Finds

Not only a thief, but a traitor too.

Special Counsel Finds Biden "WILLFULLY" DISCLOSED Classified Documents

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-special-counsel-report-handling-classified-documents

There were documents marked classified regarding military and foreign policy in Afghanistan and notebooks containing
Mr. Biden's entries about national security and foreign policy matters ...

=====

WHY did they have to be "FOUND"?

More Classified Documents Found At Biden's Home, White House Says - NPR

https://www.npr.org/2023/01/14/1149071576/biden-classified-documents-what-we-know

Jan 14, 2023 - President Biden is facing a Department of Justice investigation after his lawyers found classified
documents at his Delaware residence and an office in Washington, D.C.

============================================================================

Draft-Dodging Coward


While first glance at Creepy Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak Joe Biden's long career in politics would give you the
impression of a racist plagiarism and serious pedophile, don't worry, there's far more skeletons in his closet.

In addition to everything we already know is wrong with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, he also seems to
have a history of evading the draft in Vietnam, according to a report from InsideSources.

Of course, the outlet also bashes President Trump over his own deferment during Vietnam, but to compare Trump to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden in this respect, as you will come to learn, is a pretty unfair comparison.

According to the report, after graduating college in 1968, Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was eligible for
the draft, meaning he should have ended up fighting in Vietnam. He earned a 1-Y draft deferment, however, due to
asthma:

That's right-asthma.

There's one little problem with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's "asthma."

Although Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was granted a deferment for "asthma as a teenager"... this didn't
stop him from playing high school football.

Oops.

InsideSources also points out that, in Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's autobiography, Old-Rich-White-
Religious Freak, Joe Biden makes no mention of asthma, but does brag about being "active in intramural sports" in
college, and "recounts an active childhood [and] football exploits in high school."

Certainly doesn't seem like the kind of asthma that should have kept him from the draft if he had no problem with
"football exploits."

What's worse, during one summer home from college, according to Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's own
account, he worked as a lifeguard, which certainly has very high standards for physical fitness, including a healthy
set of lungs.

It gets worse.

One incident from that summer stands out: How Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden had to wrap a six-foot length
of metal chain around his arm to face off against a knife-wielding local tough who went by the name "Corn Pop."

"You might cut me, Corn Pop, but I'm going to wrap this chain around your head before you do," Old-Rich-White-Religious
Freak, Joe Biden told him. Strong words, but he was a healthy, high school football player who could back them up. Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden and Corn Pop resolved their differences without violence and, according to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, became poolside friends.

Just six years later, at the height of the fighting in Vietnam, that same poolside athlete avoided mandatory military
service due to "asthma as a teenager."

So let's get this straight.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, as a teenager, was healthy enough to play football and also qualify as a
lifeguard, which is no easy feat.

And the left wants to mock Trump's "bone spurs," which is the reason behind his own 1-Y classification. However, bone
spurs are a real diagnosis that don't seem to conflict with Trump's lifestyle at all.

He's not exactly known for competing in triathlons.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, on the other hand, is a known liar and and fraud, and is going to have a
very hard time explaining this doozy.
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 08:56:18 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
Post by AlleyCat
https://imgur.com/tUXqgI9
No. Fuck off with your blank page at a document sharing site.
Update your browser, stupid.

Loading Image...

=====

Narcissists appear ridiculously stupid because of their bloated egos that cannot be surpassed by anything but
themselves.

Imagine taking on a project of breaking down a wall using the best possible method. Non-narcissists would usually take
it step by step, use a strategy and come up with contingency plans, in case they fail the first time around.

With a narcissist however, they will not care about consequences as their main focus is to IMPRESS not to execute.
They'll wing it.

Narcissists automatically get into the mode of having to "convince" people for gratification of their low self-worth
that they are stronger, braver and more beautiful than the wall! Remember, I said convince, and not "prove".

Therefore, they will just keep hitting the wall (with WHATEVER resources they have) and keep doing so until it does
break; (usually not in the way intended) thereby destroying themselves and everything else around them.

And, by the time they are done, (which would eventually take a very long time), everybody would have forgotten what the
original project was about, but the narcissist would be elating at their victory - over nothing.

Stupid? Hmm... yes.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 01:19:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

=====

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's, Victor's Jamaica
Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (getting more pussy in a
week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in 11th grade, played college baseball
AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school.
(there was no freshman class)

=====

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:07:21 -0700, Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport
letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who
was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as
me, says...
There's nothing wrong with the browser
No, but I bet you you're using a 80s or 90s version. Get one that's in the 100s, like about ver.115.

It renders the page jussssst fine, stupid.
The page is *blank*.
Like your mind.
It's blank and nothing loads in it.
Get a CT Scan... sees what's missing. Probably half your brain.
There are no controls.
As a matter of fact, faggot... IMGUR is run by a bunch of soy-drinking pussy faggots, like you.

I'm banned from posting "publicly" because of all the faggots, like you, down-voting what I used to post.

If you were smart enough to get on IMGUR, you could take a look around and see that 95% of what's posted publicly
that's political in nature, is anti-Trump and Republican.

LOL... I bet you LOVE them now, huh?

Yup... they ARE your kind of fellas. [giggle]
You super, smart man: you think putting your newsgroups in a different order has some effect, do you?
Nope.

If you see all my post, you'll notice that some are in one order and some in the other. I did that for convenience. The
way they were, and the way I have my posting window set, I couldn't see if I was posting to can.politics, JUST to bug
the shit out of you and Ski Bunny.
It doesn't.
Don't CARE that you think that, fly-shit-fer-brains.

Why you so jealous of me, Tudes?

======================================================================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil
neck to the amusement of all.

When the Narcissist Fails

A Cautionary Examination of How Narcissists React To Failure

Rudy, The Insanely Jealous Narcissist

Rudy, the narcissist, usually has a deep need to be better than everyone else.
This makes him likely to become jealous of anyone he perceives as better than
him in any possible way.

Surprisingly, you don't have to be better in a real sense for you to trigger
his jealousy.

As long as you have any advantage he doesn't have, that's enough to make him
jealous. Sometimes jealousy can force Rudy the narcissist to act in ways that defy normal human behaviour.

Jealousy is one of the emotions that makes Rudy, the narcissist, both hilarious and sad.

A Sense of Competition:

A sense of competition, real or perceived can trigger jealous narcissists,
like Rudy.

Surpassing a narcissist, like Rudy, at anything that you are both involved in
or succeeding at something he failed at, can make him extremely jealous.

Rudy Has Low Self-Esteem:

Rudy, the narcissist, may not be jealous of someone on Usenet, who is better looking, as long as he is confident in his
looks.

LOL

But, he isn't, so he isn't confident in his ability to socialize. Rudy is always jealous of his social and Usenet
rivals, who make him look like the runt child he is... daily.

Actually... Rudy, the narcissist, makes himself look like a child. We do not need to help him in this realm.

Because Rudy, the narcissist has very low self-esteem behind the mask of ultra-confidence, he becomes very jealous of
anyone who has genuine confidence... like those he pretends to be better than.

They Are Happier Than Rudy:

When a narcissist is depressed, he doesn't like to see someone happier and excited, especially if that person makes him
look stupid... which is usually hourly.

This is because he knows that a happy person is powerful. Powerful enough to make him feel like a worthless turd...
that is, until that person makes a spelling or grammar mistake.

Rudy's self-esteem is so low, that even though HE'S fucked up so many times, grammatically and spelling-wise, he still
has to show his imaginary superiority, by pointing out others' mistakes.

When you are happy, you became more confident, assertive and clear-minded. On the other hand, when a person is sad or
depressed, he usually feels weak and vulnerable, like Rudy, who lashes out at those he sees as his superiors.

When a narcissist, like Rudy is depressed, feelings of vulnerability that accompany depression make him see a happy
person as a threat, especially when it's a person that he doesn't get along with, which is 99.9% of Usenet, since he's
a homophobic racist, who insults everyone, because Rudy HATES everyone he thinks is his superior.

Rudy Is Insecure:

Insecurities make a person doubt his ability to keep anyone interested.

If he is financially unsuccessful (well... YEAH!) and believes that his Usenet rivals are MORE successful (well...
duh!), he may be very jealous their success.

Rudy, the narcissist, hates it when people around him are better in every possible way. He needs to be above everybody
else in order to feel superior, and have the ability to sleep.

For this reason, he becomes very jealous of anyone he sees as superior than him, especially when there is a sense of
competition.

We Are Stealing His Attention:

RUDY, THE NARCISSIST NEEDS SO MUCH ATTENTION, hence the replies that offer NO refutations. He only replies to say,
"play with me!"

Rudy doesn't have the mental capacity to form his own opinions on subject matters that are above his head, so he simply
replies in the negative, even if it's proven that the OP is correct in everything he says or quotes.

Because he thinks that he is better than common people, Rudy believes that he deserves more attention than the average
Usenet member.

Getting the attention that a narcissist believes HE deserves, can cause a lot of jealousy.

Poor Rudy.
AlleyCat
2024-10-15 01:19:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 13:40:57 -0600, Skeeter says...
It works fine.
Of course it does. Rudy's a fucking psycho whose so jealous of me, it's plain pathetic. IMGUR works fine in "later"
versions of Firefox.

He's probably using an older version which WILL exhibit a blank page. That's why I use MULTIPLE browsers... an older
version that I've been using about 4 years, a newer portable version and a portable version of a Chrome browser, which
is NOT Google's, because they all render webpages differently.

LOL... Rudy "CLAIMS" to be a creepy IT guy and he STILL hasn't figured out how to use IMGUR?

That's as bad as this.

Loading Image...

That's Rudy in the back, getting help from a normal-sized kid. The girls in the foreground know more than Rudy. Even
the black kid in the back, knows more.

I bet you the Black kid probably voted for Trump, and Rudy called him a Nigger, because, well... if you're Black and
don't toe the Democrat Party line, well then...

https://i.imgur.com/AYFaiMm.mp4

Peace.
AlleyCat
2024-10-14 02:40:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:15:15 -0700, Rudy Canoza says...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/11/opinion/trump-movie-apprentice.html
Lie site not read.

Biden is an amoral draft-dodging document-stealing shitbag coward, and he always has been.

======================================================================================================================

Draft-Dodging Coward

While first glance at Creepy Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak Joe Biden's long career in politics would give you the
impression of a racist plagiarism and serious pedophile, don't worry, there's far more skeletons in his closet.

In addition to everything we already know is wrong with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, he also seems to
have a history of evading the draft in Vietnam, according to a report from InsideSources.

Of course, the outlet also bashes President Trump over his own deferment during Vietnam, but to compare Trump to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden in this respect, as you will come to learn, is a pretty unfair comparison.

According to the report, after graduating college in 1968, Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was eligible for
the draft, meaning he should have ended up fighting in Vietnam. He earned a 1-Y draft deferment, however, due to
asthma:

That's right-asthma.

There's one little problem with Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's "asthma."

Although Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden was granted a deferment for "asthma as a teenager"... this didn't
stop him from playing high school football.

Oops.

InsideSources also points out that, in Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's autobiography, Old-Rich-White-
Religious Freak, Joe Biden makes no mention of asthma, but does brag about being "active in intramural sports" in
college, and "recounts an active childhood [and] football exploits in high school."

Certainly doesn't seem like the kind of asthma that should have kept him from the draft if he had no problem with
"football exploits."

What's worse, during one summer home from college, according to Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden's own
account, he worked as a lifeguard, which certainly has very high standards for physical fitness, including a healthy
set of lungs.

It gets worse.

One incident from that summer stands out: How Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden had to wrap a six-foot length
of metal chain around his arm to face off against a knife-wielding local tough who went by the name "Corn Pop."

"You might cut me, Corn Pop, but I'm going to wrap this chain around your head before you do," Old-Rich-White-Religious
Freak, Joe Biden told him. Strong words, but he was a healthy, high school football player who could back them up. Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden and Corn Pop resolved their differences without violence and, according to Old-
Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, became poolside friends.

Just six years later, at the height of the fighting in Vietnam, that same poolside athlete avoided mandatory military
service due to "asthma as a teenager."

So let's get this straight.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, as a teenager, was healthy enough to play football and also qualify as a
lifeguard, which is no easy feat.

And the left wants to mock Trump's "bone spurs," which is the reason behind his own 1-Y classification. However, bone
spurs are a real diagnosis that don't seem to conflict with Trump's lifestyle at all.

He's not exactly known for competing in triathlons.

Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden, on the other hand, is a known liar and and fraud, and is going to have a
very hard time explaining this doozy.
Loading...