Discussion:
Matt Gaetz: SCOTUS Decision Not to Hear Texas Election Lawsuit Is Blow to The Power of State Legislatures
Add Reply
AlleyCat
2020-12-21 04:03:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Matt Gaetz: SCOTUS Decision Not to Hear Texas Election Lawsuit Is Blow to The
Power of State Legislatures

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., said that the Supreme Court's decision not to hear a
Trump-backed Texas case that would overturn election results in four states,
amounted to an "erosion of power" of state legislatures.

"The true casualty of the court's decision is an erosion of power of state
legislatures to make election law. The principal challenge by Texas was that
there were changes that were made not by the state legislatures that instead
were made by other officials invested in that power."

"All eyes are on January 6. I suspect there will be a little bit of debate and
discourse." On Jan. 6, Congress will meet to certify the results of the
Electoral College vote, which will occur Monday.

"This is not a case of the Trump campaign failing to produce evidence. It's a
failure of the court to exercise jurisdiction proficiently," the Florida
Republican continued.

Texas asked the court to take on a case that would have essentially nullified
the presidential election results in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and
Wisconsin.

"The State of Texas's motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied
for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution," the Supreme
Court's order reads. "Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable
interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other
pending motions are dismissed as moot."

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas said they would have heard the case
-- without granting other relief, like issuing an injunction on electoral
proceedings. They added that they expressed "no view on any other issue."

Texas on Friday morning had filed a "reply brief" with the Supreme Court,
asking the tribunal to hear its lawsuit.

The "briefing stage" of Supreme Court litigation consists of the first party,
in this instance, Texas, asking the court to hear the case. Then opposition
briefs are filed by those on the other side of the case. The first party is
allowed to file a "reply brief," which Texas did Friday morning.

"Defendant States do not seriously address grave issues that Texas raises,
choosing to hide behind other court venues and decisions in which Texas could
not participate and to mis-characterize both the relief that Texas seeks and
the justification for that relief," the Texas brief says of the opposition
briefs filed by Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Georgia Thursday.

Texas continues: "An injunction should issue because Defendant States have not-
and cannot-defend their actions."

Several top Texas lawmakers, including Gov. Greg Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick
and House Speaker Dennis Bonnen - have backed the efforts spearheaded by Texas
Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton. One hundred-six Republicans in Congress
filed an amicus brief supporting the Texas lawsuit.

The justices could have agreed to hear the case and promptly dismissed it or
ruled in favor of Texas, or they could have requested oral arguments before
ruling. They declined to hear it outright.

The crux of the Texas case was the argument that the four states it is suing --
all four of which swung for President-elect Joe Biden -- unconstitutionally
changed election statutes in their judiciaries or executive branches, when only
the legislature is allowed to make election law. The reply brief Friday says
the four states failed to adequately dispute their point that this makes their
entire elections invalid.

"Defendant States do not credibly dispute either that they changed election
statutes via non-legislative means or that the Electors Clause preempts such
changes," the Texas brief says. "Accordingly, Texas is likely to prevail on the
merits."

The four states in their reply briefs, meanwhile, did say that any changes that
were made to their elections were consistent with laws approved by their
legislatures and criticized Texas for undermining the American election
process.

Seventeen red states weighed in favor of Texas while over 20 states and
territories backed Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and Georgia. And 106
Republican House members backed the Texas suit.

=====

Liberalism Really IS a Disease
Bill Flett
2020-12-21 04:55:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by AlleyCat
Matt Gaetz: SCOTUS Decision Not to Hear Texas Election Lawsuit Is Blow to The
Power of State Legislatures
Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., said that the Supreme Court's decision not to hear a
Trump-backed Texas case that would overturn election results in four states,
amounted to an "erosion of power" of state legislatures.
Bullshit. No state legislature lost any power to determine the manner of
choosing the state's electors.
B1ackwater
2020-12-21 14:46:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Bill Flett
Post by AlleyCat
Matt Gaetz: SCOTUS Decision Not to Hear Texas Election Lawsuit Is Blow
to The Power of State Legislatures
Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., said that the Supreme Court's decision not to
hear a Trump-backed Texas case that would overturn election results in
four states, amounted to an "erosion of power" of state legislatures.
Bullshit. No state legislature lost any power to determine the manner
of choosing the state's electors.
Gaetz wanted to over turn laws banning pedophila to protect his daddy who
raped him daily.


Gaetz's asshole will be public property in prison.
B1ackwater
2021-01-03 01:37:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Bill Flett
Post by AlleyCat
Matt Gaetz: SCOTUS Decision Not to Hear Texas Election Lawsuit Is Blow
to The Power of State Legislatures
Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., said that the Supreme Court's decision not to
hear a Trump-backed Texas case that would overturn election results in
four states, amounted to an "erosion of power" of state legislatures.
Bullshit. No state legislature lost any power to determine the manner
of choosing the state's electors.
Gaetz wanted to over turn laws banning pedophila to protect his daddy who
raped him daily.


Gaetz's asshole will be public property in prison.
B1ackwater
2021-01-13 22:48:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Bill Flett
Post by AlleyCat
Matt Gaetz: SCOTUS Decision Not to Hear Texas Election Lawsuit Is Blow
to The Power of State Legislatures
Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., said that the Supreme Court's decision not to
hear a Trump-backed Texas case that would overturn election results in
four states, amounted to an "erosion of power" of state legislatures.
Bullshit. No state legislature lost any power to determine the manner
of choosing the state's electors.
Gaetz wanted to over turn laws banning pedophila to protect his daddy who
raped him daily.


Gaetz's asshole will be public property in prison.

Loading...