Discussion:
Biggest question about Taliban in Afghanistan. Why where they alive?
(too old to reply)
Liberals are Vermin!
2021-08-21 06:14:36 UTC
Permalink
In WW2, they killed 15,000-20,000 in one battle. So, why / how did 50,000 Taliban survive in Afghanistan for 20 years? What was the U.S. there for? They should have been killing them all the time. They should have killed villagers who willingly harboured them. Search and Destroy, that should have been on the ongoing mission. Instead of "nation building" which is a horribly and proven FAILED strategy.
Eric@
2021-08-21 21:23:02 UTC
Permalink
Liberals are Vermin! wrote...
Post by Liberals are Vermin!
In WW2, they killed 15,000-20,000 in one battle. So, why / how did 50,000 Taliban survive in Afghanistan for 20 years? What was the U.S. there for? They should have been killing them all the time. They should have killed villagers who willingly harboured them. Search and Destroy, that should have been on the ongoing mission. Instead of "nation building" which is a horribly and proven FAILED strategy.
They are supplied by, funded by, and find refuge in, Pakistan.
Dave Smith
2021-08-22 01:33:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Eric@
Liberals are Vermin! wrote...
Post by Liberals are Vermin!
In WW2, they killed 15,000-20,000 in one battle. So, why / how did 50,000 Taliban survive in Afghanistan for 20 years? What was the U.S. there for? They should have been killing them all the time. They should have killed villagers who willingly harboured them. Search and Destroy, that should have been on the ongoing mission. Instead of "nation building" which is a horribly and proven FAILED strategy.
They are supplied by, funded by, and find refuge in, Pakistan.
That was where they found bin Laden. He was right under the nose of the
Pakistani military.
Gregory Carr
2021-08-27 11:02:46 UTC
Permalink
In WW2, they killed 15,000-20,000 in one battle. So, why / how did 50,000 Taliban survive in Afghanistan for 20 years? What was the U.S. there for? They should >have been killing them all the time. They should have killed villagers who willingly harboured them. Search and Destroy, that should have been on the ongoing >mission. Instead of "nation building" which is a horribly and proven FAILED strategy.
Burning the ville to save it. Free fire zones. Paying bounties for severed heads and ears. My Lai. Dropping more bombs than in all of WW2 they still lost but the 1975 Saigon bug out went better than Kabul capitulation.
Loading...