And Of course The Racist Toddler Shows His Reverse Racism

[AlleyCat]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:59:46 -0500, super70s says...

Word is he's considering it but he's too stingy to invest in a new
separate bathroom at his --->"White"<--- (and don't you forget it) House.

That's racist, liberal.

Your speech had racial overtones to it. Are you racist? I just want to ask you.

I am not. I don't have a racist bone on my body. I want a strong border. I don't want illegal immigrants
pouring into this country. That doesn't make me racist. It means I love this country.

=====

WHO is more racist... Biden or Trump or liberals. If you can find us more examples of racism BY Trump, than
Biden and other Democrats, I'll stop calling you toddler.

1. "A few years ago, this guy (Barack Obama) would have been gettin' us coffee." - racist white supremacist
Bill Clinton(D) to racist white supremacist Sen. Ted Kennedy(D)

2. "Americans can't distinguish "between a South Kore
an and someone from Beijing." - Joe Biden

3. The only reason you are endorsing him is because he's black. Lets just be clear. - Former President and
racist white supremacist Bill Clinton(D)

4. Joe Biden called Black Children "Roaches" to Describe those Who Felt His Hairy Legs

5. I mean, you got the first mainstream African American [Barack Obama] who is articulate and bright and
clean and a nice looking guy. - Sen. Joseph Biden(D)

6. Praised Democrat Segregationist Sen. John Stennis(D) as "Man of Character"

7. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada described in private then Sen. Barack Obama as light skinned
and with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.

8. "Segregation Is Good for Black People" - Joe Biden

9. I'll have those Niggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years. Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air
Force One according Ronald Kessler's Book, Inside The White House

10. "(The) Democrat Party Needs More People Like Governor George Wallace." - Joe Biden

11. These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got
something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do
something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough
to make a difference. For if we don't move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there'll be
no way of stopping them, well lose the filibuster and there'll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of
wild legislation. It'll be Reconstruction all over again. Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson (D) - Texas, 1957

12. Biden Gave Speech About What's "Good for the Negro"

13. You'd find these potentates from down in Africa, you know, rather than eating each other, they'd just
come up and get a good square meal in Geneva. Fritz Hollings (D, S.C.)

14. "... if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black..." - Joe
Biden

15. Mahatma Gandhi ran a gas station down in Saint Louis. - Senator Hillary Clinton

16. I think one man is just as good as another so long as he's not a nigger or a Chinaman. Uncle Will says
that the Lord made a White man from dust, a nigger from mud, then He threw up what was left and it came down
a Chinaman. He does hate Chinese and Japs. So do I. It is race prejudice, I guess. But I am strongly of the
opinion Negroes ought to be in Africa, Yellow men in Asia and White men in Europe and America. - Harry Truman

17. "If my opponent wins, they're going to put y'all back in chains." - Joe Biden

18. On Clarence Thomas - A handkerchief-head, chicken-and-biscuit-eating Uncle Tom. - Spike Lee

19. "Unless we do something about this, my children are going to grow up in a jungle." - Joe Biden

20. There are white Niggers. I've seen a lot of white Niggers in my time. - Former Klansman and US Senator
Robert Byrd(D), a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the conscience of the Senate in March of 2001

21. "I do not buy the concept, popular in the '60s, which said, "We have suppressed the black man for 300
years." - Joe Biden

22. I am a former kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan in Raleigh County and the adjoining counties of the state....
The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia.... It is
necessary that the order be promoted immediately and in every state of the Union. Will you please inform me
as to the possibilities of rebuilding the Klan in the Realm of W. Va .... I hope that you will find it
convenient to answer my letter in regards to future possibilities. - Former Klansman and current US Senator
Robert Byrd, a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the conscience of the Senate, in a letter written
in 1946, after he quit the KKK.

23. "I mean, you got the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean." - Joe
Biden

24. Blacks and Hispanics are too busy eating watermelons and tacos to learn how to read and write. - Mike
Wallace, CBS News. Source: Newsmax

25. "We (Delawareans) were on the South's side in the Civil War." - Joe Biden

26. Republicans bring out Colin Powell and J.C. Watts because they have no program, no policy. They have no
love and no joy. They'd rather take pictures with black children than feed them. Donna Brazile, Al Gores
Campaign
Manager for the 2000 election

27. Somehow left wingnuts naturally assume that if a person has a bit of color in their face, and that color
is black, then the people they're talking to must talk, walk and act Black. Affecting a black accent to
recount
San Francisco mayor Willie Brown asking, Who is this Emily List? She's supportin' all these people. She's
supportin' Sen. Dianne Feinstein. She's supported Sen. Barbara Boxer... She supported everybody. Why wont she
support me? - Hillary Clinton (D,NY.)

28. There's some people who've gone over the state and said, Well, George Wallace has talked too strong about
segregation. Now let me ask you this: how in the name of common sense can you be too strong about it? You're
either for it or you're against it. There's not any middle ground as I know of. Democrat Alabama Governor
George Wallace (1959)

29. He's married to a white woman. He wants to be white. He wants a colorless society. He has no ethnic
pride. He doesn't want to be black. California State Senator Diane Watson's on Ward Connerly's interracial
marriage

30. Is you their black-haired answer-mammy who be smart? Does they like how you shine their shoes,
Condoleezza? Or the way you wash and park the whiteys cars? - Left-wing radio host Neil Rogers

31. Leftist Hate Group, Antifa, Calls Black Cop Nigger

32. Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to
see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the
wilds. Former Klansman and current US Senator Robert Byrd, a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the
conscience of the Senate, in a letter written in 1944, after he quit the KKK.

33. The white man is our mortal enemy, and we cannot accept him. I will fight to see that vicious beast go
down into the lake of fire prepared for him from the beginning, that he never rise again to give any innocent
black man, woman or child the hell that he has delighted in pouring on us for 400 years. - Louis Farrakhan
who campaigned for congresswoman Cynthia McKinney in 2002, City College audience in New York

34. I want to go up to the closest white person and say: You cant understand this, its a black thing and then
slap him, just for my mental health. - Charles Barron, a New York city councilman at a reparations rally,
2002

35. Some junior high nigger kicked Steve's ass while he was trying to help his brothers out; junior high or
sophomore in high school. Whatever it was, Steve had the nigger down. However it was, it was Steve's fault.
He had the nigger down, he let him up. The nigger blindsided him. Roger Clinton, the Presidents brother on
audiotape

36. The Medicaid system must have been developed by a white male slave owner. It pays for you to be pregnant
and have a baby, but it wont pay for much family planning. - Jocelyn Elders

37. These laws [segregation] are still constitutional and I promise you that until they are removed from the
ordinance books of Birmingham and the statute books of Alabama, they will be enforced in Birmingham to the
utmost of my ability and by all lawful means. - Democrat Bull Connor (1957), Commissioner of Public Safety
for Birmingham, Alabama

38. The Medicaid system must have been developed by a white male slave owner. It pays for you to be pregnant
and have a baby, but it wont pay for much family planning. - Jocelyn Elders

39. Reparations are a really good way for white people to admit they're wrong. - Zack Webb, University Of
Kentucky NAACP

40. There's no great, white bigot; there's just about 200 million little white bigots out there. - USA Today
columnist Julienne Malveaux

41. White folks was in caves while we was building empires... We taught philosophy and astrology and
mathematics before Socrates and them Greek HOMOS ever got around to it. - Rev. Al Sharpton in a 1994 speech
at Kean College, NJ, cited in Democrats Do the Dumbest Things

42. The white race is the cancer of human history. - Susan Sontag

43. The old white boys got taken fair and square. - San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown after winning an
election

44. Civil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of white men and do not apply to them. - Mary
Frances Berry, Chairwoman, US Commission on Civil Rights

45. You fucking Jew bastard. - Hillary Clinton to political operative Paul Fray. This was revealed in State
of a Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton and has been verified by Paul Fray and
three witnesses.

46. We have lost to the white racist press and to the racist reactionary Jewish misleaders. - Former Rep. Gus
Savage (D-Illinois) after his defeat 1992

47. The Jews don't like Farrakhan, so they call me Hitler. Well, that's a good name. Hitler was a very great
man. He rose Germany up from the ashes. Louis Farrakhan (1984) who campaigned for congresswoman Cynthia
McKinney in 2002

48. On New York - "Kiketown" - Harry Truman

49. Now that nation called Israel, never has had any peace in forty years and she will never have any peace
because there can never be any peace structured on injustice, thievery, lying and deceit and using the name
of God to shield your dirty religion under his holy and righteous name. - Louis Farrakhan who campaigned for
congresswoman Cynthia McKinney in 2002, 1984

50. Hymies. Hymietown. - Jesse Jackson's description of New York City while on the 1984 presidential campaign
trail.

51. Jews... that's J-E-W-S. - Democratic state representative Bill McKinney on why his daughter Cynthia lost
in 2002

52. (I) will not let the white boys win in this election. - Donna Brazile, Al Gores Campaign Manager on the
2000 election

[AlleyCat]

Rudy's so stupid. By putting this is the Newsgroups box, he's actually TELLING me he's done so, because a
REAL newsreader knows not to send back to made up, pansy-ass pussy newsgroups.

oh.no.this.is.not.going.to.can.politics

What an idiot.

=====

On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know, and he, along with you, FAILED to fill this simple request:

WHO is more racist... Trump or Biden/liberals. If you can find us more examples of racism BY Trump, than
Biden and other Democrats, I'll stop calling you toddler, but I'll never stop calling you a
psycho/narcissist/BLM/Drag Queen/Gay/Socialist/Antifa-Fascist/Marxist/Communist/Racist/Insurrectionist/
Liberal Democrat.

LOL... but you can't call me a QAnon, because I don't believe ANYTHING they do. [snicker]

QAnon, conspiracy theory originating in forum posts on the website 4chan in October 2017. Conspiracy
adherents believed that U.S. Pres. Donald Trump was waging a secret war against a cabal of satanic
cannibalistic pedophiles within Hollywood, the Democratic Party, and the so-called "deep state" within the
United States government.

LOL... nope.

Pizzagate?

Nope.

Too bad, so sad... Rudy can't call me QAnon and it mean anything.

Poor jealous Rudy.

Word is he's considering it but he's too stingy to invest in a new
separate bathroom at his --->"White"<--- (and don't you forget it) House.

That's racist, liberal.

Interviewer:
Your speech had racial overtones to it. Are you racist? I just want to ask you.

Trump:
I am not. I don't have a racist bone on my body. I want a strong border. I don't want illegal immigrants
pouring into this country. That doesn't make me racist. It means I love this country.

=====

1. "A few years ago, this guy (Barack Obama) would have been gettin' us coffee." - racist white supremacist
Bill Clinton(D) to racist white supremacist Sen. Ted Kennedy(D)

2. "Americans can't distinguish "between a South Kore
an and someone from Beijing." - Joe Biden

3. The only reason you are endorsing him is because he's black. Lets just be clear. - Former President and
racist white supremacist Bill Clinton(D)

4. Joe Biden called Black Children "Roaches" to Describe those Who Felt His Hairy Legs

5. I mean, you got the first mainstream African American [Barack Obama] who is articulate and bright and
clean and a nice looking guy. - Sen. Joseph Biden(D)

6. Praised Democrat Segregationist Sen. John Stennis(D) as "Man of Character"

7. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada described in private then Sen. Barack Obama as light skinned
and with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.

8. "Segregation Is Good for Black People" - Joe Biden

9. I'll have those Niggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years. Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air
Force One according Ronald Kessler's Book, Inside The White House

10. "(The) Democrat Party Needs More People Like Governor George Wallace." - Joe Biden

11. These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got
something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do
something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough
to make a difference. For if we don't move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there'll be
no way of stopping them, well lose the filibuster and there'll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of
wild legislation. It'll be Reconstruction all over again. Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson (D) - Texas, 1957

12. Biden Gave Speech About What's "Good for the Negro"

13. You'd find these potentates from down in Africa, you know, rather than eating each other, they'd just
come up and get a good square meal in Geneva. Fritz Hollings (D, S.C.)

14. "... if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black..." - Joe
Biden

15. Mahatma Gandhi ran a gas station down in Saint Louis. - Senator Hillary Clinton

16. I think one man is just as good as another so long as he's not a nigger or a Chinaman. Uncle Will says
that the Lord made a White man from dust, a nigger from mud, then He threw up what was left and it came down
a Chinaman. He does hate Chinese and Japs. So do I. It is race prejudice, I guess. But I am strongly of the
opinion Negroes ought to be in Africa, Yellow men in Asia and White men in Europe and America. - Harry Truman

17. "If my opponent wins, they're going to put y'all back in chains." - Joe Biden

18. On Clarence Thomas - A handkerchief-head, chicken-and-biscuit-eating Uncle Tom. - Spike Lee

19. "Unless we do something about this, my children are going to grow up in a jungle." - Joe Biden

20. There are white Niggers. I've seen a lot of white Niggers in my time. - Former Klansman and US Senator
Robert Byrd(D), a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the conscience of the Senate in March of 2001

21. "I do not buy the concept, popular in the '60s, which said, "We have suppressed the black man for 300
years." - Joe Biden

22. I am a former kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan in Raleigh County and the adjoining counties of the state....
The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia.... It is
necessary that the order be promoted immediately and in every state of the Union. Will you please inform me
as to the possibilities of rebuilding the Klan in the Realm of W. Va .... I hope that you will find it
convenient to answer my letter in regards to future possibilities. - Former Klansman and current US Senator
Robert Byrd, a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the conscience of the Senate, in a letter written
in 1946, after he quit the KKK.

23. "I mean, you got the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean." - Joe
Biden

24. Blacks and Hispanics are too busy eating watermelons and tacos to learn how to read and write. - Mike
Wallace, CBS News. Source: Newsmax

25. "We (Delawareans) were on the South's side in the Civil War." - Joe Biden

26. Republicans bring out Colin Powell and J.C. Watts because they have no program, no policy. They have no
love and no joy. They'd rather take pictures with black children than feed them. Donna Brazile, Al Gores
Campaign
Manager for the 2000 election

27. Somehow left wingnuts naturally assume that if a person has a bit of color in their face, and that color
is black, then the people they're talking to must talk, walk and act Black. Affecting a black accent to
recount
San Francisco mayor Willie Brown asking, Who is this Emily List? She's supportin' all these people. She's
supportin' Sen. Dianne Feinstein. She's supported Sen. Barbara Boxer... She supported everybody. Why wont she
support me? - Hillary Clinton (D,NY.)

28. There's some people who've gone over the state and said, Well, George Wallace has talked too strong about
segregation. Now let me ask you this: how in the name of common sense can you be too strong about it? You're
either for it or you're against it. There's not any middle ground as I know of. Democrat Alabama Governor
George Wallace (1959)

29. He's married to a white woman. He wants to be white. He wants a colorless society. He has no ethnic
pride. He doesn't want to be black. California State Senator Diane Watson's on Ward Connerly's interracial
marriage

30. Is you their black-haired answer-mammy who be smart? Does they like how you shine their shoes,
Condoleezza? Or the way you wash and park the whiteys cars? - Left-wing radio host Neil Rogers

31. Leftist Hate Group, Antifa, Calls Black Cop Nigger

32. Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to
see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the
wilds. Former Klansman and current US Senator Robert Byrd, a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the
conscience of the Senate, in a letter written in 1944, after he quit the KKK.

33. The white man is our mortal enemy, and we cannot accept him. I will fight to see that vicious beast go
down into the lake of fire prepared for him from the beginning, that he never rise again to give any innocent
black man, woman or child the hell that he has delighted in pouring on us for 400 years. - Louis Farrakhan
who campaigned for congresswoman Cynthia McKinney in 2002, City College audience in New York

34. I want to go up to the closest white person and say: You cant understand this, its a black thing and then
slap him, just for my mental health. - Charles Barron, a New York city councilman at a reparations rally,
2002

35. Some junior high nigger kicked Steve's ass while he was trying to help his brothers out; junior high or
sophomore in high school. Whatever it was, Steve had the nigger down. However it was, it was Steve's fault.
He had the nigger down, he let him up. The nigger blindsided him. Roger Clinton, the Presidents brother on
audiotape

36. The Medicaid system must have been developed by a white male slave owner. It pays for you to be pregnant
and have a baby, but it wont pay for much family planning. - Jocelyn Elders

37. These laws [segregation] are still constitutional and I promise you that until they are removed from the
ordinance books of Birmingham and the statute books of Alabama, they will be enforced in Birmingham to the
utmost of my ability and by all lawful means. - Democrat Bull Connor (1957), Commissioner of Public Safety
for Birmingham, Alabama

38. The Medicaid system must have been developed by a white male slave owner. It pays for you to be pregnant
and have a baby, but it wont pay for much family planning. - Jocelyn Elders

39. Reparations are a really good way for white people to admit they're wrong. - Zack Webb, University Of
Kentucky NAACP

40. There's no great, white bigot; there's just about 200 million little white bigots out there. - USA Today
columnist Julienne Malveaux

41. White folks was in caves while we was building empires... We taught philosophy and astrology and
mathematics before Socrates and them Greek HOMOS ever got around to it. - Rev. Al Sharpton in a 1994 speech
at Kean College, NJ, cited in Democrats Do the Dumbest Things

42. The white race is the cancer of human history. - Susan Sontag

43. The old white boys got taken fair and square. - San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown after winning an
election

44. Civil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of white men and do not apply to them. - Mary
Frances Berry, Chairwoman, US Commission on Civil Rights

45. You fucking Jew bastard. - Hillary Clinton to political operative Paul Fray. This was revealed in State
of a Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton and has been verified by Paul Fray and
three witnesses.

46. We have lost to the white racist press and to the racist reactionary Jewish misleaders. - Former Rep. Gus
Savage (D-Illinois) after his defeat 1992

47. The Jews don't like Farrakhan, so they call me Hitler. Well, that's a good name. Hitler was a very great
man. He rose Germany up from the ashes. Louis Farrakhan (1984) who campaigned for congresswoman Cynthia
McKinney in 2002

48. On New York - "Kiketown" - Harry Truman

49. Now that nation called Israel, never has had any peace in forty years and she will never have any peace
because there can never be any peace structured on injustice, thievery, lying and deceit and using the name
of God to shield your dirty religion under his holy and righteous name. - Louis Farrakhan who campaigned for
congresswoman Cynthia McKinney in 2002, 1984

50. Hymies. Hymietown. - Jesse Jackson's description of New York City while on the 1984 presidential campaign
trail.

51. Jews... that's J-E-W-S. - Democratic state representative Bill McKinney on why his daughter Cynthia lost
in 2002

52. (I) will not let the white boys win in this election. - Donna Brazile, Al Gores Campaign Manager on the
2000 election

Message-ID: <***@news.eternal-september.org>

[AlleyCat]

Rudy's so stupid. By putting this is the Newsgroups box, he's actually TELLING me he's done so, because a
REAL newsreader knows not to send back to made up, pansy-ass pussy newsgroups.

oh.no.this.is.not.going.to.can.politics

What an idiot.

=====

On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know, and he, along with you, FAILED to fill this simple request:

WHO is more racist... Trump or Biden/liberals!!

If you can find us more examples of racism BY Trump, than Biden and other Democrats, I'll stop calling you
toddler, but I'll never stop calling you a psycho/narcissist/BLM/Drag Queen/Gay/Socialist/Antifa-
Fascist/Marxist/Communist/Racist/Insurrectionist/Liberal Democrat.

They can't.

=====

Rudy can't provide any where NEAR enough examples of Trump being THIS racist, so it is the BLM/Drag
Queen/Gay/Socialist/Antifa/Fascist/Marxist/Communist/Racist/Insurrectionist/Liberal/Democrats, who are the
most racist.

1. "A few years ago, this guy (Barack Obama) would have been gettin' us coffee." - racist white supremacist
Bill Clinton(D) to racist white supremacist Sen. Ted Kennedy(D)

2. "Americans can't distinguish "between a South Kore
an and someone from Beijing." - Joe Biden

3. The only reason you are endorsing him is because he's black. Lets just be clear. - Former President and
racist white supremacist Bill Clinton(D)

4. Joe Biden called Black Children "Roaches" to Describe those Who Felt His Hairy Legs

5. I mean, you got the first mainstream African American [Barack Obama] who is articulate and bright and
clean and a nice looking guy. - Sen. Joseph Biden(D)

6. Praised Democrat Segregationist Sen. John Stennis(D) as "Man of Character"

7. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada described in private then Sen. Barack Obama as light skinned
and with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.

8. "Segregation Is Good for Black People" - Joe Biden

9. I'll have those Niggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years. Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air
Force One according Ronald Kessler's Book, Inside The White House

10. "(The) Democrat Party Needs More People Like Governor George Wallace." - Joe Biden

11. These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got
something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do
something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough
to make a difference. For if we don't move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there'll be
no way of stopping them, well lose the filibuster and there'll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of
wild legislation. It'll be Reconstruction all over again. Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson (D) - Texas, 1957

12. Biden Gave Speech About What's "Good for the Negro"

13. You'd find these potentates from down in Africa, you know, rather than eating each other, they'd just
come up and get a good square meal in Geneva. Fritz Hollings (D, S.C.)

14. "... if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black..." - Joe
Biden

15. Mahatma Gandhi ran a gas station down in Saint Louis. - Senator Hillary Clinton

16. I think one man is just as good as another so long as he's not a nigger or a Chinaman. Uncle Will says
that the Lord made a White man from dust, a nigger from mud, then He threw up what was left and it came down
a Chinaman. He does hate Chinese and Japs. So do I. It is race prejudice, I guess. But I am strongly of the
opinion Negroes ought to be in Africa, Yellow men in Asia and White men in Europe and America. - Harry Truman

17. "If my opponent wins, they're going to put y'all back in chains." - Joe Biden

18. On Clarence Thomas - A handkerchief-head, chicken-and-biscuit-eating Uncle Tom. - Spike Lee

19. "Unless we do something about this, my children are going to grow up in a jungle." - Joe Biden

20. There are white Niggers. I've seen a lot of white Niggers in my time. - Former Klansman and US Senator
Robert Byrd(D), a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the conscience of the Senate in March of 2001

21. "I do not buy the concept, popular in the '60s, which said, "We have suppressed the black man for 300
years." - Joe Biden

22. I am a former kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan in Raleigh County and the adjoining counties of the state....
The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia.... It is
necessary that the order be promoted immediately and in every state of the Union. Will you please inform me
as to the possibilities of rebuilding the Klan in the Realm of W. Va .... I hope that you will find it
convenient to answer my letter in regards to future possibilities. - Former Klansman and current US Senator
Robert Byrd, a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the conscience of the Senate, in a letter written
in 1946, after he quit the KKK.

23. "I mean, you got the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean." - Joe
Biden

24. Blacks and Hispanics are too busy eating watermelons and tacos to learn how to read and write. - Mike
Wallace, CBS News. Source: Newsmax

25. "We (Delawareans) were on the South's side in the Civil War." - Joe Biden

26. Republicans bring out Colin Powell and J.C. Watts because they have no program, no policy. They have no
love and no joy. They'd rather take pictures with black children than feed them. Donna Brazile, Al Gores
Campaign
Manager for the 2000 election

27. Somehow left wingnuts naturally assume that if a person has a bit of color in their face, and that color
is black, then the people they're talking to must talk, walk and act Black. Affecting a black accent to
recount
San Francisco mayor Willie Brown asking, Who is this Emily List? She's supportin' all these people. She's
supportin' Sen. Dianne Feinstein. She's supported Sen. Barbara Boxer... She supported everybody. Why wont she
support me? - Hillary Clinton (D,NY.)

28. There's some people who've gone over the state and said, Well, George Wallace has talked too strong about
segregation. Now let me ask you this: how in the name of common sense can you be too strong about it? You're
either for it or you're against it. There's not any middle ground as I know of. Democrat Alabama Governor
George Wallace (1959)

29. He's married to a white woman. He wants to be white. He wants a colorless society. He has no ethnic
pride. He doesn't want to be black. California State Senator Diane Watson's on Ward Connerly's interracial
marriage

30. Is you their black-haired answer-mammy who be smart? Does they like how you shine their shoes,
Condoleezza? Or the way you wash and park the whiteys cars? - Left-wing radio host Neil Rogers

31. Leftist Hate Group, Antifa, Calls Black Cop Nigger

32. Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to
see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the
wilds. Former Klansman and current US Senator Robert Byrd, a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the
conscience of the Senate, in a letter written in 1944, after he quit the KKK.

33. The white man is our mortal enemy, and we cannot accept him. I will fight to see that vicious beast go
down into the lake of fire prepared for him from the beginning, that he never rise again to give any innocent
black man, woman or child the hell that he has delighted in pouring on us for 400 years. - Louis Farrakhan
who campaigned for congresswoman Cynthia McKinney in 2002, City College audience in New York

34. I want to go up to the closest white person and say: You cant understand this, its a black thing and then
slap him, just for my mental health. - Charles Barron, a New York city councilman at a reparations rally,
2002

35. Some junior high nigger kicked Steve's ass while he was trying to help his brothers out; junior high or
sophomore in high school. Whatever it was, Steve had the nigger down. However it was, it was Steve's fault.
He had the nigger down, he let him up. The nigger blindsided him. Roger Clinton, the Presidents brother on
audiotape

36. The Medicaid system must have been developed by a white male slave owner. It pays for you to be pregnant
and have a baby, but it wont pay for much family planning. - Jocelyn Elders

37. These laws [segregation] are still constitutional and I promise you that until they are removed from the
ordinance books of Birmingham and the statute books of Alabama, they will be enforced in Birmingham to the
utmost of my ability and by all lawful means. - Democrat Bull Connor (1957), Commissioner of Public Safety
for Birmingham, Alabama

38. The Medicaid system must have been developed by a white male slave owner. It pays for you to be pregnant
and have a baby, but it wont pay for much family planning. - Jocelyn Elders

39. Reparations are a really good way for white people to admit they're wrong. - Zack Webb, University Of
Kentucky NAACP

40. There's no great, white bigot; there's just about 200 million little white bigots out there. - USA Today
columnist Julienne Malveaux

41. White folks was in caves while we was building empires... We taught philosophy and astrology and
mathematics before Socrates and them Greek HOMOS ever got around to it. - Rev. Al Sharpton in a 1994 speech
at Kean College, NJ, cited in Democrats Do the Dumbest Things

42. The white race is the cancer of human history. - Susan Sontag

43. The old white boys got taken fair and square. - San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown after winning an
election

44. Civil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of white men and do not apply to them. - Mary
Frances Berry, Chairwoman, US Commission on Civil Rights

45. You fucking Jew bastard. - Hillary Clinton to political operative Paul Fray. This was revealed in State
of a Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton and has been verified by Paul Fray and
three witnesses.

46. We have lost to the white racist press and to the racist reactionary Jewish misleaders. - Former Rep. Gus
Savage (D-Illinois) after his defeat 1992

47. The Jews don't like Farrakhan, so they call me Hitler. Well, that's a good name. Hitler was a very great
man. He rose Germany up from the ashes. Louis Farrakhan (1984) who campaigned for congresswoman Cynthia
McKinney in 2002

48. On New York - "Kiketown" - Harry Truman

49. Now that nation called Israel, never has had any peace in forty years and she will never have any peace
because there can never be any peace structured on injustice, thievery, lying and deceit and using the name
of God to shield your dirty religion under his holy and righteous name. - Louis Farrakhan who campaigned for
congresswoman Cynthia McKinney in 2002, 1984

50. Hymies. Hymietown. - Jesse Jackson's description of New York City while on the 1984 presidential campaign
trail.

51. Jews... that's J-E-W-S. - Democratic state representative Bill McKinney on why his daughter Cynthia lost
in 2002

52. (I) will not let the white boys win in this election. - Donna Brazile, Al Gores Campaign Manager on the
2000 election

Message-ID: <***@news.eternal-september.org>

Message-ID: <***@news.eternal-september.org>

[Mike Colangelo]

['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]

On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 13:38:24 -0700

Post by AlleyCat
I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 13:50:00 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail

Nope:



https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:10:49 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail

Not.



https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:22:38 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail

Nope:




https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:29:11 -0700

Post by Akidasar
https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:39:46 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail,

Not.




https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:44:27 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:47:46 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:52:24 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 16:54:59 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 17:12:57 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 17:12:57 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 17:12:57 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 17:12:58 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 17:14:32 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 17:14:33 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 17:14:33 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Wed, 22 May 2024 17:14:34 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 16:27:14 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 16:27:13 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 16:27:14 -0700

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 16:27:15 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 16:27:54 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
cocksucker.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 16:27:53 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
you lying

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 16:27:54 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
ocksucker.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[AlleyCat]

Post by Mike Colangelo
is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

This is how a psycho child acts.

804898,Subject: alkanamana is spammy

804909,There are too many tells to count.
It's spammy.

805114,"I'm not lying, spammy, you subhuman
Nazi filth."

805116,"I knew you'd show some tells, Spammy,
and of course you did."

821604,"On 4/7/2024 5:27 PM, spammy, subhuman
Nazi filth, lied:"

821609,">> On 4/7/2024 11:17 AM, spammy,
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:"

821621,"asskicking administered to spammy,
subhuman Nazi filth."

821623,"That's right, spammy."

821639,"On 4/7/2024 5:27 PM, spammy, subhuman
Nazi filth, lied:"

821643,">> On 4/7/2024 11:17 AM, spammy, a
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:"

821648,">>>> You didn't read the piece,
spammy. You only found the headline."

821656,"kicking spammy's ass, just like all
other iterations."

821658,"You suck, spammy. You blow. You suck
and you blow, spammy, you fucking dullard "

823193,"> On 4/7/2024 11:17 AM, spammy,
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:"

823246,"> On 4/7/2024 11:17 AM, spammy, a
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:"

823251,"> >> You didn't read the piece,
spammy. You only found the headline. "

823510,"On 4/7/2024 11:17 AM, spammy,
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:"

823518,"Right, spammy."

823534,"On 4/7/2024 11:17 AM, spammy, a
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:"

823539,">> You didn't read the piece, spammy.
You only found the headline. "

823543,"That's right, spammy: you didn't read
it."

827083,"> > You didn't read the piece,
spammy. You only found the headline. "

828715,"> You didn't read the piece, spammy.
You only found the headline."

830721,"On 4/7/2024 11:12 AM, spammy,
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:"

830746,"> *No* election results were
determined by fraud, spammy, you subhuman"

831465,"On 4/7/2024 9:26 AM, spammy, subhuman
Nazi filth, lied:"

831469,">> On 4/6/2024 3:44 PM, spammy,
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:"

831473,">>>> On 4/6/2024 2:43 PM, spammy,
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:"

831489,">> I'm not lying, spammy, you
subhuman Nazi filth."

831491,">> I knew you'd show some tells,
Spammy, and of course you did."

831495,"You're approaching the end, spammy,

you subhuman Nazi filth � fast."

831772,"You didn't read the piece, spammy.
You only found the headline."

831788,"On 4/7/2024 9:25 AM, spammy, subhuman
Nazi filth, lied:"

831792,">> On 4/6/2024 3:36 PM, spammy,
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:"

831796,">>>> On 4/6/2024 2:56 PM, spammy,
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:"

831815,"No, spammy. What I'm going to do is
take a blowtorch to your ass."

831817,"*No* election results were determined
by fraud, spammy, you subhuman Nazi filth."

836191,Subject: Re: spammy got out of prison
last week (Re: Arizona Dem Gov Katie Hobbs vetoes bill making illegal border crossing a state crime)

836215,> > spammy got out of prison last
week. He was away for months. He's a

836218,"> > Phil Hendry's Chop Shop,
alkanamana =E2=80=94 these are both spammy, the"

836219,> > late Bob Milby's former butt boy.
spammy is the little cocksucker

836860,Subject: Re: spammy got out of prison
last week (Re: Arizona Dem Gov Katie Hobbs vetoes bill making illegal border crossing a state crime)

836880,> spammy got out of prison last week.
He was away for months. He's a

836883,"> Phil Hendry's Chop Shop, alkanamana
� these are both spammy, the"

836884,> late Bob Milby's former butt boy.
spammy is the little cocksucker who

839991,Subject: Re: spammy got out of prison
last week (Re: Arizona Dem Gov Katie Hobbs vetoes bill making illegal border crossing a state crime)

840052,Subject: Re: spammy got out of prison
last week (Re: Arizona Dem Gov Katie Hobbs vetoes bill making illegal border crossing a state crime)

840063,"On 4/8/2024 9:16 AM, spammy, smarmy
little cocksucker, whiffed off:"

840067,">> On 4/8/2024 9:03 AM, spammy,
smarmy little cocksucker, whiffed off:"

840080,"That's right, spammy, you fucking
zero."

840082,"What prison were you in, spammy?"

840169,Subject: Re: spammy got out of prison

last week (Re: Arizona Dem Gov Katie Hobbs vetoes bill making illegal border crossing a state crime)

840183,"> On 4/8/2024 9:03 AM, spammy, smarmy little cocksucker, whiffed off:"

840229,Subject: Re: spammy got out of prison last week (Re: Arizona Dem Gov Katie Hobbs vetoes bill making
illegal border crossing a state crime)

840241,"On 4/8/2024 9:03 AM, spammy, smarmy little cocksucker, whiffed off:"

840250,What a fucking zero spammy is.

840275,Subject: Re: spammy got out of prison last week (Re: Arizona Dem Gov Katie Hobbs vetoes bill making
illegal border crossing a state crime)

841950,Subject: spammy got out of prison last week (Re: Arizona Dem Gov Katie Hobbs vetoes bill making
illegal border crossing a state crime)

841968,spammy got out of prison last week. He was away for months. He's a Usenet

841971,"Phil Hendry's Chop Shop, alkanamana � these are both spammy, the late Bob "

841972,Milby's former butt boy. spammy is the little cocksucker who thinks he can doxx

846392,them. Somebody suggested it was Spammy but who cares?

868818,"> >On 4/10/2024 2:57 PM, spammy, squishy fat queer and pale imitation"

868830,"> >I never said you were, spammy, you squishy fat queer. ""swill"" did,"

869704,> >>>> spammy.

869706,"> >>>> I've never lived anywhere close to Sacramento, spammy. You're off"

869711,"> >> I've never lived anywhere close to Sacramento, spammy. "

869995,">On 4/10/2024 2:57 PM, spammy, squishy fat queer and pale imitation of Bob Milby "

870007,">I never said you were, spammy, you squishy fat queer. ""swill"" did, and I'm not "

870467,">Yes, spammy, I did. And I kicked his ass up and down Chester Ave. in Bakersfield "

870499,>>>> spammy.

870501,">>>> I've never lived anywhere close to Sacramento, spammy. You're off"

870506,">> I've never lived anywhere close to Sacramento, spammy."

870519,"Canoza's law: spammy, who doesn't know his ass from his face, is *always* wrong."

870535,"On 4/10/2024 2:57 PM, spammy, squishy fat queer and pale imitation of Bob Milby "

870547,"I never said you were, spammy, you squishy fat queer. ""swill"" did, and I'm not "

870576,> >> spammy.

870578,"> >> I've never lived anywhere close to Sacramento, spammy. You're off"

870583,"> I've never lived anywhere close to Sacramento, spammy."

870774,">> Let's have you fuck yourself up the ass with a burning blowtorch, spammy."

870776,">> I've never lived anywhere close to Sacramento, spammy. You're off by almost 750 "

870781,"I've never lived anywhere close to Sacramento, spammy. You're off by almost 750 "

870943,"> Yes, spammy, I did. And I kicked his ass up and down Chester Ave. in"

870961,"> No, dumbfuck, spammy and I are not the same person."

870965,"> You and spammy deserve one another, dumbfuck, because he thinks you"

871026,"Yes, spammy, I did. And I kicked his ass up and down Chester Ave. in Bakersfield "

871036,"No, dumbfuck, spammy and I are not the same person."

871038,"You and spammy deserve one another, dumbfuck, because he thinks you and I are "

871099,"> On 4/10/2024 2:07 PM, spammy, pale squat-to-piss Bob Milby wannabe"

871110,"> Let's you go fuck yourself, spammy, you good-for-nothing ex-con"

871229,"> On 4/10/2024 2:07 PM, spammy, pale squat-to-piss Bob Milby wannabe"

871259,"> You're just a fucking moron, spammy, and now that you're out of"

871266,"> making better use of your time, spammy, but obviously your time is"

871608,"On 4/10/2024 2:07 PM, spammy, pale squat-to-piss Bob Milby wannabe (and fake "

871619,"Let's you go fuck yourself, spammy, you good-for-nothing ex-con fainéant."

871678,"On 4/10/2024 2:07 PM, spammy, pale squat-to-piss Bob Milby wannabe (and fake "

871693,"You're just a fucking moron, spammy, and now that you're out of prison, you just "

871696,"spammy, but obviously your time is worthless."

872097,"On 4/10/2024 2:05 PM, spammy, pale squat-to-piss Bob Milby wannabe (and fake "

872108,"Let's have you fuck yourself up the ass with a burning blowtorch, spammy."

872110,"I've never lived anywhere close to Sacramento, spammy. You're off by almost 750 "

874131,"> On 4/10/2024 12:30 PM, spammy, squat-to-piss homo cocksucker, lied:"

874367,"On 4/10/2024 12:30 PM, spammy, squat-to-piss homo cocksucker, lied:"

877318,"> Yes, spammy, I did. And I kicked his ass up and down Chester Ave. in "

877334,"> No, dumbfuck, spammy and I are not the same person."

877336,"> You and spammy deserve one another, dumbfuck, because he thinks you and "

886503,"> On 4/11/2024 11:33 AM, spammy, squat-to-piss fake tuff-boi whose son "

886518,"> Whenever spammy, the lame squat-to-piss Bob Milby wannabe, pretends he "

888745,"On 4/11/2024 11:39 AM, spammy, a squat-to-piss do-nothing worthless little "

888760,"spammy, a squat-to-piss do-nothing worthless little blowjob, for some reason "

888763,Everything spammy believes is wrong.

889574,"On 4/11/2024 11:33 AM, spammy, squat-to-piss fake tuff-boi whose son was *blown "

889589,"Whenever spammy, the lame squat-to-piss Bob Milby wannabe, pretends he has shown "

891695,"On 4/10/2024 2:10 PM, spammy, the impotent squat-to-piss Bob Milby wannabe and "

891704,Here we see the confirmation that spammy's time is worthless. spammy pisses away

891707,reply to it with nothing. spammy continues to operate under the delusions that

891711,I've been beating spammy's teeth in since 2011. He will never learn.

891714,Canoza's law: spammy is always wrong

894388,> >> spammy.

894390,"> >> I've never lived anywhere close to Sacramento, spammy. You're off"

896313,"> > Yes, spammy, I did. And I kicked his ass up and down Chester Ave."

896329,"> > No, dumbfuck, spammy and I are not the same person."

896331,"> > You and spammy deserve one another, dumbfuck, because he thinks you"

907049,>> full of shit as you. spammy and Gak don't know what the fuck they're

907468,> of shit as you. spammy and Gak don't know what the fuck they're bullshitting about.

907760,of shit as you. spammy and Gak don't know what the fuck they're bullshitting about.

908473,"No such poster here, as you and spammy well know."

920453,">>> No such poster here, as you and spammy and your cowardly subhuman "

920458,"> No such poster here, as you and spammy well know."

920653,">> No such poster here, as you and spammy and your cowardly subhuman Nazi filth pal ""anonymous""
well know."

920657,"No such poster here, as you and spammy well know."

920805,"> No such poster here, as you and spammy well know."

927374,">>>> No such poster here, as you and spammy and your cowardly subhuman Nazi filth "

927379,">> No such poster here, as you and spammy and your cowardly subhuman Nazi filth pal ""anonymous""
well know. "

927383,"No such poster here, as you and spammy and your cowardly subhuman Nazi filth pal "

928759,>>> full of shit as you. spammy and Gak don't know what the fuck they're

931039,>>>> full of shit as you. spammy and Gak don't know what the fuck they're

946954,"No such participant here, spammy. Not to mention...you've been saying that about "

946970,"No, and Rudy didn't even write that lame shit; spammy did."

951337,>>>> full of shit as you. spammy and Gak don't know what the fuck they're

961422,"""pothole,"" spammy, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell � all shriek and bleat "

961830,It's spammy again. You can ignore everything from this bullshit ID.

969584,">> spammy, whom I have been destroying in Usenet since 2011, lied:"

969903,"*hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps � singular. Literate people "

969904,"do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

969995, spammy (whom I've been destroying in Usenet since 2011) trying to defend

970177,"No. All lies, spammy. There was no ""rigging,"" no ""fraud,"" no ""stolen election."" "

970178,"This is settled, spammy."

978835,">>>> spammy, whom I have been destroying in Usenet since 2011, lied:"

979228,">> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular. Literate people"

979229,">> do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

979379,>> spammy (whom I've been destroying in Usenet since 2011) trying to defend

979726,"> >> spammy, whom I have been destroying in Usenet since 2011, lied:"

980358,">> No. All lies, spammy. There was no ""rigging,"" no ""fraud,"" no ""stolen election."""

980359,">> This is settled, spammy."

980969,"> > *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

980970,"> > Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

981555,"> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular. Literate people "

981556,"> do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

981931,> spammy (whom I've been destroying in Usenet since 2011) trying to defend

982075,"> No. All lies, spammy. There was no ""rigging,"" no ""fraud,"" no ""stolen election."" "

982076,"> This is settled, spammy."

984688,">>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular. Literate people"

984689,">>>> do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

984941,"> >> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular. Literate "

984943,"> >> do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

985052,"> > > *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

985053,"> > > Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

985745,">>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular. Literate people"

985746,">>> do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

988400,">> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular. Literate "

988402,">> do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

988551,">> >> spammy, whom I have been destroying in Usenet since 2011, lied:"

992199,">> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

992200,">> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

992282,"> No. All lies, spammy. There was no ""rigging,"" no ""fraud,"" no ""stolen"

992283,"> election."" This is settled, spammy."

995574,"> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular. Literate people"

995575,"> >>> do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

997256,">>> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

997257,">>> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

997388,">> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular. "

997390,">> >>> do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

997557,">> >> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular. "

997560,">> >> do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

999198,"> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

999199,"> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1001967,">>>> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1001968,">>>> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1006726,">>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1006727,">>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1006988,">> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? "

1006990,">> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1007423,">>>> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1007424,">>>> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1010391,"> >>>> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1010392,"> >>>> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1012069,">>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1012070,">>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1012628,">>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1012629,">>> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1012775,">>>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1012777,">>>> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1013387,"> >>>> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1013388,"> >>>> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1013604,"> >> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? "

1013606,"> >> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1013799,"> >> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? "

1013801,"> >> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1014511,">>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1014513,">>> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1014660,">> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1014661,">> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1014803,">>>>> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1014804,">>>>> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1015906,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1015907,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1016170,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1016172,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1017149,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1017150,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1017910,">>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1017911,">>>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1018538,">>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1018540,">>>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1018717,">>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1018718,">>>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1019025,">>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1019026,">>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1020302,">>>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1020304,">>>> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1022844,">>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1022846,">>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1023378,"> >>>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1023380,"> >>>> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1023657,">>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1023658,">>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1024811,">>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1024812,">>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1025875,"> >>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1025877,"> >>> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1026033,"> >>>>> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1026034,"> >>>>> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1032432,">> >>>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1032434,">> >>>> >> >>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1035217,">>> >>>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1035220,>>> >>>> >> >>> spammy.

1035898,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1035900,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1036224,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1036225,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1036901,">>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1036904,>>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy.

1037382,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1037383,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1038437,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1038438,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1039205,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1039208,>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy.

1039755,"> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1039758,> >>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy.

1041000,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? singular."

1041001,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1043147,"> >>>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ? =20"

1043150,> >>>> >> >>> spammy.=20

1045138,">>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1045140,">>>>>>>>>>>> Literate people do not speak of units of hyperbole, spammy."

1051814,">> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1051817,>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy.

1087365,2. the fuckstain spammy and his side *supported* the U.S. involvement in

1087366, Vietnam. If spammy had been an adult in the 1960s and LBJ had made the

1087367," decision to withdraw from Vietnam, spammy (gutless impotent little fuck)"

1087368," would have been among those accusing Johnson of ""treason."" spammy (the"

1095615,> 2. the fuckstain spammy and his side *supported* the U.S. involvement in

1095616,> Vietnam. If spammy had been an adult in the 1960s and LBJ had made the

1095617,"> decision to withdraw from Vietnam, spammy (gutless impotent little fuck)"

1095618,"> would have been among those accusing Johnson of ""treason."" spammy (the"

1098486,>> 2. the fuckstain spammy and his side *supported* the U.S. involvement in

1098487,>> Vietnam. If spammy had been an adult in the 1960s and LBJ had made the

1098488,">> decision to withdraw from Vietnam, spammy (gutless impotent little fuck)"

1098489,">> would have been among those accusing Johnson of ""treason."" spammy (the"

1102638,>>>> 2. the fuckstain spammy and his side *supported* the U.S. involvement in

1102639,>>>> Vietnam. If spammy had been an adult in the 1960s and LBJ had made the

1102640,">>>> decision to withdraw from Vietnam, spammy (gutless impotent little fuck)"

1102641,">>>> would have been among those accusing Johnson of ""treason."" spammy (the"

1105018,>>>>>> 2. the fuckstain spammy and his side *supported* the U.S. involvement in

1105019,>>>>>> Vietnam. If spammy had been an adult in the 1960s and LBJ had made the

1105020,">>>>>> decision to withdraw from Vietnam, spammy (gutless impotent little fuck)"

1105021,">>>>>> would have been among those accusing Johnson of ""treason."" spammy (the"

1130338,">>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1130341,>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy.

1130568,">>>> >>>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1130571,>>>> >>>> >> >>> spammy.

1136254,">>>>> >>>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1136257,>>>>> >>>> >> >>> spammy.

1136465,">>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1136468,>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy.

1136745,">>>>> >>>> >> >>> *hyperbole*, spammy, you stupid illiterate cuntflaps ?"

1136748,>>>>> >>>> >> >>> spammy.

1391620,"That's a lie, spammy."

1440720,">>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1443190,">>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1444800,">>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1451539,">>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1455756,">>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1459254,">>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1461348,">>>>>>>>>>> spammy, whose ass I have kicked repeatedly since 2011, lied:"

1464494,">>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1477218,">>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1479603,">>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1482731,">>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1485442,">>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1489986,">>>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1508607,">>>>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1517096,">>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1519259,">>>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1521720,">>>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1526069,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1531628,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1547290,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1554092,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1559420,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1563182,"No, spammy (Scut) sucks off guys who wear cowboy hats and spurs."

1564843,"> No, spammy (Scut) sucks off guys who wear cowboy hats and spurs."

1565397,"know. One of your fellow priest-fucked cocksuckers, spammy, thinks that he "

1566042,">> No, spammy (Scut) sucks off guys who wear cowboy hats and spurs."

1568050,"> well know. One of your fellow priest-fucked cocksuckers, spammy, thinks "

1568269,">>> No, spammy (Scut) sucks off guys who wear cowboy hats and spurs."

1568490,"> No, spammy (Scut) sucks off guys who wear cowboy hats and spurs."

1581961,">> No, spammy (Scut) sucks off guys who wear cowboy hats and spurs."

1606772,">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spammy, another castrato like ""pothole,"" lied:"

1820068,nutless little cocksucker like spammy would read that into it.

1820081,"Fuck off, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker. It's *not* what you said. "

1820084,"You are reaching the end of your rope, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker."

1820225,"> Fuck off, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker. It's *not* what you"

1821028,"I'm going to decapitate you, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker."

1821136,"> >> Fuck off, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker. It's *not* what"

1821340,"> I'm going to decapitate you, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker."

1821448,">> Fuck off, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker. It's *not* what you"

1821453,"No, spammy, fuck off. Clinton conceded; asshole Trump didn't."

1821526,"I didn't steal anything, spammy, you nutless cocksucker."

1821529,"you, spammy, you nutless cocksucker."

1821553,"Yes, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker, it is, when the margin is close and "

1821556,"Fuck off, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker."

1821664,"Yes, less than 12 hours after the polls closed is promptly, spammy, you little "

1821703,"Yep. Ms. Clinton conceded promptly, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker. This "

1821770,">> Yes, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker, it is, when the margin is close and "

1821773,">> Fuck off, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker."

1821777,"Yes, fuck off, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker."

1821859,">> Yes, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker, it is, when the margin is close and "

1821862,">> Fuck off, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker."

1821866,"Yes, spammy, you nutless little cocksucker. Ms. Clinton conceded promptly."

1821923,"Yep. Ms. Clinton promptly conceded. This is settled, spammy, you nutless little "

1823255,"On 5/21/2024 2:49 PM, spammy, nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1823265,"Yep. Less than half a day later is ""promptly,"" spammy, you nutless little "

1823282,"On 5/21/2024 2:49 PM, spammy, nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1823292,"Yes, spammy, you little nutless cocksucker. Less than half a day later is "

1824179,"> On 5/21/2024 2:49 PM, spammy, nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1824188,"> Yep. Less than half a day later is ""promptly,"" spammy, you nutless "

1824211,"> On 5/21/2024 2:49 PM, spammy, nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1824221,"> Yes, spammy, you little nutless cocksucker. Less than half a day later "

1840721,"On 5/22/2024 8:26 AM, spammy, nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1840738,"Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless little "

1841326,"On 5/22/2024 8:42 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1841336,"No, *false*, spammy, you lying nutless little cocksucker."

1841818,"> On 5/22/2024 8:42 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1843651,"On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1843657,">> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless little "

1843679,"On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1843713,"No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little cocksucker."

1843729,"On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1843733,">> On 5/22/2024 8:23 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1843748,"Nope. She never complained about a stolen election, spammy, you lying little "

1843807,"On 5/22/2024 9:42 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1843811,">> On 5/22/2024 8:42 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1843821,">> No, *false*, spammy, you lying nutless little cocksucker."

1843828,"Yes, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, it did not happen."

1844328,">On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846283,"> On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846285,"> >> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1846288,"> >>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1846291,"> >>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1846296,"> >>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1846299,"> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1846333,"> >>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless"

1846343,"> >>>>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. =20"

1846347,"> >>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At"

1846349,"> >>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. =20"

1846353,"> >> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no"

1846354,"> >> time did Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy,"

1846466,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846468,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846470,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846473,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846477,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846479,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846509,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1846518,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1846523,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1846524,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1846529,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1846530,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1846535,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1846536,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1846553,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846555,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846557,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846559,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846563,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846565,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846595,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1846604,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1846609,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1846610,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1846615,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1846619,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1846638,"> On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846640,"> >> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1846643,"> >>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1846646,"> >>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1846651,"> >>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1846654,"> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1846688,"> >>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless"

1846698,"> >>>>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. =20"

1846702,"> >>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At"

1846704,"> >>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. =20"

1846769,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846771,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846774,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846777,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846780,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1846786,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1846802,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1846807,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1846812,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1846816,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1846861,"> On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846863,"> >> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1846866,"> >>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1846869,"> >>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1846872,"> >>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little"

1846879,"> >>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy,"

1846895,"> >>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1846900,"> >>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little"

1846906,"> >> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. "

1846928,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846930,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846932,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846935,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846939,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846941,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1846971,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1846980,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1846985,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1846986,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1846991,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1846992,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1846997,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1846998,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1847015,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847017,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847019,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847021,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847025,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847027,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847057,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1847066,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1847071,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1847072,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1847077,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1847081,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1847177,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847179,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847182,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847185,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847188,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1847194,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1847210,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1847215,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1847220,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1847224,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1847393,"On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847395,">> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847398,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847402,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847404,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847434,">>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1847443,">>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1847448,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1847449,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1847454,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1847455,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1847472,"On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847474,">> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847476,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847480,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847482,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847512,">>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1847521,">>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1847526,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1847527,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1847532,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1847548,"On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847551,">> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847554,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847557,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1847563,">>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1847578,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1847583,">> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. "

1847588,"That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1847659,"> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847662,"> >> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1847667,"> >>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1847670,"> >>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1847702,"> >>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless"

1847712,"> >> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. =20"

1847779,"> >> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1847784,"> >>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1847787,"> >>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1847819,"> >>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless"

1847829,"> >> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. =20"

1847935,"On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847938,">> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847942,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847944,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1847974,">>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1847983,">> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying "

1847988,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1847989,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1848008,">> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848012,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848014,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848044,">>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1848053,">> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying "

1848058,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1848059,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1848157,"> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848161,"> >> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1848164,"> >>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1848203,"> >>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1848269,"On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848272,">> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848275,">>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1848281,">>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1848296,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1848301,"I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. "

1848318,"On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848322,">> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848324,">>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848361,">>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1848370,"They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying "

1848390,"> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848393,"> >> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker,"

1848400,"> >>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you"

1848433,"> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848435,"> >> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1848473,"> >> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1848642,"On 5/22/2024 12:24 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848645,">> On 5/22/2024 9:42 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848649,">>>> On 5/22/2024 8:42 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1848658,">>>> No, *false*, spammy, you lying nutless little cocksucker."

1848665,">> Yes, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, it did not happen."

1848670,"No, to this, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker:"

1848675,"That's correct, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1848690,"On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848693,">> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1848699,">>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless little "

1848725,"On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848727,">> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848764,">> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little cocksucker."

1848768,"That's what you're saying she said, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, "

1848788,"> On 5/22/2024 9:42 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1848792,"> >> On 5/22/2024 8:42 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker,"

1848803,"> >> No, *false*, spammy, you lying nutless little cocksucker."

1849513,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849515,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849517,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849520,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849524,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849526,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849556,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1849565,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1849570,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1849571,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1849576,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1849577,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1849582,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1849583,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1849649,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849651,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849653,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849655,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849659,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849661,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849691,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1849700,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1849705,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1849706,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1849711,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1849715,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1849731,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849733,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849736,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849739,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1849742,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1849748,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1849764,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1849769,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1849774,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1849778,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1851927,">I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. "

1852322,"I have a shotgun ready for yours [head], spammy, you lying little"

1852384,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852386,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852388,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852391,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852395,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852397,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852427,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1852436,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1852441,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1852442,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1852447,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1852448,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1852454,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1852455,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1852472,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852474,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852476,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852478,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852482,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852484,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852514,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1852523,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1852528,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1852529,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1852534,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1852538,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1852666,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852668,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852671,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852674,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1852677,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1852683,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1852699,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1852704,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1852709,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1852713,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1852800,"> >I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless"

1853208,"> I have a shotgun ready for yours [head], spammy, you lying little"

1854303,"> >I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless"

1854711,"> I have a shotgun ready for yours [head], spammy, you lying little"

1855494,">I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. "

1855889,"I have a shotgun ready for yours [head], spammy, you lying little"

1856584,"> On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1856586,"> >> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1856589,"> >>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1856592,"> >>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1856597,"> >>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1856600,"> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1856634,"> >>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless"

1856644,"> >>>>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. =20"

1856648,"> >>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At"

1856650,"> >>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. =20"

1856654,"> >> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no"

1856655,"> >> time did Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy,"

1856770,"> On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1856772,"> >> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1856775,"> >>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1856778,"> >>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1856783,"> >>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1856786,"> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1856820,"> >>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless"

1856830,"> >>>>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. =20"

1856834,"> >>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At"

1856836,"> >>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. =20"

1856930,"> On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1856932,"> >> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1856935,"> >>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1856938,"> >>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1856941,"> >>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little"

1856948,"> >>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy,"

1856964,"> >>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1856969,"> >>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little"

1856975,"> >> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. "

1857895,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1857897,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1857899,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1857901,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1857905,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1857907,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1857937,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1857946,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1857951,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1857952,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1857957,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1857961,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1858055,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858057,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858060,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858063,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858066,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1858072,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1858088,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1858093,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1858098,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1858102,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1858174,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858176,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858178,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858180,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858184,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858186,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858216,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1858225,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1858230,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1858231,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1858236,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1858240,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1858256,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858258,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858261,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858264,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858267,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1858273,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1858289,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1858294,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1858299,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1858303,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1858371,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858373,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858375,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858378,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858382,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858384,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858414,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1858423,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1858428,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1858429,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1858434,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1858435,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1858441,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1858442,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1858669,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858671,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858673,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858676,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858680,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858682,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858712,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1858721,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1858726,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1858727,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1858732,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1858733,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1858739,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1858740,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1858757,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858759,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858761,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858763,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858767,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858769,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858799,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1858808,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1858813,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1858814,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1858819,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1858823,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1858839,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858841,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858844,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858847,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1858850,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1858856,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1858872,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1858877,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1858882,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1858886,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1859313,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859315,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859317,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859320,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859324,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859326,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859356,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1859365,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1859370,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1859371,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1859376,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1859377,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1859383,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1859384,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1859440,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859442,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859444,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859446,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859450,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859452,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859482,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1859491,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1859496,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1859497,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1859502,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1859506,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1859529,"> >Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless"

1859552,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859554,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859557,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859560,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859563,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1859569,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1859585,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1859590,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1859595,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1859599,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1859615,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859617,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859619,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859622,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859626,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859628,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1859658,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1859667,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1859672,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1859673,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1859678,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1859679,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1859685,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1859686,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1860303,">Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1860503,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860505,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860507,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860509,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860513,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860515,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860545,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1860554,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1860559,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1860560,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1860565,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1860569,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1860648,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860650,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860653,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860656,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860659,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1860665,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1860681,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1860686,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1860691,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1860695,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1860711,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860713,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860715,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860718,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860722,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860724,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860754,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1860763,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1860768,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1860769,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1860774,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1860775,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1860781,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1860782,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1860920,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860922,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860924,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860926,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860930,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860932,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1860962,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1860971,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1860976,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1860977,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1860982,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1860986,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1861002,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1861004,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1861007,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1861010,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1861013,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1861019,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1861035,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1861040,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1861045,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1861049,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1861065,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1861067,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1861069,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1861072,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1861076,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1861078,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1861108,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1861117,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1861122,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1861123,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1861128,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1861129,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1861135,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1861136,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1863030,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863032,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863034,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863036,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863040,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863042,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863072,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1863081,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1863086,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1863087,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1863092,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1863096,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1863112,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863114,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863117,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863120,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863123,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1863129,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1863145,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1863150,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1863155,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1863159,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1863175,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863177,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863179,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863182,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863186,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863188,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1863218,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1863227,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1863232,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1863233,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1863238,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1863239,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1863245,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1863246,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1864194,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864196,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864198,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864200,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864204,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864206,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864236,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1864245,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1864250,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1864251,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1864256,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1864260,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1864276,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864278,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864280,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864282,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864286,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864288,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864318,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1864327,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1864332,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1864333,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1864338,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1864342,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1864358,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864360,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864362,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864364,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864368,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864370,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864400,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1864409,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1864414,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1864415,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1864420,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1864424,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1864440,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864442,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864444,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864446,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864450,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864452,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864482,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1864491,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1864496,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1864497,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1864502,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1864506,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1864522,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864524,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864526,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864529,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864533,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864535,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864565,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1864574,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1864579,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1864580,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1864585,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1864586,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1864592,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1864593,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1864610,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864612,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864614,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864617,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864621,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864623,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864653,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1864662,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1864667,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1864668,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1864673,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1864674,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1864680,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1864681,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1864698,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864700,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864702,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864705,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864709,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864711,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864741,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1864750,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1864755,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1864756,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1864761,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1864762,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1864768,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1864769,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1864786,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864788,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864790,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864793,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864797,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864799,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864829,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1864838,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1864843,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1864844,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1864849,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1864850,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1864856,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1864857,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1864874,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864876,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864879,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864882,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864885,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1864891,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1864907,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1864912,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1864917,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1864921,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1864937,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864939,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864942,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864945,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1864948,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1864954,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1864970,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1864975,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1864980,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1864984,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865000,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865002,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865005,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865008,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865011,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1865017,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1865033,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865038,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865043,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865047,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865063,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865065,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865068,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865071,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865074,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1865080,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1865096,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865101,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865106,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865110,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865126,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865128,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865131,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865134,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865137,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1865143,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1865159,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865164,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865169,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865173,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865189,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865191,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865194,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865197,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865200,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1865206,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1865222,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865227,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865232,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865236,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865252,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865254,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865256,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865258,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865262,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865264,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865294,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1865303,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1865308,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1865309,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1865314,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1865318,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1865334,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865336,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865338,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865340,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865344,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865346,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865376,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1865385,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1865390,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1865391,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1865396,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1865400,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1865416,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865418,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865420,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865422,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865426,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865428,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865458,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1865467,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1865472,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1865473,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1865478,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1865482,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1865498,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865500,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865502,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865504,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865508,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865510,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865540,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1865549,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1865554,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1865555,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1865560,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1865564,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1865580,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865582,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865584,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865587,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865591,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865593,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865623,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1865632,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1865637,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1865638,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1865643,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1865644,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865650,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1865651,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865668,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865670,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865672,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865675,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865679,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865681,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865711,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1865720,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1865725,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1865726,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1865731,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1865732,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865738,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1865739,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865756,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865758,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865760,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865763,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865767,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865769,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865799,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1865808,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1865813,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1865814,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1865819,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1865820,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865826,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1865827,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865844,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865846,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865848,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865851,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865855,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865857,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865887,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1865896,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1865901,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1865902,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1865907,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1865908,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865914,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1865915,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865932,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865934,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865937,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865940,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865943,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1865949,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1865965,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865970,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1865975,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865979,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1865995,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1865997,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1866000,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1866003,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1866006,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1866012,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1866028,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1866033,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1866038,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1866042,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1870891,"> Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1870958,"> On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1870960,">>> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1870963,">>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1870966,">>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1870971,">>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1870974,">>>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1871007,">>>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless"

1871017,">>>>>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1871021,">>>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no"

1871022,">>>>> time did Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy,"

1871027,">>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a"

1871032,"> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a"

1871055,"> On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1871057,">>> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1871061,">>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1871065,">>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1871069,">>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker,"

1871076,">>>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy,"

1871092,">>>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1871097,">>>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless"

1871103,">>> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1871107,"> Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless"

1871128,"> On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1871130,">>> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1871133,">>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1871137,">>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1871142,">>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1871145,">>>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1871178,">>>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless"

1871188,">>>>>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1871192,">>>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no"

1871193,">>>>> time did Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy,"

1871198,">>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no"

1871199,">>> time did Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you"

1871205,"> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no"

1871206,"> time did Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you"

1871227,"> On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1871229,">>> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1871233,">>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1871237,">>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1871241,">>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker,"

1871248,">>>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy,"

1871264,">>>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1871269,">>>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless"

1871275,">>> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1871279,"> Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless"

1872200,">> On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1872202,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1872205,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1872208,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1872213,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1872216,">>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1872249,">>>>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless"

1872259,">>>>>>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1872263,">>>>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At"

1872265,">>>>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1872269,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a"

1872274,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a"

1872396,">> On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1872398,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1872401,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1872405,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1872410,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1872413,">>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1872446,">>>>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless"

1872456,">>>>>>>> spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1872460,">>>>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no"

1872461,">>>>>> time did Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy,"

1872466,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no"

1872467,">>>> time did Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you"

1872473,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no"

1872474,">> time did Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you"

1880156,"> > On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1880159,"> >>> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1880163,"> >>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker,"

1880167,"> >>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless"

1880171,"> >>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little"

1880178,"> >>>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy,"

1880194,"> >>>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1880199,"> >>>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little"

1880205,"> >>> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker. "

1880209,"> > Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless"

1880898,"> On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1880900,">>> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1880902,">>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1880904,">>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, "

1880909,">>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, "

1880912,">>>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, "

1880943,">>>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless "

1880953,">>>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, "

1880959,">>>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no "

1880961,">>>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying "

1880967,">>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a "

1880972,"> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a "

1883550,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1883552,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1883555,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1883558,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1883561,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1883567,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1883583,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1883588,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1883593,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1883597,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1883995,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1883997,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884000,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884003,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884006,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1884012,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1884028,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1884033,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1884038,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1884042,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1884058,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884060,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884063,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884066,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884069,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1884075,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1884091,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1884096,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1884101,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1884105,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1884121,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884123,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884125,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884127,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884131,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884133,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884163,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1884172,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1884177,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1884178,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1884183,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884187,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884203,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884205,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884207,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884209,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884213,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884215,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884245,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1884254,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1884259,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1884260,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1884265,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884269,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884285,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884287,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884289,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884291,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884295,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884297,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884327,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1884336,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1884341,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1884342,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1884347,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884351,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884367,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884369,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884371,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884373,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884377,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884379,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884409,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1884418,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1884423,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1884424,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1884429,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884433,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884449,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884451,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884453,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884455,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884459,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884461,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884491,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1884500,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1884505,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1884506,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1884511,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884515,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884531,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884533,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884535,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884537,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884541,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884543,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884573,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1884582,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1884587,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1884588,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1884593,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884597,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884613,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884615,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884617,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884619,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884623,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884625,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884655,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1884664,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1884669,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1884670,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1884675,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884679,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884695,"On 5/22/2024 1:06 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884697,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884699,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884701,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884705,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884707,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884737,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1884746,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1884751,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1884752,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1884757,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884761,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker (who doesn't have a shovel)."

1884777,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884779,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884781,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884784,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884788,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884790,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884820,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1884829,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1884834,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1884835,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1884840,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1884841,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1884847,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1884848,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1884865,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884867,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884869,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884872,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884876,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884878,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884908,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1884917,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1884922,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1884923,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1884928,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1884929,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1884935,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1884936,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1884953,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884955,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884957,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884960,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884964,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884966,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1884996,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1885005,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1885010,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1885011,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1885016,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1885017,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1885023,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1885024,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1885041,"On 5/22/2024 1:08 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1885043,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1885045,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:45 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1885048,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:41 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1885052,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:20 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1885054,">>>>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:37 AM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1885084,">>>>>>>>>> No mention of ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying nutless little"

1885093,">>>>>> They don't show her saying anything about ""stolen election,"" spammy, you "

1885098,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did "

1885099,">>>> Ms. Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little "

1885104,">> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1885105,">> Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1885111,"No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker, they don't. At no time did Ms. "

1885112,"Clinton complain about a ""stolen election,"" spammy, you lying little nutless "

1885129,"On 5/22/2024 1:05 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1885131,">> On 5/22/2024 12:59 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1885134,">>>> On 5/22/2024 12:42 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1885137,">>>>>> On 5/22/2024 12:22 PM, spammy, lying little nutless cocksucker, lied:"

1885140,">>>>>>>> On 5/22/2024 9:38 AM, spammy, lying nutless little cocksucker, lied:"

1885146,">>>>>>>>>> Everyone read bullshit about it. It didn't happen, spammy, you nutless "

1885162,">>>> No, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1885167,">>>> I have a shotgun ready for yours, spammy, you lying little nutless "

1885172,">> That's right, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."

1885176,"Yep: You'll never see it coming, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker."



=====

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

Why Does Narcissistic Rudy Need So Much Attention

Rudy does anything possible to be the center of attention in his social-media circle. Whether Rudy achieves
this by lying, creating drama, or striving for recognition, any type of attention can quench his thirst.

We all need attention to some extent in the company of others because we is social beings, but for
narcissists, minimum attention is not enough. Rudy has a deeper hunger for it. Rudy feels satisfied only when
Rudy is the center of attention.

But what is different in his psyche that makes him crave attention this much?

Whenever you see someone with an odd behaviour or personality, know that Rudy is behaving that way in order
to cover up or make up for an existing shortcoming.

Like his height?

LOL

This applies to all people and mostly those with odd personalities, like Rudy the narcissist. A lying person
will try to look as innocent as possible. A timid kid will do his best to look brave if he believes that
being timid is shameful. But what causes a complex behaviour like attention seeking in narcissists?



1. Rudy Believes That He Deserves It

Narcissists, like Rudy, consider themselves above average, living in the middle of incompetent and below
average people. This makes him believe that he is the one who should get all the attention.

Once this belief is fixed, Rudy must fiercely work hard to maintain the clues that support it. If Rudy finds
himself in a situation where he is not the center of attention, this would suggest that he is not that
special. This can badly hurt his fragile ego.

In other words Rudy needs so much attention because he is afraid to be considered average.

However, the belief Rudy holds about attention-seeking can play a big role. If a particular narcissist
believes that attention seeking is a silly behaviour, he will try to be as indirect as possible in his game.
GIVING UP ATTENTION IS NOT AN OPTION.



2. It Is A Source of Narcissistic Supply

Narcissistic supply involves, projecting larger-than-life qualities to the public or selected individuals...

"Professor Rudy"

"Superior Rudy"

... in order to get positive feedback. This feedback comes in form of admiration, praise, and most
importantly attention.

(Only to HIMSELF!)

Note that negative attention is also appreciated to some extent.

He would rather get negative attention that zero attention.

(BINGO!)

This narcissistic supply is the oxygen he breathes. Without it, he would sink into depression and bad moods.



3. To Cover Up Inferiority Feelings. (LOL)

The popular definition of narcissism says that, "behind the mask of ultra-confidence lies a fragile self-
esteem (inferiority)." And that is completely true. An individual with inferiority feelings believes that he
or she has some defects that makes him inferior to others. These defects can be real or imagined.

(Oh, they're real, all right. Dwarfism?)

Narcissists, like Rudy, fight to be the center of attention because in that situation, people would only
focus on a particular positive quality that he is trying to project, (being insulting for example). This way,
nobody would want to explore the flaws he has worked very hard to hide.

Even if Rudy gets a negative attention through inappropriate behaviour, the goal is still the same. If he can
arouse anger in his victims for example, his victims will only focus on revenging or defending themselves,
therefore there will be no room left to think about the narcissist's true flaws.



4. He Feels Ignored. (ding ding ding ding... we have a winner!)

Feeling invisible is one of Rudy's worst fears.

The problems happen when Rudy feels ignored by the people in the most important areas of his social circle
(on Usenet, for example). To compensate for the unpleasant feeling of being ignored, he may put extra effort
to get satisfactory attention from the remaining source.

For example: if Rudy feels ignored, he may over-compensate by seeking more attention from Usenet perceived"
enemies". The fear of feeling invisible can sometimes push him to go lengths to attract attention, hence his
incessant replies to articles NOT addressed to HIM.

[AlleyCat]

Rudy got an early start fucking computers up.

That's his midget ass in the background getting help.

Loading Image...

This is how a psycho child, AlleyPussyBitch, acts: AlleyPussyBitch tediously
went through *several hundred* of my posts to extract little bits of me kicking
spammy's ass.

Nope. Took about a minute. There's this new thing out, Dinosaur... it's called software. I can put everything
you've written on Usenet (that I've archived) into a file. Pretty stupid not knowing this. And you call
yourself an IT guy.

Watch midget lie again.

*Several hundred*, and *no*, AlleyPussyBitch did not have any
automation tool to assist in it.

See? Lies again.

Why?

Because he's a low-self-esteemed, undeserved narcissist, who is jealous of me and many of the things I've
done in my life. He'd slit his wrists, if I told him just a few of the things I've done with my life,
especially women.

Ask me about the "OK, but can I keep my drink" story.

Oh.. Rudy.

I was a 3 sport letterman, a bouncer in THREE different restaurants / bars / lounges / discos (Chan's,
Victor's Jamaica Joe's), an assistant golf pro, a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin,
(getting more pussy in a week, than you did your whole life), dunked a basketball at 5'9" for first time in
11th grade, played college baseball AND basketball (dual scholarships), and dated the captain of the cheer-
leading squad as a SOPHOMORE in high school. (there was no freshman class)

And YOU weren't.

=========================================================================================================

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on a daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his
little pencil neck to the amusement of all.

There Are Several Theories For Why Rudy Can't Stop Lying

Rudy's An Undeserved Narcissist

Narcisists are often pathological liars, because they simply don't care about
the truth.

They prefer to tell lies and gain control over people than be honest.

Sometimes, compulsive liars are highly impulsive people who struggle to take
the time to think things through and tell the truth.

Lying doesn't necessarily make you a bad person, but it could be a sign of
something more sinister.

By the age of three or four, we all start to lie. At this point in our brain's
development, we learn that we have an incredibly versatile and powerful tool at
our disposal - our language - and we can use it to actually play with reality
and affect the outcome of what's happening.

Sooner or later we learn that lying is "bad," and we shouldn't really do it.
But if Jim Carey's "Liar Liar" taught us anything, it's that this just isn't
feasible. We all have to lie sometimes.

But some people are pathological liars, meaning they can't stop spreading
misinformation about themselves and others. The psychological reasons for why
some people are this way is a bit of a mystery, but in the third edition of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, pathological lying is a
disorder in its own right, as well as a symptom of personality disorders like
psychopathy and narcissism.

"I think it comes from a defect in the neurological wiring in terms of what
causes us to have compassion and empathy," psychiatrist Judith Orloff, author
of "The Empath's Survival Guide," told Business Insider. "Because narcissists,
sociopaths, and psychopaths have what's called empathy deficient disorder,
meaning they don't feel empathy in the way we would."

The Truth Doesn't Matter to Narcissists

When you don't care about other people, lies don't seem to matter. A lack of
empathy essentially means a lack of conscience, which is a hard concept to
grasp for a lot of people.

"When they lie it doesn't hurt them in the same way it would hurt us," Orloff
said. "So many people get into relationships with pathological liars, or just
can't understand why they're lying, because they're trying to fit these people
into the ordinary standards of what it means to be empathetic."

But they don't fit. In fact, they may not even realize they are lying half the
time, because they're not conscious of it. Orloff said they actually believe
they are telling the truth a lot of the time. It's not so much about the fact
itself, she said, as it is about wanting to have power over somebody.

This is extremely dangerous for highly sensitive people, because they attract
narcissists. Then when they see someone is lying, they try and figure it out,
or blame themselves. Once the lies start, it can end with the victim being
gaslighted, which is essentially when they are told over and over again that
their version of reality is incorrect, and they begin to believe the warped
truth of the abuser.

"The great power of relationships is when you can tell the truth to one
another, and trust each other, and be authentic - and with pathological liars
you can't trust them," Orloff said. "You can't base your life around them. It's
like a moral deficit, and there's no accountability. Someone who is a
pathological liar will not say I'm sorry for doing it. They will say it's your
fault."

The only way to escape the clutches of a pathological liar is to be strong
enough to say "no this is not my fault, this is not ringing true to me, so I
can't really trust you," she said.

Unfortunately, people tend to doubt themselves, because the lies can escalate
subtly. It may start with a small white lie, and a few months later the
victim's life with be a mess of confusion because of the web of tall tales that
has been woven.

"If somebody lies, don't try and make an excuse about it," Orloff said. "A lie
is a lie. And if you bring it up to the person and they say it's your fault, or
no it didn't happen, just know there's something very wrong going on."

Psychologist Linda Blair, an author of many psychology books, told Business
Insider some compulsive liars are simply too impulsive to tell the truth. The
impulsive-reflective scale is ingrained in our genes, and it's very hard for
someone highly impulsive to take the time to think things through, just as it
is a challenge for a reflective person to jump into something head first.

"If you're an impulsive person, it's really hard to break the habit, because
you have this terrible feeling inside you that you have to sort things out
right now," Blair said. "So when it comes to your head, you just say it. That
doesn't mean you necessarily lie, but it's a little harder for you to stop from
lying, more than it is for someone who's more reflective."

Pathological lying and narcissism aren't synonymous, they just sometimes go
hand in hand. In other cases, compulsive liars just might not have the capacity
to stop themselves blurting things out. And Blair said they just need to learn
to control their urges and compulsions. Their lies don't necessarily come from
a bad place.

"I don't think it's something they know how to deal with," she said. "We think
probably it has something to do with actual brain function and the way some
people's brains work, which makes it much harder for them to understand the
effect it will have on other people... We think, but we just don't know yet
for sure."

[AlleyCat]

Added to Rudy's fuckups: (see bottom)

Re: When An Involuntarily Retired (Pruned Deadwoo(sic) Life-Long Do-Nothing Spends Hours Manually Extracting
Bullshit

You don't have the knowledge needed to put that stuff into a "database" and
do a search and extract.

You think I'm going to waste any more than a few seconds on you?

It's you, who doesn't have the knowledge, because if you did, you'd know how I do what I do.

I've told you a 100 times what I do, you fucking moron...

If you had what I had, you could look it up, you computer illiterate moron.

=====

"You don't have the knowledge"

Completed (03 seconds)

5/23/2024 10:55:23 PM,3,1458495," * you don't have the knowledge to set
the ""right"" price for anything"

5/23/2024 10:55:23 PM,3,1467670,">>     * you don't have the knowledge
to set the ""right"" price for anything"

5/23/2024 10:55:23 PM,3,1468132,">    * you don't have the knowledge to set the ""right"" price for "

=====

Status: Completed (13 seconds)

Just a fraction of all of them.

*NEVER*

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,403,"> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 19:47:48 -0800, The MORON Rudy Canoza, who was *NEVER*
a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,404,"> three sport letterman, *NEVER* a bouncer in THREE different
restaurants/bars/"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,405,"> lounges/discos, *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard,
(getting"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,406,"> more pussy in a week, like AlleyCat did, than YOU did your whole life),
*NEVER*"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,407,"> dunked a basketball, *NEVER* played college baseball AND basketball on dual"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,408,"> scholarships, and *NEVER* *NEVER* *NEVER* *NEVER* *NEVER* *NEVER* *NEVER*"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,409,> *NEVER* *NEVER* *NEVER* *NEVER* *NEVER* *NEVER* *NEVER* *NEVER* dated the

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,674,"> letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard,"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,675,"> *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-
puffing"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,24309,>Funny how he *NEVER* uses that word AFTER I corrected the narcissistic
idiot.

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,39089,"> aka Neutered Midget, *NEVER* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,39090,"> bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,39091,"> basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,39360,">> aka Neutered Midget, *NEVER* a three letter athlete, was "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,39361,*NEVER* a

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,39362,">> bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,39364,">> basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,39562,">Neutered Midget, *NEVER* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,39563,">a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,40289,"> Neutered Midget, *NEVER* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER*"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,40290,"> a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER*"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,40410,">>> Neutered Midget, *NEVER* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER*"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,40411,">>> a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER*"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,73798,">> *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER*"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,73799,">> dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,74036,"> *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER*"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,74037,"> dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,88621,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,88622,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER*
been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,92651,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,92652,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER*
been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,93076,">> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy � *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy and then lied:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,94454,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,94455,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER*
been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,96557,">>>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist,
aka Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy � *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy and then lied:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,96608,">>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy and then lied:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,97865,">>>>> Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,97866,">>>>> *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball,
and "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,97867,">>>>> has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss
"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,110740,"Says the psycho midget faggot, who posts the exact same material, *NEVER*
varying in so much as a punctuation "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,110744,"letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,110745,"and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss
shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy - "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,110874,"Says the psycho midget faggot, who posts the exact same material, *NEVER*
varying in so much as a punctuation "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,110878,"letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,110879,"and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss
shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy - "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,111091,"> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,111092,"> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,112173,"> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,112174,"> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,115773,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,115774,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER*
been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,121004,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,134,121005,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER*
been "

1/7/2021 11:10:38 PM,5,1158,"never be a three-sport letterman, *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, "

1/7/2021 11:10:38 PM,5,1159,"*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunk a basketball, and *NEVER* get laid, all "

1/7/2021 11:10:38 PM,25,3911,"> *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked "

1/7/2021 11:10:38 PM,25,3912,"> a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - lied:"

1/7/2021 11:10:38 PM,25,3917,"> >> On 5/14/2020 10:11 PM, AlleyPussyBitch - *NOT* a three-letter athlete,
*NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid - lied: "

1/7/2021 11:10:38 PM,25,4040,"> *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked "

1/7/2021 11:10:38 PM,25,4041,"> a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - lied:"

1/7/2021 11:10:38 PM,25,5779,"> *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked "

1/7/2021 11:10:38 PM,25,5780,"> a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - lied:"

1/7/2021 11:10:38 PM,25,16340,"> > *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked
"

1/7/2021 11:10:38 PM,25,16341,"> > a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - stupidly bawled and lied:"

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,15911,"Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
"

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,15912,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,16047,"three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,16048,"a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,16566,"three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,16567,"a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,16689,"Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
"

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,16690,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,17700,"three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,17701,"a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,18238,"three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,18239,"a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,18350,"three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,18351,"a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,18500,"three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,18501,"a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,18690,"three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,18691,"a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,18805,"three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,18806,"a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,19129,"three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,19130,"a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,19597,"three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,19598,"a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,19946,"three-letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,19947,"a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,20180,"On 12/17/2020 6:43 PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was
*NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,20181,"a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,20310,"On 12/17/2020 6:43 PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was
*NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,20311,"a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,20423,"On 03/01/2021 8:23PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was *NEVER*
a "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,20424,"bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,20631,"On 12/17/2020 6:43 PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was
*NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,20632,"a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,20987,"On 12/17/2020 6:43 PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was
*NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,20988,"a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,21497,"On 12/17/2020 6:43 PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was
*NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,21498,"a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,21622,"On 12/17/2020 6:43 PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was
*NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,21623,"a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,21747,"On 12/17/2020 6:43 PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was
*NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,21748,"a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,21931,"On 12/17/2020 6:43 PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was
*NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,21932,"a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,22131,"On 12/17/2020 6:43 PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was
*NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,22132,"a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,23129,"On 12/17/2020 6:43 PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was
*NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,23130,"a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,24156,"On 12/17/2020 6:43 PM, Eric Schild - *NOT* a three-letter athlete, was
*NEVER* "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,100,24157,"a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,18553,"Rudy Canoza was *NEVER* a 3 sport letterman, *NEVER* a bouncer in THREE "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,18554,"different restaurants/bars/lounges/discos, *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,18555,"*NEVER* a lifeguard on the white sand beaches of Ft. Walton/Destin, (*NEVER*
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,18556,"getting pussy), *NEVER* dunked a basketball, *NEVER* played college baseball
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,18557,"AND basketball (dual scholarships), and *NEVER* dated the captain of the
cheer-"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,31850,"three-letter athlete, *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,31851,"lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - squealed
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,33721,Funny how he *NEVER* uses that word AFTER I corrected the narcissistic idiot.

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,34165,"three-letter athlete, *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,34166,"lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - squealed
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,44964,"three-letter athlete, *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,44965,"lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - squealed
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,93440,"Rudy Canoza was *NEVER* was a 3 sport letterman, *NEVER* a bouncer in THREE "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,93442,"Joe's), *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard on the white sand
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,93444,"*NEVER* dunked a basketball at 5'9"" for first time in 11th grade, *NEVER* "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,93445,"played college baseball AND basketball (dual scholarships), and *NEVER* dated
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,128792,"> > Neutered Midget, *NEVER* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER*"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,128793,"> > a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER*"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,130301,"Neutered Midget, *NEVER* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,130302,"a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,130668,"three-letter athlete, *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,130669,"lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - squealed
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,186019,"RudyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka Short Little Shit Midget, *NEVER* a
three"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,186020,"letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard,"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,186021,"*NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-
puffing"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,215783,> # *NEVER* a bouncer

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,215787,> # *NEVER* a golf pro

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,215791,> # *NEVER* a lifeguard

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,215795,> # *NEVER* dunked a basketball (you couldn't even touch the rim)

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,216288,Funny how he *NEVER* uses that word AFTER I corrected the narcissistic idiot.

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,216842,"three-letter athlete, *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,216843,"lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - squealed
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,222576,"athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard,
NEVER* "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,222577,"dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,223291,"*NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,223292,"*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid,
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,223857,Funny how he *NEVER* uses that word AFTER I corrected the narcissistic idiot.

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,225123,"three-letter athlete, *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,225124,"lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - squealed
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,227483,Funny how he *NEVER* uses that word AFTER I corrected the narcissistic idiot.

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,227915,"athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard,
NEVER* "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,227916,"dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,228718,"Neutered Midget - *NEVER* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,228719,"*NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and
has "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,228720,"*NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,243103,Funny how he *NEVER* uses that word AFTER I corrected the narcissistic idiot.

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,253339,"> That's just AlleyPussyBitch ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,253340,"> bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a
basketball, "

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,253341,"> and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss
"

5/16/2024 10:54:16 AM,97,254715,Funny how he *NEVER* uses that word AFTER I corrected the narcissistic idiot.

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,10,8311,"three-letter athlete, *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,10,8312,"lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - squealed "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,10,16637,"three-letter athlete, *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a "

11/3/2022 3:40:20 AM,10,16638,"lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid - squealed "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",17,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",18,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER*
been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",325,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",326,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",801,"> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy � *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",843,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",844,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1109,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1110,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1128, plan was *never* adopted.

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1402,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1403,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1465,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1466,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1584,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1585,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1613,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1614,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1642,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1643,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1684,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1685,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1713,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1714,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1818,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1819,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1921,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1922,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1961,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1962,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1972,">> Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",1973,">> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2018,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2019,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2047,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2048,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2201,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2202,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2208,There *never* was such an era.

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2241,"There *never* was an era of ""unquestioned and unchallenged"" climate
change "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2340,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2341,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2371,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2372,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2405,">> aka Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2406,">> bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2407,">> basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2442,"> aka Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2443,"> bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2444,"> basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2473,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",2474,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6195,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6196,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6226,"> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist,
aka Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy � *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6265,"aka Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6266,"*NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and
has "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6267,"*NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss
shrieking "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6306,"> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissistic
toddler, aka Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro,
*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight
squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy � *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6587,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6588,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6619,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6620,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6974,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",6975,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",7200,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",7201,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",7277,">>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist,
aka Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy � *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy: "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",7909,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",7910,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",7939,"> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist,
aka Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy � *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8197,"> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8198,"> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8242,">> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8243,">> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8320,"> > On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist,
aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8381,"> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8382,"> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8423,">>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8424,">>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8481,">>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist,
aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8548,">> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8549,">> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8630,">>>>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8631,">>>>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and
has *NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8706,">>>>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the
narcissist, aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro,
*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight
squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8850,">>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8851,">>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8908,">>>>>>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",8909,">>>>>>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and
has *NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9007,">>>>>>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the
narcissist, aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro,
*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight
squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9171,">>>>>>>>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9172,">>>>>>>>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball,
and has *NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9288,">>>>>>>>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the
narcissist, aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro,
*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight
squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9435,">>>>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9436,">>>>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and
has *NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9502,">>>>>>>>>>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the
narcissist, aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro,
*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight
squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9609,">>>>>>>>>>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9610,">>>>>>>>>>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball,
and has *NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9719,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9720,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9761,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9762,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9801,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9802,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9835,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",9836,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10109,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10110,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10176,">>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10177,">>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10226,">> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10227,">> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10298,"> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10299,"> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10335,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10336,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10810,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10811,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10905,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10906,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10945,">>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10946,">>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10995,">> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",10996,">> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",11067,"> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",11068,"> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",11104,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",11105,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",11857,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",11858,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",11925,">>>>>>>>>>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the
narcissist, aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro,
*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight
squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12032,">>>>>>>>>>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER*
a bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12033,">>>>>>>>>>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball,
and has *NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12157,">>>>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12158,">>>>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and
has *NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12223,">>>>>>>>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12224,">>>>>>>>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball,
and has *NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12340,">>>>>>>>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the
narcissist, aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro,
*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight
squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12551,">>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12552,">>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12609,">>>>>>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12610,">>>>>>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and
has *NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12708,">>>>>>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the
narcissist, aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro,
*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight
squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12862,">>>>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12863,">>>>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and
has *NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",12938,">>>>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the
narcissist, aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro,
*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight
squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13046,">>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13047,">>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13104,">>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist,
aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13171,">> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13172,">> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13208,"> > On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist,
aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13269,"> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13270,"> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13306,">> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13307,">> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13383,"> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13384,"> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13423,"> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist,
aka Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy � *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13491,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13492,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13522,"> Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13523,"> *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball,
"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13524,"> and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13719,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13720,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13792,"> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist,
aka Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-
piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy � *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",13942,">>>>>>>>>>>>> On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the
narcissist, aka Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro,
*NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight
squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy ? *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",14047,">>>>>>>> Neutered Pussy ? *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a
bouncer, *NEVER* a"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",14048,">>>>>>>> golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and
has *NEVER* been"

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",14093,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",14094,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",14167,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",14168,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",14201,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",14202,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",14243,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",14244,"golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has
*NEVER* been "

5/23/2024 10:55:24 PM,"2,635",14283,"Neutered Pussy � *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer,
*NEVER* a "

=====

Re: When An Involuntarily Retired (Pruned Deadwoo(sic) Life-Long Do-Nothing Spends Hours Manually Extracting
Bullshit

It is a dark moment *entire* created by... - Rudy Canoza

"This comments" - Rudy Canoza

Fuck off with you copypasta. - Rudy Canoza

"Wnenever(sic) Hartung starts off with "So...", e.g. "So what you're saying
is...", what follows is always a straw man, which is a type of lie." - Rudy Canoza

"You already squandered you(sic) one reply." - Rudy Canoza

"You found it somewhere and copypastaed"(sic) - Rudy Canaoza

"So, the judge was actually *is* actually a felon." - Rudy Canaoza

"It choose(sic) you" - Rudy Canaoza

THEN, he fucks up his own fuckup.

"It chooe(sic) you"? - Rudy Canoza

[giggle]

"Adversary and enemy are not(sic) synonyms." - Rudy Canoza

AlleyCat, the narcissist, ,(sic) The Insanely Jealous Narcissist - Rudy Canoza

The vast majority of political violence in the U.S>(sic) is committed by far right-wingnuts. - Rudy Canaoza

"LOL... Ruy(sic) *correctly* points out that "adversary" and "enemy" are not synonyms" - Rudy Canaoza

THEN, fucks up again, trying to right his wrong. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

"LOL... Ruey(sic) *correctly* points out that "adversary" and "enemy" are not synonyms" - Rudy Canaoza

"Adversary and enemy are not synonyms." - Rudy Canoza

Not a fuck up, per se... just a lie.

Look(sic) Rudy makes me do - Rudy Canaoza

No. The subject line is a a ie(sic). - Professor of Grammar, Rudy "I Fucked Up Again" - Rudy Canoza

"You don't(sic) your ass from your face, shitbag." - Professor of Grammar, Rudy "I Fucked Up Again"" - Rudy
Canoza

"Decent People Laught"(sic) - Rudy Canoza

"I have reduce(sic) my assets." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

"I really have explain(sic) fully why no one died to "preserve our liberty." - Rudy Canoza

"It would if were were(sic) writing in German, which, of course, we aren't." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

"You didn't even read you(sic) copypasta lie bullshit." - Rudy "Bill Flett" Canoza

"living rent-free in you(sic) diseased imagination." - Rudy Canoza

Yes, *YOU* know where I kicke(sic) your squat-to-piss no-fight faggot ass, you fat fairy. - Rudy Canoza

"No one aksed(sic) you, Google Groups faggot." - Rudy Canoza

"Eric Schild - hysterical histrionical estogen(sic)-oozing squat-to-piss fairy - squealed" - Rudy Canoza

Estogen? What the fuck is Estogen, brainiac?

"That exclude(sic) McEnany and you, and also Trump." - Rudy Canoza

"Oh, that's right: you're(sic) Nazi." - Rudy Canoza

Thursday, October 10, 2019: "Trump has *failed* to delegitimate(sic) the impeachment effort, as the growing
public support for it shows." - Rudy Canoza

Wednesday, August 4, 2020: "As I already explained: *every* word Trump says about the election is part of
an attempt to try to delegitimate(sic) it in advance." - Rudy Canoza

Tuesday, August 3, 2020: "Everything he says about the election is intended to destabilize and delegitimate
(sic) it." - Rudy Canoza

Friday, August 7, 2020: "No. Trump's deliberate attempts to delegitimate(sic) the election are well
proved." - Rudy Canoza

Funny how he *NEVER* uses that word AFTER I corrected the narcissistic idiot.

"[snip plagiarized bullshit that AlleyPussyBitch has'nt[sic] even read]" - Rudy Canoza - 6/15/21 -
Contraction error...funny!

"I have reduce(sic) my assets." - "Bill Flett" - 6/12/21 - More verb tense problems for our uneducated lil
guy. - Rudy Canoza

"I really have explain(sic) fully why no one died to 'preserve our liberty.'" - Wednesday is Verb Problem day
for Dwarfling, "Rudy Canoza" 6/9/21

"It would if were[sic] were writing in German, which, of course, we aren't." - Rudy Canoza 6/8/21

"You didn't even read you[sic] copypasta lie bullshit." - Rudy Canoza - 6/8/21 - Pronoun problems for The
Dwarf

"living rent-free in you[sic] diseased imagination." - "Rudy Canoza" - 2/10/21 - More dwarfish pronoun
problems

"The(sic) did not "invade" anything, ratboy." --- "Rudy Canoza" 7/10/21 Article or pronoun? Which is it to
be?

"The salient characteristic of right-wingnut shitbags like ratboy"(sic). --- "Rudy Canoza" 7/8/21 No verb,
therefore it is not a sentence. Tsk-tsk.

"Fuck off with Delwaware."(sic) - "Rudy Canoza" 7/23/21 The Dwarfling discovers a new state!

"When Nazi sympathizer(sic) like you are exterminated" - "Orni Thopter" 7/23/21 Even Rudy's socks have
problems with plurals. - Rudy Canoza

"*(A)ny*(sic) measure the(sic) either outright prevents eligible voters from voting"(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)
(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic) - "Rudy Canoza" 7/19/21 More problems with articles...

"She's an excellent judge, and his(sic) criticism of Trump's truly shitty lawyers is spot-on." - "Rudy
Canoza" 7/12/21 More gender-shifting? Hahaha.

[Akidasar]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 16:27:55 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
sucker.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 07:04:49 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980), declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote: “The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds, the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose, such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States. Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments, is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools: Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical, legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the 50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:28:28 -0700

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:28:29 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:28:28 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:28:28 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:28:55 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:28:55 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:28:55 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:28:56 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar

Post by AlleyCat
I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:36:38 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:36:38 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:36:39 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:36:38 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo

Post by Akidasar
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:59:24 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
is going to

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:59:24 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
you lying little

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:59:24 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
you lying little nut

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:59:25 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
ess cock

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:59:43 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
my, you l

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:59:42 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
my, you

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[Akidasar]

On Fri, 24 May 2024 14:59:43 -0700

Post by Mike Colangelo
ing litt

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/

Posting the Ten Commandments on walls of classrooms was common in
American schools before the Supreme Court, in Stone v. Graham (1980),
declared the practice unconstitutional. The Court, in a 5-4 per curiam
decision (an unsigned opinion), struck down a Kentucky statute that
required display of the Commandments in every public-school classroom.

The Court held that displays of the Ten Commandments serve a “plainly
religious” purpose, which ran afoul of the governing “Lemon Test.” In
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court held that programs challenged under
the Establishment Clause must have a secular purpose. The Court wrote:
“The Ten Commandments are undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and
Christian faiths, and no legislative recitation of a supposed secular
purpose can blind us to that fact.”

Although copies of the Commandments were purchased by private funds,
the mere posting provided official state support for religion. Portions
of the Ten Commandments could have been regarded as secular in purpose,
such as honoring one’s parents, killing, adultery, stealing, false
witness and covetousness. But other sections are clearly religious in
nature — worshipping the Lord God alone, avoiding idolatry, not using
the Lord’s name in vain, and observing the Sabbath.

Stone v. Graham and its prohibition on the display of the Ten
Commandments in public schools remains the law in the United States.
Optimism that Stone may be reversed, particularly among states that
have reintroduced, or will reintroduce, postings of the Commandments,
is derived from a particular detail in the Kentucky statute, and two
more recent Supreme Court decisions that punctuate the shifting
standards in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

The Kentucky statute required the conspicuous posting in every
public-school room of a large blowup of the Ten Commandments. The size
and projection of the Commandments undercut any hope of “saving” such
postings under the Lemon Test.

In 2005, in Van Orden v. Perry, however, the Court upheld the placement
of a six-foot Ten Commandments monument amidst 21 historical markers
and 17 other monuments in a 22-acre park surrounding the Texas State
Capital in Austin, against an Establishment Clause challenge. Chief
Justice William Rehnquist acknowledged the religious nature of the
Commandments, “but simply having religious content or promoting a
message consistent with religious doctrine does not run afoul of the
Establishment Clause.” Rehnquist distinguished the “passive” nature of
the display, which represented a part of the state’s political and
legal history, from the conspicuous posting of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, at issue in Stone, since they “confronted” students.

The Court’s ruling in Van Orden, then, suggested a strategy to states
wishing to permit postings of the Ten Commandments in public schools:
Place the Commandments within a display that includes other historical,
legal and cultural documents and milestones, and avoid the conspicuous
blowup of the posting that doomed the Kentucky law. This is precisely
what the states of South Dakota and North Dakota have done in enacting
statutes permitting the “passive” display of the Commandments. The
South Dakota law, for example, provides that the Commandments “shall
be” presented in the same “manner and appearance generally as other
objects and documents displayed,” and cannot be “presented or displayed
in any fashion that results in calling attention to it apart from the
other displayed objects and documents.”

Displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools received additional
support in the form of the Supreme Court’s decision in 2022, upholding
the right of a Washington high school football coach to pray on the
50-yard line after games, against an Establishment Clause challenge. In
Kennedy v. Bremerton, the Court, in a 6-3 opinion written by Justice
Neil Gorsuch, held that the coach’s prayers were a private expression
of his faith and not government endorsement of religion, even though
they, like postings of the Ten commandments, were offered at a state
sanctioned event, held on state property, funded by state taxpayers.

The Court’s ruling in Kennedy sounded the death knell of the Lemon Test
and its requirement that laws have a secular purpose. The Supreme
Court’s evolving Establishment Clause jurisprudence has significantly
lowered the wall between church and state and suggests that the North
and South Dakota statutes permitting display of the Ten Commandments in
public schools, like those across America, will be sustained, if they
face legal challenges.

[Mike Colangelo]

Post by Akidasar

Post by Mike Colangelo
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]
[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]
On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch, the narcissist, aka
Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing

Post by AlleyCat
Rudy's

your intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior.

Post by AlleyCat
=====
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:37:25 -0700, Mike Colangelo says...

Post by AlleyCat
That's racist, liberal.

It's not. He's accusing Trump of racism, and the accusation is warranted.

I know,

Good.

https://thinkwy.org/columns/is-posting-ten-commandments-in-schools-constitutional/
Posting the Ten Commandments

is going to fail, spammy, you lying little nutless cocksucker.

[pothead]

Post by AlleyCat
On Wed, 22 May 2024 11:59:46 -0500, super70s says...

Word is he's considering it but he's too stingy to invest in a new
separate bathroom at his --->"White"<--- (and don't you forget it) House.

That's racist, liberal.
Your speech had racial overtones to it. Are you racist? I just want to ask you.
I am not. I don't have a racist bone on my body. I want a strong border. I don't want illegal immigrants
pouring into this country. That doesn't make me racist. It means I love this country.
=====
WHO is more racist... Biden or Trump or liberals. If you can find us more examples of racism BY Trump, than
Biden and other Democrats, I'll stop calling you toddler.
1. "A few years ago, this guy (Barack Obama) would have been gettin' us coffee." - racist white supremacist
Bill Clinton(D) to racist white supremacist Sen. Ted Kennedy(D)
2. "Americans can't distinguish "between a South Kore
an and someone from Beijing." - Joe Biden
3. The only reason you are endorsing him is because he's black. Lets just be clear. - Former President and
racist white supremacist Bill Clinton(D)
4. Joe Biden called Black Children "Roaches" to Describe those Who Felt His Hairy Legs
5. I mean, you got the first mainstream African American [Barack Obama] who is articulate and bright and
clean and a nice looking guy. - Sen. Joseph Biden(D)
6. Praised Democrat Segregationist Sen. John Stennis(D) as "Man of Character"
7. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada described in private then Sen. Barack Obama as light skinned
and with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.
8. "Segregation Is Good for Black People" - Joe Biden
9. I'll have those Niggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years. Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air
Force One according Ronald Kessler's Book, Inside The White House
10. "(The) Democrat Party Needs More People Like Governor George Wallace." - Joe Biden
11. These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got
something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do
something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough
to make a difference. For if we don't move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there'll be
no way of stopping them, well lose the filibuster and there'll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of
wild legislation. It'll be Reconstruction all over again. Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson (D) - Texas, 1957
12. Biden Gave Speech About What's "Good for the Negro"
13. You'd find these potentates from down in Africa, you know, rather than eating each other, they'd just
come up and get a good square meal in Geneva. Fritz Hollings (D, S.C.)
14. "... if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black..." - Joe
Biden
15. Mahatma Gandhi ran a gas station down in Saint Louis. - Senator Hillary Clinton
16. I think one man is just as good as another so long as he's not a nigger or a Chinaman. Uncle Will says
that the Lord made a White man from dust, a nigger from mud, then He threw up what was left and it came down
a Chinaman. He does hate Chinese and Japs. So do I. It is race prejudice, I guess. But I am strongly of the
opinion Negroes ought to be in Africa, Yellow men in Asia and White men in Europe and America. - Harry Truman
17. "If my opponent wins, they're going to put y'all back in chains." - Joe Biden
18. On Clarence Thomas - A handkerchief-head, chicken-and-biscuit-eating Uncle Tom. - Spike Lee
19. "Unless we do something about this, my children are going to grow up in a jungle." - Joe Biden
20. There are white Niggers. I've seen a lot of white Niggers in my time. - Former Klansman and US Senator
Robert Byrd(D), a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the conscience of the Senate in March of 2001
21. "I do not buy the concept, popular in the '60s, which said, "We have suppressed the black man for 300
years." - Joe Biden
22. I am a former kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan in Raleigh County and the adjoining counties of the state....
The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia.... It is
necessary that the order be promoted immediately and in every state of the Union. Will you please inform me
as to the possibilities of rebuilding the Klan in the Realm of W. Va .... I hope that you will find it
convenient to answer my letter in regards to future possibilities. - Former Klansman and current US Senator
Robert Byrd, a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the conscience of the Senate, in a letter written
in 1946, after he quit the KKK.
23. "I mean, you got the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean." - Joe
Biden
24. Blacks and Hispanics are too busy eating watermelons and tacos to learn how to read and write. - Mike
Wallace, CBS News. Source: Newsmax
25. "We (Delawareans) were on the South's side in the Civil War." - Joe Biden
26. Republicans bring out Colin Powell and J.C. Watts because they have no program, no policy. They have no
love and no joy. They'd rather take pictures with black children than feed them. Donna Brazile, Al Gores
Campaign
Manager for the 2000 election
27. Somehow left wingnuts naturally assume that if a person has a bit of color in their face, and that color
is black, then the people they're talking to must talk, walk and act Black. Affecting a black accent to
recount
San Francisco mayor Willie Brown asking, Who is this Emily List? She's supportin' all these people. She's
supportin' Sen. Dianne Feinstein. She's supported Sen. Barbara Boxer... She supported everybody. Why wont she
support me? - Hillary Clinton (D,NY.)
28. There's some people who've gone over the state and said, Well, George Wallace has talked too strong about
segregation. Now let me ask you this: how in the name of common sense can you be too strong about it? You're
either for it or you're against it. There's not any middle ground as I know of. Democrat Alabama Governor
George Wallace (1959)
29. He's married to a white woman. He wants to be white. He wants a colorless society. He has no ethnic
pride. He doesn't want to be black. California State Senator Diane Watson's on Ward Connerly's interracial
marriage
30. Is you their black-haired answer-mammy who be smart? Does they like how you shine their shoes,
Condoleezza? Or the way you wash and park the whiteys cars? - Left-wing radio host Neil Rogers
31. Leftist Hate Group, Antifa, Calls Black Cop Nigger
32. Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to
see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the
wilds. Former Klansman and current US Senator Robert Byrd, a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the
conscience of the Senate, in a letter written in 1944, after he quit the KKK.
33. The white man is our mortal enemy, and we cannot accept him. I will fight to see that vicious beast go
down into the lake of fire prepared for him from the beginning, that he never rise again to give any innocent
black man, woman or child the hell that he has delighted in pouring on us for 400 years. - Louis Farrakhan
who campaigned for congresswoman Cynthia McKinney in 2002, City College audience in New York
34. I want to go up to the closest white person and say: You cant understand this, its a black thing and then
slap him, just for my mental health. - Charles Barron, a New York city councilman at a reparations rally,
2002
35. Some junior high nigger kicked Steve's ass while he was trying to help his brothers out; junior high or
sophomore in high school. Whatever it was, Steve had the nigger down. However it was, it was Steve's fault.
He had the nigger down, he let him up. The nigger blindsided him. Roger Clinton, the Presidents brother on
audiotape
36. The Medicaid system must have been developed by a white male slave owner. It pays for you to be pregnant
and have a baby, but it wont pay for much family planning. - Jocelyn Elders
37. These laws [segregation] are still constitutional and I promise you that until they are removed from the
ordinance books of Birmingham and the statute books of Alabama, they will be enforced in Birmingham to the
utmost of my ability and by all lawful means. - Democrat Bull Connor (1957), Commissioner of Public Safety
for Birmingham, Alabama
38. The Medicaid system must have been developed by a white male slave owner. It pays for you to be pregnant
and have a baby, but it wont pay for much family planning. - Jocelyn Elders
39. Reparations are a really good way for white people to admit they're wrong. - Zack Webb, University Of
Kentucky NAACP
40. There's no great, white bigot; there's just about 200 million little white bigots out there. - USA Today
columnist Julienne Malveaux
41. White folks was in caves while we was building empires... We taught philosophy and astrology and
mathematics before Socrates and them Greek HOMOS ever got around to it. - Rev. Al Sharpton in a 1994 speech
at Kean College, NJ, cited in Democrats Do the Dumbest Things
42. The white race is the cancer of human history. - Susan Sontag
43. The old white boys got taken fair and square. - San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown after winning an
election
44. Civil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of white men and do not apply to them. - Mary
Frances Berry, Chairwoman, US Commission on Civil Rights
45. You fucking Jew bastard. - Hillary Clinton to political operative Paul Fray. This was revealed in State
of a Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton and has been verified by Paul Fray and
three witnesses.
46. We have lost to the white racist press and to the racist reactionary Jewish misleaders. - Former Rep. Gus
Savage (D-Illinois) after his defeat 1992
47. The Jews don't like Farrakhan, so they call me Hitler. Well, that's a good name. Hitler was a very great
man. He rose Germany up from the ashes. Louis Farrakhan (1984) who campaigned for congresswoman Cynthia
McKinney in 2002
48. On New York - "Kiketown" - Harry Truman
49. Now that nation called Israel, never has had any peace in forty years and she will never have any peace
because there can never be any peace structured on injustice, thievery, lying and deceit and using the name
of God to shield your dirty religion under his holy and righteous name. - Louis Farrakhan who campaigned for
congresswoman Cynthia McKinney in 2002, 1984
50. Hymies. Hymietown. - Jesse Jackson's description of New York City while on the 1984 presidential campaign
trail.
51. Jews... that's J-E-W-S. - Democratic state representative Bill McKinney on why his daughter Cynthia lost
in 2002
52. (I) will not let the white boys win in this election. - Donna Brazile, Al Gores Campaign Manager on the
2000 election

Most liberals ARE racists.
It comes with the turf so to speak.