Discussion:
Off-Topic Bullshit - Because THAT'S Where Liberals Inevitably Go, Since They Can't Argue The POINT... Ten Commandments In Classrooms. What?
Add Reply
AlleyCat
2024-05-18 18:55:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
As much as it pains to say it... you are all wrong... and you are all right, because there IS room for
interpretation regarding the word "covet".

The pain part:

RUDY is the only one of you who wrote the definitive word... "desire". That is the word at the heart of all
interpretations.

That does NOT mean you are wrong, as I said before. But to me, if it matters at all (it does not... I am NOT
into myself as much as YOU fuckers), "desire" is the word needed to be concerned about.

(17) Thou shalt not covet.

This command seems to have been added in order to teach the general principle that the Law of God is
concerned, not with acts and words only, but with the THOUGHTS OF THE HEART. Rightly understood, the seventh
and eighth commandments contain the tenth, which strikes at covetousness and lustful DESIRE. (Comp. Matthew
5:27-28.)

Ancient moralists did not usually recognize this; thought... unless CARRIED OUT INTO ACTS, was regarded as
"FREE;" NO RESPONSIBILITY WAS CONSIDERED TO ATTACH TO IT, and consequently no one felt it needful to control
his thoughts or regulate them. It was therefore of importance that the Divine Law should distinctly assert a
control over men's thoughts and feelings, since they are the source of all that is evil in word and act; and
true godliness consists in bringing "every thought into captivity to Christ" (2Corinthians 10:5).

True, this is by one interpretation, but it being the first and echoing MY thoughts, I think it's as
pertinent or more to defining the word covet.

The Ten Commandments as I wrote them, were abridged versions, of course. To know the TRUE meaning of each and
every commandment, you need to look to the Bible for their exact meanings.

To simply "covet", is an over-simplification of Bible passages.

Exodus 20:17

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor
his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor's.

Another:
Thou shalt not covet - The foregoing commands implicitly forbid all DESIRE of doing that which will be an
injury to our neighbor; this forbids all inordinate DESIRE of having that which will be a gratification to
ourselves. O that such a man's house were mine! such a man's wife mine! such a man's estate mine! This is
certainly the language of discontent at our own lot, and envy at our neighbor's, and these are the sins
principally forbidden here. God give us all to see our face in the glass of this law, and to lay our hearts
under the government of it!

WAAAAAY to far off-topic, so...

============================================================================================================

Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms

I do not agree with this, BUT... if you "let" Muslims pray or anything else they want to do, then, is it
soooo much a burden to post something that's been pretty much made into law?

You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet.

Religious or a lesson and message?

I thought prayer in schools was a no-no?

Loading Image...

=====

How Supporting STUDENTS During Ramadan Helps Build Feelings of Belonging

Nation Apr 14, 2022 2:03 PM EDT

NEW ORLEANS - For Muslims, Ramadan is the holiest month of the year. It is a month of fasting, prayer,
reflection, and community. However, some practicing Muslim students in Louisiana feel ignored by their public
school community.

(annnnd why shouldn't they... separation of church and state? What's done for Christian students during Lent
and Easter? Dying eggs?)

Ramadan, which begins April 2 and ends May 2 this year, also falls during the last stretch of the school year
for many school districts in the state. The timing presents an uncomfortable situation for parents with
children who are balancing fasting and participation in other religious customs with the demands of school,
including critical year-end academic assessments and outdoor activities.

As a result, some MUSLIM PARENTS ARE SEEKING ACCOMMODATIONS FROM THEIR SCHOOLS for practicing students.
Parent advocates say a lack of guidance from the Louisiana Department of Education makes it tough to navigate
their religious beliefs.

============================================================================

THIS is Joe Biden when not on drugs or stimulants and acts like himself:

https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/S/p/u/y/Spuyq.caa.mp4?b=1&u=ummtf

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xPhZcMYekKs?feature=share



http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g











=====

Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden

Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

=====

Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4



=====

Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press
Conference


Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story
https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a-
story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech
https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


Joe Biden: You Just Wonder



Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech



Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect'



Barely There Biden Makes No Sense



Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense



Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred



Joe Biden making Zer0 sense



Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero
Sense!

Alan
2024-05-18 19:20:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
As much as it pains to say it... you are all wrong... and you are all right, because there IS room for
interpretation regarding the word "covet".
RUDY is the only one of you who wrote the definitive word... "desire". That is the word at the heart of all
interpretations.
That does NOT mean you are wrong, as I said before. But to me, if it matters at all (it does not... I am NOT
into myself as much as YOU fuckers), "desire" is the word needed to be concerned about.
(17) Thou shalt not covet.
This command seems to have been added in order to teach the general principle that the Law of God is
concerned, not with acts and words only, but with the THOUGHTS OF THE HEART. Rightly understood, the seventh
and eighth commandments contain the tenth, which strikes at covetousness and lustful DESIRE. (Comp. Matthew
5:27-28.)
Ancient moralists did not usually recognize this; thought... unless CARRIED OUT INTO ACTS, was regarded as
"FREE;" NO RESPONSIBILITY WAS CONSIDERED TO ATTACH TO IT, and consequently no one felt it needful to control
his thoughts or regulate them. It was therefore of importance that the Divine Law should distinctly assert a
control over men's thoughts and feelings, since they are the source of all that is evil in word and act; and
true godliness consists in bringing "every thought into captivity to Christ" (2Corinthians 10:5).
True, this is by one interpretation, but it being the first and echoing MY thoughts, I think it's as
pertinent or more to defining the word covet.
The Ten Commandments as I wrote them, were abridged versions, of course. To know the TRUE meaning of each and
every commandment, you need to look to the Bible for their exact meanings.
To simply "covet", is an over-simplification of Bible passages.
Exodus 20:17
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor
his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor's.
Thou shalt not covet - The foregoing commands implicitly forbid all DESIRE of doing that which will be an
injury to our neighbor; this forbids all inordinate DESIRE of having that which will be a gratification to
ourselves. O that such a man's house were mine! such a man's wife mine! such a man's estate mine! This is
certainly the language of discontent at our own lot, and envy at our neighbor's, and these are the sins
principally forbidden here. God give us all to see our face in the glass of this law, and to lay our hearts
under the government of it!
WAAAAAY to far off-topic, so...
============================================================================================================
Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms
I do not agree with this, BUT... if you "let" Muslims pray or anything else they want to do, then, is it
soooo much a burden to post something that's been pretty much made into law?
You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet.
But you still won't acknowledge that four of the other five commandments
they're mandating are religious.

So you're just the weasel you always are, loser.
AlleyCat
2024-05-18 20:07:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 18 May 2024 12:20:00 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
But you still won't acknowledge that four of the other five commandments
they're mandating are religious.
Not the topic.

They were made into laws, so they SHOULD be listed in schools. You have a problem with laws or morality?
Probably morality, since you Canadians are fucking up your own country NOT being moral at all, and your gay
PM being at the heart of all your problems.

Loading Image...

Loading Image...

=====

Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms

I do not agree with this, BUT... if you "let" Muslims pray or anything else they want to do, then, is it
soooo much a burden to post something that's been pretty much made into law?

You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet.

Religious or a lesson and message?

I thought prayer in schools was a no-no?

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2022/04/students-1200x722.jpg

=====

How Supporting STUDENTS During Ramadan Helps Build Feelings of Belonging

Nation Apr 14, 2022 2:03 PM EDT

NEW ORLEANS - For Muslims, Ramadan is the holiest month of the year. It is a month of fasting, prayer,
reflection, and community. However, some practicing Muslim students in Louisiana feel ignored by their public
school community.

(annnnd why shouldn't they... separation of church and state? What's done for Christian students during Lent
and Easter? Dying eggs?)

Ramadan, which begins April 2 and ends May 2 this year, also falls during the last stretch of the school year
for many school districts in the state. The timing presents an uncomfortable situation for parents with
children who are balancing fasting and participation in other religious customs with the demands of school,
including critical year-end academic assessments and outdoor activities.

As a result, some MUSLIM PARENTS ARE SEEKING ACCOMMODATIONS FROM THEIR SCHOOLS for practicing students.
Parent advocates say a lack of guidance from the Louisiana Department of Education makes it tough to navigate
their religious beliefs.

============================================================================

Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, And Sadists Trolls Will Lie, Exaggerate, And Offend TO GET A
RESPONSE [so true]

Loser
AlleyPussyBitch
Pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing
fairy
Pussey

Of course, these never work, AS INTENDED.

=====

An Internet troll is someone who enters an online discussion and posts comments designed to upset or disrupt
the conversation.

"Dark Tetrad" personality traits include narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism.

(someone's been reading my possstss againnnnn)

In a study of 1200 people, Dark Tetrad scores were highest among people who said trolling was their favorite
Internet activity.

In this month's issue of Personality and Individual Differences, a study was published that confirms what we
all suspected: Internet trolls are horrible people.

Let's start by getting our definitions straight: An Internet troll is someone who comes into a discussion and
posts comments designed to upset or disrupt the conversation. Often, in fact, it seems like there is no real
purpose behind their comments except to upset everyone else involved. Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and offend
to get a response.

What kind of person would do this? Some Canadian researchers decided to find out.
Study: Internet Trolls and Dark Tetrad Personality Traits

They conducted two online studies with over 1,200 people, giving personality tests to each subject along with
a survey about their Internet commenting behavior. They were looking for evidence that linked trolling with
the "Dark Tetrad" of personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism.

They found that Dark Tetrad scores were highest among people who said trolling was their favorite Internet
activity. To get an idea of how much more prevalent these traits were among Internet trolls, one can refer to
tables from the paper showing low Dark Tetrad scores for everyone in the study ... except the trolls. Their
scores for all four traits soar on the chart. The relationship between trolling and the Dark Tetrad is so
significant that the authors write in their paper:

"... the associations between sadism and GAIT (Global Assessment of Internet Trolling) scores were so strong
that it might be said that online trolls are prototypical everyday sadists." [emphasis added]

Trolls truly enjoy making you feel bad. To quote the authors once more (because this is a truly quotable
article): "Both trolls and sadists feel sadistic glee at the distress of others. Sadists just want to have
fun ... and the Internet is their playground!"

The next time you encounter a troll online, remember:

These trolls are some truly difficult people.
It is your suffering that brings them pleasure, so the best thing you can do is ignore them.
Alan
2024-05-18 20:12:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 18 May 2024 12:20:00 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
But you still won't acknowledge that four of the other five commandments
they're mandating are religious.
Not the topic.
It is most definitely the topic...

...because you're trying to pretend that "just posting some things made
into laws" is all that happened.
Post by AlleyCat
They were made into laws, so they SHOULD be listed in schools. You have a problem with laws or morality?
But you agree that that's not all they posted, right, loser?
AlleyCat
2024-05-18 22:04:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 18 May 2024 13:12:33 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But you still won't acknowledge that four of the other five commandments
they're mandating are religious.
Not the topic.
It is most definitely the topic...
Nope.
Post by Alan
...because you're trying to pretend that "just posting some things made
into laws" is all that happened.
Nope.

I listed that which has been made into law. Everything else is off-topic.
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
They were made into laws, so they SHOULD be listed in schools. You have a problem with laws or morality?
But you agree that that's not all they posted, right, loser?
Nope, but whatever a pussy faggot troll says...

============================================================================

Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, And Sadists Trolls Will Lie, Exaggerate, And Offend TO GET A
RESPONSE [so true]

Loser
AlleyPussyBitch
Pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing
fairy
Pussey

Of course, these never work, AS INTENDED.

=====

An Internet troll is someone who enters an online discussion and posts comments designed to upset or disrupt
the conversation.

"Dark Tetrad" personality traits include narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism.

(someone's been reading my possstss againnnnn)

In a study of 1200 people, Dark Tetrad scores were highest among people who said trolling was their favorite
Internet activity.

In this month's issue of Personality and Individual Differences, a study was published that confirms what we
all suspected: Internet trolls are horrible people.

Let's start by getting our definitions straight: An Internet troll is someone who comes into a discussion and
posts comments designed to upset or disrupt the conversation. Often, in fact, it seems like there is no real
purpose behind their comments except to upset everyone else involved. Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and offend
to get a response.

What kind of person would do this? Some Canadian researchers decided to find out.
Study: Internet Trolls and Dark Tetrad Personality Traits

They conducted two online studies with over 1,200 people, giving personality tests to each subject along with
a survey about their Internet commenting behavior. They were looking for evidence that linked trolling with
the "Dark Tetrad" of personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism.

They found that Dark Tetrad scores were highest among people who said trolling was their favorite Internet
activity. To get an idea of how much more prevalent these traits were among Internet trolls, one can refer to
tables from the paper showing low Dark Tetrad scores for everyone in the study ... except the trolls. Their
scores for all four traits soar on the chart. The relationship between trolling and the Dark Tetrad is so
significant that the authors write in their paper:

"... the associations between sadism and GAIT (Global Assessment of Internet Trolling) scores were so strong
that it might be said that online trolls are prototypical everyday sadists." [emphasis added]

Trolls truly enjoy making you feel bad. To quote the authors once more (because this is a truly quotable
article): "Both trolls and sadists feel sadistic glee at the distress of others. Sadists just want to have
fun ... and the Internet is their playground!"

The next time you encounter a troll online, remember:

These trolls are some truly difficult people.
It is your suffering that brings them pleasure, so the best thing you can do is ignore them.
Alan
2024-05-18 22:43:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 18 May 2024 13:12:33 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
But you still won't acknowledge that four of the other five commandments
they're mandating are religious.
Not the topic.
It is most definitely the topic...
Nope.
Yup.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
...because you're trying to pretend that "just posting some things made
into laws" is all that happened.
Nope.
Yup.
Post by AlleyCat
I listed that which has been made into law. Everything else is off-topic.
The topic was whether or not posting ALL the ten commandments was
appropriate.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
They were made into laws, so they SHOULD be listed in schools. You have a problem with laws or morality?
But you agree that that's not all they posted, right, loser?
Nope, but whatever a pussy faggot troll says...
You're claiming they didn't pass a law that requires the posting of TEN
commandments, loser?
AlleyCat
2024-05-18 23:15:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 18 May 2024 15:43:19 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
The topic was whether or not posting ALL the ten commandments was
appropriate.
Nope.

THIS is the topic.

"The purpose is NOT SOLELY RELIGIOUS," Sen. J. Adam Bass, R-Bossier City, told the Senate. Rather, it is the
Ten Commandments' "historical significance, which is simply one of many documents that display the history of
our country AND FOUNDATION OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM."

============================================================================

THIS is Joe Biden when not on drugs or stimulants and acts like himself:

https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/S/p/u/y/Spuyq.caa.mp4?b=1&u=ummtf

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xPhZcMYekKs?feature=share

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/hiDRFTVH0rY

http://youtu.be/KuhR-Nqv6Wg

http://youtu.be/D5JF7PupC58andpp

http://youtu.be/3gsMTe0Nr4Yandpp

http://youtu.be/WBUgHkbtm9Iandpp

=====

Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden

Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

=====

Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4

http://youtu.be/Slm5bvO-_5I

=====

Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press
Conference
http://youtu.be/SdfvIvYPPRo

Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story
https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a-
story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech
https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


Joe Biden: You Just Wonder
http://youtu.be/Uj0ccJgJsPA


Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech
http://youtu.be/0xwoaagXFyU


Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect'
http://youtu.be/oHI__YneMuE


Barely There Biden Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/YxxAyHgBiNU


Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc


Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred
http://youtu.be/vt7WPjsYl44


Joe Biden making Zer0 sense
http://youtu.be/VYch-1fRhiE


Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero
Sense!
http://youtu.be/qg4OUk0qyWM
Alan
2024-05-18 23:28:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 18 May 2024 15:43:19 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
The topic was whether or not posting ALL the ten commandments was
appropriate.
Nope.
THIS is the topic.
"The purpose is NOT SOLELY RELIGIOUS," Sen. J. Adam Bass, R-Bossier City, told the Senate. Rather, it is the
Ten Commandments' "historical significance, which is simply one of many documents that display the history of
our country AND FOUNDATION OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM."
Sorry, but that is a straw man attempt to justify what you constitution
explicitly denies:

State-endorsed religion.
Akidasar
2024-05-18 23:37:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:28:38 -0700
Post by Alan
constitution
State-endorsed religion.
You are in the top quitile of lying morons.

First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

No mention of "state endorsed religion".

Try England:

The Church of England (C of E) is the established Christian church in England. It traces its history to the Christian church recorded as existing in the Roman province of Britain by the 3rd century and to the 6th-century Gregorian mission to Kent led by Augustine of Canterbury. Its adherents are called Anglicans.
Alan
2024-05-18 23:46:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Akidasar
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:28:38 -0700
Post by Alan
constitution
State-endorsed religion.
You are in the top quitile of lying morons.
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
And a law that requires the display of the Christian commandments
doesn't fall under that umbra?

Do you need "umbra" explained before we go on?

The USSC disagrees with you.
Akidasar
2024-05-19 19:27:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:46:39 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by Akidasar
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:28:38 -0700
Post by Alan
constitution
State-endorsed religion.
You are in the top quitile of lying morons.
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.
And a law that requires the display of the Christian commandments
Which law is this?
Post by Alan
doesn't fall under that umbra?
The 10 Commndments were originally brought forth for the Jewish people.

No Passover Menorah is required to be displayed in any public screwl,
and certainly not by the federal government.
Post by Alan
Do you need "umbra" explained before we go on?
Do you like how Canaduh surrendered more of your rights to your
proxy royals than the framers did when they broke from the "empire"?
Post by Alan
The USSC disagrees with you.
SCOTUS revises and reverses itself as need be, always.
Alan
2024-05-21 22:05:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Akidasar
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:46:39 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by Akidasar
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:28:38 -0700
Post by Alan
constitution
State-endorsed religion.
You are in the top quitile of lying morons.
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.
And a law that requires the display of the Christian commandments
Which law is this?
Louisiana HB71:

HB71 by Representative Dodie Horton

SCHOOLS: Requires the display of the Ten Commandments in schools'

<https://legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.aspx?i=245592>
Akidasar
2024-05-22 15:36:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 21 May 2024 15:05:47 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by Akidasar
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:46:39 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by Akidasar
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:28:38 -0700
Post by Alan
constitution
State-endorsed religion.
You are in the top quitile of lying morons.
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the
people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for
a redress of grievances.
And a law that requires the display of the Christian commandments
Which law is this?
HB71 by Representative Dodie Horton
SCHOOLS: Requires the display of the Ten Commandments in schools'
<https://legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.aspx?i=245592>
"Current Status: Pending House concurrence"

It's not a law though, is it?

Bill = proposal.

Learn to be honest, or face revilement for your endless lies.

You exterminable leftard vermin.
David Hartung
2024-05-22 15:39:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Akidasar
On Tue, 21 May 2024 15:05:47 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by Akidasar
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:46:39 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by Akidasar
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:28:38 -0700
Post by Alan
constitution
State-endorsed religion.
You are in the top quitile of lying morons.
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the
people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for
a redress of grievances.
And a law that requires the display of the Christian commandments
Which law is this?
HB71 by Representative Dodie Horton
SCHOOLS: Requires the display of the Ten Commandments in schools'
<https://legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.aspx?i=245592>
"Current Status: Pending House concurrence"
It's not a law though, is it?
The fact that the whore even wants to do it makes her eligible for being hanged.
AlleyCat
2024-05-18 23:44:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:28:38 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The purpose is NOT SOLELY RELIGIOUS," Sen. J. Adam Bass, R-Bossier City, told the Senate. Rather, it is the
Ten Commandments' "historical significance, which is simply one of many documents that display the history of
our country AND FOUNDATION OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM."
Sorry, but that is a straw man attempt to justify what you constitution
https://i.imgur.com/4UOoGc1.mp4

============================================================================

THIS is Joe Biden when not on drugs or stimulants and acts like himself:

https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/S/p/u/y/Spuyq.caa.mp4?b=1&u=ummtf

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xPhZcMYekKs?feature=share

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/hiDRFTVH0rY

http://youtu.be/KuhR-Nqv6Wg

http://youtu.be/D5JF7PupC58andpp

http://youtu.be/3gsMTe0Nr4Yandpp

http://youtu.be/WBUgHkbtm9Iandpp

=====

Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden

Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

=====

Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4

http://youtu.be/Slm5bvO-_5I

=====

Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press
Conference
http://youtu.be/SdfvIvYPPRo

Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story
https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a-
story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech
https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


Joe Biden: You Just Wonder
http://youtu.be/Uj0ccJgJsPA


Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech
http://youtu.be/0xwoaagXFyU


Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect'
http://youtu.be/oHI__YneMuE


Barely There Biden Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/YxxAyHgBiNU


Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc


Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred
http://youtu.be/vt7WPjsYl44


Joe Biden making Zer0 sense
http://youtu.be/VYch-1fRhiE


Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero
Sense!
http://youtu.be/qg4OUk0qyWM
Alan
2024-05-18 23:47:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:28:38 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
"The purpose is NOT SOLELY RELIGIOUS," Sen. J. Adam Bass, R-Bossier City, told the Senate. Rather, it is the
Ten Commandments' "historical significance, which is simply one of many documents that display the history of
our country AND FOUNDATION OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM."
Sorry, but that is a straw man attempt to justify what you constitution
https://i.imgur.com/4UOoGc1.mp4
So, precisely no actual rebuttal.

Got it.
AlleyCat
2024-05-18 23:57:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:47:46 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
So, precisely no actual rebuttal.
That's right... you haven't made one yet.

Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms

I do not agree with this, BUT... if you "let" Muslims pray or anything else they want to do, then, is it
soooo much a burden to post something that's been pretty much made into law?

You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet.

Religious or a lesson and message?

I thought prayer in schools was a no-no?

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2022/04/students-1200x722.jpg

=====

How Supporting STUDENTS During Ramadan Helps Build Feelings of Belonging

Nation Apr 14, 2022 2:03 PM EDT

NEW ORLEANS - For Muslims, Ramadan is the holiest month of the year. It is a month of fasting, prayer,
reflection, and community. However, some practicing Muslim students in Louisiana feel ignored by their public
school community.

(annnnd why shouldn't they... separation of church and state? What's done for Christian students during Lent
and Easter? Dying eggs?)

Ramadan, which begins April 2 and ends May 2 this year, also falls during the last stretch of the school year
for many school districts in the state. The timing presents an uncomfortable situation for parents with
children who are balancing fasting and participation in other religious customs with the demands of school,
including critical year-end academic assessments and outdoor activities.

As a result, some MUSLIM PARENTS ARE SEEKING ACCOMMODATIONS FROM THEIR SCHOOLS for practicing students.
Parent advocates say a lack of guidance from the Louisiana Department of Education makes it tough to navigate
their religious beliefs.

==========================================================================

THIS is Joe Biden when not on drugs or stimulants and acts like himself:

https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/S/p/u/y/Spuyq.caa.mp4?b=1&u=ummtf

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xPhZcMYekKs?feature=share

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/hiDRFTVH0rY

http://youtu.be/KuhR-Nqv6Wg

http://youtu.be/D5JF7PupC58andpp

http://youtu.be/3gsMTe0Nr4Yandpp

http://youtu.be/WBUgHkbtm9Iandpp

=====

Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden

Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

=====

Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4

http://youtu.be/Slm5bvO-_5I

=====

Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press
Conference
http://youtu.be/SdfvIvYPPRo

Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story
https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a-
story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech
https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


Joe Biden: You Just Wonder
http://youtu.be/Uj0ccJgJsPA


Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech
http://youtu.be/0xwoaagXFyU


Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect'
http://youtu.be/oHI__YneMuE


Barely There Biden Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/YxxAyHgBiNU


Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc


Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred
http://youtu.be/vt7WPjsYl44


Joe Biden making Zer0 sense
http://youtu.be/VYch-1fRhiE


Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero
Sense!
http://youtu.be/qg4OUk0qyWM
Alan
2024-05-19 00:11:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:47:46 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
So, precisely no actual rebuttal.
That's right... you haven't made one yet.
Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms
Which is explicitly prohibited by your constitution as interpreted by
your supreme court.
Post by AlleyCat
I do not agree with this, BUT... if you "let" Muslims pray or anything else they want to do, then, is it
soooo much a burden to post something that's been pretty much made into law?
You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet.
Religious or a lesson and message?
Religious...

...because the also include these:

“Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”
“Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image.”
“Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.”
“Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.”

Happy to explain that to you!
Max Boot
2024-05-19 16:49:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:47:46 -0700,  Alan says...
Post by Alan
So, precisely no actual rebuttal.
That's right... you haven't made one yet.
Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms
Which is explicitly prohibited by your constitution as interpreted by your
supreme court.
Posting the so-called ten commandments in a classroom undoubtedly is
unconstitutional. Teaching about them and their historical significance isn't,
but the classroom instruction cannot *only* focus on Judeo-Christian religious
dogma. It would have to include dogma from other religions.
I do not agree with this, BUT... if you "let" Muslims pray or anything else
they want to do, then, is it
soooo much a burden to post something that's been pretty much made into law?
     You shall not murder.
     You shall not commit adultery.
     You shall not steal.
     You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
     You shall not covet.
Religious or a lesson and message?
Religious...
     “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”
     “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image.”
     “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.”
     “Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.”
Happy to explain that to you!
Of course. *Seven* of the so-called ten commandments have nothing to do with
America's political or legal origins.
Akidasar
2024-05-19 19:30:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 18 May 2024 17:11:38 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:47:46 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
So, precisely no actual rebuttal.
That's right... you haven't made one yet.
Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms
Which is explicitly prohibited by your constitution as interpreted by
your supreme court.
Ekshually it's not a done deal yet:

https://www.axios.com/local/new-orleans/2024/05/17/louisiana-10-commandments-classrooms

The bill passed the state Senate with a 30-8 vote Thursday, but requires a second vote in front of the full House before it would land on Gov. Jeff Landry's desk for signature.

Since it initially passed in the House, the bill was amended to state
that the displays could be paid for by public donation.
Alan
2024-05-21 22:08:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Akidasar
On Sat, 18 May 2024 17:11:38 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:47:46 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
So, precisely no actual rebuttal.
That's right... you haven't made one yet.
Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms
Which is explicitly prohibited by your constitution as interpreted by
your supreme court.
https://www.axios.com/local/new-orleans/2024/05/17/louisiana-10-commandments-classrooms
The bill passed the state Senate with a 30-8 vote Thursday, but requires a second vote in front of the full House before it would land on Gov. Jeff Landry's desk for signature.
Since it initially passed in the House, the bill was amended to state
that the displays could be paid for by public donation.
How does that change anything?

'A.(1) Each public school governing authority and the governing
authority of each nonpublic school that receives state funds shall
display the Ten Commandments in each building it uses and classroom in
each school under its jurisdiction.'

<https://legis.la.gov/legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=1364576>

What does it matter how it is paid for if it is REQUIRED (shall display)?
Akidasar
2024-05-22 15:37:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 21 May 2024 15:08:26 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by Akidasar
On Sat, 18 May 2024 17:11:38 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 18 May 2024 16:47:46 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
So, precisely no actual rebuttal.
That's right... you haven't made one yet.
Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms
Which is explicitly prohibited by your constitution as interpreted
by your supreme court.
https://www.axios.com/local/new-orleans/2024/05/17/louisiana-10-commandments-classrooms
The bill passed the state Senate with a 30-8 vote Thursday, but
requires a second vote in front of the full House before it would
land on Gov. Jeff Landry's desk for signature.
Since it initially passed in the House, the bill was amended to
state that the displays could be paid for by public donation.
How does that change anything?
"Current Status: Pending House concurrence"

You propagandist weasel fuck.
Mike Colangelo
2024-05-19 16:49:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 18 May 2024 15:43:19 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
The topic was whether or not posting ALL the ten commandments was
appropriate.
Nope.
Yep.
Post by AlleyCat
THIS is the topic.
"The purpose is NOT SOLELY RELIGIOUS," [shrieking] Sen. J. Adam Bass, R-Bossier City, told the Senate.
I'll bet Republiscum/QAnon Sen. Bass didn't shriek when he said that nugget of
bullshit..
Post by AlleyCat
Rather, it is the Ten Commandments' "historical significance,
The Qur'an *also* has historical significance, as do writings of Wicca, the
Bahá’í faith and Hinduism.
Post by AlleyCat
which is simply one of many documents that display the history of our country
No, the so-called ten commandments do not "display" any part of the "history of
our country." Here's something that *does* display the history of our country:

Congress shall make no law respecting an *establishment of religion*
Post by AlleyCat
AND FOUNDATION OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM."
More shrieking, and no, the so-called ten commandments are *not* the foundation
of our legal system. Our legal system says not one *fucking* thing about having
any gods, graven images, remembering the sabbath, committing adultery, taking
any names in vain, honoring parents, or coveting.


The reason fucktards want the so-called ten commandments posted in school is to
*impose* their benighted religion on others. They will fail. We will stop them.
Mitchell Holman
2024-05-19 18:08:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 18 May 2024 15:43:19 -0700, Alan says...
Post by Alan
The topic was whether or not posting ALL the ten commandments was
appropriate.
Nope.
Yep.
Post by AlleyCat
THIS is the topic.
"The purpose is NOT SOLELY RELIGIOUS," [shrieking] Sen. J. Adam Bass,
R-Bossier City, told the Senate.
Read the very First Commandment
and get back to us on that one.
Post by Mike Colangelo
I'll bet Republiscum/QAnon Sen. Bass didn't shriek when he said that
nugget of bullshit..
Post by AlleyCat
Rather, it is the Ten Commandments' "historical significance,
The Qur'an *also* has historical significance, as do writings of
Wicca, the Bahá’í faith and Hinduism.
Post by AlleyCat
which is simply one of many documents that display the history of our country
No, the so-called ten commandments do not "display" any part of the
"history of our country." Here's something that *does* display the
Congress shall make no law respecting an *establishment of
religion*
Post by AlleyCat
AND FOUNDATION OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM."
More shrieking, and no, the so-called ten commandments are *not* the
foundation of our legal system. Our legal system says not one
*fucking* thing about having any gods, graven images, remembering the
sabbath, committing adultery, taking any names in vain, honoring
parents, or coveting.
The reason fucktards want the so-called ten commandments posted in
school is to *impose* their benighted religion on others. They will
fail. We will stop them.
My school district is going thru a
flood of asian students for whom the Ten
Commandments would have NO "historical
significance"
AlleyCat
2024-05-19 18:32:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 09:49:05 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by Mike Colangelo
Congress shall make no law respecting an *establishment of religion*
The Ten Commandments, as a whole, is Not a Religion, nor does it profess to be OF any particular religion. I
count ONE commandment which is from Christianity. The nine other Commandments could have come from ANY
religion.


You shall have no other gods before Me.

WHICH God?

You shall make no idols.

WHICH religion?

You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.

One for Christianity.

Keep the Sabbath day holy.

Jews celebrate the Sabbath

Honor your father and your mother.

ZERO religious implication.

You shall not murder.

Made into law.

You shall not commit adultery.

Made into law.

You shall not steal.

Made into law.

You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

Made into law.

You shall not covet.

Made into law, IF taken further.

============================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

There Are Several Theories For Why Rudy Can't Stop Lying

Rudy's An Undeserved Narcissist

Narcisists are often pathological liars, because they simply don't care about
the truth.

They prefer to tell lies and gain control over people than be honest.

Sometimes, compulsive liars are highly impulsive people who struggle to take
the time to think things through and tell the truth.

Lying doesn't necessarily make you a bad person, but it could be a sign of
something more sinister.

By the age of three or four, we all start to lie. At this point in our brain's
development, we learn that we have an incredibly versatile and powerful tool at
our disposal - our language - and we can use it to actually play with reality
and affect the outcome of what's happening.

Sooner or later we learn that lying is "bad," and we shouldn't really do it.
But if Jim Carey's "Liar Liar" taught us anything, it's that this just isn't
feasible. We all have to lie sometimes.

But some people are pathological liars, meaning they can't stop spreading
misinformation about themselves and others. The psychological reasons for why
some people are this way is a bit of a mystery, but in the third edition of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, pathological lying is a
disorder in its own right, as well as a symptom of personality disorders like
psychopathy and narcissism.

"I think it comes from a defect in the neurological wiring in terms of what
causes us to have compassion and empathy," psychiatrist Judith Orloff, author
of "The Empath's Survival Guide," told Business Insider. "Because narcissists,
sociopaths, and psychopaths have what's called empathy deficient disorder,
meaning they don't feel empathy in the way we would."

The Truth Doesn't Matter to Narcissists

When you don't care about other people, lies don't seem to matter. A lack of
empathy essentially means a lack of conscience, which is a hard concept to
grasp for a lot of people.

"When they lie it doesn't hurt them in the same way it would hurt us," Orloff
said. "So many people get into relationships with pathological liars, or just
can't understand why they're lying, because they're trying to fit these people
into the ordinary standards of what it means to be empathetic."

But they don't fit. In fact, they may not even realize they are lying half the
time, because they're not conscious of it. Orloff said they actually believe
they are telling the truth a lot of the time. It's not so much about the fact
itself, she said, as it is about wanting to have power over somebody.

This is extremely dangerous for highly sensitive people, because they attract
narcissists. Then when they see someone is lying, they try and figure it out,
or blame themselves. Once the lies start, it can end with the victim being
gaslighted, which is essentially when they are told over and over again that
their version of reality is incorrect, and they begin to believe the warped
truth of the abuser.

"The great power of relationships is when you can tell the truth to one
another, and trust each other, and be authentic - and with pathological liars
you can't trust them," Orloff said. "You can't base your life around them. It's
like a moral deficit, and there's no accountability. Someone who is a
pathological liar will not say I'm sorry for doing it. They will say it's your
fault."

The only way to escape the clutches of a pathological liar is to be strong
enough to say "no this is not my fault, this is not ringing true to me, so I
can't really trust you," she said.

Unfortunately, people tend to doubt themselves, because the lies can escalate
subtly. It may start with a small white lie, and a few months later the
victim's life with be a mess of confusion because of the web of tall tales that
has been woven.

"If somebody lies, don't try and make an excuse about it," Orloff said. "A lie
is a lie. And if you bring it up to the person and they say it's your fault, or
no it didn't happen, just know there's something very wrong going on."

Psychologist Linda Blair, an author of many psychology books, told Business
Insider some compulsive liars are simply too impulsive to tell the truth. The
impulsive-reflective scale is ingrained in our genes, and it's very hard for
someone highly impulsive to take the time to think things through, just as it
is a challenge for a reflective person to jump into something head first.

"If you're an impulsive person, it's really hard to break the habit, because
you have this terrible feeling inside you that you have to sort things out
right now," Blair said. "So when it comes to your head, you just say it. That
doesn't mean you necessarily lie, but it's a little harder for you to stop from
lying, more than it is for someone who's more reflective."

Pathological lying and narcissism aren't synonymous, they just sometimes go
hand in hand. In other cases, compulsive liars just might not have the capacity
to stop themselves blurting things out. And Blair said they just need to learn
to control their urges and compulsions. Their lies don't necessarily come from
a bad place.

"I don't think it's something they know how to deal with," she said. "We think
probably it has something to do with actual brain function and the way some
people's brains work, which makes it much harder for them to understand the
effect it will have on other people... We think, but we just don't know yet
for sure."
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-19 19:06:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 09:49:05 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by Mike Colangelo
Congress shall make no law respecting an *establishment of religion*
The Ten Commandments, as a whole, is Not a Religion, nor does it profess to be OF any particular religion. I
count ONE commandment which is from Christianity. The nine other Commandments could have come from ANY
religion.
The Establishment Clause does not permit the government to favor
religious beliefs over secular beliefs (or vice versa).
Mike Colangelo
2024-05-19 19:08:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 09:49:05 -0700,  Mike Colangelo says...
   Congress shall make no law respecting an *establishment of religion*
The Ten Commandments, as a whole, is Not a Religion, nor does it profess to be
OF any particular religion. I
count ONE commandment which is from Christianity. The nine other Commandments
could have come from ANY
religion.
The Establishment Clause does not permit the government to favor religious
beliefs over secular beliefs (or vice versa).
And it also doesn't permit the government to pick favorites among religions.
AlleyCat
2024-05-19 21:43:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 12:08:31 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by Mike Colangelo
The Establishment Clause does not permit the government to favor religious
beliefs over secular beliefs (or vice versa).
And it also doesn't permit the government to pick favorites among religions.
Who said it did?

Find it for us.

=====

As much as it pains to say it... you are all wrong... and you are all right, because there IS room for
interpretation regarding the word "covet".

The pain part:

RUDY is the only one of you who wrote the definitive word... "desire". That is the word at the heart of all
interpretations.

That does NOT mean you are wrong, as I said before. But to me, if it matters at all (it does not... I am NOT
into myself as much as YOU fuckers), "desire" is the word needed to be concerned about.

(17) Thou shalt not covet.

This command seems to have been added in order to teach the general principle that the Law of God is
concerned, not with acts and words only, but with the THOUGHTS OF THE HEART. Rightly understood, the seventh
and eighth commandments contain the tenth, which strikes at covetousness and lustful DESIRE. (Comp. Matthew
5:27-28.)

Ancient moralists did not usually recognize this; thought... unless CARRIED OUT INTO ACTS, was regarded as
"FREE;" NO RESPONSIBILITY WAS CONSIDERED TO ATTACH TO IT, and consequently no one felt it needful to control
his thoughts or regulate them. It was therefore of importance that the Divine Law should distinctly assert a
control over men's thoughts and feelings, since they are the source of all that is evil in word and act; and
true godliness consists in bringing "every thought into captivity to Christ" (2Corinthians 10:5).

True, this is by one interpretation, but it being the first and echoing MY thoughts, I think it's as
pertinent or more to defining the word covet.

The Ten Commandments as I wrote them, were abridged versions, of course. To know the TRUE meaning of each and
every commandment, you need to look to the Bible for their exact meanings.

To simply "covet", is an over-simplification of Bible passages.

Exodus 20:17

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor
his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor's.

Another:
Thou shalt not covet - The foregoing commands implicitly forbid all DESIRE of doing that which will be an
injury to our neighbor; this forbids all inordinate DESIRE of having that which will be a gratification to
ourselves. O that such a man's house were mine! such a man's wife mine! such a man's estate mine! This is
certainly the language of discontent at our own lot, and envy at our neighbor's, and these are the sins
principally forbidden here. God give us all to see our face in the glass of this law, and to lay our hearts
under the government of it!

WAAAAAY to far off-topic, so...

============================================================================================================

Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms

I do not agree with this, BUT... if you "let" Muslims pray or anything else they want to do, then, is it
soooo much a burden to post something that's been pretty much made into law?

You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet.

Religious or a lesson and message?

I thought prayer in schools was a no-no?

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2022/04/students-1200x722.jpg

=====

How Supporting STUDENTS During Ramadan Helps Build Feelings of Belonging

Nation Apr 14, 2022 2:03 PM EDT

NEW ORLEANS - For Muslims, Ramadan is the holiest month of the year. It is a month of fasting, prayer,
reflection, and community. However, some practicing Muslim students in Louisiana feel ignored by their public
school community.

(annnnd why shouldn't they... separation of church and state? What's done for Christian students during Lent
and Easter? Dying eggs?)

Ramadan, which begins April 2 and ends May 2 this year, also falls during the last stretch of the school year
for many school districts in the state. The timing presents an uncomfortable situation for parents with
children who are balancing fasting and participation in other religious customs with the demands of school,
including critical year-end academic assessments and outdoor activities.

As a result, some MUSLIM PARENTS ARE SEEKING ACCOMMODATIONS FROM THEIR SCHOOLS for practicing students.
Parent advocates say a lack of guidance from the Louisiana Department of Education makes it tough to navigate
their religious beliefs.

=====

But you still won't acknowledge that four of the other five commandments
they're mandating are religious.

So you're just the weasel you always are, loser.

=====
Post by Mike Colangelo
But you still won't acknowledge that four of the other five commandments
they're mandating are religious.
Not the topic.

They were made into laws, so they SHOULD be listed in schools. You have a problem with laws or morality?
Probably morality, since you Canadians are fucking up your own country NOT being moral at all, and your gay
PM being at the heart of all your problems.

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/18BB/production/_88413360_478909202.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/07/23/16/429C1CBA00000578-0-image-a-77_1500825145596.jpg

=====

Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms

I do not agree with this, BUT... if you "let" Muslims pray or anything else they want to do, then, is it
soooo much a burden to post something that's been pretty much made into law?

You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet.

Religious or a lesson and message?

I thought prayer in schools was a no-no?

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2022/04/students-1200x722.jpg

=====

How Supporting STUDENTS During Ramadan Helps Build Feelings of Belonging

Nation Apr 14, 2022 2:03 PM EDT

NEW ORLEANS - For Muslims, Ramadan is the holiest month of the year. It is a month of fasting, prayer,
reflection, and community. However, some practicing Muslim students in Louisiana feel ignored by their public
school community.

(annnnd why shouldn't they... separation of church and state? What's done for Christian students during Lent
and Easter? Dying eggs?)

Ramadan, which begins April 2 and ends May 2 this year, also falls during the last stretch of the school year
for many school districts in the state. The timing presents an uncomfortable situation for parents with
children who are balancing fasting and participation in other religious customs with the demands of school,
including critical year-end academic assessments and outdoor activities.

As a result, some MUSLIM PARENTS ARE SEEKING ACCOMMODATIONS FROM THEIR SCHOOLS for practicing students.
Parent advocates say a lack of guidance from the Louisiana Department of Education makes it tough to navigate
their religious beliefs.

============================================================================
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 03:31:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 20:00:56 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by AlleyCat
Who said it did?
You did.
Nope.
Picking "sacred writings" from one religion to post on the schoolroom
wall is picking favorites.
No one did that either.
Fuck off.
Only if you help, fella.

=====

Gay Narcissistic Personality Disorder And Gay Rudy

Gay Narcissistic personality disorder is a condition often erroneously mistaken for overconfidence or
conceitedness.

"Professor Canoza"

Sufferers will often monopolize conversations, BELITTLE OTHERS, freely express their sense of SUPERIORITY and
ENTITLEMENT and BECOME DEPRESSED, ANGRY and ABUSIVE in the face of perceived criticism which raises feelings
of insecurity and shame.

There is a theory that gay men, like Rudy, may be particularly susceptible to narcissistic personality
disorder(BINGO!), as a result of subconscious feelings of intense inadequacy, for which narcissism is an
over-compensation.

Counseling for gay men can offer the opportunity to discuss and resolve these issues. Unresolved, the
symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder can have serious consequences, in terms of failure to form
meaningful relationships, build friendships, develop careers and...

...GETTING BANNED FROM ALL USENET SERVERS.

Common indicators

Criteria for diagnosing narcissistic personality disorder are generally considered to be an exaggerated sense
of self-importance, feeling superior and expecting to be considered superior by others, exaggerating
achievements, fantasizing about spectacular successes, demanding constant admiration and compliance, taking
advantage of others while struggling to recognize their needs and feelings, believing they are envied by
others and generally behaving arrogantly. Psychotherapy and counseling for gay men, like Rudy, can help open
the process of exploring issues that underlie these responses.

When to seek help

Often people experiencing narcissistic personality disorder put off seeking clinical intervention. Their
erroneous self-perception as powerful and perfect isolates them from others including medical professionals,
and they generally only seek treatment when they experience associated symptoms of depression, as a result of
perceived slights or rejections with which they struggle to cope.

Early medical intervention

If you recognize personality traits that are common to narcissistic personality disorder, or you're
experiencing depression, anxiety or a disabling sadness, you should consider contacting your own doctor to
discuss these feelings and related concerns, or contacting an experienced counselor or psychiatrist in London
who may be able to offer insight, perspective and the counseling that allows you to confront this life-
limiting condition. Getting appropriate treatment could make your life more rewarding and enjoyable.
Alan
2024-05-21 22:14:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 20:00:56 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by AlleyCat
Who said it did?
You did.
Nope.
Picking "sacred writings" from one religion to post on the schoolroom
wall is picking favorites.
No one did that either.
That is exactly what is being done.
AlleyCat
2024-05-22 00:23:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

How Rudy Thinks (Warning: It's Pretty Messed Up)

Joe Navarro

We often hear the term "narcissist," but in reality, what does that mean? Does it merely describe someone who likes to be the center of attention or likes the way he or she looks, or is there more to it?

The psychiatric literature defines narcississts, like Rudy, as having specific traits such as having a sense of entitlement or requiring excessive admiration, to name a few. But what are narcissistic individuals really like on a day-to-day level?

How a narcissist, like Rudy, thinks:

Anyone who has lived with or worked for a narcissist will tell you how a narcissist, like Rudy, thinks: narcissists, like Rudy, view themselves entirely differently - i.e., preferentially - compared to others, making those around them less valued. And there's the rub: everything must be about the narcissist.

We don't mind that a two-year-old needs constant attention. That's appropriate for the developmental stage of a two-year-old. But we do mind when a forty-year-old needs that level of appreciation - and achieving it comes at our expense.

Narcissists, like Rudy, victimize those around them just by just being who they are, and they won't change. That statement may seem extreme until you listen to the stories of those who have been victimized by a narcissist. Then you realize just how toxic these individuals are.

Work for a narcissistic boss and I can guarantee that he or she will make you physically or psychologically ill. Live with one and I fear for you. I can say that because in researching my book Dangerous Personalities, I talked to scores of individuals who have been victimized by narcissistic personality disorder.

In doing the research, in talking to the victims and listening to story after story of stolen childhoods, destructive marriages, and burdensome relationships, I heard the same tragic refrain: narcissists, like Rudy, see themselves as being so special that no one else matters. No one. Over time, the behavior resulting from their defining pathological traits will cast a wide debris field of human suffering.

But don't take it from me. Listen to the victims. Here's what I have learned about how a narcissist thinks and the lessons that no medical book can teach you. They are lessons for all of us.

1. I love myself and I know you do, too; in fact, everyone does - I can't imagine anyone that doesn't.

2. I have no need to apologize. You, however, must understand, accept, and tolerate me no matter what I do or say.

3. I have few equals in this world, and so far, I have yet to meet one. I am the best (manager, businessman, lover, student, etc.).

4. Most people don't measure up. Without me to lead, others would flounder.

5. I appreciate that there are rules and obligations, but those apply mostly to you because I don't have the time or the inclination to abide by them. Besides, rules are for the average person, and I am far above average.

6. I hope you appreciate all that I am and everything that I have achieved for you-because I am wonderful and faultless.

7. I do wish we could be equals, but we are not and never will be. I will remind you with an unapologetic frequency that I am the smartest person in the room and how well I did in school, in business, as a parent, etc., and you must be grateful.

8. I may seem arrogant and haughty, and that's OK with me. I just don't want to be seen as being like you.

9. I expect you to be loyal to me at all times, no matter what I do; however, don't expect me to be loyal to you in any way.

10. I will criticize you and I expect you to accept it, but if you criticize me, especially in public, I will come at you with rage. One more thing: I will never forget or forgive, and I will pay you back one way or another because I am a "wound collector."

11. I expect you to be interested in what I have achieved and in what I have to say. I, on the other hand, am not at all interested in you or in what you have achieved, so don't expect much curiosity or interest from me about your life. I just don't care.

RELATED: 11 Signs Your Personality Is Offensive (And You Don't Know It)

12. I am not manipulative; I just like to have things done my way, no matter how much it inconveniences others or how it makes them feel. I actually don't care how others feel; feelings are for the weak.

13. I expect gratitude at all times, for even the smallest things I do. As for you, I expect you to do as I demand.

14. I only associate with the best people, and frankly, most of your friends don't measure up.

15. If you would just do what I say and obey, things would be better.

As you can see, it is not easy living with or working with someone that thinks and behaves this way. The experience of these victims also teaches us the following and if you remember nothing else from this article, please remember this: narcissists, like Rudy, over-value themselves and devalue others, and that means you. You will never be treated as an equal, you will never be respected, and you will in time be devalued out of necessity so that they can over-value
themselves.

TOLERATING THE NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY

Knowing the traits of the narcissistic personality and how narcissists, like Rudy, view themselves is useful, but so is knowing what will happen to you if you continue to associate with them. I say this while being well aware that in many cases, children, the elderly, or the infirm may not have a choice. In those cases, it is up to all of us as friends, relatives, teachers, coaches, associates, and co-workers to assist as best we can.

Also, there are those who, for reasons of finances, circumstances, or because they are in a complicated relationship or marriage, will choose to stick it out. To them I say beware: you will be victimized and you will pay a price, be it physically, psychologically, or even financially.

I say that from experience and from talking to many victims whose stories still burden my heart. If you do choose to live with or work with a narcissistic personality, be prepared to accept the following:

1. Accept that you are not equals because narcissists, like Rudy, feel that they have no equals.

2. Those feelings of insecurity, dismay, disbelief, or incongruity that you are experiencing are real and will continue.

3. Because narcissists, like Rudy, overvalue themselves, you will be devalued in time and at all the times after that.

You will, in essence, become the narcissist's chew-toy. Gird yourself to be repeatedly degraded.

4. You will be talked to and treated in ways you never imagined, and you will be expected to tolerate it.

5. The narcissist's needs, wants, and desires come first above all others, no matter how inconvenient to you.

6. Be prepared on a moment's notice for them to turn on you with reptilian indifference at a moment's notice...

As if any positive interactions in the past did not matter. You will question your own sanity as they turn on you, but that is your reality when involved with a narcissist.

7. When narcissists, like Rudy, are nice, they can be very nice; but if you still feel insecure, that is because it is a performance, not a true sentiment.

Niceness is a tool for social survival-a means to get what they want, like needing a hammer to hang a picture.

8. You will lap up the narcissist's niceness, poodle-like, because it doesn't come often, but niceness for the narcissist is perfunctory; merely utilitarian.

9. Be prepared for when the narcissist lashes out not with anger, but with rage.

It is frightening! You will feel attacked and your sense of dignity will be violated.

10. Morality, ethics, and kindness are mere words.

Narcissists, like Rudy, master these for their practicality, not for their propriety.

11. Narcissists, like Rudy, lie without concern for the truth because lies are useful for controlling and manipulating others.

When you catch them in a lie, they will say that it is you who is lying or wrong, or that you misunderstood. Prepare to be attacked and to receive counter-allegations.

12. If it seems that they can only talk about themselves, even at the oddest of times, it is not your imagination.

Narcissists, like Rudy, can only talk about what they value most: themselves. That is their vacuous nature.

13. Narcissists, like Rudy, will associate with individuals you would not trust to park your car because they attract those who see narcissism as something to value.

14. Never expect the narcissist to admit to a mistake or to apologize.

Never! Blame is always outward toward you or others, never inward. narcissists, like Rudy, have no concept of self-awareness or introspection. But they are quick to see faults in others.

15. They expect you to forgive and forget and above all never to challenge them or make them look bad in public.

You must remember that they always want to be perfect in public. Don't embarrass them or contradict them publicly, or you will pay the price.

16. Get used to losing sleep, feeling anxious, restless, less in control, becoming increasingly worried, perhaps even developing psychosomatic ailments.

That is what happens when you live with or associate with a narcissist. Those insecurities are your subconscious talking to you, telling you to escape.

17. Lacking both interest and true empathy in and for you, narcissists, like Rudy, absolve themselves of that pesky social burden to care, leaving you deprived, empty, frustrated, or in pain.

18. They will be unwilling to acknowledge even the smallest thing that matters to you.

In doing so, they devalue you, leaving you feeling unfulfilled and empty.

19. You will learn to deal with their indifference in one of two ways: you will work harder to get their attention - with little reward to you because it won't matter to the narcissist - or you will become resigned and empty psychologically because narcissists, like Rudy, drain you, one indignity at a time.

20. You will be expected to be their cheerleader at all times, even when it is you who needs encouragement the most.

This is the sad, unvarnished truth about how a narcissist thinks, how they will behave, and how they will make you feel. I wish it were a better picture, but talk to the survivors of these personalities and they will tell you: it is that bad, it is that toxic. Why? Because, as Stuart C. Yudofsky explained in his book Fatal Flaws: Navigating Destructive Relationships With People With Disorders of Personality and Character, the truly narcissistic personality is "severely
flawed of character."

For those who ask, "What can I do?" Conventional wisdom advises seeing a trained professional for guidance. That is wise but not always available. In my experience, there is only one solution that works.

Distance yourself from these individuals as soon as you recognize them for what they are and as soon as it is practical. Get as far as you can from them and as your wounds heal, you will see your life change for the better and your dignity restored. As painful as distancing yourself may be, it is often the only way to make the hurting stop and to restore your own physical and mental well-being.
AlleyCat
2024-05-22 02:04:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

How Rudy Thinks (Warning: It's Pretty Messed Up)

Joe Navarro

We often hear the term "narcissist," but in reality, what does that mean? Does it merely describe someone who
likes to be the center of attention or likes the way he or she looks, or is there more to it?

The psychiatric literature defines narcississts, like Rudy, as having specific traits such as having a sense
of entitlement or requiring excessive admiration, to name a few. But what are narcissistic individuals really
like on a day-to-day level?

How a narcissist, like Rudy, thinks:

Anyone who has lived with or worked for a narcissist will tell you how a narcissist, like Rudy, thinks:
narcissists, like Rudy, view themselves entirely differently - i.e., preferentially - compared to others,
making those around them less valued. And there's the rub: everything must be about the narcissist.

We don't mind that a two-year-old needs constant attention. That's appropriate for the developmental stage of
a two-year-old. But we do mind when a forty-year-old needs that level of appreciation - and achieving it
comes at our expense.

Narcissists, like Rudy, victimize those around them just by just being who they are, and they won't change.
That statement may seem extreme until you listen to the stories of those who have been victimized by a
narcissist. Then you realize just how toxic these individuals are.

Work for a narcissistic boss and I can guarantee that he or she will make you physically or psychologically
ill. Live with one and I fear for you. I can say that because in researching my book Dangerous Personalities,
I talked to scores of individuals who have been victimized by narcissistic personality disorder.

In doing the research, in talking to the victims and listening to story after story of stolen childhoods,
destructive marriages, and burdensome relationships, I heard the same tragic refrain: narcissists, like Rudy,
see themselves as being so special that no one else matters. No one. Over time, the behavior resulting from
their defining pathological traits will cast a wide debris field of human suffering.

But don't take it from me. Listen to the victims. Here's what I have learned about how a narcissist thinks
and the lessons that no medical book can teach you. They are lessons for all of us.

1. I love myself and I know you do, too; in fact, everyone does - I can't imagine anyone that doesn't.

2. I have no need to apologize. You, however, must understand, accept, and tolerate me no matter what I do or
say.

3. I have few equals in this world, and so far, I have yet to meet one. I am the best (manager, businessman,
lover, student, etc.).

4. Most people don't measure up. Without me to lead, others would flounder.

5. I appreciate that there are rules and obligations, but those apply mostly to you because I don't have the
time or the inclination to abide by them. Besides, rules are for the average person, and I am far above
average.

6. I hope you appreciate all that I am and everything that I have achieved for you-because I am wonderful and
faultless.

7. I do wish we could be equals, but we are not and never will be. I will remind you with an unapologetic
frequency that I am the smartest person in the room and how well I did in school, in business, as a parent,
etc., and you must be grateful.

8. I may seem arrogant and haughty, and that's OK with me. I just don't want to be seen as being like you.

9. I expect you to be loyal to me at all times, no matter what I do; however, don't expect me to be loyal to
you in any way.

10. I will criticize you and I expect you to accept it, but if you criticize me, especially in public, I will
come at you with rage. One more thing: I will never forget or forgive, and I will pay you back one way or
another because I am a "wound collector."

11. I expect you to be interested in what I have achieved and in what I have to say. I, on the other hand, am
not at all interested in you or in what you have achieved, so don't expect much curiosity or interest from me
about your life. I just don't care.

RELATED: 11 Signs Your Personality Is Offensive (And You Don't Know It)

12. I am not manipulative; I just like to have things done my way, no matter how much it inconveniences
others or how it makes them feel. I actually don't care how others feel; feelings are for the weak.

13. I expect gratitude at all times, for even the smallest things I do. As for you, I expect you to do as I
demand.

14. I only associate with the best people, and frankly, most of your friends don't measure up.

15. If you would just do what I say and obey, things would be better.

As you can see, it is not easy living with or working with someone that thinks and behaves this way. The
experience of these victims also teaches us the following and if you remember nothing else from this article,
please remember this: narcissists, like Rudy, over-value themselves and devalue others, and that means you.
You will never be treated as an equal, you will never be respected, and you will in time be devalued out of
necessity so that they can over-value
themselves.

TOLERATING THE NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY

Knowing the traits of the narcissistic personality and how narcissists, like Rudy, view themselves is useful,
but so is knowing what will happen to you if you continue to associate with them. I say this while being well
aware that in many cases, children, the elderly, or the infirm may not have a choice. In those cases, it is
up to all of us as friends, relatives, teachers, coaches, associates, and co-workers to assist as best we
can.

Also, there are those who, for reasons of finances, circumstances, or because they are in a complicated
relationship or marriage, will choose to stick it out. To them I say beware: you will be victimized and you
will pay a price, be it physically, psychologically, or even financially.

I say that from experience and from talking to many victims whose stories still burden my heart. If you do
choose to live with or work with a narcissistic personality, be prepared to accept the following:

1. Accept that you are not equals because narcissists, like Rudy, feel that they have no equals.

2. Those feelings of insecurity, dismay, disbelief, or incongruity that you are experiencing are real and
will continue.

3. Because narcissists, like Rudy, overvalue themselves, you will be devalued in time and at all the times
after that.

You will, in essence, become the narcissist's chew-toy. Gird yourself to be repeatedly degraded.

4. You will be talked to and treated in ways you never imagined, and you will be expected to tolerate it.

5. The narcissist's needs, wants, and desires come first above all others, no matter how inconvenient to you.

6. Be prepared on a moment's notice for them to turn on you with reptilian indifference at a moment's
notice...

As if any positive interactions in the past did not matter. You will question your own sanity as they turn on
you, but that is your reality when involved with a narcissist.

7. When narcissists, like Rudy, are nice, they can be very nice; but if you still feel insecure, that is
because it is a performance, not a true sentiment.

Niceness is a tool for social survival-a means to get what they want, like needing a hammer to hang a
picture.

8. You will lap up the narcissist's niceness, poodle-like, because it doesn't come often, but niceness for
the narcissist is perfunctory; merely utilitarian.

9. Be prepared for when the narcissist lashes out not with anger, but with rage.

It is frightening! You will feel attacked and your sense of dignity will be violated.

10. Morality, ethics, and kindness are mere words.

Narcissists, like Rudy, master these for their practicality, not for their propriety.

11. Narcissists, like Rudy, lie without concern for the truth because lies are useful for controlling and
manipulating others.

When you catch them in a lie, they will say that it is you who is lying or wrong, or that you misunderstood.
Prepare to be attacked and to receive counter-allegations.

12. If it seems that they can only talk about themselves, even at the oddest of times, it is not your
imagination.

Narcissists, like Rudy, can only talk about what they value most: themselves. That is their vacuous nature.

13. Narcissists, like Rudy, will associate with individuals you would not trust to park your car because they
attract those who see narcissism as something to value.

14. Never expect the narcissist to admit to a mistake or to apologize.

Never! Blame is always outward toward you or others, never inward. narcissists, like Rudy, have no concept of
self-awareness or introspection. But they are quick to see faults in others.

15. They expect you to forgive and forget and above all never to challenge them or make them look bad in
public.

You must remember that they always want to be perfect in public. Don't embarrass them or contradict them
publicly, or you will pay the price.

16. Get used to losing sleep, feeling anxious, restless, less in control, becoming increasingly worried,
perhaps even developing psychosomatic ailments.

That is what happens when you live with or associate with a narcissist. Those insecurities are your
subconscious talking to you, telling you to escape.

17. Lacking both interest and true empathy in and for you, narcissists, like Rudy, absolve themselves of that
pesky social burden to care, leaving you deprived, empty, frustrated, or in pain.

18. They will be unwilling to acknowledge even the smallest thing that matters to you.

In doing so, they devalue you, leaving you feeling unfulfilled and empty.

19. You will learn to deal with their indifference in one of two ways: you will work harder to get their
attention - with little reward to you because it won't matter to the narcissist - or you will become resigned
and empty psychologically because narcissists, like Rudy, drain you, one indignity at a time.

20. You will be expected to be their cheerleader at all times, even when it is you who needs encouragement
the most.

This is the sad, unvarnished truth about how a narcissist thinks, how they will behave, and how they will
make you feel. I wish it were a better picture, but talk to the survivors of these personalities and they
will tell you: it is that bad, it is that toxic. Why? Because, as Stuart C. Yudofsky explained in his book
Fatal Flaws: Navigating Destructive Relationships With People With Disorders of Personality and Character,
the truly narcissistic personality is "severely
flawed of character."

For those who ask, "What can I do?" Conventional wisdom advises seeing a trained professional for guidance.
That is wise but not always available. In my experience, there is only one solution that works.

Distance yourself from these individuals as soon as you recognize them for what they are and as soon as it is
practical. Get as far as you can from them and as your wounds heal, you will see your life change for the
better and your dignity restored. As painful as distancing yourself may be, it is often the only way to make
the hurting stop and to restore your own physical and mental well-being.
AlleyCat
2024-05-22 02:04:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 21 May 2024 18:38:41 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
AlleyPussyBitch is one of the [sic] several people who *capitulate* and *submit* to Rudy on an [sic] daily basis,
Nooo... that's not narcissistic at all.

Pretty sad when narcissists like Rudy, have to change others' text to make it seem they fucked up, when in
reality, it's Rudy who's fucked up... in the head.

============================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

There Are Several Theories For Why Rudy Can't Stop Lying

Rudy's An Undeserved Narcissist

Narcissists are often pathological liars, because they simply don't care about
the truth.

They prefer to tell lies and gain control over people than be honest.

Sometimes, compulsive liars are highly impulsive people who struggle to take
the time to think things through and tell the truth.

Lying doesn't necessarily make you a bad person, but it could be a sign of
something more sinister.

By the age of three or four, we all start to lie. At this point in our brain's
development, we learn that we have an incredibly versatile and powerful tool at
our disposal - our language - and we can use it to actually play with reality
and affect the outcome of what's happening.

Sooner or later we learn that lying is "bad," and we shouldn't really do it.
But if Jim Carey's "Liar Liar" taught us anything, it's that this just isn't
feasible. We all have to lie sometimes.

But some people are pathological liars, meaning they can't stop spreading
misinformation about themselves and others. The psychological reasons for why
some people are this way is a bit of a mystery, but in the third edition of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, pathological lying is a
disorder in its own right, as well as a symptom of personality disorders like
psychopathy and narcissism.

"I think it comes from a defect in the neurological wiring in terms of what
causes us to have compassion and empathy," psychiatrist Judith Orloff, author
of "The Empath's Survival Guide," told Business Insider. "Because narcissists,
sociopaths, and psychopaths have what's called empathy deficient disorder,
meaning they don't feel empathy in the way we would."

The Truth Doesn't Matter to Narcissists

When you don't care about other people, lies don't seem to matter. A lack of
empathy essentially means a lack of conscience, which is a hard concept to
grasp for a lot of people.

"When they lie it doesn't hurt them in the same way it would hurt us," Orloff
said. "So many people get into relationships with pathological liars, or just
can't understand why they're lying, because they're trying to fit these people
into the ordinary standards of what it means to be empathetic."

But they don't fit. In fact, they may not even realize they are lying half the
time, because they're not conscious of it. Orloff said they actually believe
they are telling the truth a lot of the time. It's not so much about the fact
itself, she said, as it is about wanting to have power over somebody.

This is extremely dangerous for highly sensitive people, because they attract
narcissists. Then when they see someone is lying, they try and figure it out,
or blame themselves. Once the lies start, it can end with the victim being
gaslighted, which is essentially when they are told over and over again that
their version of reality is incorrect, and they begin to believe the warped
truth of the abuser.

"The great power of relationships is when you can tell the truth to one
another, and trust each other, and be authentic - and with pathological liars
you can't trust them," Orloff said. "You can't base your life around them. It's
like a moral deficit, and there's no accountability. Someone who is a
pathological liar will not say I'm sorry for doing it. They will say it's your
fault."

The only way to escape the clutches of a pathological liar is to be strong
enough to say "no this is not my fault, this is not ringing true to me, so I
can't really trust you," she said.

Unfortunately, people tend to doubt themselves, because the lies can escalate
subtly. It may start with a small white lie, and a few months later the
victim's life with be a mess of confusion because of the web of tall tales that
has been woven.

"If somebody lies, don't try and make an excuse about it," Orloff said. "A lie
is a lie. And if you bring it up to the person and they say it's your fault, or
no it didn't happen, just know there's something very wrong going on."

Psychologist Linda Blair, an author of many psychology books, told Business
Insider some compulsive liars are simply too impulsive to tell the truth. The
impulsive-reflective scale is ingrained in our genes, and it's very hard for
someone highly impulsive to take the time to think things through, just as it
is a challenge for a reflective person to jump into something head first.

"If you're an impulsive person, it's really hard to break the habit, because
you have this terrible feeling inside you that you have to sort things out
right now," Blair said. "So when it comes to your head, you just say it. That
doesn't mean you necessarily lie, but it's a little harder for you to stop from
lying, more than it is for someone who's more reflective."

Pathological lying and narcissism aren't synonymous, they just sometimes go
hand in hand. In other cases, compulsive liars just might not have the capacity
to stop themselves blurting things out. And Blair said they just need to learn
to control their urges and compulsions. Their lies don't necessarily come from
a bad place.

"I don't think it's something they know how to deal with," she said. "We think
probably it has something to do with actual brain function and the way some
people's brains work, which makes it much harder for them to understand the
effect it will have on other people... We think, but we just don't know yet
for sure."
Alan
2024-05-21 22:13:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 12:08:31 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by Mike Colangelo
The Establishment Clause does not permit the government to favor religious
beliefs over secular beliefs (or vice versa).
And it also doesn't permit the government to pick favorites among religions.
Who said it did?
Find it for us.
'Today, what constitutes an "establishment of religion" is often
governed under the three-part test set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court
in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971). Under the "Lemon" test,
government can assist religion only if (1) the primary purpose of the
assistance is secular, (2) the assistance must neither promote nor
inhibit religion, and (3) there is no excessive entanglement between
church and state.'

<https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/first-amendment-and-religion>
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-22 01:07:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Alan
On Sun, 19 May 2024 12:08:31 -0700,  Mike Colangelo says...
Post by Mike Colangelo
The Establishment Clause does not permit the government to favor religious
beliefs over secular beliefs (or vice versa).
And it also doesn't permit the government to pick favorites among religions.
Who said it did?
Find it for us.
'Today, what constitutes an "establishment of religion" is often
governed under the three-part test set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court
in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971). Under the "Lemon" test,
government can assist religion only if (1) the primary purpose of the
assistance is secular, (2) the assistance must neither promote nor
inhibit religion, and (3) there is no excessive entanglement between
church and state.'
<https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/first-amendment-and-religion>
Lemon was overruled by SCOTUS in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District
(2022). Instead, "the Establishment Clause must be interpreted by
“reference to historical practices and understandings.”" (whatever that
means and however it might apply to cases going forward).
Akidasar
2024-05-22 15:39:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 21 May 2024 15:13:44 -0700
Post by Alan
Under the "Lemon" test,
government can assist religion only if (1) the primary purpose of the
assistance is secular, (2) the assistance must neither promote nor
inhibit religion, and (3) there is no excessive entanglement between
church and state.'
Good, that ends discussions about teaching the history of the 10
Commandments and our using them as a basis for modern law..

TY
AlleyCat
2024-05-19 21:43:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 12:14:00 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by AlleyCat
The Ten Commandments, as a whole, is Not a Religion,
All of your upper case is *wrong* and illiterate.
It's not "a" religion, but it is inseparable *from* religion.
Whose?
Post by AlleyCat
nor does it profess to be OF any particular religion.
That's a lie. The so-called ten commandments were supposedly "divinely revealed"
to Moses on Mt. Sinai. It is this mythical "divine" origin that is the very
reason Jews and Christians want to post them on schoolroom walls.
I guess you're to stupid to know what "A" particular religion means, huh shorty?

=====

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

Why Does Narcissistic Rudy Need So Much Attention

Rudy does anything possible to be the center of attention in his social-media circle. Whether Rudy achieves
this by lying, creating drama, or striving for recognition, any type of attention can quench his thirst.

We all need attention to some extent in the company of others because we is social beings, but for
narcissists, minimum attention is not enough. Rudy has a deeper hunger for it. Rudy feels satisfied only when
Rudy is the center of attention.

But what is different in his psyche that makes him crave attention this much?

Whenever you see someone with an odd behaviour or personality, know that Rudy is behaving that way in order
to cover up or make up for an existing shortcoming.

Like his height?

LOL

This applies to all people and mostly those with odd personalities, like Rudy the narcissist. A lying person
will try to look as innocent as possible. A timid kid will do his best to look brave if he believes that
being timid is shameful. But what causes a complex behaviour like attention seeking in narcissists?



1. Rudy Believes That He Deserves It

Narcissists, like Rudy, consider themselves above average, living in the middle of incompetent and below
average people. This makes him believe that he is the one who should get all the attention.

Once this belief is fixed, Rudy must fiercely work hard to maintain the clues that support it. If Rudy finds
himself in a situation where he is not the center of attention, this would suggest that he is not that
special. This can badly hurt his fragile ego.

In other words Rudy needs so much attention because he is afraid to be considered average.

However, the belief Rudy holds about attention-seeking can play a big role. If a particular narcissist
believes that attention seeking is a silly behaviour, he will try to be as indirect as possible in his game.
GIVING UP ATTENTION IS NOT AN OPTION.



2. It Is A Source of Narcissistic Supply

Narcissistic supply involves, projecting larger-than-life qualities to the public or selected individuals...

"Professor Rudy"

"Superior Rudy"

... in order to get positive feedback. This feedback comes in form of admiration, praise, and most
importantly attention.

(Only to HIMSELF!)

Note that negative attention is also appreciated to some extent.

He would rather get negative attention that zero attention.

(BINGO!)

This narcissistic supply is the oxygen he breathes. Without it, he would sink into depression and bad moods.



3. To Cover Up Inferiority Feelings. (LOL)

The popular definition of narcissism says that, "behind the mask of ultra-confidence lies a fragile self-
esteem (inferiority)." And that is completely true. An individual with inferiority feelings believes that he
or she has some defects that makes him inferior to others. These defects can be real or imagined.

(Oh, they're real, all right. Dwarfism?)

Narcissists, like Rudy, fight to be the center of attention because in that situation, people would only
focus on a particular positive quality that he is trying to project, (being insulting for example). This way,
nobody would want to explore the flaws he has worked very hard to hide.

Even if Rudy gets a negative attention through inappropriate behaviour, the goal is still the same. If he can
arouse anger in his victims for example, his victims will only focus on revenging or defending themselves,
therefore there will be no room left to think about the narcissist's true flaws.



4. He Feels Ignored. (ding ding ding ding... we have a winner!)

Feeling invisible is one of Rudy's worst fears.

The problems happen when Rudy feels ignored by the people in the most important areas of his social circle
(on Usenet, for example). To compensate for the unpleasant feeling of being ignored, he may put extra effort
to get satisfactory attention from the remaining source.

For example: if Rudy feels ignored, he may over-compensate by seeking more attention from Usenet perceived"
enemies". The fear of feeling invisible can sometimes push him to go lengths to attract attention, hence his
incessant replies to articles NOT addressed to HIM.
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-19 22:57:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 12:14:00 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by AlleyCat
The Ten Commandments, as a whole, is Not a Religion,
All of your upper case is *wrong* and illiterate.
It's not "a" religion, but it is inseparable *from* religion.
Whose?
It does not matter. If a public school teaches the goodness (or badness)
of a strictly religious value, it has violated the Establishment Clause
even though the religious value belongs to no particular religion.
Akidasar
2024-05-19 23:21:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 15:57:15 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 12:14:00 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by AlleyCat
The Ten Commandments, as a whole, is Not a Religion,
All of your upper case is *wrong* and illiterate.
It's not "a" religion, but it is inseparable *from* religion.
Whose?
It does not matter.
Of course it matters, no specific religious identity remands the
discussion to core values. And core values in this nation spring from
Christianity. Everyone knows this.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
If a public school teaches the goodness (or
badness) of a strictly religious value, it has violated the
Establishment Clause even though the religious value belongs to no
particular religion.
Goodness is not a strictly religious value, it's a general trait
available to any and all regardless of specific faith or dogma.

Quit dancing on the head of a pin to make yourself look erudite. You're
not.

Given Biblical precepts are already well-established (and represented
in our courts) as the basis for modern American laws, the seed values of
Christianity are institutionalized and accepted.
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-20 00:49:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Akidasar
On Sun, 19 May 2024 15:57:15 -0700
{snip}
Post by Akidasar
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
If a public school teaches the goodness (or
badness) of a strictly religious value, it has violated the
Establishment Clause even though the religious value belongs to no
particular religion.
Goodness is not a strictly religious value, it's a general trait
available to any and all regardless of specific faith or dogma.
WTF are you blabbering about? If a public school teaches that the First
Commandment is a good thing, it has violated the Establishment Clause
even if no particular religion is being elevated above any other
particular religion.
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 02:29:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 02:03:27 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
And the other Biblical "commandments"
(theft, murder, lying) are common to ALL
cultures and ALL religions. Even atheistic
countries have them.
Thanks.

=====

Liberals Are Wimps (New Study Shocks Scientifc Community...

https://freedomwire.com/liberals-are-wimps-new-study-shocks-scientific- community/

Liberal men are physically smaller and weaker than conservative men - and it's measurable.

=====

Vice Admits Liberal Men are Weaker, Less Attractive than...

https://phillipschneider.com/vice-admits-liberal-men-are-weaker-less- attractive-than-conservatives/

Vice Admits Liberal Men are Weaker, Less Attractive than Conservatives By Phillip Schneider on August 11,
2020 ( Leave a comment ) While the flames of the culture war rage, even far-left media publication Vice
admits that liberal men are weaker and less competent than conservatives.

=====

TRUTH: Why Liberals Are WEAKER Than Conservatives https://thefederalistpapers.org/us/truth-liberals-weaker-
conservatives

TRUTH: Why Liberals Are WEAKER Than Conservatives. Speaking of weak liberals, who can't even stand the sight
of history: Texas Restaurant Defending Controversial Sign Some Are Calling Racist - by Robert Gehl. A Texas
restaurant is under attack on social media for what many are calling its racist décor. The neon sign hung at
Cook's Garage...

=====

Science Proves That Liberals Are Crazier Than Conservatives

https://freedomwire.com/liberals-are-crazy/

Well, I recently came across a fantastic article about another study of Liberals - except this time, instead
of focusing on the weak males, it focuses on the average Liberal woman instead. A Ph.D. candidate at Georgia
State University has analyzed the data out of a recent Pew Research Center poll, and the results are amazing.

=====

Shocker: Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal

https://redstate.com/terichristoph/2017/05/26/shocker-study-shows-physically- weak-men-tend-to-be-liberal-
n72373

Shocker: Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal. In news that will surprise absolutely no one, a
new study reveals that girly men are more likely to favor socialist policies. The study, conducted by
researchers at Brunel University London, looked at the height, weight, physical strength, and bicep
circumference of 171 men, along...

=====

Liberalism Breeds Soft, Weak, Young "Men" - Louder With...

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/liberalism-breeds-soft-weak-young-men

by Steven Crowder I know some of you think when I say "liberalism breeds weak, fat men," that I'm merely
politicizing an issue to be polarizing. I assure you that's not the case. Allow me five hundred words to make
my case. I was a chubby kid. Strike that, I was a jiggly shrimp. Skinny-fat. The kind of kid who was
relatively thin, yet managed to ma

=====

Why Liberals Are So Physically Monstrous And Repulsive...

https://www.returnofkings.com/118536/why-liberals-are-so-physically-monstrous- and-repulsive

Liberals are not born uglier. They voluntarily remain ugly or become uglier to fit a narrative. "Appearance
is ideology". It takes a special kind of hypocrisy to call something that is universally seen as ugly
"beautiful" and vice-versa.

=====

Science says liberals, not conservatives, are psychotic

https://nypost.com/2016/06/09/science-says-liberal-beliefs-are-linked-to- pyschotic-traits/

Jun 9, 2016 Turns out liberals are the real authoritarians. A political-science journal that published an
oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more likely to show traits associated with "psychoticism"...

=====

12 Reasons Why Liberals And Progressives Will Always Be...

https://www.returnofkings.com/100887/12-reasons-why-liberals-and-progressives- will-always-be-losers

Liberal men however are inexcusable, they are either effeminate enough to be emotionally manipulated or are
weak and yielding to social pressures. December 10, 2016 Take The Red Pill Don't forget that Liberal men are
usually the offspring of domineering feminists or divorced feminists and sometimes single mothers.

=====

Men With Weak Upper Bodies Tend to Be Liberal - Physically Strong Men Tend to Be Conservative

Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are
inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.

Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to physical strength.

Men's upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic redistribution, according to the
research.

The principal investigators - psychological scientists Michael Bang Petersen, of Aarhus University in
Denmark, and Daniel Sznycer, of the University of California in the U.S., believe that the link may reflect
psychological traits that evolved in response to our early ancestral environments and continue to influence
behavior today.

Professor Petersen said: 'While many think of politics as a modern phenomenon, it has - in a sense - always
been with our species.'

In the days of our early ancestors, decisions about the distribution of resources were not made in
courthouses or legislative offices, but through shows of strength.

With this in mind, Professor Petersen and Professor Sznycer hypothesized that upper-body strength - a proxy
for the ability to physically defend or acquire resources - would predict men's opinions about the
redistribution of wealth.
Akidasar
2024-05-20 17:10:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 17:49:57 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
On Sun, 19 May 2024 15:57:15 -0700
{snip}
Post by Akidasar
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
If a public school teaches the goodness (or
badness) of a strictly religious value, it has violated the
Establishment Clause even though the religious value belongs to no
particular religion.
Goodness is not a strictly religious value, it's a general trait
available to any and all regardless of specific faith or dogma.
WTF are you blabbering about?
Read for comprehension, brigh tboi!
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
If a public school teaches that the
First Commandment is a good thing, it has violated the Establishment
Clause even if no particular religion is being elevated above any
other particular religion.
Nope.

No specific religion is established by denoting the origins and nature
of that value.

Have a contextual clue from our framer's please:

https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript

In Congress, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted
among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these
ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to
institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and
organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely
to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-20 19:44:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Akidasar
On Sun, 19 May 2024 17:49:57 -0700
{snip}
Post by Akidasar
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
If a public school teaches that the
First Commandment is a good thing, it has violated the Establishment
Clause even if no particular religion is being elevated above any
other particular religion.
Nope.
No specific religion is established by denoting the origins and nature
of that value.
No specific religion need be for a violation of the Establishment Clause.
Akidasar
2024-05-20 19:48:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:44:43 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
On Sun, 19 May 2024 17:49:57 -0700
{snip}
Post by Akidasar
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
If a public school teaches that the
First Commandment is a good thing, it has violated the
Establishment Clause even if no particular religion is being
elevated above any other particular religion.
Nope.
No specific religion is established by denoting the origins and
nature of that value.
No specific religion need be for a violation of the Establishment Clause.
Then your premise is that our Declaration is in violation of the
Establishment clause?

You stuttering simpleton.


https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript

In Congress, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted
among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these
ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to
institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and
organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely
to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-20 19:54:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Akidasar
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:44:43 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
On Sun, 19 May 2024 17:49:57 -0700
{snip}
Post by Akidasar
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
If a public school teaches that the
First Commandment is a good thing, it has violated the
Establishment Clause even if no particular religion is being
elevated above any other particular religion.
Nope.
No specific religion is established by denoting the origins and
nature of that value.
No specific religion need be for a violation of the Establishment Clause.
Then your premise is that our Declaration is in violation of the
Establishment clause?
The only reference to religion in the Declaration is that our rights
come from a Creator. That's an opinion. It's not a law, regulation, rule
or any other type of tangible government policy. It thus can't be in
violation of the Establishment Clause.
Akidasar
2024-05-20 21:41:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:54:24 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:44:43 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
On Sun, 19 May 2024 17:49:57 -0700
{snip}
Post by Akidasar
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
If a public school teaches that the
First Commandment is a good thing, it has violated the
Establishment Clause even if no particular religion is being
elevated above any other particular religion.
Nope.
No specific religion is established by denoting the origins and
nature of that value.
No specific religion need be for a violation of the Establishment Clause.
Then your premise is that our Declaration is in violation of the
Establishment clause?
The only reference to religion in the Declaration is that our rights
come from a Creator.
No, that is NOT a reference to "religion" - try again, you lying
skankbag.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
That's an opinion.
No it is a direct credit to the creator for our given rights, try again,
skankbag.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
It's not a law, regulation,
rule or any other type of tangible government policy.
It is the underlying and establishing document from which the
constitution sprung, skankbag.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
It thus can't
be in violation of the Establishment Clause.
Iow - the Constitution agrees that official mention and credit to
the Creator/Nature's God is NOT an establishment of any
definable religion.

Thanks for playing, skankbag.
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-20 22:46:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Akidasar
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:54:24 -0700
Iow - the Constitution agrees that official mention and credit to
the Creator/Nature's God is NOT an establishment of any
definable religion.
It would not, in and of itself, violate the Establishment Clause. But,
if such a mention *advocated* for religious doctrine, that would be a
violation without that doctrine being tied to any specific religion.
Akidasar
2024-05-20 23:05:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 15:46:21 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:54:24 -0700
Iow - the Constitution agrees that official mention and credit to
the Creator/Nature's God is NOT an establishment of any
definable religion.
It would not, in and of itself, violate the Establishment Clause.
It underlies the very document containing said clause, skankbag!
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
But, if such a mention *advocated* for religious doctrine,
It does NOT!

Game over - you lose.
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-20 23:29:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Akidasar
On Mon, 20 May 2024 15:46:21 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:54:24 -0700
Iow - the Constitution agrees that official mention and credit to
the Creator/Nature's God is NOT an establishment of any
definable religion.
It would not, in and of itself, violate the Establishment Clause.
It underlies the very document containing said clause, skankbag!
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
But, if such a mention *advocated* for religious doctrine,
It does NOT!
And thus, the Declaration of Independence does not violate the
Establishment Clause. But, teaching the Ten Commandments in public
school does even if no specific religion is taught.
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 23:41:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 16:29:31 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
It does NOT!
And thus, the Declaration of Independence does not violate the
Establishment Clause. But, teaching the Ten Commandments in public
school does even if no specific religion is taught.
No.

TEACHING the Ten Commandments is like Bible study.

Billy... these are the Ten Commandments.

Not illegal.

Billy... you MUST follow these Ten Commandments because the government says so.

Illegal.

============================================================================

THIS is Joe Biden when not on drugs or stimulants and acts like himself:

https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/S/p/u/y/Spuyq.caa.mp4?b=1&u=ummtf

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xPhZcMYekKs?feature=share

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/hiDRFTVH0rY

http://youtu.be/KuhR-Nqv6Wg

http://youtu.be/D5JF7PupC58andpp

http://youtu.be/3gsMTe0Nr4Yandpp

http://youtu.be/WBUgHkbtm9Iandpp

=====

Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden

Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

=====

Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4

http://youtu.be/Slm5bvO-_5I

=====

Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press
Conference
http://youtu.be/SdfvIvYPPRo

Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story
https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a-
story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech
https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


Joe Biden: You Just Wonder
http://youtu.be/Uj0ccJgJsPA


Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech
http://youtu.be/0xwoaagXFyU


Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect'
http://youtu.be/oHI__YneMuE


Barely There Biden Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/YxxAyHgBiNU


Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc


Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred
http://youtu.be/vt7WPjsYl44


Joe Biden making Zer0 sense
http://youtu.be/VYch-1fRhiE


Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero
Sense!
http://youtu.be/qg4OUk0qyWM
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-20 23:47:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 16:29:31 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
It does NOT!
And thus, the Declaration of Independence does not violate the
Establishment Clause. But, teaching the Ten Commandments in public
school does even if no specific religion is taught.
No.
TEACHING the Ten Commandments is like Bible study.
Billy... these are the Ten Commandments.
Not illegal.
Very illegal in public schools.
Post by AlleyCat
Billy... you MUST follow these Ten Commandments because the government says so.
Illegal.
Akidasar
2024-05-21 00:49:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 16:47:56 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 16:29:31 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
It does NOT!
And thus, the Declaration of Independence does not violate the
Establishment Clause. But, teaching the Ten Commandments in public
school does even if no specific religion is taught.
No.
TEACHING the Ten Commandments is like Bible study.
Billy... these are the Ten Commandments.
Not illegal.
Very illegal in public schools.
History itself is illegal - you don't say!
Mike Colangelo
2024-05-21 06:10:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Akidasar
On Mon, 20 May 2024 16:47:56 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 16:29:31 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
It does NOT!
And thus, the Declaration of Independence does not violate the
Establishment Clause. But, teaching the Ten Commandments in public
school does even if no specific religion is taught.
No.
TEACHING the Ten Commandments is like Bible study.
Billy... these are the Ten Commandments.
Not illegal.
Very illegal in public schools.
History itself is illegal
Bullshit. The so-called ten commandments are not history. Teaching history is
not illegal, but teaching religious dogma and pretending it's history is illegal.

Posting religious dogma on schoolroom walls is illegal, and it won't happen. You
have to accommodate yourself to that fact.
Akidasar
2024-05-21 15:23:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 23:10:21 -0700
Post by Mike Colangelo
The so-called ten commandments are not history.
tRudy, you are a senseless denial bot - fuck off and die.
Akidasar
2024-05-21 00:48:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 16:29:31 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
On Mon, 20 May 2024 15:46:21 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:54:24 -0700
Iow - the Constitution agrees that official mention and credit to
the Creator/Nature's God is NOT an establishment of any
definable religion.
It would not, in and of itself, violate the Establishment Clause.
It underlies the very document containing said clause, skankbag!
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
But, if such a mention *advocated* for religious doctrine,
It does NOT!
And thus, the Declaration of Independence does not violate the
Establishment Clause.
And thus the Constitutioon establishes a precedent for the citation,
study, and credit to the Creator and His laws, as expressed in our
laws.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
But, teaching the Ten Commandments in public
school does even if no specific religion is taught.
Nope.

It is history, same as teaching the Iroquis Confederacy, skankbag.
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-21 01:29:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 16:29:31 -0700
{snip}
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
But, teaching the Ten Commandments in public
school does even if no specific religion is taught.
Nope.
It is history, same as teaching the Iroquis Confederacy, skankbag.
You can teach the history of the Commandments. You can't teach that the
Commandments as being good (or bad).
AlleyCat
2024-05-21 02:31:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 18:29:12 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
You can teach the history of the Commandments. You can't teach that the
Commandments as being good (or bad).
Make up your fucking mind.

That's what I said, and you said no.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
And thus, the Declaration of Independence does not violate the
Establishment Clause. But, teaching the Ten Commandments in public
school does even if no specific religion is taught.
No.

TEACHING the Ten Commandments is like Bible study.

Billy... these are the Ten Commandments.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by AlleyCat
Not illegal.
Very illegal in public schools.
Billy... you MUST follow these Ten Commandments because the government says so.

Illegal.

============================================================================

THIS is Joe Biden when not on drugs or stimulants and acts like himself:

https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/S/p/u/y/Spuyq.caa.mp4?b=1&u=ummtf

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xPhZcMYekKs?feature=share

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/hiDRFTVH0rY

http://youtu.be/KuhR-Nqv6Wg

http://youtu.be/D5JF7PupC58andpp

http://youtu.be/3gsMTe0Nr4Yandpp

http://youtu.be/WBUgHkbtm9Iandpp

=====

Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden

Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

=====

Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4

http://youtu.be/Slm5bvO-_5I

=====

Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press
Conference
http://youtu.be/SdfvIvYPPRo

Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story
https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a-
story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech
https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


Joe Biden: You Just Wonder
http://youtu.be/Uj0ccJgJsPA


Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech
http://youtu.be/0xwoaagXFyU


Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect'
http://youtu.be/oHI__YneMuE


Barely There Biden Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/YxxAyHgBiNU


Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc


Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred
http://youtu.be/vt7WPjsYl44


Joe Biden making Zer0 sense
http://youtu.be/VYch-1fRhiE


Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero
Sense!
http://youtu.be/qg4OUk0qyWM
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-21 04:12:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 18:29:12 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
You can teach the history of the Commandments. You can't teach that the
Commandments as being good (or bad).
Make up your fucking mind.
That's what I said, and you said no.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
And thus, the Declaration of Independence does not violate the
Establishment Clause. But, teaching the Ten Commandments in public
school does even if no specific religion is taught.
No.
TEACHING the Ten Commandments is like Bible study.
Bible study usually refers to affirming one's religious beliefs, not as
a study of history or literature. My "not legal" comment referred to
teaching the Commandments from that perspective.
Akidasar
2024-05-21 15:23:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 21:12:08 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Bible study usually refers to affirming one's religious beliefs
Not necessarily, not at all.

One can study scriptures without being beholden to any given faith, even
the Jewish one.
AlleyCat
2024-05-21 18:14:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 21:12:08 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by AlleyCat
TEACHING the Ten Commandments is like Bible study.
Bible study usually refers to affirming one's religious beliefs
Usually? Let's deal in absolutes, here.

You don't think ANY teacher, who taught Bible study, can be objective? THAT would be being close-minded.

Teaching Bible Study is no different than taking out a history book and going over what's inside the book.
You can teach history without "affirming one's belief" in how history transpired, though there ARE a LOT of
history teachers out there teaching bullshit history revisionism and Critical Race Theory and attaching THEIR
affirmations and feewings to it.

If the teacher can be objective, "teaching" the Bible is no different than teaching History.

If you don't know it already... I'm an atheist. I CAN be objectionable. LOL

=============================================================================================================

THIS is Joe Biden when not on drugs or stimulants and acts like himself:

https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/S/p/u/y/Spuyq.caa.mp4?b=1&u=ummtf

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xPhZcMYekKs?feature=share

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/hiDRFTVH0rY

http://youtu.be/KuhR-Nqv6Wg

http://youtu.be/D5JF7PupC58andpp

http://youtu.be/3gsMTe0Nr4Yandpp

http://youtu.be/WBUgHkbtm9Iandpp

=====

Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden

Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

=====

Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4

http://youtu.be/Slm5bvO-_5I

=====

Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press
Conference
http://youtu.be/SdfvIvYPPRo

Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story
https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a-
story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech
https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


Joe Biden: You Just Wonder
http://youtu.be/Uj0ccJgJsPA


Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech
http://youtu.be/0xwoaagXFyU


Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect'
http://youtu.be/oHI__YneMuE


Barely There Biden Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/YxxAyHgBiNU


Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc


Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred
http://youtu.be/vt7WPjsYl44


Joe Biden making Zer0 sense
http://youtu.be/VYch-1fRhiE


Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero
Sense!
http://youtu.be/qg4OUk0qyWM
Akidasar
2024-05-21 15:21:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 18:29:12 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 16:29:31 -0700
{snip}
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
But, teaching the Ten Commandments in public
school does even if no specific religion is taught.
Nope.
It is history, same as teaching the Iroquis Confederacy, skankbag.
You can teach the history of the Commandments.
Yes we can, and will and do.
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
You can't teach that
the Commandments as being good (or bad).
You are a sickening fascist of exterminable proportions.
Mike Colangelo
2024-05-21 06:10:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 16:29:31 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
On Mon, 20 May 2024 15:46:21 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by Akidasar
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:54:24 -0700
Iow - the Constitution agrees that official mention and credit to
the Creator/Nature's God is NOT an establishment of any
definable religion.
It would not, in and of itself, violate the Establishment Clause.
It underlies the very document containing said clause, skankbag!
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
But, if such a mention *advocated* for religious doctrine,
It does NOT!
And thus, the Declaration of Independence does not violate the
Establishment Clause.
And thus the Constitutioon [sic] establishes a precedent for the citation,
study, and credit to the Creator [sic] and His [sic] laws, as expressed in our
laws.
The *Constitution* establishes no such thing. Our laws are not predicated in any
way on "credit to the Creator." Fuck off with your fawning mock reverence. Fuck
off altogether with your benighted christo-fascist thinking.

The Declaration *precedes* the Constitution, and the latter is not in any way
dependent on the former. We could have a constitution *without* any such
declaration. The Declaration was purely a political statement, and a
justification for political action. The Constitution is purely a legal document.
There is no overlap or intersection.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
But, teaching the Ten Commandments in public
school does even if no specific religion is taught.
The so-called ten commandments *is*, of course, inseparably tied to a specific
religion or religious tradition, Josh. Even if that specific religion or
religious tradition isn't named, we all know what it is. Mandating the posting
of the so-called ten commandments is mandating establishment of religion —
*prohibited*.
Post by AlleyCat
Nope.
Yep.
Post by AlleyCat
It is history,
It is not *our* national history, and it is not fundamental to *American* history.

No ten commandments on the schoolroom wall. This is settled. We win, you lose.
Akidasar
2024-05-21 15:25:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 23:10:24 -0700
Post by Mike Colangelo
Our laws are not predicated in any
way on "credit to the Creator." Fuck off with your fawning mock
reverence. Fuck off altogether with your benighted christo-fascist
thinking.
Tell it to the framers, you exterminable little Suckramento filth:


In Congress, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.
AlleyCat
2024-05-22 14:27:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
... hail old racist, slave-owning White men's words that are also as old as those documents..

Hypocrite, much?

On Wed, 22 May 2024 12:50:13 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
"I do not find in orthodox Christianity one redeeming
feature."
-- Thomas Jefferson
But he believed in God, and God spoke all these words (The Ten Commandments)
"I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early
in life, I absenteed myself from Christian assemblies."
-- Benjamin Franklin
But he believed in God, and God spoke all these words (The Ten Commandments)
"The purpose of separation of church and state is
to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless
strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood
for centuries."
-- James Madison
Writing about keeping the Church of England, not Christianity. Did he believe in God? And God spoke all these
words (The Ten Commandments)
"The divinity of Jesus is made a convenient cover for
absurdity. Nowhere in the Gospels do we find a precept
for Creeds, Confessions, Oaths, Doctrines, and whole
carloads of other foolish trumpery that we find in
Christianity."
-- John Adams
But he believed in God, and God spoke all these words (The Ten Commandments)
"Question with boldness even the existence of God;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of the
homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear."
-- Thomas Jefferson
The religious views of Thomas Jefferson diverged widely from the traditional Christianity of his era.
Throughout his life, Jefferson was intensely interested in THEOLOGY, RELIGIOUS STUDIES, and MORALITY.

Do we REALLY care what Thomas Paine thinks? Do you?

I thought you liberals had nothing but disdain for our "Founding Fathers"?
"Christianity is the most perverted system that
ever shone on man."
-- Thomas Jefferson
THEOLOGY, RELIGIOUS STUDIES, and MORALITY.

=====

Why Are Liberals Such Hypocrites?

In the liberal world view, everything they do is the greatest. They can do no wrong. And, they refuse to see
facts or evidence that suggests otherwise.

Fundamentally, this disconnect between facts and reality comes about because liberals live in a fantasy world
they construct for themselves. Their aim is to control their life by manipulating everyone else around them
to see them they way they want to be seen.

When confronted with contrary facts to this reality, a liberal will -

Ignore the facts

Blame other people for those faults

Lie to make them OK

Use triangulation and gaslighting to make other people believe their lies

Go on the offensive to distract people from their mistake

Liberals are also overly judgmental. This too stems from the desire to be better than other people. By
holding other people to high standards, they are able to easily criticize people who they fear might be
competition and bring them down a notch.

A liberal doesn't have to be good, they just feel and think they have to be better than you.

When a liberal's judgmental mentality combines with their warped perception of reality, the become a
hypocrite. A liberal will blame you and call you out for doing exactly the same things that they do.

A liberal will pay heavy lip service to themselves: how good they are at..., the high standards they hold for
themselves, how they are perfect in every way. Yet, will feel no obligation to actually perform.

Yet, when you fail to hold to their unrealistic standards, they will call you out for being a failure.


Are All liberals Hypocrites?

All liberals are hypocrites by their very nature. The symptoms of liberal personality disorder are thought to
stem partially from upbringing, and invariably cause them to act hypocritical.

As a child, most liberals experienced either overly strict parenting or lived in a family with little
parental guidance. As a consequence they failed to develop self-esteem, and a healthy separation between
their own thoughts and emotions and the thoughts and emotions of others.

Because of this, they need to need other people to feel good about them in order for them to feel good about
themselves. And, they have a severely underdeveloped instinct for empathy.

Why does this make them hypocritical?

A liberal will do anything to make themselves look good in the eyes of other people, and don't feel the need
to be fair or reciprocate. They don't seem them self as an equal to everyone else. Instead, they are special
in their own mind, and follow their own set of rules that don't apply to everyone else.

By definition, they are hypocrites because they don't apply their own rules for other people to themselves.


Do liberals Realize They are being Hypocritical?

While liberals know they are being hypocritical on a intellectual level, they do not feel like they are being
unfair or hypocritical.

This is very much linked to their difficulty separating their needs and wants from the needs and wants of
others. To a liberal, what is good for them is good forever everyone else. How could someone want something
other than what they want?

So when a liberal passes judgment on you, so that they feel good, there is no contradiction in their mind
when they act the same way that you did, again so they feel good. If it feels good to them, then it aligns
with their conception of good and bad.

If a liberal could be objective about the facts of the situation, then they would agree that they are being
hypocritical. For instance, if you described what they are doing back to them, but say that you are talking
about a friend, then they would be able to recognize how they are being hypocritical.

However, if you confront a liberal directly with their hypocrisy, then they will never be able to recognize
or accept that that they are the ones at fault.
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 03:31:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
You missed the subject line, again, midget.

On Sun, 19 May 2024 20:00:54 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing
Post by AlleyCat
Post by AlleyCat
The Ten Commandments, as a whole, is Not a Religion,
All of your upper case is *wrong* and illiterate.
It's not "a" religion, but it is inseparable *from* religion.
Whose?
The benighted Judeo-Christian religious tradition
The Ten Commandments, as a whole, is Not a Religion
Post by AlleyCat
Post by AlleyCat
nor does it profess to be OF any particular religion.
That's a lie. The so-called ten commandments were supposedly "divinely revealed"
to Moses on Mt. Sinai.
So?

And?

Moses is considered one of the most important religious leaders in world history. He is claimed by the
religions of Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Bahai.

Pick "A" religion, stupid.
Post by AlleyCat
I guess you're to stupid to know what "A" particular religion means
Nope. I nailed it, runt.
LOL... taller than you, punk.

============================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

[I Just *LOVE* The Way This Sig-file Makes Boi-Fucker Lose His Fucking Mind]


Rudy's Little Man's Disease: A disease of short males marked by aggressive antisocial behavior and constant
overcompensation resulting in pompous mannerisms such as spitting, twitching, swearing, speaking loudly and
tough talk.

"I can kill you with one hand. You know this." - Rudy

The disease only affects teenagers or men who are less than 5' 6" tall.

"I'm about eight inches shorter than Trump [6' 2"]." - Rudy

The severity of this disease is inversely proportional to the height of the sufferer. Other characteristics
of this scourge are a very short penis, acne, low I.Q and bad etiquette.

Often these males are homophobic to the point of insanity because of latent sexual orientation issues.

**FAGGOT!** - Rudy Canoza

"Fixed your lie, you you no-fight faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"Thanks for kicking my faggot ass." - Rudy Canoza

"'Self' is redundant, you toothless squat-to-piss no-fight faggot. - Rudy Canoza

"I've beaten *you* to a bloody pulp, you squat-to-piss *no-fight* faggot - every fucking time. You're a
zero, as every, stale, squat-to-piss *no-fight* faggot who incessantly bleats about "mommy's basement"
*ALWAYS* is." - Rudy Canoza

"... you you no-fight faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"... you toothless squat-to-piss no-fight faggot" - Rudy Canoza

"Kicked your flabby faggot ass again. Yes." - Rudy Canoza

"You a Squat-to-Piss Faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"The disgusting gurgling, slurping sounds below are just the faggots Hartung, Sanitary Napkin and Bit of
Nothingness enjoying a three-way" - Rudy Canoza

"YOU lose, Nazi faggot." - Rudy Canoza

Little Man's Disease is an untreatable epidemic in this country.

This is Rudy Canoza: https://i.imgur.com/4FSRuAQ.mp4
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 17:05:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 22:29:29 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
The so-called ten commandments are *inextricably* tied to *one* religious
tradition. They will *not* be posted on schoolroom walls. This is settled.
Nope.
That's a lie. The so-called ten commandments were supposedly "divinely revealed"
to Moses on Mt. Sinai. It is this mythical "divine" origin that is the very
reason Jews and Christians want to post them on schoolroom walls.
Moses is considered one of the most important religious leaders in world history. He is claimed by the
religions of Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Bahai.

So... no ONE religion.

=====

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

Rudy's Egomania

Rudy "Low-Self-Esteem" Canoza... someone who always has to have the last word
in a conversation or an argument. That's why he HAS to reply to EVERY post
about him, or it drives him crazy enough to not being able to sleep.

Everyone has come across this type of person and knows how plain sad it is when
you see it.

Having the last word is closely associated with ego, though those who exhibit
these traits are far from anyone who SHOULD be egomaniacal.

Egomaniacs always have to have the last word. It gives them a feeling of power
(LOL... Rudy HAS no power), as if they immediate draw all of the power of the
person they are communicating with and become powerful due to it.

[giggle]

This feeling is short-lived (until he sees my next post), as it is only a state
of mind, and most people who have any sense of understanding of human
psychology knows that people that do this are only doing it because they feel
INSECURE... competitive, HARDHEADED, and LACK CONFIDENCE, often in their own
intellect or are in need of covering tracks.

Greek Methodology explains this well. Echo, a mountain nymph, had to have the
last word in everything, and it was her undoing. While Echo was
beautiful with a musical voice, and people enjoyed hearing her talk,
this eventually went to her head.

Echo took so much pleasure in having the last word in both arguments and normal
conversations, that eventually it became her undoing. As the story goes, she
fell in love with Narcissus, and he rejected her. In return she begged him not
to.

Narcissus broke her heart and Echo wasted away and was doomed to a very
sad life.

A person, like Rudy, who has to have the last word is fundamentally flawed.

Their flaws are there for the world to see. They may be charismatic and draw
people in, but if you listen to their conversations and in the modern age, look
at their posts on social media, you will see a common thread of egocentricity
and a NEED for supremacy.

Those who have to have the last word feel uncomfortable, when that power is
taken away from them and they usually end up fighting or in an argument because
this has been taken away from them.

They lash out (FAGGOT!) and look for ways to rectify this. People with this
"disease" usually strive to be the only voice over the people around them.

They often never rise to the top in career or business (or START one at all),
so they adapt their personal profiles so that they can be seen as "winning" in
some area that they feel no-one can compete.

Their need for respect and to be liked, more so than those around them, usually
is their undoing.

If you have to have the last say, think to yourself, "what am I afraid of?"
(people who have done better things with their lives than YOU, Rudy)

Because ultimately, having the last say, means nothing.
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 17:51:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 10:41:20 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...


Moses is considered one of the most important religious leaders in world history. He is claimed by the
religions of Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Bahai.

So... no ONE religion.
By Jews and Christians.
So... no ONE religion.

Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Bahai.

So... no TWO religions.

============================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

Rudy thinks that, because the Democrat Party has held down the Blacks and Hispanics of this country, by
giving them free shit to buy their vote, that they HAVE to vote Democrat, or they're Niggers and Spics.

This is reflected in Rudy's penchent for calling Conservative Blacks, House Niggers, Porch Monkeys and every
other vile epithet, aimed at those he considers sub-human, JUST because they don't toe the Democrat Party
line.

In a 1980 paper published in the Journal of the National Medical Association, the late psychiatrist Carl C.
Bell, M.D., CCHP, pondered, "What characteristics cause an individual to accommodate to racist views which
are in direct opposition to the value of a democratic free society?"

Bell's research, as well as subsequent studies, by other psychologists, point to one potential psychological
factor: narcissism.

The concept of the "narcissistic racist" was recently brought to light again in a widely shared Instagram
post by Jacquelyn Ogorchukwu Iyamah, a user experience designer focused on racial justice education and
decolonizing wellness. To better understand the association between racism and narcissism, mbg looked into
Bell's research and spoke with licensed psychologist Ramani Durvasula, Ph.D., and psychoanalyst Babita
Spinelli, L.P.

How narcissism can fuel racism.

According to Bell's 1980 study, many racist traits are also traits of narcissism. Further, "racist attitudes
may be indicative of a narcissistic personality disorder." Bell describes three different types of racists-
the narcissistic racist, the stress-induced racist, and the socially misinformed racist-all three of which
may actually be linked back to narcissistic traits.

Personal Growth

How Narcissism & Racism Are Connected, According To Research

Racism is not only feeling bias or prejudice toward Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC)
communities. It's a system of oppression that maintains and inflicts power over them, through schools, police
departments, court systems, and health care.

But in a 1980 paper published in the Journal of the National Medical Association, the late psychiatrist Carl
C. Bell, M.D., CCHP, pondered, "What characteristics cause an individual to accommodate to racist views which
are in direct opposition to the value of a democratic free society?"

Bell's research, as well as subsequent studies by other psychologists, point to one potential psychological
factor: narcissism.

The concept of the "narcissistic racist" was recently brought to light again in a widely shared Instagram
post by Jacquelyn Ogorchukwu Iyamah, a user experience designer focused on racial justice education and
decolonizing wellness. To better understand the association between racism and narcissism, mbg looked into
Bell's research and spoke with licensed psychologist Ramani Durvasula, Ph.D., and psychoanalyst Babita
Spinelli, L.P.
How narcissism can fuel racism.

According to Bell's 1980 study3, many racist traits are also traits of narcissism. Further, "racist attitudes
may be indicative of a narcissistic personality disorder." Bell describes three different types of racists-
the narcissistic racist, the stress-induced racist, and the socially misinformed racist-all three of which
may actually be linked back to narcissistic traits.
Need help with your health? This quiz will get you answers.


1. The narcissistic racist

"The narcissistic racist is a person whose racism is primarily a symptom of a narcissistic personality
disorder," the study says. A personality disorder diagnosis does not, however, relieve anyone of the
responsibility for their behavior, Bell notes.

He describes various traits of narcissism that manifest into racism, including a grandiose sense of self-
importance, a lack of empathy for others, and a likelihood to respond to criticism with defensiveness or
indifference. Many of these are rooted in the narcissist's need for control and power.

"It is this need for a sense of absolute control which the racist feels justifies his self-given right to
violate another's 'territory' by either a physical attack, segregation, or discrimination," the study says.
"The 'territory' (in this country) being, for example, the individual's right to adequate health care,
education, and housing wherever he can afford it."

2. The stress-induced racist

It's important to note that not every person with narcissistic traits has narcissistic personality disorder
(NPD), and, in fact, most people have some level of narcissism. With that in mind, the stress-induced racist
is someone who acts in response to stress, rather than NPD. The study describes this type of racism as "a
transient form of narcissistic rage" and is usually a response to feeling wronged and seeking revenge at all
costs. Even those who don't have NPD can display this type of narcissism-fueled racist behavior.

"The main stressor that narcissists have to manage is the threat to their ego and sense of superiority,"
Durvasula explains. Anything that threatens their fragile egos and puts them in a vulnerable state (i.e.,
losing a job, marital issues, etc.) may cause them to react with victim-hood, shame, and rage, she says.
"They need someone to blame because they cannot take responsibility."

A racist would take it out on people of different races, and a narcissist would attach false rhetorics to
groups of people in order to justify their blame, Durvasula says.

3. The socially misinformed racist

Socially misinformed racists with NPD need the people leading their institutions to be direct reflections of
themselves and their ideas. This can then justify their un-empathetic feelings and behaviors. Bell cites
research by psychoanalyst Heinz Kohut, who wrote of this type of racist narcissist: "They seem to combine an
absolute certainty concerning the validity of their ideas with an equally absolute lack of empathic
understanding for large segments of feelings, needs, and rights of other human beings and for the values
cherished by them. They understand the environment in which they live only as an extension of their own
narcissistic universe."

Bell does note there's another type of socially misinformed racist that may not have NPD and instead is a
product of systemic racism. They are socially misinformed at an early age, though with enough exposure to
different people and cultures, Bell says they can start to unlearn their ignorant beliefs.

How narcissistic traits manifest as racism: Lack of empathy

Empathy is threefold, according to Durvasula. "First is the classical emotional piece-the ability or desire
to feel the other person and shape your responses and behavior accordingly," she says. Then, there's the
cognitive piece-to understand what the other person is experiencing. Finally, the self-reflective capacity
piece, which she describes as "the ability to understand and reflect on the impact of your behavior and words
on other people."

Narcissistic individuals lack all three aspects, and Durvasula says it is likely that racist individuals
don't care about those around them and save the worst of their hatred for people who are different from them.
Gaslighting

Gaslighting is when a person denies another person's reality, Spinelli says. Examples of gaslighting can
sound like It's not a big deal, or Just let it go.

"This is similar to how a racist would dismiss the reality of racism and attempt to normalize racist
practices," Spinelli explains.
Other traits include:

Insecurity
Extreme sense of entitlement
A need for power and control
A superiority to others
Tendency to bully and oppress others

So can a narcissistic racist change?

"A racist has the potential to process and recover from being a racist, if they take steps to face their
racist stance and invest the time and effort to learn, grow, and take action to change," Spinelli says.
"Narcissists, on the other hand, generally do not believe they need to change and refuse to change."

In rare cases, both experts say a narcissist may change, but it takes several years of intense therapeutic
work. This may help them understand their core traumas, attachment issues, and early dynamic issues that led
them to be racist, Durvasula says, but most often they won't be willing or interested in discussing their
emotions in therapy.

Do not invest energy into changing the narcissist's view, Spinelli says.
What does this mean for the efforts to end racism?

If narcissists are hard to change, and narcissism and racism are linked, what does that mean for the efforts
to end racism?

As previously mentioned, it's important to recognize that not everybody with narcissistic traits has NPD.
Most of us have some levels of narcissism within us, and if we can recognize how our internalized racism may
be rooted in narcissism, it may provide insights into what type of inner work we need to be doing to heal our
racism.

But the connection between racism and NPD is also an important reminder that dismantling racism must go
beyond individual-level change. The idea that racism is rooted in ignorance alone is too simple, Durvasula
says. Since ignorance means a lack of education, that suggests people can seek more information and change
their attitude. "That rarely happens," she says. Racism is deeper-it is privilege mixed with entitlement,
contempt, fragility, shame, fear, arrogance, lack of empathy, hypersensitivity, and ignorance, she says.

While self-reflection is a critical part of committing to anti-racism, Spinelli recommends focusing on
efforts like educating, challenging normalized racism, dismantling systems that embolden racism, and working
toward changing the policies and procedures that keep them in place.
Alan
2024-05-21 22:12:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 09:49:05 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by Mike Colangelo
Congress shall make no law respecting an *establishment of religion*
The Ten Commandments, as a whole, is Not a Religion, nor does it profess to be OF any particular religion. I
count ONE commandment which is from Christianity. The nine other Commandments could have come from ANY
religion.
You shall have no other gods before Me.
WHICH God?
The Judeo-Christian godly
Post by AlleyCat
You shall make no idols.
WHICH religion?
Judaism or Christianity, and only them.
Post by AlleyCat
You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.
One for Christianity.
And overtly and solely religious.
Post by AlleyCat
Keep the Sabbath day holy.
Jews celebrate the Sabbath
But still overtly and solely religious.
Post by AlleyCat
Honor your father and your mother.
ZERO religious implication.
You shall not murder.
Made into law.
You shall not commit adultery.
Made into law.
You shall not steal.
Made into law.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
Made into law.
You shall not covet.
Made into law, IF taken further.
And all irrelevant.

Because this is an official endorsement of religion by government, which
the USSC has always held to be forbidden by the 1st amendment. to the USC.
Akidasar
2024-05-22 15:38:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 21 May 2024 15:12:51 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
WHICH religion?
Judaism or Christianity, and only them.
There are how many flavors of each one?

You misrepresent again.
AlleyCat
2024-05-19 18:32:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 09:51:23 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Oops! I forgot something the first time I replied.
No... you were still childishly jealous.

['can.politics' crosspost removed by the childish midget, reinserted]

============================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

Why Childish Narcissist Rudy Is Childish Narcissist Rudy

There are many similarities between the way Rudy the narcissist thinks and processes things and the way
children do. In fact, in many ways, these processes are virtually identical. This is because Rudy the
narcissist has arrested emotional development.

The emotional maturation that most children go through did not occur within Rudy, for whatever reason. Often,
this reason is abuse or neglect during childhood.

These things caused Rudy to focus intensely on himself, to the exclusion of all other things. It also results
in the mind being taken up with trying to defend itself from his abuse.

Rudy's mind is, in a sense, always playing catch up, and because of the trauma that he has experienced, some
things are skipped, so to speak, or don't happen.

(see Rudy's separation from reality)

His mind becomes locked in a pattern of defensive reaction and emotional perception, made up of many
different but related facets, that matures extremely slowly and is extrordinarily resistant to change. We
call this reaction/defense pattern malignant narcissism.

In children, these things are normal. In Rudy, they are evidence of a disorder.

Young children and babies are not capable of understanding the emotions or needs of others. They only know
want and need. They have no way of taking care of their own needs, and they can only scream for someone to do
it for them. When Rudy's mother was exhausted and deathly ill with a fever and vomiting, and she'd been up
for three days, and she simply could not cope anymore, does Rudy sympathize accordingly? Does Rudy stop
crying?

No. Rudy does not recognize this. Rudy does not care. Rudy can NOT care. He can only keep screaming out his
needs, regardless of his mother's suffering.

This is, in essence, what you are dealing with when it comes to Rudy the narcissist. He does not recognize,
understand or consider other people's needs.

He sees only his own, and his inability to meet them. The more damaged Rudy is, the more narcissistic he will
be, the more immature he will be and the more childish his way of thinking.

And this is not childish as in, silly. This is immature as in, the emotional maturity and understanding of a
toddler.

For example, besides the hysterical tantrum behavior we see in Rudy that is very clearly on par with a very
young child's, Rudy the narcissist generally believes he is immune to the things that happen to "regular"
people.

This is an example of something called magical thinking which is a phenomenon we commonly see in very young
children. Rudy sees feelings as facts, the way that children do. Rudy the narcissist sees everything in the
world as an extension of himself, the way that children do and Rudy the narcissist truly believes in his own
perceived omnipresence and immortality as children do.

He has always been, he will always be.

So children believe... so Rudy the narcissist believes.

The view that he is just another person that must fit into a wider world does not occur to young children.

How could it? Rather, Rudy functions under the assumption that the world fits around HIM, and that everything
he experiences or encounters is related to him in some form.

This is the same way Rudy see things. He has never matured past this extremely immature way of looking at
things. The idea that the world does not revolve around them never occurs to children, as it does not occur
to Rudy.

For example, children view their parents as only having to do with them and connected only to them, rather
than as separate people with their own lives, needs, wants, feelings, etc. Parents are very one dimensional
to young children; despite the fact that children are only one part of the parent's life, the child does not
see this nor understand it in any way.

To a child, parents only exist as their caretakers. It is the only context children view parents in and the
only context they can understand. This is identical to how Rudy the narcissist views all other people:
outside of the narcissist and the narcissist's needs, these people do not exist.

As children mature, they learn that this viewpoint is not true; they learn to see and appreciate their
parents as individuals that are separate from themselves. Rudy does not.

The development of Rudy is so arrested that this, coupled with such extreme self-focus means he is never able
to separate himself as an authentic individual from the external world.

Because of this, Rudy often feels acted upon by the world and other people or circumstances, rather than as
people who act in the world.

In Rudy's view, he does not act, but rather react to the things that are being done to him. It's as if he
never outgrew the idea of himself as a powerless child, unable to take control or ownership of his own life.

He behaves as though other people are still responsible for his emotions, the way that parents are
responsible for a small child. He seems unable to own his choices or even to recognize that things are
choices. And this is also like a child.

Rudy the narcissist is generally impulsive, irrational and extremely immature. He is careless, irresponsible
and foolhardy. He doesn't seem able to consider consequences or think about things before he does them, just
like a child.

When pressed for an answer as to why he's done something, Rudy may seem just as mystified as everyone else.
"I don't know" is a very common answer. It may be the truth. He seems to possess very little insight as to
why he does things, simply reacting on impulse as we see children do.

Like a child, Rudy often feels helpless in a world of more powerful, more competent, more knowledgeable
adults.

However, this is also an excuse. It's easier to be a helpless victim. If you are a victim, you can never be
blamed. If you are helpless, you can never be forced to take responsibility.

Children are not blamed for not controlling themselves or for their choices. Rudy doesn't seem to feel he
should be either. He doesn't seem to understand the difference between a child and an adult, and he will
often say things to that effect. These are mostly things that no self-respecting mature adult would ever say.

*FAGGOT!*

He may compare himself to a child, compete with the children, or complain that his spouse (LOL) holds "double
standards" because the kids are allowed to get away with things that they are called out for. Rudy doesn't
seem to realize that adults and children are held to different standards, or why this should be.

For example, the narcissist must be asked repeatedly every single night to bring their plate into the
kitchen, or throw their clothing in the hamper rather than leaving these things on the ground. Instead of
simply doing it, the narcissist responds that little Johnny never does it either but he doesn't get yelled
at. Little Johnny is seven. The narcissist is 40 and is one of Little Johnny's parents.

The discrepancy here is obvious; this is the type of response you would receive from a child that does not
want to do his chores, not an adult. To the narcissist, this is a clear example of favoritism and being
attacked for who they are. It does not seem to enter Rudy's mind that there is a very large difference
between a 7-year-old and a 40-year-old. Regardless of whether or not he actually feels this way, the
childishness and absurdity of his argument is really unbelievable-almost shocking in it's ignorance. There is
not only the complete refusal to behave as an adult, there is an inability to even understand why this would
be expected.

The truth is, underneath of all of the horrible things Rudy does, the narcissist is still that 5-year-old
child pretending he is somebody else to escape an abusive situation that ended years ago. When all of Rudy's
reasoning is examined, when all of Rudy's behavior is scrutinized and looked at through the lens of
perspective rather than pain, this is what we are left with: a person with the emotional maturity of a
toddler who cannot understand why they are expected to behave otherwise and who is trying desperately to
pretend they are somebody else.

All of Rudy's attention seeking, all of Rudy's manipulations, all of Rudy's gas lighting, all of Rudy's smear
campaigns, all of Rudy's abuse, all of the hurtful things he does, when seen for what they really are, these
things are nothing but childish behaviors that have been perpetrated by an adult.

Every single one of these things is seen in children. Gas-lighting is a 3 year old with chocolate all over
his face who is hiding the chocolate bar behind his back in plain view, saying "What chocolate, Mommy? I
don't have chocolate." Smear campaigns are a 6-year-old telling lies about a girl to all that girl's friends
so they won't like her anymore. Though these behaviors are sometimes seen as sophisticated schemes, they
really aren't. They are the same childish and petty things we all dealt with on the elementary school
playground. They are just more confusing and therefore more dangerous because they are coming from an adult.
AlleyCat
2024-05-19 21:43:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 11:46:18 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed (this infuriates
AlleyPussyBitch, leading to hissy-fits)]
I'm not the one screeching *NEVER* in jealous hissy-fits *EVERY* time I reply!

LOL
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired (this
infuriates the narcissistic toddler, too)]
I'm not the one screeching *NEVER* in jealous hissy-fits *EVERY* time I reply!

LOL

On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy - *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing
fairy - *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy and then lied:

Jealous hissy-fits suit you, toddler.

============================================================================

This is why Rudy throws hissy-fits all the time.

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

Why Rudy Is Rudy

There are many similarities between the way Rudy the narcissist thinks and processes things and the way
children do. In fact, in many ways, these processes are virtually identical. This is because Rudy the
narcissist has arrested emotional development.

The emotional maturation that most children go through did not occur within Rudy, for whatever reason. Often,
this reason is abuse or neglect during childhood.

These things caused Rudy to focus intensely on himself, to the exclusion of all other things. It also results
in the mind being taken up with trying to defend itself from his abuse.

Rudy's mind is, in a sense, always playing catch up, and because of the trauma that he has experienced, some
things are skipped, so to speak, or don't happen.

(see Rudy's separation from reality)

His mind becomes locked in a pattern of defensive reaction and emotional perception, made up of many
different but related facets, that matures extremely slowly and is extrordinarily resistant to change. We
call this reaction/defense pattern malignant narcissism.

In children, these things are normal. In Rudy, they are evidence of a disorder.

Young children and babies are not capable of understanding the emotions or needs of others. They only know
want and need. They have no way of taking care of their own needs, and they can only scream for someone to do
it for them. When Rudy's mother was exhausted and deathly ill with a fever and vomiting, and she'd been up
for three days, and she simply could not cope anymore, does Rudy sympathize accordingly? Does Rudy stop
crying?

No. Rudy does not recognize this. Rudy does not care. Rudy can NOT care. He can only keep screaming out his
needs, regardless of his mother's suffering.

This is, in essence, what you are dealing with when it comes to Rudy the narcissist. He does not recognize,
understand or consider other people's needs.

He sees only his own, and his inability to meet them. The more damaged Rudy is, the more narcissistic he will
be, the more immature he will be and the more childish his way of thinking.

And this is not childish as in, silly. This is immature as in, the emotional maturity and understanding of a
toddler.

For example, besides the hysterical hissy-fit behavior we see in Rudy that is very clearly on par with a very
young child's, Rudy the narcissist generally believes he is immune to the things that happen to "regular"
people.

This is an example of something called magical thinking which is a phenomenon we commonly see in very young
children. Rudy sees feelings as facts, the way that children do. Rudy the narcissist sees everything in the
world as an extension of himself, the way that children do and Rudy the narcissist truly believes in his own
perceived omnipresence and immortality as children do.

He has always been, he will always be.

So children believe... so Rudy the narcissist believes.

The view that he is just another person that must fit into a wider world does not occur to young children.

How could it? Rather, Rudy functions under the assumption that the world fits around HIM, and that everything
he experiences or encounters is related to him in some form.

This is the same way Rudy see things. He has never matured past this extremely immature way of looking at
things. The idea that the world does not revolve around them never occurs to children, as it does not occur
to Rudy.

For example, children view their parents as only having to do with them and connected only to them, rather
than as separate people with their own lives, needs, wants, feelings, etc. Parents are very one dimensional
to young children; despite the fact that children are only one part of the parent's life, the child does not
see this nor understand it in any way.

To a child, parents only exist as their caretakers. It is the only context children view parents in and the
only context they can understand. This is identical to how Rudy the narcissist views all other people:
outside of the narcissist and the narcissist's needs, these people do not exist.

As children mature, they learn that this viewpoint is not true; they learn to see and appreciate their
parents as individuals that are separate from themselves. Rudy does not.

The development of Rudy is so arrested that this, coupled with such extreme self-focus means he is never able
to separate himself as an authentic individual from the external world.

Because of this, Rudy often feels acted upon by the world and other people or circumstances, rather than as
people who act in the world.

In Rudy's view, he does not act, but rather react to the things that are being done to him. It's as if he
never outgrew the idea of himself as a powerless child, unable to take control or ownership of his own life.

He behaves as though other people are still responsible for his emotions, the way that parents are
responsible for a small child. He seems unable to own his choices or even to recognize that things are
choices. And this is also like a child.

Rudy the narcissist is generally impulsive, irrational and extremely immature. He is careless, irresponsible
and foolhardy. He doesn't seem able to consider consequences or think about things before he does them, just
like a child.

When pressed for an answer as to why he's done something, Rudy may seem just as mystified as everyone else.
"I don't know" is a very common answer. It may be the truth. He seems to possess very little insight as to
why he does things, simply reacting on impulse as we see children do.

Like a child, Rudy often feels helpless in a world of more powerful, more competent, more knowledgeable
adults.

However, this is also an excuse. It's easier to be a helpless victim. If you are a victim, you can never be
blamed. If you are helpless, you can never be forced to take responsibility.

Children are not blamed for not controlling themselves or for their choices. Rudy doesn't seem to feel he
should be either. He doesn't seem to understand the difference between a child and an adult, and he will
often say things to that effect. These are mostly things that no self-respecting mature adult would ever say.

*FAGGOT!*

He may compare himself to a child, compete with the children, or complain that his spouse (LOL) holds "double
standards" because the kids are allowed to get away with things that they are called out for. Rudy doesn't
seem to realize that adults and children are held to different standards, or why this should be.

For example, the narcissist must be asked repeatedly every single night to bring their plate into the
kitchen, or throw their clothing in the hamper rather than leaving these things on the ground. Instead of
simply doing it, the narcissist responds that little Johnny never does it either but he doesn't get yelled
at. Little Johnny is seven. The narcissist is 40 and is one of Little Johnny's parents.

The discrepancy here is obvious; this is the type of response you would receive from a child that does not
want to do his chores, not an adult. To the narcissist, this is a clear example of favoritism and being
attacked for who they are. It does not seem to enter Rudy's mind that there is a very large difference
between a 7-year-old and a 40-year-old. Regardless of whether or not he actually feels this way, the
childishness and absurdity of his argument is really unbelievable-almost shocking in it's ignorance. There is
not only the complete refusal to behave as an adult, there is an inability to even understand why this would
be expected.

The truth is, underneath of all of the horrible things Rudy does, the narcissist is still that 5-year-old
child pretending he is somebody else to escape an abusive situation that ended years ago. When all of Rudy's
reasoning is examined, when all of Rudy's behavior is scrutinized and looked at through the lens of
perspective rather than pain, this is what we are left with: a person with the emotional maturity of a
toddler who cannot understand why they are expected to behave otherwise and who is trying desperately to
pretend they are somebody else.

All of Rudy's attention seeking, all of Rudy's manipulations, all of Rudy's gas lighting, all of Rudy's smear
campaigns, all of Rudy's abuse, all of the hurtful things he does, when seen for what they really are, these
things are nothing but childish behaviors that have been perpetrated by an adult.

Every single one of these things is seen in children. Gas-lighting is a 3 year old with chocolate all over
his face who is hiding the chocolate bar behind his back in plain view, saying "What chocolate, Mommy? I
don't have chocolate." Smear campaigns are a 6-year-old telling lies about a girl to all that girl's friends
so they won't like her anymore. Though these behaviors are sometimes seen as sophisticated schemes, they
really aren't. They are the same childish and petty things we all dealt with on the elementary school
playground. They are just more confusing and therefore more dangerous because they are coming from an adult.
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 03:31:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 20:00:53 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
You're a hysterical adolescent girl with irregular menstrual cycles. You engage
in histrionics in every post you make.
Says the pansy-ass little jealous pussy who posts these:

['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]

On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy - *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing
fairy - *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy and then lied:

What a little girl.

============================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

Why Rudy Is Rudy

There are many similarities between the way Rudy the narcissist thinks and processes things and the way
children do. In fact, in many ways, these processes are virtually identical. This is because Rudy the
narcissist has arrested emotional development.

The emotional maturation that most children go through did not occur within Rudy, for whatever reason. Often,
this reason is abuse or neglect during childhood.

These things caused Rudy to focus intensely on himself, to the exclusion of all other things. It also results
in the mind being taken up with trying to defend itself from his abuse.

Rudy's mind is, in a sense, always playing catch up, and because of the trauma that he has experienced, some
things are skipped, so to speak, or don't happen.

(see Rudy's separation from reality)

His mind becomes locked in a pattern of defensive reaction and emotional perception, made up of many
different but related facets, that matures extremely slowly and is extrordinarily resistant to change. We
call this reaction/defense pattern malignant narcissism.

In children, these things are normal. In Rudy, they are evidence of a disorder.

Young children and babies are not capable of understanding the emotions or needs of others. They only know
want and need. They have no way of taking care of their own needs, and they can only scream for someone to do
it for them. When Rudy's mother was exhausted and deathly ill with a fever and vomiting, and she'd been up
for three days, and she simply could not cope anymore, does Rudy sympathize accordingly? Does Rudy stop
crying?

No. Rudy does not recognize this. Rudy does not care. Rudy can NOT care. He can only keep screaming out his
needs, regardless of his mother's suffering.

This is, in essence, what you are dealing with when it comes to Rudy the narcissist. He does not recognize,
understand or consider other people's needs.

He sees only his own, and his inability to meet them. The more damaged Rudy is, the more narcissistic he will
be, the more immature he will be and the more childish his way of thinking.

And this is not childish as in, silly. This is immature as in, the emotional maturity and understanding of a
toddler.

For example, besides the hysterical tantrum behavior we see in Rudy that is very clearly on par with a very
young child's, Rudy the narcissist generally believes he is immune to the things that happen to "regular"
people.

This is an example of something called magical thinking which is a phenomenon we commonly see in very young
children. Rudy sees feelings as facts, the way that children do. Rudy the narcissist sees everything in the
world as an extension of himself, the way that children do and Rudy the narcissist truly believes in his own
perceived omnipresence and immortality as children do.

He has always been, he will always be.

So children believe... so Rudy the narcissist believes.

The view that he is just another person that must fit into a wider world does not occur to young children.

How could it? Rather, Rudy functions under the assumption that the world fits around HIM, and that everything
he experiences or encounters is related to him in some form.

This is the same way Rudy see things. He has never matured past this extremely immature way of looking at
things. The idea that the world does not revolve around them never occurs to children, as it does not occur
to Rudy.

For example, children view their parents as only having to do with them and connected only to them, rather
than as separate people with their own lives, needs, wants, feelings, etc. Parents are very one dimensional
to young children; despite the fact that children are only one part of the parent's life, the child does not
see this nor understand it in any way.

To a child, parents only exist as their caretakers. It is the only context children view parents in and the
only context they can understand. This is identical to how Rudy the narcissist views all other people:
outside of the narcissist and the narcissist's needs, these people do not exist.

As children mature, they learn that this viewpoint is not true; they learn to see and appreciate their
parents as individuals that are separate from themselves. Rudy does not.

The development of Rudy is so arrested that this, coupled with such extreme self-focus means he is never able
to separate himself as an authentic individual from the external world.

Because of this, Rudy often feels acted upon by the world and other people or circumstances, rather than as
people who act in the world.

In Rudy's view, he does not act, but rather react to the things that are being done to him. It's as if he
never outgrew the idea of himself as a powerless child, unable to take control or ownership of his own life.

He behaves as though other people are still responsible for his emotions, the way that parents are
responsible for a small child. He seems unable to own his choices or even to recognize that things are
choices. And this is also like a child.

Rudy the narcissist is generally impulsive, irrational and extremely immature. He is careless, irresponsible
and foolhardy. He doesn't seem able to consider consequences or think about things before he does them, just
like a child.

When pressed for an answer as to why he's done something, Rudy may seem just as mystified as everyone else.
"I don't know" is a very common answer. It may be the truth. He seems to possess very little insight as to
why he does things, simply reacting on impulse as we see children do.

Like a child, Rudy often feels helpless in a world of more powerful, more competent, more knowledgeable
adults.

However, this is also an excuse. It's easier to be a helpless victim. If you are a victim, you can never be
blamed. If you are helpless, you can never be forced to take responsibility.

Children are not blamed for not controlling themselves or for their choices. Rudy doesn't seem to feel he
should be either. He doesn't seem to understand the difference between a child and an adult, and he will
often say things to that effect. These are mostly things that no self-respecting mature adult would ever say.

*FAGGOT!*

He may compare himself to a child, compete with the children, or complain that his spouse (LOL) holds "double
standards" because the kids are allowed to get away with things that they are called out for. Rudy doesn't
seem to realize that adults and children are held to different standards, or why this should be.

For example, the narcissist must be asked repeatedly every single night to bring their plate into the
kitchen, or throw their clothing in the hamper rather than leaving these things on the ground. Instead of
simply doing it, the narcissist responds that little Johnny never does it either but he doesn't get yelled
at. Little Johnny is seven. The narcissist is 40 and is one of Little Johnny's parents.

The discrepancy here is obvious; this is the type of response you would receive from a child that does not
want to do his chores, not an adult. To the narcissist, this is a clear example of favoritism and being
attacked for who they are. It does not seem to enter Rudy's mind that there is a very large difference
between a 7-year-old and a 40-year-old. Regardless of whether or not he actually feels this way, the
childishness and absurdity of his argument is really unbelievable-almost shocking in it's ignorance. There is
not only the complete refusal to behave as an adult, there is an inability to even understand why this would
be expected.

The truth is, underneath of all of the horrible things Rudy does, the narcissist is still that 5-year-old
child pretending he is somebody else to escape an abusive situation that ended years ago. When all of Rudy's
reasoning is examined, when all of Rudy's behavior is scrutinized and looked at through the lens of
perspective rather than pain, this is what we are left with: a person with the emotional maturity of a
toddler who cannot understand why they are expected to behave otherwise and who is trying desperately to
pretend they are somebody else.

All of Rudy's attention seeking, all of Rudy's manipulations, all of Rudy's gas lighting, all of Rudy's smear
campaigns, all of Rudy's abuse, all of the hurtful things he does, when seen for what they really are, these
things are nothing but childish behaviors that have been perpetrated by an adult.

Every single one of these things is seen in children. Gas-lighting is a 3 year old with chocolate all over
his face who is hiding the chocolate bar behind his back in plain view, saying "What chocolate, Mommy? I
don't have chocolate." Smear campaigns are a 6-year-old telling lies about a girl to all that girl's friends
so they won't like her anymore. Though these behaviors are sometimes seen as sophisticated schemes, they
really aren't. They are the same childish and petty things we all dealt with on the elementary school
playground. They are just more confusing and therefore more dangerous because they are coming from an adult.
AlleyCat
2024-05-19 18:35:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:14:24 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
The foundation of our legal system -
the presumption of innocence, double
jeopardy, due process, appeals courts -
has ANYTHING to do with the Bible.
No one said ANY of that, HoleMan. Just because your fuck-buddy Rudy said it didn't, doesn't mean someone did.
We're not talking about the Bible.

You shall not murder.

Made into law.

You shall not commit adultery.

Made into law.

You shall not steal.

Made into law.

You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

Made into law.

You shall not covet.

Made into law, IF taken further.

============================================================================

THIS is Joe Biden when not on drugs or stimulants and acts like himself:

https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/S/p/u/y/Spuyq.caa.mp4?b=1&u=ummtf

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xPhZcMYekKs?feature=share

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/hiDRFTVH0rY

http://youtu.be/KuhR-Nqv6Wg

http://youtu.be/D5JF7PupC58andpp

http://youtu.be/3gsMTe0Nr4Yandpp

http://youtu.be/WBUgHkbtm9Iandpp

=====

Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden

Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

=====

Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4

http://youtu.be/Slm5bvO-_5I

=====

Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press
Conference
http://youtu.be/SdfvIvYPPRo

Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story
https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a-
story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech
https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


Joe Biden: You Just Wonder
http://youtu.be/Uj0ccJgJsPA


Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech
http://youtu.be/0xwoaagXFyU


Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect'
http://youtu.be/oHI__YneMuE


Barely There Biden Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/YxxAyHgBiNU


Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc


Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred
http://youtu.be/vt7WPjsYl44


Joe Biden making Zer0 sense
http://youtu.be/VYch-1fRhiE


Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero
Sense!
http://youtu.be/qg4OUk0qyWM
Alan
2024-05-19 18:42:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:14:24 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
The foundation of our legal system -
the presumption of innocence, double
jeopardy, due process, appeals courts -
has ANYTHING to do with the Bible.
No one said ANY of that, HoleMan. Just because your fuck-buddy Rudy said it didn't, doesn't mean someone did.
We're not talking about the Bible.
You shall not murder.
Made into law.
And irrelevant to whether posting an overtly religious list of
commandments is appropriate or legal
Post by AlleyCat
============================================================================
You mean like this:

'BREAKING: Donald Trump just glitched out and froze at his rally
tonight. He is clearly unfit for office. Retweet so every American knows
Trump is senile.'

<https://twitter.com/BidensWins/status/1792000790938198296>
Akidasar
2024-05-19 19:59:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 11:42:23 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
Made into law.
And irrelevant to whether posting an overtly religious list of
commandments is appropriate or legal
1O COMMANDMENTS = THE BASIS FOR AMERICA'S LEGAL SYSTEM.

https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=lu_law_review

From the beginning of our republic through the present, American courts
have commonly quoted or cited the Ten Commandments and other portions
of Biblical law in their official published decisions. But how frequently, in
what form, and for what purpose are they cited?
Seeking an answer to these questions, I conducted a Lexis computer search
in March 2002 to discover how often courts have cited the Decalogue. My
research is far from complete, but when I inputted the words "Ten
Commandments," the Lexis search reported 515 cases in which that term was
used. This included only published decisions of courts of record: the United
States Supreme Court, federal courts of appeals, federal district courts, state
supreme courts, and occasionally state courts of appeals.
A further search using the term "Decalogue" revealed 331 cases in which
that term is quoted or cited. Searches for individual Commandments, which
I conducted in October 2002, revealed many more: "First Commandment,"
twenty-six cases; "Second Commandment," twenty-four cases; "Third
Commandment," nine cases; "Fourth Commandment," forty-four cases;
"Fifth Commandment," forty-five cases; "Sixth Commandment," twentyseven cases; "Seventh Commandment," twenty-nine cases; "Eighth
Commandment," thirty-four cases; "Ninth Commandment," nine cases; and
"Tenth Commandment," thirteen cases.

Added together, these citations totaled 1106 cases. However, this figure
needs to be qualified in several ways.
(1) One case may cite the Decalogue many times, yet this will be
reported as one citation. However, if different terms are in the same case,
this may result in multiple citations. For example, if a case referred to the
"Decalogue" and then referred to the "Second Commandment" and "Fourth
Commandment" as well, this would be reported as three citations.
However, if the case referred to the "Second and Fourth Commandments,"
the Lexis search might not report this at all, since the exact term "Second
Commandment" or "Fourth Commandment" was not entered.
(2) Other references to the Decalogue in different terms would not be
uncovered by this search. For example, if a court referred to "the stone
tablets delivered on Mt. Sinai" or the "admonitions of Moses," these would
escape detection. Similarly, a reference to "Thou shalt not kill" without the
Commandment being cited by number would not come up in this search.
Likewise, if a court simply referred to "Exodus 20:4," the search would not
have found this citation.
(3) Frequently, when I looked up the case, I found that the court cited
other cases that the computer search did not reveal. This, plus the other
factors mentioned above, led me to believe that I only scratched the surface
of the myriad cases that employed the Decalogue.
(4) The Lexis search obviously does not include the innumerable cases in
which local trial judges and appellate judges have quoted or cited the Ten
Commandments in unpublished opinions. It also does not include citations
by administrative courts.
The different systems by which different theological traditions number
the Ten Commandments can be confusing in court citations. Jews generally
regard "I am the Lord thy God" as the First Commandment, while Catholics
and Protestants generally regard that declaration as the introduction or
preamble. Catholics combine "Thou shalt have no other gods before me"
and "Thou shalt not worship a graven image" into the First Commandment,
while Jews combine them as the Second Commandment, and most
Protestants divide these commands into the First and Second
Commandments. Jews and most Protestants regard "Thou shalt not covet"
as the Tenth Commandment, while Catholics divide this prohibition into
"Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife" as the Ninth and "Thou shalt not
covet anything that is thy neighbor's" as the Tenth. (Most Lutherans follow
the Catholic enumeration of the Commandments.) Perhaps unmindful of
these distinctions, some courts have referred to "Thou shalt not kill" as the
Fifth Commandment, while others have called it the Sixth. The prohibition
against adultery is sometimes called the Sixth Commandment and sometimes the Seventh, while the prohibition against stealing is sometimes
called the Seventh Commandment and sometimes the Eighth. When I
discuss the courts' treatment of the Commandments individually, I will
categorize them by description ("Thou shalt not kill," etc.) rather than by
number.
I found that the courts use the Ten Commandments in several ways:
(1) Courts often cite or quote a portion of the Decalogue to underscore
the importance of a statute and enhance its moral authority.
(2) Courts likewise cite the Decalogue to establish that a certain act is in
fact a common law crime.
(3) Also, at times, the courts cite the Ten Commandments to distinguish
the common law from actual statutory offenses.
(4) Judges often use the Decalogue to interpret the meaning of statutes.
For example, Sabbatarian laws have their origin in the Commandment to
"remember the Sabbath and keep it holy." To determine whether the
Sabbath refers to Saturday or Sunday, courts have looked to the Decalogue
and also to the extra-biblical Jewish law, the practice of the New Testament
church, and the practices of Jews and Christians thereafter. The laws of
many jurisdictions have exempted "works of charity and necessity" from
Sunday closing laws, and courts have often looked to the Mosaic Law, the
New Testament, and Jewish and Christian history to determine the meaning
and scope of these exceptions.
(5) Sometimes the courts cite the Ten Commandments to establish that a
certain act is malum in se, or of moral turpitude. For example, a Louisiana
school district terminated the employment of a school bus driver because
she had been convicted of theft. State law prohibited termination for
conviction of a crime unless the crime involved moral turpitude. To
establish that theft was an act of moral turpitude, the court noted that theft
was a violation not only of state law, but also of the Decalogue.'
(6) Courts also have used the Decalogue to establish moral responsibility
or mental capacity. For example, in a case involving a thirteen-year-old boy
charged with murder, the court admitted evidence that the boy had been
taught the Ten Commandments and therefore knew that murder was
wrong.2
(7) A few of these cases involve court challenges to public Ten
Commandments displays.
(8) A few cases involve those who raise Free Exercise Clause defenses,
such as those who object to military service because of the Commandment
"Thou shalt not kill," or who refuse to rise for the judge in court because
"Thou shalt have no other gods before me," or who refuse to salute the flag
because "Thou shalt not worship a graven image." Again, these are a
negligible part of the total number of cases.
(9) At times, judges have employed the language of the Decalogue as a
literary tool. Bray v. United States Net & Twine Co. involved a patent for a
device that was designed to prevent fishing lines from snagging, thereby
causing the fisherman "to indulge in expressions not altogether in harmony
with the precepts of the decalogue."3 A Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
Judge used his literary skills to refer to the "commandments" of the Bill of
Rights as "thou shalt not violate anyone's right to be secure in his person
against unreasonable seizure" and "thou shalt not deprive any person of life,
liberty or property without due process of law." 4 People v. Vecchio referred
to the statute that sets forth the various factors to consider in dismissing an
indictment as "the decalogue of possible determinants." 5 Ballengee v. State
referenced an article by Federal District Court Chief Judge Edwin J. Devitt
titled "Ten Commandments for the New Judge."6 In State ex rel. Lashly v.
Becker, dissenting Judge Higbee argued by analogy:
[T]he simple truth is that section 57 no more repeals section 1 or
the proviso of section 7 of article 4 than the Sermon on the
Mount abrogates the Ten Commandments. Indeed, the Master
gave a new interpretation to the Commandments. Envy of
another's goods is larceny; lust is adultery; hatred is murder.
Still, the Law, written by God's finger on the Tables of Stone,
remains the Gibraltar of civilization.7
These usages demonstrate how thoroughly ingrained into our culture the
Ten Commandments have become, to the point that the usage of this
terminology lends instant recognition and moral authority to the injunctions
they describe. Admittedly, however, increasing Biblical illiteracy may have
dimmed Americans' recognition of the Ten Commandments in recent years.
Mitchell Holman
2024-05-19 18:51:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:14:24 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
The foundation of our legal system -
the presumption of innocence, double
jeopardy, due process, appeals courts -
has ANYTHING to do with the Bible.
No one said ANY of that, HoleMan. Just because your fuck-buddy Rudy
said it didn't, doesn't mean someone did. We're not talking about the
Bible.
You shall not murder.
Made into law.
You shall not commit adultery.
Made into law.
Wrong. Adultery is not a crime in the US
Post by AlleyCat
You shall not steal.
Made into law.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
Made into law.
Wrong. Lying about your neighbor
is not a crime in the US
Post by AlleyCat
You shall not covet.
Made into law,
Wrong. You can covet all you want.
"Lfestyles of the Rich and Famous",
just for starters.
Mike Colangelo
2024-05-19 19:43:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:14:24 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
The foundation of our legal system -
the presumption of innocence, double
jeopardy, due process, appeals courts -
has ANYTHING to do with the Bible.
No one said ANY of that, HoleMan. Just because your fuck-buddy Rudy
said it didn't, doesn't mean someone did. We're not talking about the
Bible.
You shall not murder.
Made into law.
You shall not commit adultery.
Made into law.
Wrong. Adultery is not a crime in the US
It's not a crime in most of the U.S., but it still is in a few. From Wikipedia:

Although adultery laws are mostly found in the conservative states
(especially Southern states), there are some notable exceptions such as New
York.

In general, 3 US states criminalize it as a felony (Oklahoma, Michigan, and
Wisconsin) and 14 states along with Puerto Rico criminalize it as a
misdemeanor. Punishments range from as little as a $10 fine in Maryland
(despite being technically a criminal offense, not a civil one) to a fine of
up to $10,000 and jail time of up to 3.5 years in Wisconsin and a fine of up
to $5,000 and jail time of up to 5 years in Michigan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adultery_laws#United_States
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
You shall not steal.
Made into law.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
Made into law.
Wrong. Lying about your neighbor
is not a crime in the US
"Bearing false witness" means in a legal proceeding, and lying about your
neighbor in either a criminal or civil procedure is perjury, a felony.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
You shall not covet.
Made into law,
Wrong. You can covet all you want.
"Lfestyles of the Rich and Famous",
just for starters.
Correct.
Akidasar
2024-05-19 20:21:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 12:43:06 -0700
Post by Mike Colangelo
Post by Mitchell Holman
Wrong. You can covet all you want.
"Lfestyles of the Rich and Famous",
just for starters.
Correct.
Liar.



https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=lu_law_review

J. Thou Shalt Not Covet
My October 2002 Lexis search revealed thirteen cases in which the
Tenth Commandment was cited. Please note that Roman Catholics consider
"Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife" as the Ninth Commandment and
"Thou shalt not covet anything that is thy neighbor's" as the Tenth
Commandment, while Jews and Protestants treat all coveting as Tenth
Commandment violations.
Coveting is not simply wanting things. Rather, coveting is (1) wanting
something even though it is not God's will that one should have it; (2)
wanting something obsessively; (3) wanting something so badly that one is
willing to obtain it by illegal or unethical means; or (4) wanting something
so badly that one resents the fact that someone else has it.
Judge Dent, whose concurring opinion in the voting fraud case of Doll v.
Bender, previously quoted in its reference to the Commandment "Thou
shalt not steal" as including theft of votes or civil liberties, spoke further of
the Tenth Commandment:
While the tenth commandment, 'Thou shalt not covet,' rebukes
even the desire to do such things. The selfish disregard of these
plain inhibitions of both revealed and natural law, supported by
the dictates of a pure conscience, brings on political corruption,
poisons the very fountain head of civil authority-the ballot boxand ends in disrespect to all law, followed by lawlessness, fraud,
rapine, murder, and lynching by rope, fire, and torture. A broken
moral law, by whoever done, however done, and wherever done,
is certain to bring its retribution, which may fall on the head of
the innocent and pure, but for which the aggressor must some
day, somewhere and somehow, make full restitution. This is a lesson which men are slow to learn and unwilling to receive,
although the history of the past is but a record of one half of its
profound truth, while the other half awaits the revelations of
eternity. With my unshaken and fixed belief in the moral law, the
supreme rule of Almighty God, the final triumph of perfect
righteousness, and the sure punishment of all iniquity, I could
not do otherwise than concur in sustaining the expressed will of
the people, bound as I am by the oath of office under which I
hold my commission. A cross and a crown of thorns are far more
to be preferred than success achieved through the broken laws of
God.
9 2
In Cooley, Cooley and The 7C Company v. United States, the United
States Court of Claims noted that regulatory takings can run afoul of the
Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment if they go too far. The court noted:
'[F]or what is the land but the profits thereof[?]' In fact, the
Tenth Commandment embodies this same principle ('Neither
shalt thou desire thy neighbour's wife, neither shalt thou covet
thy neighbour's house, his field, or his manservant, or his
maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or any thing that is thy
neighbour's.') 93
Chisman v. Moylan involved the duty of a broker to his clients. The court
opined:
What has here been said as it concerns the duty incumbent
upon a broker to his principal is nothing new, but constitutes an
axiomatic truth which adverts farther back than contemporary
law. It flows from the highest and most everlasting authority, the
Holy Writ. There the law of fairness and the ethics of man's
conduct with man is given in incomparable clarity and purity
through the admonition of the Tenth Commandment. 'Thou shalt
not covet' and the Golden Rule, 'Therefore all things whatsoever
ye would that men should do to you, de ye even so to them: for
this is the law and the prophets.' 94
Haskins v. Royster applied the Fourth Commandment and the Tenth
Commandment to the enticing away of servants or laborers.
This is so by the common law. The relation of master and
servant has existed from the earliest stages of society. It is
recognized both in the 4th and 10th commandments of the
decalogue, and is said by Blackstone to be founded in
convenience, whereby a person calls in the assistance of others
when his skill and labor will not be sufficient to answer the cares
incumbent on him.95
Unlike stealing, coveting is seldom the subject of legislation. But the
Commandment is nevertheless highly relevant to law and government,
because it is a "hedge" of protection against illegal activity. A person who
covets his neighbor's property is more likely to steal it. A person who
covets his neighbor's spouse is more likely to commit adultery. Persons
who have been trained not to covet are more likely to be honest, lawabiding citizens than those who have not been so taught.
Gaines v. State involved an attempt to gain Winslett's confidence and
rob him. The court said "the excessive manifestations of hospitality as
exhibited by Gaines, Patrick, and McRae toward Winslett immediately after
the latter displayed his large roll of money were not due to his fascinating
personality, but rather to a spirit of cupidity against which the Tenth
Commandment had not effectively admonished them.,
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 02:19:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 01:47:08 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
And 16 states still have sodomy bans
despite the Supreme Court overturning them
20 years ago. An unenforceable law is a
nullity.
https://i.imgur.com/8Ftbf2k.mp4

=====

Gay Narcissistic Personality Disorder And Gay HoleMan

Gay Narcissistic personality disorder is a condition often erroneously mistaken for overconfidence or
conceitedness.

Sufferers will often monopolize conversations, BELITTLE OTHERS, freely express their sense of SUPERIORITY and
ENTITLEMENT and BECOME DEPRESSED, ANGRY and ABUSIVE in the face of perceived criticism which raises feelings
of insecurity and shame.

There is a theory that gay men, like Mitchie, may be particularly susceptible to narcissistic personality
disorder(BINGO!), as a result of subconscious feelings of intense inadequacy, for which narcissism is an
over-compensation.

Counseling for gay men can offer the opportunity to discuss and resolve these issues. Unresolved, the
symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder can have serious consequences, in terms of failure to form
meaningful relationships, build friendships, develop careers and...

...GETTING BANNED FROM ALL USENET SERVERS.

Common indicators

Criteria for diagnosing narcissistic personality disorder are generally considered to be an exaggerated sense
of self-importance, feeling superior and expecting to be considered superior by others, exaggerating
achievements, fantasizing about spectacular successes, demanding constant admiration and compliance, taking
advantage of others while struggling to recognize their needs and feelings, believing they are envied by
others and generally behaving arrogantly. Psychotherapy and counseling for gay men, like Rudy, can help open
the process of exploring issues that underlie these responses.

When to seek help

Often people experiencing narcissistic personality disorder put off seeking clinical intervention. Their
erroneous self-perception as powerful and perfect isolates them from others including medical professionals,
and they generally only seek treatment when they experience associated symptoms of depression, as a result of
perceived slights or rejections with which they struggle to cope.

Early medical intervention

If you recognize personality traits that are common to narcissistic personality disorder, or you're
experiencing depression, anxiety or a disabling sadness, you should consider contacting your own doctor to
discuss these feelings and related concerns, or contacting an experienced counselor or psychiatrist in London
who may be able to offer insight, perspective and the counseling that allows you to confront this life-
limiting condition. Getting appropriate treatment could make your life more rewarding and enjoyable.
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 17:05:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 13:19:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
States rights.
You love to toss that one around, so here you go.
Do you really need me to repost the
Supremecy Clause of the Constitution
again?
There's no such thing as "The Supremecy Clause".

BUT... the Supremacy Clause states:

Federal statutes and treaties must be within the parameters of the Constitution; that is, they must be
pursuant to the federal government's enumerated powers, and not violate other constitutional limits on
federal power, such as the Bill of Rights and the (First Amendment, which dictates):

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF.

NO WHERE is it written that there shall be a "separation of church and state".

Separation of Church And State: Is It Actually In The Constitution?

Nope.

It's true that the phrase "separation of church and state" does not appear anywhere in the Constitution of
the United States.

So...

Constitutional Myth #4: The Constitution Doesn't Separate Church And State - The Atlantic

"... separation between Church and State..." is a METAPHOR used by Thomas Jefferson in a letter replying to
the Danbury Baptists.

=============================================================================================================

THIS is Joe Biden when not on drugs or stimulants and acts like himself:

https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/S/p/u/y/Spuyq.caa.mp4?b=1&u=ummtf

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xPhZcMYekKs?feature=share

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/hiDRFTVH0rY

http://youtu.be/KuhR-Nqv6Wg

http://youtu.be/D5JF7PupC58andpp

http://youtu.be/3gsMTe0Nr4Yandpp

http://youtu.be/WBUgHkbtm9Iandpp

=====

Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden

Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

=====

Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4

http://youtu.be/Slm5bvO-_5I

=====

Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press
Conference
http://youtu.be/SdfvIvYPPRo

Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story
https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a-
story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech
https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


Joe Biden: You Just Wonder
http://youtu.be/Uj0ccJgJsPA


Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech
http://youtu.be/0xwoaagXFyU


Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect'
http://youtu.be/oHI__YneMuE


Barely There Biden Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/YxxAyHgBiNU


Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc


Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred
http://youtu.be/vt7WPjsYl44


Joe Biden making Zer0 sense
http://youtu.be/VYch-1fRhiE


Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero
Sense!
http://youtu.be/qg4OUk0qyWM
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-20 19:47:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 13:19:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
States rights.
You love to toss that one around, so here you go.
Do you really need me to repost the
Supremecy Clause of the Constitution
again?
There's no such thing as "The Supremecy Clause".
Yes there is (Article VI, Clause2):

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be
made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be
made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law
of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any
thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary
notwithstanding."
Akidasar
2024-05-20 19:52:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:47:48 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 13:19:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
States rights.
You love to toss that one around, so here you go.
Do you really need me to repost the
Supremecy Clause of the Constitution
again?
There's no such thing as "The Supremecy Clause".
Yes there is
Learn to spell.

Loading Image...
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 20:50:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:47:48 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by AlleyCat
There's no such thing as "The Supremecy Clause".
No. Check YOUR spelling.

And then read my post again.

BUT... the SupremAcy Clause states:

Federal statutes and treaties must be within the parameters of the Constitution; that is, they must be
pursuant to the federal government's enumerated powers, and not violate other constitutional limits on
federal power, such as the Bill of Rights and the (First Amendment, which dictates):

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF.

NO WHERE is it written that there shall be a "separation of church and state".

Separation of Church And State: Is It Actually In The Constitution?

Nope.

It's true that the phrase "separation of church and state" does not appear anywhere in the Constitution of
the United States.

So...

Constitutional Myth #4: The Constitution Doesn't Separate Church And State - The Atlantic

"... separation between Church and State..." is a METAPHOR used by Thomas Jefferson in a letter replying to
the Danbury Baptists.

============================================================================

THIS is Joe Biden when not on drugs or stimulants and acts like himself:

https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/S/p/u/y/Spuyq.caa.mp4?b=1&u=ummtf

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xPhZcMYekKs?feature=share

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/hiDRFTVH0rY

http://youtu.be/KuhR-Nqv6Wg

http://youtu.be/D5JF7PupC58andpp

http://youtu.be/3gsMTe0Nr4Yandpp

http://youtu.be/WBUgHkbtm9Iandpp

=====

Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden

Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

=====

Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4

http://youtu.be/Slm5bvO-_5I

=====

Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press
Conference
http://youtu.be/SdfvIvYPPRo

Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story
https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a-
story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech
https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


Joe Biden: You Just Wonder
http://youtu.be/Uj0ccJgJsPA


Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech
http://youtu.be/0xwoaagXFyU


Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect'
http://youtu.be/oHI__YneMuE


Barely There Biden Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/YxxAyHgBiNU


Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc


Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred
http://youtu.be/vt7WPjsYl44


Joe Biden making Zer0 sense
http://youtu.be/VYch-1fRhiE


Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero
Sense!
http://youtu.be/qg4OUk0qyWM
Josh Rosenbluth
2024-05-20 22:50:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:47:48 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by AlleyCat
There's no such thing as "The Supremecy Clause".
No. Check YOUR spelling.
And then read my post again.
Federal statutes and treaties must be within the parameters of the Constitution; that is, they must be
pursuant to the federal government's enumerated powers, and not violate other constitutional limits on
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF.
NO WHERE is it written that there shall be a "separation of church and state".
That's not relevant to Holman's comment which was about state rights and
adultery laws, not the Establishment Clause.
Akidasar
2024-05-20 23:05:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 15:50:12 -0700
Post by Josh Rosenbluth
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:47:48 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth says...
Post by AlleyCat
There's no such thing as "The Supremecy Clause".
No. Check YOUR spelling.
And then read my post again.
Federal statutes and treaties must be within the parameters of the
Constitution; that is, they must be pursuant to the federal
government's enumerated powers, and not violate other
constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF.
NO WHERE is it written that there shall be a "separation of church and state".
That's not relevant to Holman's comment
Fuck cornholer, and fuck you too, skankbag.
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 21:02:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 13:50:17 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Pedantic little hysteric was making a big deal of Holman's misspelling.
ha ha... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

LOL... STILL can't come up with his own words.

I made no "big deal". Not like YOU do when someone makes a typing, not necessarily a spelling, mistake.

Says the pedantic little midget who harps on EVERYONE'S misspellings, AND has NO room to talk, because he
fucks up MORE than anyone else... COMBINED.

You even whine about me using superscript 2 on CO². THAT'S pedantic. I can't type a subscript 2 in this
newsreader, stupid. Besides, pussy... *I* can write whatever the hell I want.

If I want to represent CO² as CO³, I'll do that too. YOU don't get to tell anyone what to do. YOU don't
fucking matter, insignificant fly shit speck.

Count up YOUR fuckups and then count everyone else's... there's NO comparison. You're THE biggest fuckup
ever. Your father knew this... that's why he left your mommy.

Now, go fetch mommy her gin... it's getting late.

=====

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

1. It is a dark moment *entire* created by... - Rudy Canoza

2. "This comments" - Rudy Canoza

3. Fuck off with you copypasta. - Rudy Canoza

4. "Wnenever(sic) Hartung starts off with "So...", e.g. "So what you're saying is...", what follows is
always a straw man, which is a type of lie." - Rudy Canoza

5. "You already squandered you(sic) one reply." - Rudy Canoza

6. "You found it somewhere and copypastaed"(sic) - Rudy Canaoza

7. "So, the judge was actually *is* actually a felon." - Rudy Canaoza

8. "It choose(sic) you" - Rudy Canaoza

9. THEN, he fucks up his own fuckup.

10. "It chooe(sic) you"? - Rudy Canoza

11. "Adversary and enemy are not(sic) synonyms." - Rudy Canoza

12. AlleyCat, the narcissist, ,(sic) The Insanely Jealous Narcissist - Rudy Canoza

13. The vast majority of political violence in the U.S>(sic) is committed by far right-wingnuts. - Rudy
Canaoza

14. "LOL... Ruy(sic) *correctly* points out that "adversary" and "enemy" are not synonyms" - Rudy Canaoza

15. "LOL... Ruey(sic) *correctly* points out that "adversary" and "enemy" are not synonyms" - Rudy Canaoza

16. "Adversary and enemy are not synonyms."

17. Look(sic) Rudy makes me do - Rudy Canaoza

18. No. The subject line is a a ie(sic). - Professor of Grammar, Rudy "I Fucked Up Again" - Rudy Canoza

19. "You don't(sic) your ass from your face, shitbag." - Professor of Grammar, Rudy "I Fucked Up Again"" -
Rudy Canoza

20. "Decent People Laught"(sic) - Rudy Canoza

21. "I have reduce(sic) my assets." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

22. "I really have explain(sic) fully why no one died to "preserve our liberty." - Rudy Canoza

23. "It would if were were(sic) writing in German, which, of course, we aren't." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

24. "You didn't even read you(sic) copypasta lie bullshit." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

25. "living rent-free in you(sic) diseased imagination." - Rudy Canoza

26. Yes, *YOU* know where I kicke(sic) your squat-to-piss no-fight faggot ass, you fat fairy. - Rudy Canoza

27. "No one aksed(sic) you, Google Groups faggot." - Rudy Canoza

28. "Eric Schild - hysterical histrionical estogen(sic)-oozing squat-to-piss fairy - squealed" - Rudy
Canoza

29. Estogen? What the fuck is Estogen, brainiac?

30. "That exclude(sic) McEnany and you, and also Trump." - Rudy Canoza

31. "Oh, that's right: you're(sic) Nazi." - Rudy Canoza

32. Thursday, October 10, 2019: "Trump has *failed* to delegitimate(sic) the impeachment effort, as the
growing public support for it shows." - Rudy Canoza

33. Wednesday, August 4, 2020: "As I already explained: *every* word Trump says about the election is
part of an attempt to try to delegitimate(sic) it in advance." - Rudy Canoza

34. Tuesday, August 3, 2020: "Everything he says about the election is intended to destabilize and
delegitimate(sic) it." - Rudy Canoza

35. Friday, August 7, 2020: "No. Trump's deliberate attempts to delegitimate(sic) the election are well
proved." - Rudy Canoza

36. Funny how he *NEVER* uses that word AFTER I corrected the narcissistic idiot.

37. "[snip plagiarized bullshit that AlleyPussyBitch has'nt[sic] even read]" - Rudy Canoza - 6/15/21 -
Contraction error...funny!

38. "I have reduce(sic) my assets." - "Bill Flett" - 6/12/21 - More verb tense problems for our uneducated
lil guy. - Rudy Canoza

39. "I really have explain(sic) fully why no one died to 'preserve our liberty.'" - Wednesday is Verb
Problem day for Dwarfling, "Rudy Canoza" 6/9/21

40. "It would if were[sic] were writing in German, which, of course, we aren't." - Rudy Canoza 6/8/21

41. "You didn't even read you[sic] copypasta lie bullshit." - Rudy Canoza - 6/8/21 - Pronoun problems for
The Dwarf

42. "living rent-free in you[sic] diseased imagination." - "Rudy Canoza" - 2/10/21 - More dwarfish pronoun
problems

43. "The(sic) did not "invade" anything, ratboy." --- "Rudy Canoza" 7/10/21 Article or pronoun? Which is it
to be?

44. "The salient characteristic of right-wingnut shitbags like ratboy"(sic). --- "Rudy Canoza" 7/8/21 No
verb, therefore it is not a sentence. Tsk-tsk.

45. "Fuck off with Delwaware."(sic) - "Rudy Canoza" 7/23/21 The Dwarfling discovers a new state!

46. "When Nazi sympathizer(sic) like you are exterminated" - "Orni Thopter" 7/23/21 Even Rudy's socks have
problems with plurals. - Rudy Canoza

47. "*(A)ny*(sic) measure the(sic) either outright prevents eligible voters from voting" - "Rudy Canoza"

48. "She's an excellent judge, and his(sic) criticism of Trump's truly shitty lawyers is spot-on." - "Rudy
Canoza" 7/12/21 More gender-shifting? Hahaha.
NoBody
2024-05-21 11:01:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 12:47:48 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 13:19:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
States rights.
You love to toss that one around, so here you go.
Do you really need me to repost the
Supremecy Clause of the Constitution
again?
There's no such thing as "The Supremecy Clause".
No there is no "Supremecy Clause" but there IS a "SupremaAcy Clause".
Had you actually read his response and not snip it you'd have
recognized that.

<eyeroll>
pothead
2024-05-21 12:56:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 20 May 2024 13:19:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
States rights.
You love to toss that one around, so here you go.
Do you really need me to repost the
Supremecy Clause of the Constitution
again?
There's no such thing as "The Supremecy Clause".
Federal statutes and treaties must be within the parameters of the Constitution; that is, they must be
pursuant to the federal government's enumerated powers, and not violate other constitutional limits on
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF.
NO WHERE is it written that there shall be a "separation of church and state".
Separation of Church And State: Is It Actually In The Constitution?
Nope.
It's true that the phrase "separation of church and state" does not appear anywhere in the Constitution of
the United States.
So...
Constitutional Myth #4: The Constitution Doesn't Separate Church And State - The Atlantic
"... separation between Church and State..." is a METAPHOR used by Thomas Jefferson in a letter replying to
the Danbury Baptists.
Interesting.
I was not aware of that.
Good information.
--
pothead
Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.
Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.
Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.
Akidasar
2024-05-19 20:06:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:51:57 +0000
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:14:24 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
The foundation of our legal system -
the presumption of innocence, double
jeopardy, due process, appeals courts -
has ANYTHING to do with the Bible.
No one said ANY of that, HoleMan. Just because your fuck-buddy Rudy
said it didn't, doesn't mean someone did. We're not talking about
the Bible.
You shall not murder.
Made into law.
You shall not commit adultery.
Made into law.
Wrong. Adultery is not a crime in the US
Liar.

https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=lu_law_review

Hild v. Hild held that the Maryland presumption against awarding
custody of a child to a spouse found guilty of adultery had not been
overcome, noting that adultery was prohibited by ancient law "[c]ommonly
known as the Decalogue or Ten Commandments. See Exodus 20:1-17; Deut. 5:6-21. ''

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/adultery-lawyers.html

Is It a Crime to Commit Adultery?
As of the year 2022, adultery is categorized as a criminal offense in
16 states.

As of 2002, adultery by some form of the definition is still a crime in 14 states, including:

Arizona;
Florida;
Georgia;
Kansas;
Illinois;
Michigan;
Minnesota;
Mississippi;
New York;
North Carolina;
Oklahoma;
South Carolina;
Utah; and
Wisconsin.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
You shall not steal.
Made into law.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
Made into law.
Wrong. Lying about your neighbor
is not a crime in the US
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=lu_law_review

I. Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Thy Neighbor
My October 2002 Lexis search revealed nine cases that cite the Ninth
Commandment, again recognizing variants in the numbering. Many courts
have cited this Commandment to condemn perjury, although as previously
noted, perjury is also condemned by the Commandment, "Thou shalt not
take the name of the Lord thy God in vain."
In United States v. lanniello, the court stated:
When our judicial system was established and the requirement of
an oath or affirmation on the part of a witness was borrowed
from the British common law, the swearing of an oath meant
something-namely, that the court could be fairly sure that a
witness would tell the truth. In the time of our Founding Fathers,
witnesses believed that they would be subject to severe and
perhaps immediate Divine retribution if they lied under oath on
the witness stand, based on the Ninth Commandment's
proscription, handed down by God to Moses that 'Thou shalt not
bear false witness against thy neighbor.' 86
In Commonwealth v. Brown, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
observed that a dying declaration is accepted as evidence because
[W]hen a person is faced with death which he knows is
impending and he is about to see his Maker face to face, is he not
more likely to tell the truth than is a witness in Court who knows
that if he lies he will have a locus penitentiae, an opportunity to
repent, confess and be absolved of his sin?87
But the dissent by Justice Musmanno countered that "An expiring murderer
could have as much motive to falsify as he had to kill. If the Sixth
Commandment did not deter him from slaughtering his fellow-man, the
Ninth Commandment would present no barrier to his bearing false
witness. 8 8 The reason, he said, is that "there are persons who defy
goodness and honor and who accept the cut rates of Mr. Satan at his
sulphuric supermarket rather than pay the just price which decency and
justice demand, that evil still walks the earth.
Rejecting an appeal from a judgment of fraud, the Court of Appeals of
California, Third Appellate District, wrote, "Counsel for the appellants cite
several verses of the Bible, all of which, perhaps, are fitting when the
circumstances correspond, but in this case we think the ninth commandment given effect by the judgment of the trial court, is conclusive." 90
In Davis v. Queen City Furniture the Louisiana Supreme Court
concluded that "Whether in all these contradictions it is plaintiffs witnesses
who have violated the ninth commandment or if it be the defendant's
witnesses, only the Supreme Judge can decide with absolute certainty."
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
You shall not covet.
Made into law,
Wrong. You can covet all you want.
"Lfestyles of the Rich and Famous",
just for starters.
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=lu_law_review

J. Thou Shalt Not Covet
My October 2002 Lexis search revealed thirteen cases in which the
Tenth Commandment was cited. Please note that Roman Catholics consider
"Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife" as the Ninth Commandment and
"Thou shalt not covet anything that is thy neighbor's" as the Tenth
Commandment, while Jews and Protestants treat all coveting as Tenth
Commandment violations.
Coveting is not simply wanting things. Rather, coveting is (1) wanting
something even though it is not God's will that one should have it; (2)
wanting something obsessively; (3) wanting something so badly that one is
willing to obtain it by illegal or unethical means; or (4) wanting something
so badly that one resents the fact that someone else has it.
Judge Dent, whose concurring opinion in the voting fraud case of Doll v.
Bender, previously quoted in its reference to the Commandment "Thou
shalt not steal" as including theft of votes or civil liberties, spoke further of
the Tenth Commandment:
While the tenth commandment, 'Thou shalt not covet,' rebukes
even the desire to do such things. The selfish disregard of these
plain inhibitions of both revealed and natural law, supported by
the dictates of a pure conscience, brings on political corruption,
poisons the very fountain head of civil authority-the ballot boxand ends in disrespect to all law, followed by lawlessness, fraud,
rapine, murder, and lynching by rope, fire, and torture. A broken
moral law, by whoever done, however done, and wherever done,
is certain to bring its retribution, which may fall on the head of
the innocent and pure, but for which the aggressor must some
day, somewhere and somehow, make full restitution. This is a lesson which men are slow to learn and unwilling to receive,
although the history of the past is but a record of one half of its
profound truth, while the other half awaits the revelations of
eternity. With my unshaken and fixed belief in the moral law, the
supreme rule of Almighty God, the final triumph of perfect
righteousness, and the sure punishment of all iniquity, I could
not do otherwise than concur in sustaining the expressed will of
the people, bound as I am by the oath of office under which I
hold my commission. A cross and a crown of thorns are far more
to be preferred than success achieved through the broken laws of
God.
9 2
In Cooley, Cooley and The 7C Company v. United States, the United
States Court of Claims noted that regulatory takings can run afoul of the
Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment if they go too far. The court noted:
'[F]or what is the land but the profits thereof[?]' In fact, the
Tenth Commandment embodies this same principle ('Neither
shalt thou desire thy neighbour's wife, neither shalt thou covet
thy neighbour's house, his field, or his manservant, or his
maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or any thing that is thy
neighbour's.') 93
Chisman v. Moylan involved the duty of a broker to his clients. The court
opined:
What has here been said as it concerns the duty incumbent
upon a broker to his principal is nothing new, but constitutes an
axiomatic truth which adverts farther back than contemporary
law. It flows from the highest and most everlasting authority, the
Holy Writ. There the law of fairness and the ethics of man's
conduct with man is given in incomparable clarity and purity
through the admonition of the Tenth Commandment. 'Thou shalt
not covet' and the Golden Rule, 'Therefore all things whatsoever
ye would that men should do to you, de ye even so to them: for
this is the law and the prophets.' 94
Haskins v. Royster applied the Fourth Commandment and the Tenth
Commandment to the enticing away of servants or laborers.
This is so by the common law. The relation of master and
servant has existed from the earliest stages of society. It is
recognized both in the 4th and 10th commandments of the
decalogue, and is said by Blackstone to be founded in
convenience, whereby a person calls in the assistance of others
when his skill and labor will not be sufficient to answer the cares
incumbent on him.95
Unlike stealing, coveting is seldom the subject of legislation. But the
Commandment is nevertheless highly relevant to law and government,
because it is a "hedge" of protection against illegal activity. A person who
covets his neighbor's property is more likely to steal it. A person who
covets his neighbor's spouse is more likely to commit adultery. Persons
who have been trained not to covet are more likely to be honest, lawabiding citizens than those who have not been so taught.
Gaines v. State involved an attempt to gain Winslett's confidence and
rob him. The court said "the excessive manifestations of hospitality as
exhibited by Gaines, Patrick, and McRae toward Winslett immediately after
the latter displayed his large roll of money were not due to his fascinating
personality, but rather to a spirit of cupidity against which the Tenth
Commandment had not effectively admonished them.,
AlleyCat
2024-05-19 21:43:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:51:57 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:14:24 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
The foundation of our legal system -
the presumption of innocence, double
jeopardy, due process, appeals courts -
has ANYTHING to do with the Bible.
No one said ANY of that, HoleMan. Just because your fuck-buddy Rudy
said it didn't, doesn't mean someone did. We're not talking about the
Bible.
You shall not murder.
Made into law.
You shall not commit adultery.
Made into law.
Wrong. Adultery is not a crime in the US
Yes it is, and was.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
You shall not steal.
Made into law.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
Made into law.
Wrong. Lying about your neighbor
is not a crime in the US
In court, stupid. Or to police to have someone arrested for something they didn't do.

Fat, drunk and stu0id is no way to go through life, son.
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
You shall not covet.
Made into law,
Wrong. You can covet all you want.
Noticed you took out words that mattered.

Made into law, IF taken further.

Lying sack of liberal.

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-
ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 03:31:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 20:00:55 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by AlleyCat
Yes it is, and was.
Mostly it's not. It only is in benighted shithole state
Like New York?

Yes.

Thanks.

Not subject to rational debate, shorty.

============================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

[I Just *LOVE* The Way This Sig-file Makes Boi-Fucker Lose His Fucking Mind]


Rudy's Little Man's Disease: A disease of short males marked by aggressive antisocial behavior and constant
overcompensation resulting in pompous mannerisms such as spitting, twitching, swearing, speaking loudly and
tough talk.

"I can kill you with one hand. You know this." - Rudy

The disease only affects teenagers or men who are less than 5' 6" tall.

"I'm about eight inches shorter than Trump [6' 2"]." - Rudy

The severity of this disease is inversely proportional to the height of the sufferer. Other characteristics
of this scourge are a very short penis, acne, low I.Q and bad etiquette.

Often these males are homophobic to the point of insanity because of latent sexual orientation issues.

**FAGGOT!** - Rudy Canoza

"Fixed your lie, you you no-fight faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"Thanks for kicking my faggot ass." - Rudy Canoza

"'Self' is redundant, you toothless squat-to-piss no-fight faggot. - Rudy Canoza

"I've beaten *you* to a bloody pulp, you squat-to-piss *no-fight* faggot - every fucking time. You're a
zero, as every, stale, squat-to-piss *no-fight* faggot who incessantly bleats about "mommy's basement"
*ALWAYS* is." - Rudy Canoza

"... you you no-fight faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"... you toothless squat-to-piss no-fight faggot" - Rudy Canoza

"Kicked your flabby faggot ass again. Yes." - Rudy Canoza

"You a Squat-to-Piss Faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"The disgusting gurgling, slurping sounds below are just the faggots Hartung, Sanitary Napkin and Bit of
Nothingness enjoying a three-way" - Rudy Canoza

"YOU lose, Nazi faggot." - Rudy Canoza

Little Man's Disease is an untreatable epidemic in this country.

This is Rudy Canoza: https://i.imgur.com/4FSRuAQ.mp4
AlleyCat
2024-05-19 21:43:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:14:24 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
The foundation of our legal system -
the presumption of innocence, double
jeopardy, due process, appeals courts -
has ANYTHING to do with the Bible.
No one said ANY of that, HoleMan. Just because your fuck-buddy Rudy
said it didn't, doesn't mean someone did. We're not talking about the
Bible.
You shall not murder.
Made into law.
You shall not commit adultery.
Made into law.
Wrong. Adultery is not a crime in the US
It's not a crime in most of the U.S., but it still is in a few. From Wikipedia:

Although adultery laws are mostly found in the conservative states
(especially Southern states), there are some notable exceptions such as New
York.

In general, 3 US states criminalize it as a felony (Oklahoma, Michigan, and
Wisconsin) and 14 states along with Puerto Rico criminalize it as a
misdemeanor. Punishments range from as little as a $10 fine in Maryland
(despite being technically a criminal offense, not a civil one) to a fine of
up to $10,000 and jail time of up to 3.5 years in Wisconsin and a fine of up
to $5,000 and jail time of up to 5 years in Michigan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adultery_laws#United_States
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
You shall not steal.
Made into law.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
Made into law.
Wrong. Lying about your neighbor
is not a crime in the US
"Bearing false witness" means in a legal proceeding, and lying about your
neighbor in either a criminal or civil procedure is perjury, a felony.

Smacked down GOOD, liberal.

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

Vice Admits Liberal Men are Weaker, Less Attractive than...

https://phillipschneider.com/vice-admits-liberal-men-are-weaker-less- attractive-than-conservatives/

Vice Admits Liberal Men are Weaker, Less Attractive than Conservatives By Phillip Schneider on August 11,
2020 ( Leave a comment ) While the flames of the culture war rage, even far-left media publication Vice
admits that liberal men are weaker and less competent than conservatives.

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

TRUTH: Why Liberals Are WEAKER Than Conservatives https://thefederalistpapers.org/us/truth-liberals-weaker-
conservatives

TRUTH: Why Liberals Are WEAKER Than Conservatives. Speaking of weak liberals, who can't even stand the sight
of history: Texas Restaurant Defending Controversial Sign Some Are Calling Racist - by Robert Gehl. A Texas
restaurant is under attack on social media for what many are calling its racist décor. The neon sign hung at
Cook's Garage...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

Shocker: Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal

https://redstate.com/terichristoph/2017/05/26/shocker-study-shows-physically- weak-men-tend-to-be-liberal-
n72373

Shocker: Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal. In news that will surprise absolutely no one, a
new study reveals that girly men are more likely to favor socialist policies. The study, conducted by
researchers at Brunel University London, looked at the height, weight, physical strength, and bicep
circumference of 171 men, along...

=====

Science Proves That Liberals Are Crazier Than Conservatives

https://freedomwire.com/liberals-are-crazy/

Well, I recently came across a fantastic article about another study of Liberals - except this time, instead
of focusing on the weak males, it focuses on the average Liberal woman instead. A Ph.D. candidate at Georgia
State University has analyzed the data out of a recent Pew Research Center poll, and the results are amazing.

=====

Liberalism Breeds Soft, Weak, Young "Men" - Louder With...

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/liberalism-breeds-soft-weak-young-men

by Steven Crowder I know some of you think when I say "liberalism breeds weak, fat men," that I'm merely
politicizing an issue to be polarizing. I assure you that's not the case. Allow me five hundred words to make
my case. I was a chubby kid. Strike that, I was a jiggly shrimp. Skinny-fat. The kind of kid who was
relatively thin, yet managed to ma

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Why Liberals Are So Physically Monstrous And Repulsive...

https://www.returnofkings.com/118536/why-liberals-are-so-physically-monstrous- and-repulsive

Liberals are not born uglier. They voluntarily remain ugly or become uglier to fit a narrative. "Appearance
is ideology". It takes a special kind of hypocrisy to call something that is universally seen as ugly
"beautiful" and vice-versa.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

Science says liberals, not conservatives, are psychotic

https://nypost.com/2016/06/09/science-says-liberal-beliefs-are-linked-to- pyschotic-traits/

Jun 9, 2016 Turns out liberals are the real authoritarians. A political-science journal that published an
oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more likely to show traits associated with "psychoticism"...

=====

12 Reasons Why Liberals And Progressives Will Always Be...

https://www.returnofkings.com/100887/12-reasons-why-liberals-and-progressives- will-always-be-losers

Liberal men however are inexcusable, they are either effeminate enough to be emotionally manipulated or are
weak and yielding to social pressures. December 10, 2016 Take The Red Pill Don't forget that Liberal men are
usually the offspring of domineering feminists or divorced feminists and sometimes single mothers.

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-
ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...


=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News

=====

Men With Weak Upper Bodies Tend to Be Liberal - Physically Strong Men Tend to Be Conservative

Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are
inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.

Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to physical strength.

Men's upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic redistribution, according to the
research.

The principal investigators - psychological scientists Michael Bang Petersen, of Aarhus University in
Denmark, and Daniel Sznycer, of the University of California in the U.S., believe that the link may reflect
psychological traits that evolved in response to our early ancestral environments and continue to influence
behavior today.

Professor Petersen said: 'While many think of politics as a modern phenomenon, it has - in a sense - always
been with our species.'

In the days of our early ancestors, decisions about the distribution of resources were not made in
courthouses or legislative offices, but through shows of strength.

With this in mind, Professor Petersen and Professor Sznycer hypothesized that upper-body strength - a proxy
for the ability to physically defend or acquire resources - would predict men's opinions about the
redistribution of wealth.

diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 03:31:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 20:00:53 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:14:24 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
The foundation of our legal system -
the presumption of innocence, double
jeopardy, due process, appeals courts -
has ANYTHING to do with the Bible.
No one said ANY of that, HoleMan. Just because your fuck-buddy Rudy
said it didn't, doesn't mean someone did. We're not talking about the
Bible.
You shall not murder.
Made into law.
You shall not commit adultery.
Made into law.
Wrong. Adultery is not a crime in the US
Fuck off, faggot plagiarist
Awww... cry some more, puss.

=====

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

Why Rudy Gets So Angwy

Narcissists, like Rudy, are people who feed off the energy of others. They draw from people around them TO
BOOST THEIR SELF-ESTEEM.

(perfect!)

As a result, they are extraordinarily self-centered. If you have a narcissist for a boss, it can be very
difficult. Narcissists are reluctant to share credit with others.

One question about narcissists is whether they are also prone to aggressive and violent reactions toward
others when their self-esteem is threatened. This issue was explored in a paper by Zlatan Krizan and Omesh
Johar in the May 2015 issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

The researchers point out that there are actually two subtypes of narcissism:

One is grandiose narcissism, which is characterized by people having a high opinion of themselves. Grandiose
narcissists believe that other people are interested in them, and that they should be listened to by others.
One of the most popular personality tests used to identify narcissists, the Narcissistic Personality
Inventory, measures grandiose narcissism.

The second subtype is vulnerable narcissism, in which people are self-centered, but also defensive and
resentful of others.

This new set of studies suggests that vulnerable narcissism leads to aggressive and violent reactions to
other people, while grandiose narcissism does not.

In one study, participants were given several personality inventories, including one designed to test for
grandiose narcissism and one designed to test for vulnerable narcissism. Participants filled out scales that
measured their level of physical and verbal aggression, as well as anger and hostility toward others. The
researchers also measured individuals' tendency to experience shame.

Vulnerable narcissists were much more prone than grandiose narcissists to experience shame, to find their
self-esteem influenced by the beliefs of others, and to experience anger and rage toward others. Grandiose
narcissists were more prone than vulnerable narcissists to feel entitled and to try to exploit others.

A second study looked at aggression in the laboratory. Participants were measured on scales of grandiose and
vulnerable narcissism. Participants had been told that the study was focused on food preferences. They were
told that they had been paired with a partner sitting in another room. First, that unseen partner was going
to select a food for them to taste, and then they were going to select a food for the partner to taste.

The first phase of the study was designed to provoke a reaction in the participants. They were told that
their partner selected a bitter drink for them to try. They were told that the partner could give them a
mildly bitter drink or a harshly bitter drink, and could select how much of it the person had to try.

One group of participants was given three ounces of the harshly bitter drink. This was expected to make the
participant feel like their partner did not like them. A second group of participants was given three ounces
of the mildly bitter drink. This condition was a control. All participants were asked to drink what they were
given, and all did so. The participants given the more bitter drink felt it was vile. Participants rated how
annoyed they were at the other person as well as their anger toward that person and their trust of that
person.

In the second phase of the study, participants selected a spicy sauce for a second person to drink. They
could select amounts from two bottles, one of which was a very hot pepper sauce, while the other was mild.
Participants got a small taste of the sauces so that they would know how unpleasant the hotter sauce was. The
idea was that the more aggressive the participant felt toward their partner, the more hot sauce they would
want that participant to drink.

Participants who had been given the bitter drink were more annoyed at their partner than those given the mild
drink. As a result, people who were given the bitter drink were more likely to give hot sauce to the other
person than those who were given the mild drink. The people high in vulnerable narcissism who received the
bitter drink were most likely to give hot sauce to the other person. The vulnerable narcissists given the
bitter drink were also most angry at, and least trusting of, the other person. Grandiose narcissism, however,
did not predict aggression toward the other person or ratings of anger or trust.

These studies suggest that there are two distinct subtypes of narcissists:

Those whose narcissism reflects a feeling of self-importance tend to exploit other people, but they are not
inclined to act aggressively or violently toward others.

Those whose narcissism reflects feelings of defensiveness and resentment feel shame when their self-esteem is
threatened, and tend to react to those threats with anger and aggression.
pothead
2024-05-20 00:02:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:14:24 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
The foundation of our legal system -
the presumption of innocence, double
jeopardy, due process, appeals courts -
has ANYTHING to do with the Bible.
No one said ANY of that, HoleMan. Just because your fuck-buddy Rudy
said it didn't, doesn't mean someone did. We're not talking about the
Bible.
You shall not murder.
Made into law.
You shall not commit adultery.
Made into law.
Wrong. Adultery is not a crime in the US
Wrong again.

It depends upon the state.
--
pothead
Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.
Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.
Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 02:23:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 20 May 2024 01:49:20 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
Show us the last prosecution for adultery.
Doesn't matter... You shall not commit adultery, was made into law.

It's a law, just like spitting on the sidewalk.

Pick your poison, pussy.

Look it up yourself and use your exact words.

"show us the last prosecution for adultery"

It doesn't matter if it was a 1000 years ago... it was still made into law.

===============================================================================

White Liberals More Likely To Have A Mental Health Condition

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/22/white-liberals-more-likely-
have-mental-health-cond/

Apr 22, 2021 - Sixty-two percent of Whites who classify themselves as "very
liberal" or "liberal" have been told by a doctor they have a mental health
condition, as compared to 26% of conservatives and...

=====

White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems... - Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/white-liberals-mental-health-study/2021/04/20/id/1018293/

The Pew Study, Which The Washington Free Beacon notes was published last year
but only gained attention in a recent article, showed that white liberals of
all ages were more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition than
moderates or conservatives, with the disparity particularly pronounced among
those aged 18-29, according to evie...

=====

Study: Young White Liberals More Likely to Have Mental Health Problems

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/22/study-young-white-liberals-
more-likely-to-have-mental-health-problems/

Apr 22, 2021 - When sex and age were factors, 56.3 percent of white women
between the ages of 18 and 29 and who labeled themselves as "liberal," said
they had been given a mental health diagnosis, compared to 27.3 percent of
conservatives in the same categories and 28.4 percent of moderates:

=====

62% of "liberal" or very "liberal" whites have a mental health condition

https://www.independentsentinel.com/62-of-liberal-or-very-liberal-whites-have-
a-mental-health-condition/

According to a Pew Research Center survey, 62% percent of Whites who classify
themselves as "very liberal" or "liberal" has been told by a doctor they have a
mental health condition. Only 26% of conservatives and 20% of moderates have
been told they have such a condition, the study found.

=====

Pew Study: White Liberals Disproportionately Suffer From Mental Illness...

https://wibc.com/108211/pew-study-white-liberals-disproportionately-suffer-
from-mental-illness/

White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health
diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4%
in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives. Zach Goldberg, a Ph.D. candidate in
political science, consolidated the study's info in a set of visuals and posted
them to a thread on Twitter.

SCIENCE: White Libs More Likely To Have Mental Health Problems

https://freebeacon.com/politics/white-libs-mental-health/

Within this demographic, 34 percent of liberals reported having mental health
problems, compared with 22 percent of moderates and 16 percent of
conservatives. Zach Goldberg, the doctoral...

=====

White Liberals Twice as Likely to be Diagnosed with Psychological Problems

https://www.hennessysview.com/p/psychologic-disorders-white-liberals

Nearly 1 in 2 (45.9%) of white liberals have been diagnosed with mental health
disorders. White liberals of all ages are more than twice as likely as
conservatives of any age to suffer from mental health disorders. White liberals
are almost twice as likely as non-white liberals to be diagnosed with mental
health problems.

=====

6 Reasons Why Liberalism IS A Mental Disorder (LOL) - The Political Insider

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/6-reasons-why-liberalism-can-be-considered-a-
mental-disorder/

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental
Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory. Additionally, Dr. Lyle
Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he
diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.

=====

Personality Traits, Mental Illness, and Ideology

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/202103/personality-traits-mental-illness-and-
ideology

specifically, surveys on the " big five " traits of extraversion,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience have
found that people identifying as politically...

=====

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health...

https://theliberal.ie/study-claims-over-50-of-liberal-women-under-30-have-
mental-health-issues-men-and-women-with-liberal-views-more-likely-to-be-
mentally-unwell/

Study claims over 50% of liberal women under 30 have mental health issues, men
and women with liberal views more likely to be mentally unwell April 24, 2021 -
12:01 Gerard Clarke Irish News
AlleyCat
2024-05-19 21:43:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 11:46:16 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by AlleyCat
No one said ANY of that,
That lying Republiscum/QAnon fuckstain *absolutely* said that our legal system
is wholly predicated on the so-called ten commandments, and that's a lie.
Nope, so the BLM/Drag Queen/Gay/Socialist/Antifa Fascist/Marxist/Communist/Racist/Insurrectionist/Liberal
Democrats who think that, are liars.

============================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

There Are Several Theories For Why Rudy Can't Stop Lying

Rudy's An Undeserved Narcissist

Narcisists are often pathological liars, because they simply don't care about
the truth.

They prefer to tell lies and gain control over people than be honest.

Sometimes, compulsive liars are highly impulsive people who struggle to take
the time to think things through and tell the truth.

Lying doesn't necessarily make you a bad person, but it could be a sign of
something more sinister.

By the age of three or four, we all start to lie. At this point in our brain's
development, we learn that we have an incredibly versatile and powerful tool at
our disposal - our language - and we can use it to actually play with reality
and affect the outcome of what's happening.

Sooner or later we learn that lying is "bad," and we shouldn't really do it.
But if Jim Carey's "Liar Liar" taught us anything, it's that this just isn't
feasible. We all have to lie sometimes.

But some people are pathological liars, meaning they can't stop spreading
misinformation about themselves and others. The psychological reasons for why
some people are this way is a bit of a mystery, but in the third edition of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, pathological lying is a
disorder in its own right, as well as a symptom of personality disorders like
psychopathy and narcissism.

"I think it comes from a defect in the neurological wiring in terms of what
causes us to have compassion and empathy," psychiatrist Judith Orloff, author
of "The Empath's Survival Guide," told Business Insider. "Because narcissists,
sociopaths, and psychopaths have what's called empathy deficient disorder,
meaning they don't feel empathy in the way we would."

The Truth Doesn't Matter to Narcissists

When you don't care about other people, lies don't seem to matter. A lack of
empathy essentially means a lack of conscience, which is a hard concept to
grasp for a lot of people.

"When they lie it doesn't hurt them in the same way it would hurt us," Orloff
said. "So many people get into relationships with pathological liars, or just
can't understand why they're lying, because they're trying to fit these people
into the ordinary standards of what it means to be empathetic."

But they don't fit. In fact, they may not even realize they are lying half the
time, because they're not conscious of it. Orloff said they actually believe
they are telling the truth a lot of the time. It's not so much about the fact
itself, she said, as it is about wanting to have power over somebody.

This is extremely dangerous for highly sensitive people, because they attract
narcissists. Then when they see someone is lying, they try and figure it out,
or blame themselves. Once the lies start, it can end with the victim being
gaslighted, which is essentially when they are told over and over again that
their version of reality is incorrect, and they begin to believe the warped
truth of the abuser.

"The great power of relationships is when you can tell the truth to one
another, and trust each other, and be authentic - and with pathological liars
you can't trust them," Orloff said. "You can't base your life around them. It's
like a moral deficit, and there's no accountability. Someone who is a
pathological liar will not say I'm sorry for doing it. They will say it's your
fault."

The only way to escape the clutches of a pathological liar is to be strong
enough to say "no this is not my fault, this is not ringing true to me, so I
can't really trust you," she said.

Unfortunately, people tend to doubt themselves, because the lies can escalate
subtly. It may start with a small white lie, and a few months later the
victim's life with be a mess of confusion because of the web of tall tales that
has been woven.

"If somebody lies, don't try and make an excuse about it," Orloff said. "A lie
is a lie. And if you bring it up to the person and they say it's your fault, or
no it didn't happen, just know there's something very wrong going on."

Psychologist Linda Blair, an author of many psychology books, told Business
Insider some compulsive liars are simply too impulsive to tell the truth. The
impulsive-reflective scale is ingrained in our genes, and it's very hard for
someone highly impulsive to take the time to think things through, just as it
is a challenge for a reflective person to jump into something head first.

"If you're an impulsive person, it's really hard to break the habit, because
you have this terrible feeling inside you that you have to sort things out
right now," Blair said. "So when it comes to your head, you just say it. That
doesn't mean you necessarily lie, but it's a little harder for you to stop from
lying, more than it is for someone who's more reflective."

Pathological lying and narcissism aren't synonymous, they just sometimes go
hand in hand. In other cases, compulsive liars just might not have the capacity
to stop themselves blurting things out. And Blair said they just need to learn
to control their urges and compulsions. Their lies don't necessarily come from
a bad place.

"I don't think it's something they know how to deal with," she said. "We think
probably it has something to do with actual brain function and the way some
people's brains work, which makes it much harder for them to understand the
effect it will have on other people... We think, but we just don't know yet
for sure."
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 03:31:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
You missed vandalizing the subject line again, midget.

On Sun, 19 May 2024 11:46:16 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by AlleyCat
No one said ANY of that,
That lying Republiscum/QAnon fuckstain *absolutely* said that our legal system
is wholly predicated on the so-called ten commandments, and that's a lie.
Nope, so the BLM/Drag Queen/Gay/Socialist/Antifa Fascist/Marxist/Communist/Racist/Insurrectionist/Liberal
Democrats who think that, are liars.

============================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

There Are Several Theories For Why Rudy Can't Stop Lying

Rudy's An Undeserved Narcissist

Narcisists are often pathological liars, because they simply don't care about
the truth.

They prefer to tell lies and gain control over people than be honest.

Sometimes, compulsive liars are highly impulsive people who struggle to take
the time to think things through and tell the truth.

Lying doesn't necessarily make you a bad person, but it could be a sign of
something more sinister.

By the age of three or four, we all start to lie. At this point in our brain's
development, we learn that we have an incredibly versatile and powerful tool at
our disposal - our language - and we can use it to actually play with reality
and affect the outcome of what's happening.

Sooner or later we learn that lying is "bad," and we shouldn't really do it.
But if Jim Carey's "Liar Liar" taught us anything, it's that this just isn't
feasible. We all have to lie sometimes.

But some people are pathological liars, meaning they can't stop spreading
misinformation about themselves and others. The psychological reasons for why
some people are this way is a bit of a mystery, but in the third edition of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, pathological lying is a
disorder in its own right, as well as a symptom of personality disorders like
psychopathy and narcissism.

"I think it comes from a defect in the neurological wiring in terms of what
causes us to have compassion and empathy," psychiatrist Judith Orloff, author
of "The Empath's Survival Guide," told Business Insider. "Because narcissists,
sociopaths, and psychopaths have what's called empathy deficient disorder,
meaning they don't feel empathy in the way we would."

The Truth Doesn't Matter to Narcissists

When you don't care about other people, lies don't seem to matter. A lack of
empathy essentially means a lack of conscience, which is a hard concept to
grasp for a lot of people.

"When they lie it doesn't hurt them in the same way it would hurt us," Orloff
said. "So many people get into relationships with pathological liars, or just
can't understand why they're lying, because they're trying to fit these people
into the ordinary standards of what it means to be empathetic."

But they don't fit. In fact, they may not even realize they are lying half the
time, because they're not conscious of it. Orloff said they actually believe
they are telling the truth a lot of the time. It's not so much about the fact
itself, she said, as it is about wanting to have power over somebody.

This is extremely dangerous for highly sensitive people, because they attract
narcissists. Then when they see someone is lying, they try and figure it out,
or blame themselves. Once the lies start, it can end with the victim being
gaslighted, which is essentially when they are told over and over again that
their version of reality is incorrect, and they begin to believe the warped
truth of the abuser.

"The great power of relationships is when you can tell the truth to one
another, and trust each other, and be authentic - and with pathological liars
you can't trust them," Orloff said. "You can't base your life around them. It's
like a moral deficit, and there's no accountability. Someone who is a
pathological liar will not say I'm sorry for doing it. They will say it's your
fault."

The only way to escape the clutches of a pathological liar is to be strong
enough to say "no this is not my fault, this is not ringing true to me, so I
can't really trust you," she said.

Unfortunately, people tend to doubt themselves, because the lies can escalate
subtly. It may start with a small white lie, and a few months later the
victim's life with be a mess of confusion because of the web of tall tales that
has been woven.

"If somebody lies, don't try and make an excuse about it," Orloff said. "A lie
is a lie. And if you bring it up to the person and they say it's your fault, or
no it didn't happen, just know there's something very wrong going on."

Psychologist Linda Blair, an author of many psychology books, told Business
Insider some compulsive liars are simply too impulsive to tell the truth. The
impulsive-reflective scale is ingrained in our genes, and it's very hard for
someone highly impulsive to take the time to think things through, just as it
is a challenge for a reflective person to jump into something head first.

"If you're an impulsive person, it's really hard to break the habit, because
you have this terrible feeling inside you that you have to sort things out
right now," Blair said. "So when it comes to your head, you just say it. That
doesn't mean you necessarily lie, but it's a little harder for you to stop from
lying, more than it is for someone who's more reflective."

Pathological lying and narcissism aren't synonymous, they just sometimes go
hand in hand. In other cases, compulsive liars just might not have the capacity
to stop themselves blurting things out. And Blair said they just need to learn
to control their urges and compulsions. Their lies don't necessarily come from
a bad place.

"I don't think it's something they know how to deal with," she said. "We think
probably it has something to do with actual brain function and the way some
people's brains work, which makes it much harder for them to understand the
effect it will have on other people... We think, but we just don't know yet
for sure."




Message-ID: <***@news.eternal-september.org>
AlleyCat
2024-05-19 21:43:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 18:14:24 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
The foundation of our legal system -
the presumption of innocence, double
jeopardy, due process, appeals courts -
has ANYTHING to do with the Bible.
No one said ANY of that, HoleMan. Just because your fuck-buddy Rudy said it didn't, doesn't mean someone did.
We're not talking about the Bible.

You shall not murder.

Made into law.

You shall not commit adultery.

Made into law.

You shall not steal.

Made into law.

You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

Made into law.

You shall not covet.

Made into law, IF taken further.

============================================================================

THIS is Joe Biden when not on drugs or stimulants and acts like himself:

https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/S/p/u/y/Spuyq.caa.mp4?b=1&u=ummtf

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xPhZcMYekKs?feature=share

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/NDdNDLvvk1g

http://youtu.be/hiDRFTVH0rY

http://youtu.be/KuhR-Nqv6Wg

http://youtu.be/D5JF7PupC58andpp

http://youtu.be/3gsMTe0Nr4Yandpp

http://youtu.be/WBUgHkbtm9Iandpp

=====

Ladies and Gentlemen... I give you the Democrats' best: Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden

Or As Old-Rich-White-Religious Freak, Joe Biden Would Say: "Labadies and Gntlmn... I gve yu the Dmcrts' bst."

=====

Truinnerashuvvaduprezure!

https://i.imgur.com/vtb7SuM.mp4

http://youtu.be/Slm5bvO-_5I

=====

Joe Bidden Completely Forgets What He's Talking About In Excruciating Press
Conference
http://youtu.be/SdfvIvYPPRo

Joe Biden Gets Completely LOST in Middle of a Story
https://rumble.com/vgbxnh-joe-biden-gets-completely-lost-in-middle-of-a-
story.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab


Biden tries to explain the Covid bill. This moron is President? Wow.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1368292670372683776


Biden's Dementia Flares Up, Has Complete Mental Short-Circuit During Speech
https://rumble.com/ve8jlz-biden-briefly-malfunctions-again.html


Out-Performed Every Presidential Challenger In US History?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1364024001736155144


Joe Biden: You Just Wonder
http://youtu.be/Uj0ccJgJsPA


Joe Biden Fumbles Through Speech
http://youtu.be/0xwoaagXFyU


Joe Biden Embarrassingly Delivers his WORST Speech while 'President Elect'
http://youtu.be/oHI__YneMuE


Barely There Biden Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/YxxAyHgBiNU


Joe Biden Stumbles, Makes No Sense
http://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc


Joe Biden Makes No Sense, Forgets When The 1918 Flu Pandemic Occurred
http://youtu.be/vt7WPjsYl44


Joe Biden making Zer0 sense
http://youtu.be/VYch-1fRhiE


Joe Biden Told Voters To "Go To" A Phone Number. Now, He Still Makes Zero
Sense!
http://youtu.be/qg4OUk0qyWM
AlleyCat
2024-05-20 03:31:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 19 May 2024 20:00:49 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...
Post by AlleyCat
The foundation of our legal system -
the presumption of innocence, double
jeopardy, due process, appeals courts -
has ANYTHING to do with the Bible.
No one said ANY of that, HoleMan. Just because your fuck-buddy Rudy said it didn't, doesn't mean someone did.
We're not talking about the Bible.
You shall not murder.
Made into law.
You shall not commit adultery.
Made into law.
You shall not steal.
Made into law.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
Made into law.
You shall not covet.
Made into law, IF taken further.
That's a lie, you squat-to-piss hysterical fairy.
LOL... and he calls me hysterical.
Post by AlleyCat
That pig-fucking
Republiscum/QAnon state senator from some shithole red state said "our" legal
system ? all of it, from start to finish ? is based on the so-called ten
commandments. That's bullshit, he's full of shit, and so are you for defending
his fuckwittery.
My my my... are you mad, bro?

Take a sip of mommy's gin and relax.

https://i.imgur.com/RzAelXK.mp4

=====

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

Narcissistic Behavior: Whining and Complaining

The next hallmark of Rudy's narcissistic behavior, we will focus on (whining and complaining).

At first, it seems to be rather harmless for those involved with Rudy.

However, after spending some time with Rudy, a narcissist, his constant complaints, whining and
dissatisfaction can become very soothing, as it becomes more humorous.

Even if there seems to be no apparent reason for complaining or for being sad and depressed, the narcissist,
Rudy, will always find something that darkens his mood.

Rudy will not be content with just being sad... he will rub his sadness in everyone's faces, and constantly
talk about it and draw you into his negativity. In the end, you will feel a strange feeling of happiness,
that he's so unhappy.

Listening to Rudy the narcissist, with his tendency to whine and complain can, as a result, be very healthy
and emotionally uplifting for us all.

While in the beginning, we still hope we can have a positive effect on his well-being, we soon see that we
have to come to terms with the painful realization that he won't have any use for our efforts to make them
feel better.

He prefers to wallow in his sadness and to present us with never-ending tales of woe. TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP! I'm
short. I'm ugly. I can't golf.

We soon get drawn into his negativity, though not kicking and screaming, because as long as he is unhappy, we
can feel the most happy.

It might sound cruel, but if you ever find yourself reading Rudy's shit, you know, his tales of woe... you
should seriously consider opting out, unless you want a good laugh, THEN, it can be quite cathartic, laughing
that much and that hard.

I know it might seem like a tempting and worthwhile endeavor to try to make him feel better, but in the end,
he is a lost cause and you will often have accomplished nothing at all... he has no real use for our
sympathy.

His narcissism prevents getting help from anyone. He is a lost cause.

Poor narcissistic Rudy.
Akidasar
2024-05-18 21:27:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 18 May 2024 12:20:00 -0700
Post by Alan
Post by AlleyCat
As much as it pains to say it... you are all wrong... and you are
all right, because there IS room for interpretation regarding the
word "covet".
RUDY is the only one of you who wrote the definitive word...
"desire". That is the word at the heart of all interpretations.
That does NOT mean you are wrong, as I said before. But to me, if
it matters at all (it does not... I am NOT into myself as much as
YOU fuckers), "desire" is the word needed to be concerned about.
(17) Thou shalt not covet.
This command seems to have been added in order to teach the general
principle that the Law of God is concerned, not with acts and words
only, but with the THOUGHTS OF THE HEART. Rightly understood, the
seventh and eighth commandments contain the tenth, which strikes at
covetousness and lustful DESIRE. (Comp. Matthew 5:27-28.)
Ancient moralists did not usually recognize this; thought... unless
CARRIED OUT INTO ACTS, was regarded as "FREE;" NO RESPONSIBILITY
WAS CONSIDERED TO ATTACH TO IT, and consequently no one felt it
needful to control his thoughts or regulate them. It was therefore
of importance that the Divine Law should distinctly assert a
control over men's thoughts and feelings, since they are the source
of all that is evil in word and act; and true godliness consists in
bringing "every thought into captivity to Christ" (2Corinthians
10:5).
True, this is by one interpretation, but it being the first and
echoing MY thoughts, I think it's as pertinent or more to defining
the word covet.
The Ten Commandments as I wrote them, were abridged versions, of
course. To know the TRUE meaning of each and every commandment, you
need to look to the Bible for their exact meanings.
To simply "covet", is an over-simplification of Bible passages.
Exodus 20:17
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy
neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his
ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor's.
Thou shalt not covet - The foregoing commands implicitly forbid all
DESIRE of doing that which will be an injury to our neighbor; this
forbids all inordinate DESIRE of having that which will be a
gratification to ourselves. O that such a man's house were mine!
such a man's wife mine! such a man's estate mine! This is certainly
the language of discontent at our own lot, and envy at our
neighbor's, and these are the sins principally forbidden here. God
give us all to see our face in the glass of this law, and to lay
our hearts under the government of it!
WAAAAAY to far off-topic, so...
============================================================================================================
Louisiana Becomes 1st State To Require The Ten Commandments Be Posted In Classrooms
I do not agree with this, BUT... if you "let" Muslims pray or
anything else they want to do, then, is it soooo much a burden to
post something that's been pretty much made into law?
You shall not murder.
You shall not commit adultery.
You shall not steal.
You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
You shall not covet.
But you still won't acknowledge that four of the other five
commandments they're mandating are religious.
So which religion(s)?

Oh and:

Honor your father and your mother
Post by Alan
So you're just the weasel you always are, loser.
Bout time to dip you in kerosene and set a match to ya.
Loading...