Discussion:
Trump Pockets $100 Million From Russia
(too old to reply)
Honey Wagon
2017-05-13 22:02:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 10:59:54 AM UTC-4, #BeamMeUpScotty
Trump Hid More Than $100 Million in Russian Income Since 2008
Miami Herald - 12 hours ago
--
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article1502763
87.html
We loaned Russia money when their communism collapsed... didn't
someone make money off those loans?
Yes, the Cheeto did.
And now, he will be impeached for it.
No. You mean he'll be impeached for lying about it.
Lol! You're so full of shit. You libtards keep grabbing for the small
slippery end of every media turd, and all you get are two stinky hands.

The man's business was real estate, unlike drug dealing, uranium dealing,
and influence peddling such as the Clintons and Obama engaged in.

"Outside of the exceptions, the letter states, “your tax returns do not
reflect . . . any income of any type from Russian sources . . . any debt
owed by you or TTO to Russian lenders or any interest paid by you to or
TTO by Russian lenders . . . any equity investments by Russian persons or
entities in entities controlled by you or TTO or . . . any equity of debt
investments by you or TTO in Russian entities.”
AlleyCat
2017-05-13 22:08:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Trump Hid More Than $100 Million in Russian Income Since 2008
Miami Herald - 12 hours ago
-- http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article150276387.html
Please tell us, you fucking idiots, how proceeds from a Miss Universe
Pageant IN MOSCOW, and selling a PRIVATE Russian citizen, connects to any
so-called "collusion" in the 2016 Presidential election.

Trump made money off of EVERY venue for his pageant... do we EVER talk
about any of THOSE countries being "colluded' with?

Connect the dots, you fucktards. Quit taking DEMOCRAT liberal newspapers'
words for everything, that they twist around to make it only SEEM like
something's wrong.

Trump was a PRIVATE citizen in 2008. How many Presidents through the ages
have made a lot of money before being President? Many, but now that's a
crime? How so?

*****

Trump's Lawyers Say His Tax Returns For Last Decade Reflect No Russia Ties

A copy of a letter to President Trump from the law firm of Morgan, Lewis &
Bockius LLP says that a review of his last 10 years of tax returns do not
reflect "any income of any type from Russian sources," with some
exceptions.

Selling property to a billionaire who HAPPENS to be a Russian citizen,
does NOT qualify as a "Russian source".

WASHINGTON - Lawyers for President Trump said Friday that a review of his
last 10 years of tax returns did not reflect "any income of any type from
Russian sources," but the letter included exceptions related to previously
cited income generated from a beauty pageant and sale of a Florida estate.

Woo hooooooo... THAT'S got Putin's fingerprints ALL over it!!

The letter represented the latest attempt by the president to tamp down
concerns about any Russian ties amid an ongoing investigation of his
campaign's associates and Russia's meddling in the 2016 election.

The attorneys did not release copies of Trump's tax returns, so The
Associated Press cannot independently verify their conclusions. Their
review also notably takes into account only Trump's returns from the past
10 years, leaving open questions about whether there were financial
dealings with Russia (RUSSIA or some company that HAPPENS to be Russian?)
in earlier years.

What about Hillary Clinton's dealings with the RUSSIAN government itself?
SOMEONE brokered a deal with them on Uranium One ANNNNNND voted for the
deal to go through.

In a letter released to the AP and dated March 8, the attorneys said
Trump's last 10 years of tax returns don't reflect equity investments by
Russians in entities controlled by Trump or debt owed by Trump to Russian
lenders. Under U.S. tax law, not all financial ties would be required to
be reported on a personal tax return.

The letter said that the returns do reflect some income from the 2013 Miss
Universe pageant that was held in Moscow and a property sold to a Russian
billionaire in 2008 for $95 million.

Hmmm... I smell collusion with PUTIN! Da!

The White House said Trump asked his lawyers for the letter to outline
information on any ties Trump might have to Russia. The letter was then
provided to Sen. Lindsey Graham. Graham leads one of the congressional
committees investigating Russia's interference in last year's election.

The letter came amid an active FBI probe into the Trump 2016 campaign's
possible ties to Russia's election meddling and days after Trump's
stunning firing of FBI Director James Comey.

"I have no investments in Russia, none whatsoever," Trump said Thursday in
an interview with NBC News. "I don't have property in Russia. A lot of
people thought I owned office buildings in Moscow. I don't have property
in Russia."

YOU prove him wrong. Quit taking the opinions of left wing butt-hurt
newspapers.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Mexicans.
Mexicans are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, mainly
because they're mostly Catholic... oh, and they HATE you. Am I leaving
anything else out that you just LOVE about them?

Riiiiight... they're potential Democrap voters.

Loading Image...

Loading Image...
PIBB
2017-05-13 22:49:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
Please tell us, you fucking idiots, how proceeds from a Miss
Universe Pageant IN MOSCOW, and selling a PRIVATE Russian
citizen, connects to any so-called "collusion" in the 2016
Presidential election.
Trump made money off of EVERY venue for his pageant... do we
EVER talk about any of THOSE countries being "colluded' with?
Connect the dots, you fucktards. Quit taking DEMOCRAT liberal
newspapers' words for everything, that they twist around to make
it only SEEM like something's wrong.
Trump was a PRIVATE citizen in 2008. How many Presidents through
the ages have made a lot of money before being President? Many,
but now that's a crime? How so?
Methinks you and Trump doth protest too much.

If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any
investigation?

No true American wants the Russians interfering with our elections.

Give the FBI the extra resources Comey asked for and let them get on
with it for as long as it takes.
M.I.Wakefield
2017-05-13 23:27:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
Trump was a PRIVATE citizen in 2008. How many Presidents through the
ages have made a lot of money before being President? Many, but now
that's a crime? How so?
It's a crime if the money was proceeds of crime, and Trump knew, or should
have known, it was. It's a crime if Trump was violating sanctions, and
knew, or should have known.
Post by PIBB
Methinks you and Trump doth protest too much.
Word.
Post by PIBB
If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any investigation?
Because if they're digging into his finances, they could discover
inconvenient things in his past? Like that hotel project in Baku where his
"notoriously corrupt" partner has a history of being funded by the Iranian
Revolutionary Guards.
Post by PIBB
No true American wants the Russians interfering with our elections.
Unless it helps them win, in the Republican's case.
Post by PIBB
Give the FBI the extra resources Comey asked for and let them get on with
it for as long as it takes.
Keep turning over rocks until the scurrying stops.
PIBB
2017-05-14 09:29:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
Trump was a PRIVATE citizen in 2008. How many Presidents
through the ages have made a lot of money before being
President? Many, but now that's a crime? How so?
It's a crime if the money was proceeds of crime, and Trump knew,
or should have known, it was. It's a crime if Trump was
violating sanctions, and knew, or should have known.
Post by PIBB
Methinks you and Trump doth protest too much.
Word.
Post by PIBB
If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any
investigation?
Because if they're digging into his finances, they could
discover inconvenient things in his past? Like that hotel
project in Baku where his "notoriously corrupt" partner has a
history of being funded by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards.
How very true. Trump Tower Baku stinks. The New Yorker had a
good in-depth article and sweet innocent Ivanka seem to be
involved more than a litle. The whole family is crooked.

www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/13/donald-trumps-worst-deal
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by PIBB
No true American wants the Russians interfering with our
elections.
Unless it helps them win, in the Republican's case.
Post by PIBB
Give the FBI the extra resources Comey asked for and let them
get on with it for as long as it takes.
Keep turning over rocks until the scurrying stops.
NoBody
2017-05-14 13:45:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by AlleyCat
Trump was a PRIVATE citizen in 2008. How many Presidents through the
ages have made a lot of money before being President? Many, but now
that's a crime? How so?
It's a crime if the money was proceeds of crime, and Trump knew, or should
have known, it was. It's a crime if Trump was violating sanctions, and
knew, or should have known.
Present your credible evidence and place it right here. Take as much
space as you need. Right now, it seems you're living out a fantasy.
PIBB
2017-05-14 18:14:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 19:27:27 -0400, "M.I.Wakefield"
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by AlleyCat
Trump was a PRIVATE citizen in 2008. How many Presidents
through the ages have made a lot of money before being
President? Many, but now that's a crime? How so?
It's a crime if the money was proceeds of crime, and Trump knew,
or should have known, it was. It's a crime if Trump was
violating sanctions, and knew, or should have known.
Present your credible evidence and place it right here. Take as
much space as you need. Right now, it seems you're living out a
fantasy.
See the interview Trump gave Esquire magazine where he talks about
how members of the mob and then later he goes and does funny business
with them while later claiming he didn't know their background.

Also take a look at the strange way he got a gambling license for the
Taj Mahal despite there being enough in his background to disqualify
him.

Google is your friend if you want to research further.
NoBody
2017-05-15 10:27:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by PIBB
On Sat, 13 May 2017 19:27:27 -0400, "M.I.Wakefield"
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by AlleyCat
Trump was a PRIVATE citizen in 2008. How many Presidents
through the ages have made a lot of money before being
President? Many, but now that's a crime? How so?
It's a crime if the money was proceeds of crime, and Trump knew,
or should have known, it was. It's a crime if Trump was
violating sanctions, and knew, or should have known.
Present your credible evidence and place it right here. Take as
much space as you need. Right now, it seems you're living out a
fantasy.
See the interview Trump gave Esquire magazine where he talks about
how members of the mob and then later he goes and does funny business
with them while later claiming he didn't know their background.
Also take a look at the strange way he got a gambling license for the
Taj Mahal despite there being enough in his background to disqualify
him.
Google is your friend if you want to research further.
Translation: You refuse to support your claim and expect me to do your
homework for you. I don't do the homework of others. BTW, what does
your "evidence" have to do with Russia, as was the original
discussion.
AlleyCat
2017-05-13 23:59:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 May 2017 23:49:15 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any
investigation?
HOW is he doing that... by firing Comey?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You think the investigation is dead, now that Comey's gone? LOL That's so
fucking loony, no wonder liberalism is considered a disease now... it rots
and tricks the brain into believing EVERYTHING the lying liberal media
says, is true.

The FBI will continue to investigate RUSSIA'S involvement into the
election. It has been said by the FBI and the ex-head of the DIA that
Trump is NOT included into the hair-brained liberal wet-dream, of
collusion.
Post by PIBB
No true American wants the Russians interfering with our elections.
Hell no... Trump WANTS the investigation to bear fruit (he has SAID so),
but HE knows he's not "guilty" of anything... the MEDIA keeps saying that
he is, and you just keep on believing it. Why? Because you WANT to believe
it so badly... you're so fucking butt-hurt about that fat-ass crooked
criminal bitch, Hillary, losing.
Post by PIBB
Give the FBI the extra resources Comey asked for and let them get on
with it for as long as it takes.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Where in the fuck did you hear that? Do you watch or listen to ANYTHING
other than the left-winger news outlets?

Comey didn't ask Trump for anything, you dumbass. That's ANOTHER liberal
myth. The acting director of the FBI said that that couldn't have
happened, A) because we HAVE enough money and B) "they" can't go to the
President and get money... CONGRESS gives them their money.

McCabe SAID as much.

Direct quote from testimony: "If you are referring to the Russia
investigation... I believe we have the adequate resources to do it and I
know that we have resourced that investigation adequately," acting FBI
director Andrew McCabe told lawmakers, adding that he was unaware of any
request by the agency for additional resources.

While being questioned by some old hag with over-sized dentures about
Comey requesting more resources for the Russian investigation:

"As you know ma'am when we need resources we make those requests here
(Congress). So, I'm not aware of that request and it's not consistent with
my understanding of how we request additional resources. That said, we
don't typically request resources for an individual case and as
I mentioned I strongly believe that the Russia investigation is adequately
resourced."

If you want to SEE him say these things, it's not hard to find. But, being
the lazy liberal you are, you won't, because you're AFRAID of the truth.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Alan Baker
2017-05-14 00:15:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 May 2017 23:49:15 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any
investigation?
HOW is he doing that... by firing Comey?
That, and hiding his tax returns.
Post by AlleyCat
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You think the investigation is dead, now that Comey's gone? LOL That's so
fucking loony, no wonder liberalism is considered a disease now... it rots
and tricks the brain into believing EVERYTHING the lying liberal media
says, is true.
The FBI will continue to investigate RUSSIA'S involvement into the
election. It has been said by the FBI and the ex-head of the DIA that
Trump is NOT included into the hair-brained liberal wet-dream, of
collusion.
No. That has not been said.

What WAS said was by Clapper who said he didn't know of anything, but
that also he would in the normal course of things necessarily be informed.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
No true American wants the Russians interfering with our elections.
Hell no... Trump WANTS the investigation to bear fruit (he has SAID so),
but HE knows he's not "guilty" of anything... the MEDIA keeps saying that
he is, and you just keep on believing it. Why? Because you WANT to believe
it so badly... you're so fucking butt-hurt about that fat-ass crooked
criminal bitch, Hillary, losing.
Which is why he gave it as one of the reasons for firing Comey...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
Give the FBI the extra resources Comey asked for and let them get on
with it for as long as it takes.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Where in the fuck did you hear that? Do you watch or listen to ANYTHING
other than the left-winger news outlets?
Numerous sources reported it.
Post by AlleyCat
Comey didn't ask Trump for anything, you dumbass. That's ANOTHER liberal
myth. The acting director of the FBI said that that couldn't have
happened, A) because we HAVE enough money and B) "they" can't go to the
President and get money... CONGRESS gives them their money.
McCabe SAID as much.
Direct quote from testimony: "If you are referring to the Russia
investigation... I believe we have the adequate resources to do it and I
know that we have resourced that investigation adequately," acting FBI
director Andrew McCabe told lawmakers, adding that he was unaware of any
request by the agency for additional resources.
While being questioned by some old hag with over-sized dentures about
"As you know ma'am when we need resources we make those requests here
(Congress). So, I'm not aware of that request and it's not consistent with
my understanding of how we request additional resources. That said, we
don't typically request resources for an individual case and as
I mentioned I strongly believe that the Russia investigation is adequately
resourced."
Bet the specific question you're quoting the answer to was from a
Republican and phrased to get just such an answer...
Post by AlleyCat
If you want to SEE him say these things, it's not hard to find. But, being
the lazy liberal you are, you won't, because you're AFRAID of the truth.
PIBB
2017-05-14 09:42:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 May 2017 23:49:15 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any
investigation?
HOW is he doing that... by firing Comey?
That, and hiding his tax returns.
Post by AlleyCat
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You think the investigation is dead, now that Comey's gone? LOL
That's so fucking loony, no wonder liberalism is considered a
disease now... it rots and tricks the brain into believing
EVERYTHING the lying liberal media says, is true.
The FBI will continue to investigate RUSSIA'S involvement into
the election. It has been said by the FBI and the ex-head of
the DIA that Trump is NOT included into the hair-brained
liberal wet-dream, of collusion.
No. That has not been said.
What WAS said was by Clapper who said he didn't know of
anything, but that also he would in the normal course of things
necessarily be informed.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
No true American wants the Russians interfering with our
elections.
Hell no... Trump WANTS the investigation to bear fruit (he has
SAID so), but HE knows he's not "guilty" of anything... the
MEDIA keeps saying that he is, and you just keep on believing
it. Why? Because you WANT to believe it so badly... you're so
fucking butt-hurt about that fat-ass crooked criminal bitch,
Hillary, losing.
Which is why he gave it as one of the reasons for firing
Comey...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
Give the FBI the extra resources Comey asked for and let them
get on with it for as long as it takes.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
AHAHAHA
Where in the fuck did you hear that? Do you watch or listen to
ANYTHING other than the left-winger news outlets?
Numerous sources reported it.
Post by AlleyCat
Comey didn't ask Trump for anything, you dumbass. That's
ANOTHER liberal myth. The acting director of the FBI said that
that couldn't have happened, A) because we HAVE enough money
and B) "they" can't go to the President and get money...
CONGRESS gives them their money.
McCabe SAID as much.
Direct quote from testimony: "If you are referring to the
Russia investigation... I believe we have the adequate
resources to do it and I know that we have resourced that
investigation adequately," acting FBI director Andrew McCabe
told lawmakers, adding that he was unaware of any request by
the agency for additional resources.
While being questioned by some old hag with over-sized dentures
about Comey requesting more resources for the Russian
"As you know ma'am when we need resources we make those
requests here (Congress). So, I'm not aware of that request and
it's not consistent with my understanding of how we request
additional resources. That said, we don't typically request
resources for an individual case and as I mentioned I strongly
believe that the Russia investigation is adequately
resourced."
Post by Alan Baker
Bet the specific question you're quoting the answer to was from
a Republican and phrased to get just such an answer...
Reuters reports:

"A congressional source with knowledge of the matter said Comey
told lawmakers within the past few days he had asked the
Justice Department to make additional resources available -
mainly more staffing - for the Russia probe.

Comey informed lawmakers of that request after the Senate
Intelligence Committee, conducting its own investigation, had
asked the FBI to speed up its Russia inquiry, the source
said."
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
If you want to SEE him say these things, it's not hard to find.
But, being the lazy liberal you are, you won't, because you're
AFRAID of the truth.
NoBody
2017-05-14 13:48:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 May 2017 23:49:15 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any
investigation?
HOW is he doing that... by firing Comey?
That, and hiding his tax returns.
Post by AlleyCat
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You think the investigation is dead, now that Comey's gone? LOL
That's so fucking loony, no wonder liberalism is considered a
disease now... it rots and tricks the brain into believing
EVERYTHING the lying liberal media says, is true.
The FBI will continue to investigate RUSSIA'S involvement into
the election. It has been said by the FBI and the ex-head of
the DIA that Trump is NOT included into the hair-brained
liberal wet-dream, of collusion.
No. That has not been said.
What WAS said was by Clapper who said he didn't know of
anything, but that also he would in the normal course of things
necessarily be informed.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
No true American wants the Russians interfering with our
elections.
Hell no... Trump WANTS the investigation to bear fruit (he has
SAID so), but HE knows he's not "guilty" of anything... the
MEDIA keeps saying that he is, and you just keep on believing
it. Why? Because you WANT to believe it so badly... you're so
fucking butt-hurt about that fat-ass crooked criminal bitch,
Hillary, losing.
Which is why he gave it as one of the reasons for firing
Comey...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
Give the FBI the extra resources Comey asked for and let them
get on with it for as long as it takes.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
AHAHAHA
Where in the fuck did you hear that? Do you watch or listen to
ANYTHING other than the left-winger news outlets?
Numerous sources reported it.
Post by AlleyCat
Comey didn't ask Trump for anything, you dumbass. That's
ANOTHER liberal myth. The acting director of the FBI said that
that couldn't have happened, A) because we HAVE enough money
and B) "they" can't go to the President and get money...
CONGRESS gives them their money.
McCabe SAID as much.
Direct quote from testimony: "If you are referring to the
Russia investigation... I believe we have the adequate
resources to do it and I know that we have resourced that
investigation adequately," acting FBI director Andrew McCabe
told lawmakers, adding that he was unaware of any request by
the agency for additional resources.
While being questioned by some old hag with over-sized dentures
about Comey requesting more resources for the Russian
"As you know ma'am when we need resources we make those
requests here (Congress). So, I'm not aware of that request and
it's not consistent with my understanding of how we request
additional resources. That said, we don't typically request
resources for an individual case and as I mentioned I strongly
believe that the Russia investigation is adequately
resourced."
Post by Alan Baker
Bet the specific question you're quoting the answer to was from
a Republican and phrased to get just such an answer...
"A congressional source with knowledge of the matter said Comey
told lawmakers within the past few days he had asked the
Justice Department to make additional resources available -
mainly more staffing - for the Russia probe.
Another anonymous source...Fake News.
NoBody
2017-05-14 13:47:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 May 2017 23:49:15 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any
investigation?
HOW is he doing that... by firing Comey?
That, and hiding his tax returns.
Post by AlleyCat
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You think the investigation is dead, now that Comey's gone? LOL That's so
fucking loony, no wonder liberalism is considered a disease now... it rots
and tricks the brain into believing EVERYTHING the lying liberal media
says, is true.
The FBI will continue to investigate RUSSIA'S involvement into the
election. It has been said by the FBI and the ex-head of the DIA that
Trump is NOT included into the hair-brained liberal wet-dream, of
collusion.
No. That has not been said.
What WAS said was by Clapper who said he didn't know of anything, but
that also he would in the normal course of things necessarily be informed.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
No true American wants the Russians interfering with our elections.
Hell no... Trump WANTS the investigation to bear fruit (he has SAID so),
but HE knows he's not "guilty" of anything... the MEDIA keeps saying that
he is, and you just keep on believing it. Why? Because you WANT to believe
it so badly... you're so fucking butt-hurt about that fat-ass crooked
criminal bitch, Hillary, losing.
Which is why he gave it as one of the reasons for firing Comey...
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
Give the FBI the extra resources Comey asked for and let them get on
with it for as long as it takes.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Where in the fuck did you hear that? Do you watch or listen to ANYTHING
other than the left-winger news outlets?
Numerous sources reported it.
All anonymous sources. That equates to Fake News.
PIBB
2017-05-14 09:39:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sat, 13 May 2017 23:49:15 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any
investigation?
HOW is he doing that... by firing Comey?
That is what Trump himself said.
Post by AlleyCat
You think the investigation is dead, now that Comey's gone?
Trump has demonstrated what will happen to anyone at the FBI who
pushes to extend the investigation.
Post by AlleyCat
The FBI will continue to investigate RUSSIA'S involvement into
the election. It has been said by the FBI and the ex-head of the
DIA that Trump is NOT included into the hair-brained liberal
wet-dream, of collusion.
Trump is not currently the subject of an investigation but the way
things are going and as more facts about his business dealings
with Russians and about his associates are uncovered then it's
looking likely Trump will be investigated.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
No true American wants the Russians interfering with our
elections.
Hell no... Trump WANTS the investigation to bear fruit (he has
SAID so),
Trump lies about everything. It's a fact he does not want to be
investigated. It's also a fact that he does not want Russian
interference in his election to be investigated - in case the
election is declared void.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
Give the FBI the extra resources Comey asked for and let them
get on with it for as long as it takes.
Where in the fuck did you hear that?
Comey didn't ask Trump for anything, you dumbass.
Comey requested additional resources shortly before he was fired.

"Comey asked for more money, staffing for Russia investigation
days before firing" says ABC news headline and many others too.
Seems Fox News and Breitbart conveniently missed that news.
AlleyCat
2017-05-14 22:56:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 10:39:20 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any
investigation?
HOW is he doing that... by firing Comey?
That is what Trump himself said.
Trump, HIMSELF, said that he was thwarting the investigation by firing
Comey?

Quote it, please. Video will be best.

What fucking planet are you from? Be specific, because I'm thinking
Venus... where all the weak-upper-body liberals are from.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Alan Baker
2017-05-14 23:19:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 10:39:20 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
Post by PIBB
If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any
investigation?
HOW is he doing that... by firing Comey?
That is what Trump himself said.
Trump, HIMSELF, said that he was thwarting the investigation by firing
Comey?
Quote it, please. Video will be best.
"And in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself -- I said,
you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story.
It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they
should've won."

<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/11/president_trumps_full_interview_with_lester_holt.html>

That's the direct quote.

The video's there too: go one minute in to hear it right out of his mouth.
Post by AlleyCat
What fucking planet are you from? Be specific, because I'm thinking
Venus... where all the weak-upper-body liberals are from.
AlleyCat
2017-05-15 00:58:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:19:17 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
"And in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself -- I said,
you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story.
It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they
should've won."
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/11/president_trumps_full_interview_with_lester_holt.html>
That's the direct quote.
And Has ZERO , Null, Nothing To Do With THWARTING The Investigation of
Collusion With The Russians In Last Year's Election, Dumb Fuck

Read and watch it again. Before his "And in fact..." line, he said there
no GOOD time to do it...

"He had made a recommendation. But regardless of recommendation, I was
going to fire Comey, knowing there was no good time to do it."

...THEN he said, "And in fact...", meaning he thought there was no "good
time" to do "it" (fire Comey), as in NOW, when there is an investigation
going on.

This fixation you snowflakes have on this Russia/Trump collusion lie, is
sad and pathetic. If NBC doesn't infer what YOU seem to have, then there
IS nothing to infer, because Trump didn't IMPLY that he fired Comey to
"thwart" anything.

He SAID he thought it was a BAD time, but he did it anyway, knowing
snowflakes like you would piss and moan and screech, "HE FIRED COMEY TO
COVER-UP AND THWART THE INVESTIGATION INTO HIM!!"

HOW many times does Trump have to tell you idiots, that Comey told him
THREE times, HE wasn't under investigation?


If you're gonna lie, make it a GOOD lie, like:

"And in fact, when I (Trump) decided to just do it (fire Comey), I said to
myself -- I said, you know, this Russia thing (investigation) with Trump
and Russia, is a made-up story."

"It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they
(think they) should've won, so now I am going to do EVERYTHING in my power
to thwart this made up story and subsequent investigation, INCLUDING
firing anyone who stands in my way."

Gawd, you liberals are pathetically sad. Trump said NOTHING that would
indicate he fired Comey for that reason.

The article you QUOTE, doesn't even mention that THAT'S why he fired
Comey. If, after hearing the above quote, they thought and inferred (like
you did, stupidly, I might add) that he fired Comey BECAUSE of the
investigation, don't you think THEY (NBC) would have jumped on it right
away and whined (like you did), "This is why heee firrrred Comeeeeey."

Get a fucking life.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Siri Cruise
2017-05-15 01:26:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:19:17 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
"And in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself -- I said,
you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story.
It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they
should've won."
And Has ZERO , Null, Nothing To Do With THWARTING The Investigation of
Collusion With The Russians In Last Year's Election, Dumb Fuck
Anyway, Ingsoc would not last long. The problem doublethink and mutable facts is
that reality continues rolling along whether the Party acknowledges it or not.
Not only does the Party ignore reality, they have no mechanism in place to know
reality in case something disasterous to the Party is coming their way, like the
factory of telesecreen transistors has shutdown because the workers starved to
death after the harvest failure.

And here you are demonstrating your doublethink.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
AlleyCat
2017-05-15 01:37:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 18:26:54 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
And here you are demonstrating your doublethink.
Noooo... I'm disproving Alan Baker's doublethink. HE'S the one over-
thinking what Trump meant when he said what he said.

Put the bottle down... you have a long hard day of surfing the Internet
tomorrow.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
PIBB
2017-05-15 12:27:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:19:17 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
"And in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself --
I said, you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a
made-up story. It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost
an election that they should've won."
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/11/president_tru
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Alan Baker
mps_full_interview_with_lester_holt.html>
That's the direct quote.
And Has ZERO , Null, Nothing To Do With THWARTING The
Investigation of Collusion With The Russians In Last Year's
Election, Dumb Fuck
Read and watch it again. Before his "And in fact..." line, he
said there no GOOD time to do it...
"He had made a recommendation. But regardless of recommendation,
I was going to fire Comey, knowing there was no good time to do
it."
...THEN he said, "And in fact...", meaning he thought there was
no "good time" to do "it" (fire Comey), as in NOW, when there is
an investigation going on.
This fixation you snowflakes have on this Russia/Trump collusion
lie, is sad and pathetic. If NBC doesn't infer what YOU seem to
have, then there IS nothing to infer, because Trump didn't IMPLY
that he fired Comey to "thwart" anything.
He SAID he thought it was a BAD time, but he did it anyway,
knowing snowflakes like you would piss and moan and screech, "HE
FIRED COMEY TO COVER-UP AND THWART THE INVESTIGATION INTO HIM!!"
HOW many times does Trump have to tell you idiots, that Comey
told him THREE times, HE wasn't under investigation?
"And in fact, when I (Trump) decided to just do it (fire Comey),
I said to myself -- I said, you know, this Russia thing
(investigation) with Trump and Russia, is a made-up story."
"It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election
that they (think they) should've won, so now I am going to do
EVERYTHING in my power to thwart this made up story and
subsequent investigation, INCLUDING firing anyone who stands in
my way."
Gawd, you liberals are pathetically sad. Trump said NOTHING that
would indicate he fired Comey for that reason.
The article you QUOTE, doesn't even mention that THAT'S why he
fired Comey. If, after hearing the above quote, they thought and
inferred (like you did, stupidly, I might add) that he fired
Comey BECAUSE of the investigation, don't you think THEY (NBC)
would have jumped on it right away and whined (like you did),
"This is why heee firrrred Comeeeeey."
Get a fucking life.
Are you on drugs?
m***@gmail.com
2017-05-15 18:26:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:19:17 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
"And in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself -- I said,
you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story.
It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they
should've won."
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/11/president_trumps_full_interview_with_lester_holt.html>
That's the direct quote.
And Has ZERO , Null, Nothing To Do With THWARTING The Investigation of
Collusion With The Russians In Last Year's Election, Dumb Fuck
Read and watch it again. Before his "And in fact..." line, he said there
no GOOD time to do it...
"He had made a recommendation. But regardless of recommendation, I was
going to fire Comey, knowing there was no good time to do it."
...THEN he said, "And in fact...", meaning he thought there was no "good
time" to do "it" (fire Comey), as in NOW, when there is an investigation
going on.
This fixation you snowflakes have on this Russia/Trump collusion lie, is
sad and pathetic. If NBC doesn't infer what YOU seem to have, then there
IS nothing to infer, because Trump didn't IMPLY that he fired Comey to
"thwart" anything.
He SAID he thought it was a BAD time, but he did it anyway, knowing
snowflakes like you would piss and moan and screech, "HE FIRED COMEY TO
COVER-UP AND THWART THE INVESTIGATION INTO HIM!!"
HOW many times does Trump have to tell you idiots, that Comey told him
THREE times, HE wasn't under investigation?
"And in fact, when I (Trump) decided to just do it (fire Comey), I said to
myself -- I said, you know, this Russia thing (investigation) with Trump
and Russia, is a made-up story."
"It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they
(think they) should've won, so now I am going to do EVERYTHING in my power
to thwart this made up story and subsequent investigation, INCLUDING
firing anyone who stands in my way."
Gawd, you liberals are pathetically sad. Trump said NOTHING that would
indicate he fired Comey for that reason.
The article you QUOTE, doesn't even mention that THAT'S why he fired
Comey. If, after hearing the above quote, they thought and inferred (like
you did, stupidly, I might add) that he fired Comey BECAUSE of the
investigation, don't you think THEY (NBC) would have jumped on it right
away and whined (like you did), "This is why heee firrrred Comeeeeey."
Get a fucking life.
Well that's the problem. The Shit Stain has no life, no wife, no job, no kids, no talents.

IT, is a natural born Luzer.
Alan Baker
2017-05-15 19:43:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:19:17 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
"And in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself -- I said,
you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story.
It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they
should've won."
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/11/president_trumps_full_interview_with_lester_holt.html>
That's the direct quote.
And Has ZERO , Null, Nothing To Do With THWARTING The Investigation of
Collusion With The Russians In Last Year's Election, Dumb Fuck
Read and watch it again. Before his "And in fact..." line, he said there
no GOOD time to do it...
"He had made a recommendation. But regardless of recommendation, I was
going to fire Comey, knowing there was no good time to do it."
...THEN he said, "And in fact...", meaning he thought there was no "good
time" to do "it" (fire Comey), as in NOW, when there is an investigation
going on.
This fixation you snowflakes have on this Russia/Trump collusion lie, is
sad and pathetic. If NBC doesn't infer what YOU seem to have, then there
IS nothing to infer, because Trump didn't IMPLY that he fired Comey to
"thwart" anything.
He SAID he thought it was a BAD time, but he did it anyway, knowing
snowflakes like you would piss and moan and screech, "HE FIRED COMEY TO
COVER-UP AND THWART THE INVESTIGATION INTO HIM!!"
HOW many times does Trump have to tell you idiots, that Comey told him
THREE times, HE wasn't under investigation?
"And in fact, when I (Trump) decided to just do it (fire Comey), I said to
myself -- I said, you know, this Russia thing (investigation) with Trump
and Russia, is a made-up story."
"It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they
(think they) should've won, so now I am going to do EVERYTHING in my power
to thwart this made up story and subsequent investigation, INCLUDING
firing anyone who stands in my way."
Gawd, you liberals are pathetically sad. Trump said NOTHING that would
indicate he fired Comey for that reason.
The article you QUOTE, doesn't even mention that THAT'S why he fired
Comey. If, after hearing the above quote, they thought and inferred (like
you did, stupidly, I might add) that he fired Comey BECAUSE of the
investigation, don't you think THEY (NBC) would have jumped on it right
away and whined (like you did), "This is why heee firrrred Comeeeeey."
Get a fucking life.
Well that's the problem. The Shit Stain has no life, no wife, no job, no kids, no talents.
IT, is a natural born Luzer.
So cute you're now running all around the internet trying to get my
attention...

:-)
Alan Baker
2017-05-15 20:52:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:19:17 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
"And in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself -- I said,
you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story.
It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they
should've won."
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/11/president_trumps_full_interview_with_lester_holt.html>
That's the direct quote.
And Has ZERO , Null, Nothing To Do With THWARTING The Investigation of
Collusion With The Russians In Last Year's Election, Dumb Fuck
Read and watch it again. Before his "And in fact..." line, he said there
no GOOD time to do it...
"He had made a recommendation. But regardless of recommendation, I was
going to fire Comey, knowing there was no good time to do it."
...THEN he said, "And in fact...", meaning he thought there was no "good
time" to do "it" (fire Comey), as in NOW, when there is an investigation
going on.
This fixation you snowflakes have on this Russia/Trump collusion lie, is
sad and pathetic. If NBC doesn't infer what YOU seem to have, then there
IS nothing to infer, because Trump didn't IMPLY that he fired Comey to
"thwart" anything.
Yeah. He really did.
Post by AlleyCat
He SAID he thought it was a BAD time, but he did it anyway, knowing
snowflakes like you would piss and moan and screech, "HE FIRED COMEY TO
COVER-UP AND THWART THE INVESTIGATION INTO HIM!!"
HOW many times does Trump have to tell you idiots, that Comey told him
THREE times, HE wasn't under investigation?
How do you know that he wasn't lying?

We haven't heard Comey say he said anything like that.
Post by AlleyCat
"And in fact, when I (Trump) decided to just do it (fire Comey), I said to
myself -- I said, you know, this Russia thing (investigation) with Trump
and Russia, is a made-up story."
"It's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they
(think they) should've won, so now I am going to do EVERYTHING in my power
to thwart this made up story and subsequent investigation, INCLUDING
firing anyone who stands in my way."
Gawd, you liberals are pathetically sad. Trump said NOTHING that would
indicate he fired Comey for that reason.
The article you QUOTE, doesn't even mention that THAT'S why he fired
Comey. If, after hearing the above quote, they thought and inferred (like
you did, stupidly, I might add) that he fired Comey BECAUSE of the
investigation, don't you think THEY (NBC) would have jumped on it right
away and whined (like you did), "This is why heee firrrred Comeeeeey."
Get a fucking life.
AlleyCat
2017-05-14 23:19:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 10:39:20 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
You think the investigation is dead, now that Comey's gone?
Trump has demonstrated what will happen to anyone at the FBI who
pushes to extend the investigation.
By firing Comey? LOL

The investigation doesn't NEED "extension"... it will go ahead with or
without Comey.

Why do you fucking dumbasses, think that if a director is fired that
somehow the investigation, ANY investigation, will "end"?

So when Bill Clinton fired HIS FBI director, HE was sending out a message
to the whole FBI, what will happen to THEM, and all the "gates" HE was
involved in, stopped? Riiiiight.

HOWEVER did the FBI survive Monicagate, Filegate, Fostergate,
Whitewatergate, Travelgate, Pardongate, Chinagate and all the other
"gates" Bill Clinton was a part of? Okie doke.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Alan Baker
2017-05-14 23:28:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 10:39:20 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
You think the investigation is dead, now that Comey's gone?
Trump has demonstrated what will happen to anyone at the FBI who
pushes to extend the investigation.
By firing Comey? LOL
The investigation doesn't NEED "extension"... it will go ahead with or
without Comey.
Why do you fucking dumbasses, think that if a director is fired that
somehow the investigation, ANY investigation, will "end"?
So when Bill Clinton fired HIS FBI director, HE was sending out a message
to the whole FBI, what will happen to THEM, and all the "gates" HE was
involved in, stopped? Riiiiight.
Except that Sessions was fired for cause...

...real cause:

'Just before Bill Clinton was inaugurated as the 42nd President of the
United States on January 20, 1993, allegations of ethical improprieties
were made against Sessions. A report by outgoing Attorney General
William P. Barr presented to the Justice Department that month by the
Office of Professional Responsibility included criticisms that he had
used an FBI plane to travel to visit his daughter on several occasions,
and had a security system installed in his home at government
expense.[3] Janet Reno, the 78th Attorney General of the United States,
announced that Sessions had exhibited "serious deficiencies in
judgment."[4]'

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_S._Sessions#FBI_career>
Post by AlleyCat
HOWEVER did the FBI survive Monicagate, Filegate, Fostergate,
Whitewatergate, Travelgate, Pardongate, Chinagate and all the other
"gates" Bill Clinton was a part of? Okie doke.
AlleyCat
2017-05-15 01:18:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:28:43 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Except that Sessions was fired for cause...
Incompetence is NOT a REAL cause?

LOL

You liebertards.

You're so fucking funny.

"... included criticisms that he had used an FBI plane to travel to visit
his daughter on several occasions..."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

That's an every day occurrence these days.

"... and had a security system installed in his home at government
expense."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

$500? Off with his head. Reason enough to be fired? LOL That's funny.

"... Janet Reno, the 78th Attorney General of the United States,
announced that Sessions had exhibited "serious deficiencies in
judgment."

Like announcing that a Secretary of State had broken a law, that if ANY
other person had broken, WOULD be in jail right now, but decided it was
just "carelessness"?

*****

Meet the 'Little People': Those Punished for Far Less Than What Clinton
Did

Several people have been punished for a similar or lesser offense than
what Hillary Clinton is getting away with - being "extremely careless" in
handling "very sensitive, highly classified information," as FBI Director
James Comey has said.

In announcing that the FBI will not recommend charges in the Clinton email
scandal, Comey appeared to suggest that if someone other than the
Democratic presidential nominee mishandles classified information, that
person would be punished.

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a
person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences," he
conceded. "To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to
security or administrative sanctions."
Comey noted:

Although there is evidence of potential violation of the statutes
regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no
reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.

He argued that there was no recent precedent for bringing a criminal case
against Clinton without evidence of willful intent or gross negligence.

The Political Insider provides 10 examples of people who have been
punished for a similar or lesser offense than what Clinton did:

Bill Clinton's National Security Adviser guilty of Destroying
Documents in National Archives: 'Sandy Berger ... pleaded guilty in 2005
to illegally sneaking classified documents from the National Archives by
stuffing papers in his suit. He later destroyed some of them in his office
and lied about it.'

State Department Official Fired and Security Clearance Revoked After
Linking to Classified Wikileaks Document: Peter Van Buren, a foreign
service officer for Hillary's State Department, was fired and his security
clearance revoked for quoting a Wikileaks document AFTER publishing a book
critical of Clinton...

Bill Clinton's CIA Director Was Pardoned During Plea Negotiations for
Storing Classified Data on Home Computer: John Deutch, CIA director under
President Clinton, was found to have classified information on a
government-owned computer in his home several days after he left the CIA.
He had to be pardoned in the middle of plea negotiations by Hillary's
husband.

Navy engineer sentenced for mishandling classified material: Bryan
Nishimura of Folsom, California, plead guilty to the unauthorized removal
and retention of classified materials during stints in Afghanistan in 2007
and 2008...Nishimura was sentenced to two years probation, fined $7,500,
and had to surrender his security clearance.

Sailor Smuggles Classified Docs off Ship: 'A Navy intelligence
specialist admitted Thursday that he smuggled classified documents out of
Fort Bragg in folders and his pants pockets, then sold them for $11,500 to
a man he believed was a Chinese agent.'

Low Level Submarine Shipmate Prosecuted for Less Serious Crime than
Clinton: Petty Officer First Class Kristian Saucier allegedly used a
cellphone camera to take photos in the classified engine room of the
nuclear submarine where he worked as a mechanic, the USS Alexandria, then
destroyed a laptop, camera and memory card after learning he was under
investigation. He was indicted on one felony count of unlawful retention
of national defense information and another felony count of obstruction of
justice.

Marine Corps. Major Caught Sending Classified Documents to Superiors
Using Personal Email: Maj. Jason Brezler was dismissed from the Marine
Corps when he 'accidentally took home 14 documents on his personal
computer, some of which were classified.' According to the report, Brezler
was 'in a graduate school class when he received an urgent email from
military officials in Afghanistan and sent a specific document in
response, using his personal email account.'

Lab Tech Steals Data from Nuclear Facility: Jessica Lynn Quintana, a
former worker at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, pleaded guilty in
federal court to 'knowingly removing classified information from the
national security research laboratory, after she took home sensitive
documents and data from the lab last year.'

NSA Manager gives Classified Info to Newspaper: A National Security
Agency manager was indicted on allegations of willful retention of
'national defense' or classified information, obstruction of justice and
making a false statement, after he allegedly 'passed classified
information to a Baltimore Sun reporter who wrote stories exposing NSA
mismanagement.' Charges were dropped and the NSA manager pleaded to a
misdemeanor, in what was called a victory against the Obama administration
whom had attempted to use dated laws to prosecute leakers of classified
information...

State Dept. Official Steals Classified Docs: Donald Willis Keyser
earned over a year in prison when he 'plead guilty to a three-count
Criminal Information in which he admitted that he willfully and unlawfully
removed classified documents and digital memory devices from the
Department of State to his residence.' United States Attorney Chuck
Rosenberg stated that... 'His (Keyser's) sentence of imprisonment is a
warning to others in positions of public trust.'
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Pipewrench Peterson
2017-05-15 05:17:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:28:43 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Except that Sessions was fired for cause...
Incompetence is NOT a REAL cause?
Comey is eminently competent. That's the reason Trump, the fascist,
fired him. He was getting to the bottom of Trump being Putin's stooge.
PIBB
2017-05-15 12:35:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Pipewrench Peterson
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:28:43 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Except that Sessions was fired for cause...
Incompetence is NOT a REAL cause?
Comey is eminently competent. That's the reason Trump, the
fascist, fired him. He was getting to the bottom of Trump being
Putin's stooge.
Trump wants to surround himself with utterly loyal lieutenants who'll
break the law rather than give him away. Anyone who won't do this,
like Comey, gets disposed of.

Sounds familiar. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Mugabe did the
same.
AlleyCat
2017-05-15 21:18:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 13:35:32 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by Pipewrench Peterson
Comey is eminently competent. That's the reason Trump, the
fascist, fired him. He was getting to the bottom of Trump being
Putin's stooge.
Trump wants to surround himself with utterly loyal lieutenants who'll
break the law rather than give him away. Anyone who won't do this,
like Comey, gets disposed of.

Sounds familiar. OBAMA, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Mugabe did the
same.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
PIBB
2017-05-16 20:30:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 15 May 2017 13:35:32 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by Pipewrench Peterson
Comey is eminently competent. That's the reason Trump, the
fascist, fired him. He was getting to the bottom of Trump
being Putin's stooge.
Trump wants to surround himself with utterly loyal lieutenants
who'll break the law rather than give him away. Anyone who
won't do this, like Comey, gets disposed of.
Sounds familiar. OBAMA, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Mugabe
did the same.
You are attributing someone else's post as if it was mine.
Alan Baker
2017-05-15 20:56:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:28:43 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Except that Sessions was fired for cause...
Incompetence is NOT a REAL cause?
LOL
You liebertards.
You're so fucking funny.
"... included criticisms that he had used an FBI plane to travel to visit
his daughter on several occasions..."
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
That's an every day occurrence these days.
"... and had a security system installed in his home at government
expense."
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
$500? Off with his head. Reason enough to be fired? LOL That's funny.
"... Janet Reno, the 78th Attorney General of the United States,
announced that Sessions had exhibited "serious deficiencies in
judgment."
Yup. That's called "fired for cause".

Comey's firing was because he wouldn't pledge loyalty to Trump over his
duty to his country.
Post by AlleyCat
Like announcing that a Secretary of State had broken a law, that if ANY
other person had broken, WOULD be in jail right now, but decided it was
just "carelessness"?
And break out the strawman!

Clue time: Clinton isn't in politics, and Trump was ecstatic about
Comey's handling of the case up until very recently.

Why do you suppose that's the case?
Siri Cruise
2017-05-15 00:35:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
Why do you fucking dumbasses, think that if a director is fired that
somehow the investigation, ANY investigation, will "end"?
I didn't fire Comey. Drumpf did. The question is whether he thinks that will end
the investigation.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
AlleyCat
2017-05-15 01:24:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 17:35:41 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
Why do you fucking dumbasses, think that if a director is fired that
somehow the investigation, ANY investigation, will "end"?
I didn't fire Comey.
Didn't say you did, buttercup.
Post by Siri Cruise
Drumpf did.
No shit.
Post by Siri Cruise
The question is whether he thinks that will end
the investigation.
No, it's not... he KNOWS it won't and wants it to be investigated even
MORE vigorously, dumb ass. Don't you read anything your fellow butt-
munchers post?

HOLT: Did you ask him to drop the investigation?

TRUMP: No, never.

HOLT: Did anyone from the White House...

TRUMP: No. In fact, I want the investigation SPEEDED UP...

HOLT: Did anyone from the White House ask him to -- to end the
investigation?

TRUMP: No, no. Why would we do that?

HOLT: Any -- any surrogates on behalf of the White House?

TRUMP: Not that I know of. Look, I WANT TO FIND OUT IF THERE WAS A PROBLEM
WITH AN ELECTION HAVING TO DO WITH RUSSIA. Or by the way any -- but -- any
-- anybody else. Any other country.

And I want that to be so strong and so good. And I want it to happen.

*****

Nerd... put the fucking bottle down.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Siri Cruise
2017-05-15 02:35:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
TRUMP: No. In fact, I want the investigation SPEEDED UP...
Yes, I know. He wants it to be concluded. Comey wanted to intensify it, which
would likely lengthen it.
Post by AlleyCat
And I want that to be so strong and so good. And I want it to happen.
And the Whitehouse says that what candidate said, and continues to say at his
rallies, is not applicable to what the president does. An admission Drumpf has
no integrity.

You can trust an admitted liar. I don't.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
NoBody
2017-05-15 11:18:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
TRUMP: No. In fact, I want the investigation SPEEDED UP...
Yes, I know. He wants it to be concluded. Comey wanted to intensify it, which
would likely lengthen it.
Proof? And no, unnamed sources does not constitute proof.
PIBB
2017-05-15 12:37:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
TRUMP: Not that I know of. Look, I WANT TO FIND OUT IF THERE WAS
A PROBLEM WITH AN ELECTION HAVING TO DO WITH RUSSIA. Or by the
way any -- but -- any -- anybody else. Any other country.
Trump is a such a liar that we are safe to assume the truth is the
opposite of what he says.

Trump behaves like a man who is frightened of being investigated for
his Russian contacts and business dealings.
NoBody
2017-05-14 13:43:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
Please tell us, you fucking idiots, how proceeds from a Miss
Universe Pageant IN MOSCOW, and selling a PRIVATE Russian
citizen, connects to any so-called "collusion" in the 2016
Presidential election.
Trump made money off of EVERY venue for his pageant... do we
EVER talk about any of THOSE countries being "colluded' with?
Connect the dots, you fucktards. Quit taking DEMOCRAT liberal
newspapers' words for everything, that they twist around to make
it only SEEM like something's wrong.
Trump was a PRIVATE citizen in 2008. How many Presidents through
the ages have made a lot of money before being President? Many,
but now that's a crime? How so?
Methinks you and Trump doth protest too much.
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just making
up claims out of thin air?
Post by PIBB
If Trump is so innocent then why is he trying to thwart any
investigation?
Your claim proves my point perfectly.
Siri Cruise
2017-05-14 20:57:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just making
up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?

He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?

Obama approved Flynn so he didn't have to check him out?

Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?


Hey, I understand. Really. It's not the first time a white guy with small hands
felt inadequate next to a black man or a woman.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
AlleyCat
2017-05-14 23:34:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just making
up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Post by Siri Cruise
He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he didn't?

Crowd sizes are ALWAYS estimates.

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-
gigapixel/

Estimate THAT, then tell us the difference in his and Obama's.
Post by Siri Cruise
Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?
YOU don't know they didn't. NO ONE has gone through the voter roles and
never will. Why? Because they don't WANT to know the truth and spend
millions of dollars to prove a moot point. Trump won the electoral AND
populous vote... Hillary won the inner city dregs vote (hoping for more
free shit) and snob vote.

If the Democrats hadn't started herding Blacks and minorities into the
cities, where it's easier to give out free shit for votes, it wouldn't
have been close.
Post by Siri Cruise
Hey, I understand. Really. It's not the first time a white guy with
small hands felt inadequate next to a black man or a woman.
So... dick size matters in Presidential elections now. Typical, mah dick,
liberal.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Alan Baker
2017-05-14 23:43:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just making
up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he didn't?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Crowd sizes are ALWAYS estimates.
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-
gigapixel/
Estimate THAT, then tell us the difference in his and Obama's.
Except there were clear pictures from the top of the Washington monument
that show a tremendous difference.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?
YOU don't know they didn't. NO ONE has gone through the voter roles and
never will. Why? Because they don't WANT to know the truth and spend
millions of dollars to prove a moot point. Trump won the electoral AND
populous vote... Hillary won the inner city dregs vote (hoping for more
free shit) and snob vote.
But saying it in the absence of any proof is still lying.
Post by AlleyCat
If the Democrats hadn't started herding Blacks and minorities into the
cities, where it's easier to give out free shit for votes, it wouldn't
have been close.
More unsupported bullshit
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
Hey, I understand. Really. It's not the first time a white guy with
small hands felt inadequate next to a black man or a woman.
So... dick size matters in Presidential elections now. Typical, mah dick,
liberal.
AlleyCat
2017-05-15 01:34:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:43:48 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Yes. Everyone does.
How? Oh yeah... you and your fellow fudge-packing snowflakes read minds
from 10,000 miles away, like you did when the subject was brought up and
Obama DIDN'T say anything about it.

Orrrr... are you ninnies still playing that bullshit liberal semantics
game, by saying Obama himself didn't "wiretap" anyone, or that wire-
tapping isn't performed anymore, because the NSA can just listen in on
anyone's phone calls without having to do ANY "wiring"?

Bullshit semantics.

Please... enlighten us, 12 year old... how do you KNOW Obama didn't order
"surveillance" on Trump or his campaign or ANYTHING thing else, "Trump"?

Was it because you think Hillary did? oh, that's so much "better".

I call you 12 year old, because you act JUST like one, refusing to admit
the truth, when you KNOW it. WHO ordered the surveillance? Does whomever
DID order "it", not answer to the President?

Is the President not held accountable when things of this nature are
uncovered?

He IS held responsible, whether he actually did anything. HE'S THE FUCKING
PRESIDENT, you twelve year old little boy.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
PIBB
2017-05-15 12:42:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
how do you KNOW Obama didn't order
"surveillance" on Trump or his campaign or ANYTHING thing else, "Trump"?
Because it requires a FISA court warrant.

These warrants are classified but Trump can declassify any
document and show it to everyone but he hasn't been able to do
that because there is no FISA ruling which does what he alleges.

Haven't we been over and over this already?
Alan Baker
2017-05-15 21:00:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:43:48 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Yes. Everyone does.
How? Oh yeah... you and your fellow fudge-packing snowflakes read minds
from 10,000 miles away, like you did when the subject was brought up and
Obama DIDN'T say anything about it.
I don't have to read minds. He lacks the power to order it directly, and
if there were an order for such surveillance, now that he is president,
Trump could make it public.
Post by AlleyCat
Orrrr... are you ninnies still playing that bullshit liberal semantics
game, by saying Obama himself didn't "wiretap" anyone, or that wire-
tapping isn't performed anymore, because the NSA can just listen in on
anyone's phone calls without having to do ANY "wiring"?
Bullshit semantics.
Please... enlighten us, 12 year old... how do you KNOW Obama didn't order
"surveillance" on Trump or his campaign or ANYTHING thing else, "Trump"?
Was it because you think Hillary did? oh, that's so much "better".
I call you 12 year old, because you act JUST like one, refusing to admit
the truth, when you KNOW it. WHO ordered the surveillance? Does whomever
DID order "it", not answer to the President?
Is the President not held accountable when things of this nature are
uncovered?
He IS held responsible, whether he actually did anything. HE'S THE FUCKING
PRESIDENT, you twelve year old little boy.
Again, if you can refrain from the tantrums, if such wiretapping
existed, why cannot Trump reveal any evidence at all of it having occurred.

The only thing that has come to light is that various Trump associates
were caught talking to Russians who are legitimate targets of
surveillance. And please don't go off on another rant about "unmasking"
as if that means that those who were unmasked were the target of the
surveillance. Remember that when the unmasking was requested...

...the person making the request COULD NOT KNOW who the person to be
unmasked was.
NoBody
2017-05-15 10:30:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just making
up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he didn't?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Crowd sizes are ALWAYS estimates.
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-
gigapixel/
Estimate THAT, then tell us the difference in his and Obama's.
Except there were clear pictures from the top of the Washington monument
that show a tremendous difference.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?
YOU don't know they didn't. NO ONE has gone through the voter roles and
never will. Why? Because they don't WANT to know the truth and spend
millions of dollars to prove a moot point. Trump won the electoral AND
populous vote... Hillary won the inner city dregs vote (hoping for more
free shit) and snob vote.
But saying it in the absence of any proof is still lying.
So then you agree all the claims about Trump and the Russians are Fake
News?
Alan Baker
2017-05-15 15:43:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by NoBody
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just making
up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he didn't?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Crowd sizes are ALWAYS estimates.
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-
gigapixel/
Estimate THAT, then tell us the difference in his and Obama's.
Except there were clear pictures from the top of the Washington monument
that show a tremendous difference.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?
YOU don't know they didn't. NO ONE has gone through the voter roles and
never will. Why? Because they don't WANT to know the truth and spend
millions of dollars to prove a moot point. Trump won the electoral AND
populous vote... Hillary won the inner city dregs vote (hoping for more
free shit) and snob vote.
But saying it in the absence of any proof is still lying.
So then you agree all the claims about Trump and the Russians are Fake
News?
Nope. There is lots of real news in there.
NoBody
2017-05-16 10:14:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Alan Baker
Post by NoBody
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just making
up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he didn't?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Crowd sizes are ALWAYS estimates.
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-
gigapixel/
Estimate THAT, then tell us the difference in his and Obama's.
Except there were clear pictures from the top of the Washington monument
that show a tremendous difference.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?
YOU don't know they didn't. NO ONE has gone through the voter roles and
never will. Why? Because they don't WANT to know the truth and spend
millions of dollars to prove a moot point. Trump won the electoral AND
populous vote... Hillary won the inner city dregs vote (hoping for more
free shit) and snob vote.
But saying it in the absence of any proof is still lying.
So then you agree all the claims about Trump and the Russians are Fake
News?
Nope. There is lots of real news in there.
All you have to do is find some facts to support the endless
undocumentable claims the media is spewing out daily....
Alan Baker
2017-05-16 18:55:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by NoBody
Post by Alan Baker
Post by NoBody
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just making
up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he didn't?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Crowd sizes are ALWAYS estimates.
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-
gigapixel/
Estimate THAT, then tell us the difference in his and Obama's.
Except there were clear pictures from the top of the Washington monument
that show a tremendous difference.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?
YOU don't know they didn't. NO ONE has gone through the voter roles and
never will. Why? Because they don't WANT to know the truth and spend
millions of dollars to prove a moot point. Trump won the electoral AND
populous vote... Hillary won the inner city dregs vote (hoping for more
free shit) and snob vote.
But saying it in the absence of any proof is still lying.
So then you agree all the claims about Trump and the Russians are Fake
News?
Nope. There is lots of real news in there.
All you have to do is find some facts to support the endless
undocumentable claims the media is spewing out daily....
Give an example?

The release of classified information in his meeting with Russia?

That's now been confirmed. The new claim is that it was appropriate to
do so.
PIBB
2017-05-16 20:34:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Alan Baker
On Mon, 15 May 2017 08:43:03 -0700, Alan Baker
Post by Alan Baker
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:43:48 -0700, Alan Baker
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself
just making up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he didn't?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Crowd sizes are ALWAYS estimates.
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/
trump-inauguration-gigapixel/
Estimate THAT, then tell us the difference in his and
Obama's.
Except there were clear pictures from the top of the
Washington monument that show a tremendous difference.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?
YOU don't know they didn't. NO ONE has gone through the
voter roles and never will. Why? Because they don't WANT to
know the truth and spend millions of dollars to prove a
moot point. Trump won the electoral AND populous vote...
Hillary won the inner city dregs vote (hoping for more
free shit) and snob vote.
But saying it in the absence of any proof is still lying.
So then you agree all the claims about Trump and the Russians
are Fake News?
Nope. There is lots of real news in there.
All you have to do is find some facts to support the endless
undocumentable claims the media is spewing out daily....
Give an example?
The release of classified information in his meeting with
Russia?
That's now been confirmed. The new claim is that it was
appropriate to do so.
So often, it's not the bad move which causes the trouble but
the attempts at covering it up.

This is going to be another White House downward spiral into
chaos.
Alan Baker
2017-05-16 20:35:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by PIBB
Post by Alan Baker
On Mon, 15 May 2017 08:43:03 -0700, Alan Baker
Post by Alan Baker
On Sun, 14 May 2017 16:43:48 -0700, Alan Baker
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself
just making up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he didn't?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Crowd sizes are ALWAYS estimates.
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/
trump-inauguration-gigapixel/
Estimate THAT, then tell us the difference in his and
Obama's.
Except there were clear pictures from the top of the
Washington monument that show a tremendous difference.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?
YOU don't know they didn't. NO ONE has gone through the
voter roles and never will. Why? Because they don't WANT to
know the truth and spend millions of dollars to prove a
moot point. Trump won the electoral AND populous vote...
Hillary won the inner city dregs vote (hoping for more
free shit) and snob vote.
But saying it in the absence of any proof is still lying.
So then you agree all the claims about Trump and the Russians
are Fake News?
Nope. There is lots of real news in there.
All you have to do is find some facts to support the endless
undocumentable claims the media is spewing out daily....
Give an example?
The release of classified information in his meeting with
Russia?
That's now been confirmed. The new claim is that it was
appropriate to do so.
So often, it's not the bad move which causes the trouble but
the attempts at covering it up.
This is going to be another White House downward spiral into
chaos.
Yup.

The man's huge narcissism won't let him and his people stay silent long
enough to even figure out a plausible lie...
M.I.Wakefield
2017-05-16 21:03:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
So often, it's not the bad move which causes the trouble but the attempts
at covering it up.
This is going to be another White House downward spiral into chaos.
"Chaos" would be a big step up for the Trump White House, and I'm not sure
that they can get there.
PIBB
2017-05-16 21:37:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by PIBB
So often, it's not the bad move which causes the trouble but
the attempts at covering it up.
This is going to be another White House downward spiral into
chaos.
"Chaos" would be a big step up for the Trump White House, and
I'm not sure that they can get there.
lol. I guess I was being too generous. :)
M.I.Wakefield
2017-05-16 22:00:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by PIBB
Post by M.I.Wakefield
So often, it's not the bad move which causes the trouble but the
attempts at covering it up.
This is going to be another White House downward spiral into chaos.
"Chaos" would be a big step up for the Trump White House, and I'm not
sure that they can get there.
lol. I guess I was being too generous. :)
And then the Comey story broke ... I wasn't expecting confirmation that
quickly.
AlleyCat
2017-05-16 20:42:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
... when Trump's White House does it, it's a national security breach.

First off, it's not. NOTHING will happen to the person(s) or country that
supplied us with the information on how they will deal with ISIS,
pertaining to terrorism and aviation in particular.




On Tue, 16 May 2017 11:55:07 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
That's now been confirmed. The new claim is that it was appropriate to
do so.
It's not a "claim", idiot. WaPo even SAID as much.

"(T)he president has the authority to disclose even the most highly
classified information at will." - The Washington Post

Who fucking cares what YOU or the WaPo think?
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Alan Baker
2017-05-16 20:53:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
... when Trump's White House does it, it's a national security breach.
First off, it's not. NOTHING will happen to the person(s) or country that
supplied us with the information on how they will deal with ISIS,
pertaining to terrorism and aviation in particular.
And you know so much about this... ...how, exactly?
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 11:55:07 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
That's now been confirmed. The new claim is that it was appropriate to
do so.
It's not a "claim", idiot. WaPo even SAID as much.
"(T)he president has the authority to disclose even the most highly
classified information at will." - The Washington Post
Who fucking cares what YOU or the WaPo think?
AlleyCat
2017-05-16 21:08:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 16 May 2017 13:53:58 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
First off, it's not. NOTHING will happen to the person(s) or country that
supplied us with the information on how they will deal with ISIS,
pertaining to terrorism and aviation in particular.
And you know so much about this... ...how, exactly?
Uhhhh... WHAT!? Are you shitting me? You're replying to all of this and
you don't even KNOW what this is all about?

LOL... next thing we know, you'll be saying I work FOR Trump, and I'm here
to cover for him.

Orrr... I leaked this information and I'm here to cover for myself!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Seriously.... what... you get your news from here (Usenet) only? For
fuck's sake, man... get a clue, THEN come back with your replies. Until
then... adiós.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Mexicans.
Mexicans are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, mainly
because they're mostly Catholic... oh, and they HATE you. Am I leaving
anything else out that you just LOVE about them?

Riiiiight... they're potential Democrap voters.

http://i.imgur.com/VsWANkz.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/5oeqnDw.jpg
Alan Baker
2017-05-16 21:09:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 13:53:58 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
First off, it's not. NOTHING will happen to the person(s) or country that
supplied us with the information on how they will deal with ISIS,
pertaining to terrorism and aviation in particular.
And you know so much about this... ...how, exactly?
Uhhhh... WHAT!? Are you shitting me? You're replying to all of this and
you don't even KNOW what this is all about?
Nope. That's not at all what I said.

But you just said positively that

"NOTHING will happen to the person(s) or country that supplied us with
the information on how they will deal with ISIS,"

That implies a level of knowledge that you simply don't have.
Post by AlleyCat
LOL... next thing we know, you'll be saying I work FOR Trump, and I'm here
to cover for him.
Orrr... I leaked this information and I'm here to cover for myself!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Seriously.... what... you get your news from here (Usenet) only? For
fuck's sake, man... get a clue, THEN come back with your replies. Until
then... adiós.
AlleyCat
2017-05-16 21:55:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 16 May 2017 14:09:48 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
That implies a level of knowledge that you simply don't have.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Alan Baker
2017-05-16 21:58:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 14:09:48 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
That implies a level of knowledge that you simply don't have.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Sorry, but why was it suddenly necessary to snip all context?

How can you possibly know:

"NOTHING will happen to the person(s) or country that supplied us with
the information on how they will deal with ISIS,"

That's your direct statement.
Rudy Canoza
2017-05-16 22:09:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 14:09:48 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
That implies a level of knowledge that you simply don't have.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You concede Alan is correct. Good.
Siri Cruise
2017-05-17 02:26:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 13:53:58 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
First off, it's not. NOTHING will happen to the person(s) or country that
supplied us with the information on how they will deal with ISIS,
pertaining to terrorism and aviation in particular.
And you know so much about this... ...how, exactly?
Uhhhh... WHAT!? Are you shitting me? You're replying to all of this and
you don't even KNOW what this is all about?
LOL... next thing we know, you'll be saying I work FOR Trump, and I'm here
to cover for him.
Useful idiot.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
AlleyCat
2017-05-17 02:31:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 16 May 2017 19:26:21 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 13:53:58 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
First off, it's not. NOTHING will happen to the person(s) or country that
supplied us with the information on how they will deal with ISIS,
pertaining to terrorism and aviation in particular.
And you know so much about this... ...how, exactly?
Uhhhh... WHAT!? Are you shitting me? You're replying to all of this and
you don't even KNOW what this is all about?
LOL... next thing we know, you'll be saying I work FOR Trump, and I'm here
to cover for him.
Useful idiot.
Naaa... just idiot.

I didn't vote for Trump in the primaries. NOT a fan.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Siri Cruise
2017-05-16 21:58:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Alan Baker
Post by NoBody
Post by Alan Baker
Post by NoBody
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just making
up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he didn't?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Crowd sizes are ALWAYS estimates.
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-
gigapixel/
Estimate THAT, then tell us the difference in his and Obama's.
Except there were clear pictures from the top of the Washington monument
that show a tremendous difference.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?
YOU don't know they didn't. NO ONE has gone through the voter roles and
never will. Why? Because they don't WANT to know the truth and spend
millions of dollars to prove a moot point. Trump won the electoral AND
populous vote... Hillary won the inner city dregs vote (hoping for more
free shit) and snob vote.
But saying it in the absence of any proof is still lying.
So then you agree all the claims about Trump and the Russians are Fake
News?
Nope. There is lots of real news in there.
All you have to do is find some facts to support the endless
undocumentable claims the media is spewing out daily....
Give an example?
The release of classified information in his meeting with Russia?
That's now been confirmed. The new claim is that it was appropriate to
do so.
I knew there would a completely different lie in a couple of days. We still have
a baker's dozen of alternate truths to go through before Donald pretends to read
papers on his desk and ignores us.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
NoBody
2017-05-17 09:46:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Alan Baker
Post by NoBody
Post by Alan Baker
Post by NoBody
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just making
up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he didn't?
Yes. Everyone does.
Post by AlleyCat
Crowd sizes are ALWAYS estimates.
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-
gigapixel/
Estimate THAT, then tell us the difference in his and Obama's.
Except there were clear pictures from the top of the Washington monument
that show a tremendous difference.
Post by AlleyCat
Post by Siri Cruise
Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?
YOU don't know they didn't. NO ONE has gone through the voter roles and
never will. Why? Because they don't WANT to know the truth and spend
millions of dollars to prove a moot point. Trump won the electoral AND
populous vote... Hillary won the inner city dregs vote (hoping for more
free shit) and snob vote.
But saying it in the absence of any proof is still lying.
So then you agree all the claims about Trump and the Russians are Fake
News?
Nope. There is lots of real news in there.
All you have to do is find some facts to support the endless
undocumentable claims the media is spewing out daily....
Give an example?
The release of classified information in his meeting with Russia?
That's now been confirmed. The new claim is that it was appropriate to
do so.
Cite?
Siri Cruise
2017-05-15 00:33:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just making
up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
I've lost track: what's Drumpf latest story on why he canned Comey?
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
AlleyCat
2017-05-15 01:38:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 14 May 2017 17:33:13 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
I've lost track: what's Drumpf latest story on why he canned Comey?
Same as the first and only.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Alan Baker
2017-05-15 21:01:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 17:33:13 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
I've lost track: what's Drumpf latest story on why he canned Comey?
Same as the first and only.
So what do you claim that is?

I can see why you don't want to be specific. Anything you do make
concrete can easily be refuted by Trump's own statements, or those of
his mouthpieces.

:-)
AlleyCat
2017-05-15 22:11:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:01:14 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 17:33:13 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
I've lost track: what's Drumpf latest story on why he canned Comey?
Same as the first and only.
So what do you claim that is?
I can see why you don't want to be specific. Anything you do make
concrete can easily be refuted by Trump's own statements, or those of
his mouthpieces.
Ahhhhh.... now it's his "mouthpieces" that matter. Sorry... they don't.
We're talking about the reason TRUMP fired Comey, NOT what some cornered
part of his administration might say to some persistent junior reporter,
who THEN fucks up the quote(s), but runs the story anyway.

Quote TRUMP on his "MANY" reasons for canning Comey. Video ONLY, please. I
don't want some bullshit "anonymous" source(s).

And really... does it matter? He's gone... HE didn't do ANY of the legwork
in the investigation (and it will go on, unabated, like Trump WANTS it
to)... he was a figure-head, much like Obama was.... PAID to stand up in
front of everyone and talk a good game, but in Obama's case, READ a
teleprompter.

Heaven help us when Obama went off teleprompter. LOL It's quite
amusing... okie dokie?



https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=obama+gaffes+greatest+hits

I tried to juts roll my eyes at these, but they're too damn funny!
Alan Baker
2017-05-15 22:15:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:01:14 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 17:33:13 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
I've lost track: what's Drumpf latest story on why he canned Comey?
Same as the first and only.
So what do you claim that is?
I can see why you don't want to be specific. Anything you do make
concrete can easily be refuted by Trump's own statements, or those of
his mouthpieces.
Ahhhhh.... now it's his "mouthpieces" that matter. Sorry... they don't.
So you're suggesting that they're NOT acting at his direction?
Post by AlleyCat
We're talking about the reason TRUMP fired Comey, NOT what some cornered
part of his administration might say to some persistent junior reporter,
who THEN fucks up the quote(s), but runs the story anyway.
Strawman... ...because that's NOT what happened.
Post by AlleyCat
Quote TRUMP on his "MANY" reasons for canning Comey. Video ONLY, please. I
don't want some bullshit "anonymous" source(s).
Sorry, but you're the one on the hook here.

YOU claim there is only one reason he fired Comey.

So state what you claim that to be.
Post by AlleyCat
And really... does it matter? He's gone... HE didn't do ANY of the legwork
in the investigation (and it will go on, unabated, like Trump WANTS it
to)... he was a figure-head, much like Obama was.... PAID to stand up in
front of everyone and talk a good game, but in Obama's case, READ a
teleprompter.
Deflection.
Post by AlleyCat
Heaven help us when Obama went off teleprompter. LOL It's quite
amusing... okie dokie?
Yet more deflection.
Post by AlleyCat
http://youtu.be/agiY1j7Ijg0
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=obama+gaffes+greatest+hits
I tried to juts roll my eyes at these, but they're too damn funny!
Anything to stop you having to declare yourself on the issue at hand,
I'm sure...
Siri Cruise
2017-05-15 23:27:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
Ahhhhh.... now it's his "mouthpieces" that matter. Sorry... they don't.
We're talking about the reason TRUMP fired Comey, NOT what some cornered
part of his administration might say to some persistent junior reporter,
So when Drumpf hires press secretaries to speak for him, he is allowed to
declare they don't speak for him when he's caught in a lie.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
PIBB
2017-05-17 13:04:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:01:14 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 17:33:13 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
I've lost track: what's Drumpf latest story on why he canned Comey?
Same as the first and only.
So what do you claim that is?
I can see why you don't want to be specific. Anything you do
make concrete can easily be refuted by Trump's own statements,
or those of his mouthpieces.
Ahhhhh.... now it's his "mouthpieces" that matter. Sorry ...
Like we believe YOU over the Washington Post or New York Times
reports.
Ain't that the truth.

AlleyCat's psychotic ramblings are great for overwhelming a decent
debate with noise and perhaps providing him with something to ease
the boredom of his days but I doubt his bizarre reasoning has ever
persuaded a single person here to share his point of view.
NoBody
2017-05-18 10:17:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:01:14 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 17:33:13 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
I've lost track: what's Drumpf latest story on why he canned Comey?
Same as the first and only.
So what do you claim that is?
I can see why you don't want to be specific. Anything you do
make concrete can easily be refuted by Trump's own statements,
or those of his mouthpieces.
Ahhhhh.... now it's his "mouthpieces" that matter. Sorry ...
Like we believe YOU over the Washington Post or New York Times
reports.
Ain't that the truth.
AlleyCat's psychotic ramblings are great for overwhelming a decent
debate with noise and perhaps providing him with something to ease
the boredom of his days but I doubt his bizarre reasoning has ever
persuaded a single person here to share his point of view.
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed "sources"
for every one of their stories.
Siri Cruise
2017-05-18 11:40:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed "sources"
for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Read all the
President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein were dismissed by Republicans for
using anonymous sources.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
PIBB
2017-05-18 16:04:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed
"sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein were
dismissed by Republicans for using anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by behaving so
badly, it wouldn't have been possible to appoint a special
prosecutor against the president within 110 days.

Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in the
foot.
andy memory
2017-05-18 16:14:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed
"sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein were
dismissed by Republicans for using anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by behaving so
badly, it wouldn't have been possible to appoint a special
prosecutor against the president within 110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in the
foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state operatives
would do everything to impeach him for threatening to "drain the swamp".

You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?

Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
PIBB
2017-05-18 16:46:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed
"sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein
were dismissed by Republicans for using anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by behaving so
badly, it wouldn't have been possible to appoint a special
prosecutor against the president within 110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in the
foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state
operatives would do everything to impeach him for threatening to
"drain the swamp".
Donald Trump's attempts at establishing a deep state in the White
House are floundering. The Congressional representatives of the
people are not allowing an unelected government within a
government. Trump's swamp is being drained.
Post by andy memory
You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?
Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
The people want to know if Trump colluded with the Russians to get
elected and the special prosecutor will find the answer.

Trump wrote "I look forward to this matter concluding quickly".
Somebody please tell him the investigation isn't going to be over
anytime soon.
andy memory
2017-05-18 18:09:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed
"sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein
were dismissed by Republicans for using anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by behaving so
badly, it wouldn't have been possible to appoint a special
prosecutor against the president within 110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in the
foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state
operatives would do everything to impeach him for threatening to
"drain the swamp".
Donald Trump's attempts at establishing a deep state in the White
House are floundering.
He never tried to establish a "deep state in the White House"

That's an absurd lie, even for you.
Post by PIBB
The Congressional representatives of the
people are not allowing an unelected government within a
government.
Maxine Waters and the Soros funded filth that are promulgating these
lies will burn in Hell.
Post by PIBB
Trump's swamp is being drained.
he never had one.

But DC was built on a swamp and it has remained one for eons.
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?
Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
The people want to know if Trump colluded with the Russians to get
elected and the special prosecutor will find the answer.
"The people" are inveigled by the deep state's lamestream media an
incapable of rational thought.

It's called brainwashing.
Post by PIBB
Trump wrote "I look forward to this matter concluding quickly".
So?
Post by PIBB
Somebody please tell him the investigation isn't going to be over
anytime soon.
That's the deep state's playbook - drag this on as long and as widely as
possible and obstruct the change the people voted for.

Traitors like you will be identified and dealt with, that much you may
rely on.

Enjoy.

***@blocknews.net
First-Post
2017-05-18 18:35:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed
"sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein
were dismissed by Republicans for using anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by behaving so
badly, it wouldn't have been possible to appoint a special
prosecutor against the president within 110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in the
foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state
operatives would do everything to impeach him for threatening to
"drain the swamp".
Donald Trump's attempts at establishing a deep state in the White
House are floundering.
He never tried to establish a "deep state in the White House"
That's an absurd lie, even for you.
Post by PIBB
The Congressional representatives of the
people are not allowing an unelected government within a
government.
Maxine Waters and the Soros funded filth that are promulgating these
lies will burn in Hell.
Here's a list of them:
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000000306
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Trump's swamp is being drained.
he never had one.
But DC was built on a swamp and it has remained one for eons.
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?
Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
The people want to know if Trump colluded with the Russians to get
elected and the special prosecutor will find the answer.
"The people" are inveigled by the deep state's lamestream media an
incapable of rational thought.
It's called brainwashing.
Post by PIBB
Trump wrote "I look forward to this matter concluding quickly".
So?
Post by PIBB
Somebody please tell him the investigation isn't going to be over
anytime soon.
That's the deep state's playbook - drag this on as long and as widely as
possible and obstruct the change the people voted for.
Traitors like you will be identified and dealt with, that much you may
rely on.
Enjoy.
andy memory
2017-05-18 18:58:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by First-Post
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed
"sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein
were dismissed by Republicans for using anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by behaving so
badly, it wouldn't have been possible to appoint a special
prosecutor against the president within 110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in the
foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state
operatives would do everything to impeach him for threatening to
"drain the swamp".
Donald Trump's attempts at establishing a deep state in the White
House are floundering.
He never tried to establish a "deep state in the White House"
That's an absurd lie, even for you.
Post by PIBB
The Congressional representatives of the
people are not allowing an unelected government within a
government.
Maxine Waters and the Soros funded filth that are promulgating these
lies will burn in Hell.
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000000306
Nice work, thank you.


Soros has shown the power one billionaire can wield.

He has, largely by himself, funded and caused the destruction of Europe
and the seeding of a global Muslim caliphate.

Astounding!
Post by First-Post
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Trump's swamp is being drained.
he never had one.
But DC was built on a swamp and it has remained one for eons.
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?
Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
The people want to know if Trump colluded with the Russians to get
elected and the special prosecutor will find the answer.
"The people" are inveigled by the deep state's lamestream media an
incapable of rational thought.
It's called brainwashing.
Post by PIBB
Trump wrote "I look forward to this matter concluding quickly".
So?
Post by PIBB
Somebody please tell him the investigation isn't going to be over
anytime soon.
That's the deep state's playbook - drag this on as long and as widely as
possible and obstruct the change the people voted for.
Traitors like you will be identified and dealt with, that much you may
rely on.
Enjoy.
First-Post
2017-05-18 19:08:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by andy memory
Post by First-Post
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed
"sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein
were dismissed by Republicans for using anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by behaving so
badly, it wouldn't have been possible to appoint a special
prosecutor against the president within 110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in the
foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state
operatives would do everything to impeach him for threatening to
"drain the swamp".
Donald Trump's attempts at establishing a deep state in the White
House are floundering.
He never tried to establish a "deep state in the White House"
That's an absurd lie, even for you.
Post by PIBB
The Congressional representatives of the
people are not allowing an unelected government within a
government.
Maxine Waters and the Soros funded filth that are promulgating these
lies will burn in Hell.
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000000306
Nice work, thank you.
Soros has shown the power one billionaire can wield.
He has, largely by himself, funded and caused the destruction of Europe
and the seeding of a global Muslim caliphate.
Astounding!
I hate potentially invoking "Godwin" but Soros really is the modern
day economic equivalent of Hitler.

Where Hitler found true believers to be his brownshirts, Soros just
pays hired hands cash to be his.
And where Adolph used military force to gain power, Soros uses
economic force such as currency manipulation to try to topple
governments he doesn't like.
Hitler's ultimate goal was total global domination and Soros has made
no bones about the fact that it is also his goal.
Post by andy memory
Post by First-Post
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Trump's swamp is being drained.
he never had one.
But DC was built on a swamp and it has remained one for eons.
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?
Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
The people want to know if Trump colluded with the Russians to get
elected and the special prosecutor will find the answer.
"The people" are inveigled by the deep state's lamestream media an
incapable of rational thought.
It's called brainwashing.
Post by PIBB
Trump wrote "I look forward to this matter concluding quickly".
So?
Post by PIBB
Somebody please tell him the investigation isn't going to be over
anytime soon.
That's the deep state's playbook - drag this on as long and as widely as
possible and obstruct the change the people voted for.
Traitors like you will be identified and dealt with, that much you may
rely on.
Enjoy.
andy memory
2017-05-18 19:16:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by First-Post
Post by andy memory
Post by First-Post
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed
"sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein
were dismissed by Republicans for using anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by behaving so
badly, it wouldn't have been possible to appoint a special
prosecutor against the president within 110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in the
foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state
operatives would do everything to impeach him for threatening to
"drain the swamp".
Donald Trump's attempts at establishing a deep state in the White
House are floundering.
He never tried to establish a "deep state in the White House"
That's an absurd lie, even for you.
Post by PIBB
The Congressional representatives of the
people are not allowing an unelected government within a
government.
Maxine Waters and the Soros funded filth that are promulgating these
lies will burn in Hell.
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000000306
Nice work, thank you.
Soros has shown the power one billionaire can wield.
He has, largely by himself, funded and caused the destruction of Europe
and the seeding of a global Muslim caliphate.
Astounding!
I hate potentially invoking "Godwin" but Soros really is the modern
day economic equivalent of Hitler.
Of this there is no question, in fact he was a property confiscator for
the Nazis during the war, and here's what he had to say about those days:

“I don’t deny the Jews their right to a national existence–but I don’t
want to be part of it.”

“My mother was quite anti-Semitic, and ashamed of being Jewish. Given
the culture in which one lived, being Jewish was a clear-cut stigma,
disadvantage, a handicap-and, therefore, there was always the desire to
transcend it, to escape it.”

“So the assimilationist Jews of Hungary had a deep sense of
inferiority and it took me a long time to work through that,”

– “As I looked around me for a worthy cause. I ran into difficulties. I
did not belong to any community. As a Hungarian Jew I had never quite
become an American. I had left Hungary behind and my Jewishness did not
express itself in a sense of tribal loyalty that would have led me to
support Israel,”

George Soros has repeatedly called 1944 “The Best Year of his Life.” 70%
of Mr. Soros’s fellow Jews in Hungary, nearly a half-million human
beings, were annihilated in that year, yet he gives no sign that this
put any damper on his elation, either at the time or indeed in
retrospect. During an interview with “Sixty Minute’s” Steve Kroft, Soros
was asked about his “best year.”
George Soros Interview Where He Admitted He Was A Nazi Collaborator:

He was only to happy to admit his collaboration with the Nazis,in fact,
he called those days the “best time of my life”. Click to watch, in
context, that startling confession.

KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of
yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.

SOROS: Yes. Yes.

KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property
from your fellow Jews, friends and neighbors.

SOROS: Yes. That’s right. Yes.

KROFT: I mean, that sounds like an experience that would send lots of
people to the psychiatric couch for many, many, years. Was it difficult?

SOROS: No, not at all. Not at all, I rather enjoyed it.

KROFT: No feelings of guilt?

SOROS: No, only feelings of absolute power.

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/proof-george-soros-nazi-past-finally-comes-light-discovery-forgotten-interview/
Post by First-Post
Where Hitler found true believers to be his brownshirts, Soros just
pays hired hands cash to be his.
Yes.
Post by First-Post
And where Adolph used military force to gain power, Soros uses
economic force such as currency manipulation to try to topple
governments he doesn't like.
Yes.
Post by First-Post
Hitler's ultimate goal was total global domination and Soros has made
no bones about the fact that it is also his goal.
100% accurate!
Post by First-Post
Post by andy memory
Post by First-Post
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Trump's swamp is being drained.
he never had one.
But DC was built on a swamp and it has remained one for eons.
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?
Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
The people want to know if Trump colluded with the Russians to get
elected and the special prosecutor will find the answer.
"The people" are inveigled by the deep state's lamestream media an
incapable of rational thought.
It's called brainwashing.
Post by PIBB
Trump wrote "I look forward to this matter concluding quickly".
So?
Post by PIBB
Somebody please tell him the investigation isn't going to be over
anytime soon.
That's the deep state's playbook - drag this on as long and as widely as
possible and obstruct the change the people voted for.
Traitors like you will be identified and dealt with, that much you may
rely on.
Enjoy.
PIBB
2017-05-18 20:00:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using
unnamed "sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein
were dismissed by Republicans for using anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by behaving
so badly, it wouldn't have been possible to appoint a special
prosecutor against the president within 110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in the
foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state
operatives would do everything to impeach him for threatening
to "drain the swamp".
Donald Trump's attempts at establishing a deep state in the
White House are floundering.
He never tried to establish a "deep state in the White House"
That's an absurd lie, even for you.
Of course he did. Trump and Bannon came along with their new
ideas about how the White House should be run. Withdraw from the
press. Provide the public with less info. "Honey badger don't
give a shit". Shock and Awe. Reduced interaction with Congress.
And so on. It's the new deep state. A state within a state. In
the White House.
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
The Congressional representatives of the
people are not allowing an unelected government within a
government.
Maxine Waters and the Soros funded filth that are promulgating
these lies will burn in Hell.
Post by PIBB
Trump's swamp is being drained.
he never had one.
But DC was built on a swamp and it has remained one for eons.
Trump's placemen, billionaire pals, self-interested businessmen,
family members, political outsiders, hangers on promoted only for
their loyalty, etc all form part of Trump's swamp.

He brought his personal distasteful swamp to Washington but as his
coterie is not fit for purpose, it is being drained. The members
are leaving.
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?
Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
The people want to know if Trump colluded with the Russians to
get elected and the special prosecutor will find the answer.
"The people" are inveigled by the deep state's lamestream media
an incapable of rational thought.
It's called brainwashing.
The American people are not so stupid as to believe every single
thing they read or see. Give them credit. They aren't
brainwashed.
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Trump wrote "I look forward to this matter concluding quickly".
Somebody please tell him the investigation isn't going to be
over anytime soon.
That's the state's playbook - drag this on as long and as
widely as possible and obstruct the change the people voted for.
Long may this investigation run.

It's going to take the wind out of Donald's sails. Although trump
won't put be able to fix his stupidity, he is going to tread far
more carefully.

He knows another special investigation can be arranged to look
into some other aspect if needed.
andy memory
2017-05-18 21:31:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using
unnamed "sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein
were dismissed by Republicans for using anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by behaving
so badly, it wouldn't have been possible to appoint a special
prosecutor against the president within 110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in the
foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state
operatives would do everything to impeach him for threatening
to "drain the swamp".
Donald Trump's attempts at establishing a deep state in the
White House are floundering.
He never tried to establish a "deep state in the White House"
That's an absurd lie, even for you.
Of course he did. Trump and Bannon came along with their new
ideas about how the White House should be run. Withdraw from the
press. Provide the public with less info. "Honey badger don't
give a shit". Shock and Awe. Reduced interaction with Congress.
And so on. It's the new deep state. A state within a state. In
the White House.
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
The Congressional representatives of the
people are not allowing an unelected government within a
government.
Maxine Waters and the Soros funded filth that are promulgating
these lies will burn in Hell.
Post by PIBB
Trump's swamp is being drained.
he never had one.
But DC was built on a swamp and it has remained one for eons.
Trump's placemen, billionaire pals, self-interested businessmen,
family members, political outsiders, hangers on promoted only for
their loyalty, etc all form part of Trump's swamp.
He brought his personal distasteful swamp to Washington but as his
coterie is not fit for purpose, it is being drained. The members
are leaving.
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?
Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
The people want to know if Trump colluded with the Russians to
get elected and the special prosecutor will find the answer.
"The people" are inveigled by the deep state's lamestream media
an incapable of rational thought.
It's called brainwashing.
The American people are not so stupid as to believe every single
thing they read or see. Give them credit. They aren't
brainwashed.
No, they ARE precisely that stupid, or damned close to it!

And it's common among most nations, not just America.

CBC are common liars.
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Trump wrote "I look forward to this matter concluding quickly".
Somebody please tell him the investigation isn't going to be
over anytime soon.
That's the state's playbook - drag this on as long and as
widely as possible and obstruct the change the people voted for.
Long may this investigation run.
That's an moron's stance.
Post by PIBB
It's going to take the wind out of Donald's sails.
And that will take the wind out of an economy that largely fuels Canaduh's.
Post by PIBB
Although trump
won't put be able to fix his stupidity, he is going to tread far
more carefully.
He may be gone on Monday.
Post by PIBB
He knows another special investigation can be arranged to look
into some other aspect if needed.
Yes, the deep state and Soros are at play and the pwnd public is losing.
PIBB
2017-05-18 21:53:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using
unnamed "sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat
it. Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and
Bernstein were dismissed by Republicans for using
anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by
behaving so badly, it wouldn't have been possible to
appoint a special prosecutor against the president within
110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in
the foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state
operatives would do everything to impeach him for
threatening to "drain the swamp".
Donald Trump's attempts at establishing a deep state in the
White House are floundering.
He never tried to establish a "deep state in the White House"
That's an absurd lie, even for you.
Of course he did. Trump and Bannon came along with their new
ideas about how the White House should be run. Withdraw from
the press. Provide the public with less info. "Honey badger
don't give a shit". Shock and Awe. Reduced interaction with
Congress. And so on. It's the new deep state. A state within
a state. In the White House.
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
The Congressional representatives of the people are not
allowing an unelected government within a government.
Maxine Waters and the Soros funded filth that are promulgating
these lies will burn in Hell.
Post by PIBB
Trump's swamp is being drained.
he never had one. But DC was built on a swamp and it has
remained one for eons.
Trump's placemen, billionaire pals, self-interested
businessmen, family members, political outsiders, hangers on
promoted only for their loyalty, etc all form part of Trump's
swamp.
He brought his personal distasteful swamp to Washington but as
his coterie is not fit for purpose, it is being drained. The
members are leaving.
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?
Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
The people want to know if Trump colluded with the Russians
to get elected and the special prosecutor will find the
answer.
"The people" are inveigled by the deep state's lamestream
media an incapable of rational thought.
It's called brainwashing.
The American people are not so stupid as to believe every
single thing they read or see. Give them credit. They aren't
brainwashed.
No, they ARE precisely that stupid, or damned close to it!
And it's common among most nations, not just America.
CBC are common liars.
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Trump wrote "I look forward to this matter concluding
quickly". Somebody please tell him the investigation isn't
going to be over anytime soon.
That's the state's playbook - drag this on as long and as
widely as possible and obstruct the change the people voted
for.
Long may this investigation run.
That's an moron's stance.
Post by PIBB
It's going to take the wind out of Donald's sails.
And that will take the wind out of an economy that largely fuels Canaduh's.
Post by PIBB
Although trump won't put be able to fix his stupidity, he is
going to tread far more carefully.
He may be gone on Monday.
Post by PIBB
He knows another special investigation can be arranged to look
into some other aspect if needed.
Yes, the deep state and Soros are at play and the pwnd public is losing.
Maybe we should have a version of Godwin's Law for when the "deep
state", "fake media" or some conspiracy theory gets mentioned.
andy memory
2017-05-18 22:14:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using
unnamed "sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat
it. Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and
Bernstein were dismissed by Republicans for using
anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by
behaving so badly, it wouldn't have been possible to
appoint a special prosecutor against the president within
110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in
the foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state
operatives would do everything to impeach him for
threatening to "drain the swamp".
Donald Trump's attempts at establishing a deep state in the
White House are floundering.
He never tried to establish a "deep state in the White House"
That's an absurd lie, even for you.
Of course he did. Trump and Bannon came along with their new
ideas about how the White House should be run. Withdraw from
the press. Provide the public with less info. "Honey badger
don't give a shit". Shock and Awe. Reduced interaction with
Congress. And so on. It's the new deep state. A state within
a state. In the White House.
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
The Congressional representatives of the people are not
allowing an unelected government within a government.
Maxine Waters and the Soros funded filth that are promulgating
these lies will burn in Hell.
Post by PIBB
Trump's swamp is being drained.
he never had one. But DC was built on a swamp and it has
remained one for eons.
Trump's placemen, billionaire pals, self-interested
businessmen, family members, political outsiders, hangers on
promoted only for their loyalty, etc all form part of Trump's
swamp.
He brought his personal distasteful swamp to Washington but as
his coterie is not fit for purpose, it is being drained. The
members are leaving.
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?
Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
The people want to know if Trump colluded with the Russians
to get elected and the special prosecutor will find the
answer.
"The people" are inveigled by the deep state's lamestream
media an incapable of rational thought.
It's called brainwashing.
The American people are not so stupid as to believe every
single thing they read or see. Give them credit. They aren't
brainwashed.
No, they ARE precisely that stupid, or damned close to it!
And it's common among most nations, not just America.
CBC are common liars.
Post by PIBB
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Trump wrote "I look forward to this matter concluding
quickly". Somebody please tell him the investigation isn't
going to be over anytime soon.
That's the state's playbook - drag this on as long and as
widely as possible and obstruct the change the people voted
for.
Long may this investigation run.
That's an moron's stance.
Post by PIBB
It's going to take the wind out of Donald's sails.
And that will take the wind out of an economy that largely fuels Canaduh's.
Post by PIBB
Although trump won't put be able to fix his stupidity, he is
going to tread far more carefully.
He may be gone on Monday.
Post by PIBB
He knows another special investigation can be arranged to look
into some other aspect if needed.
Yes, the deep state and Soros are at play and the pwnd public is losing.
Maybe we should have a version of Godwin's Law for when the "deep
state", "fake media" or some conspiracy theory gets mentioned.
Maybe we should have trials for treason and see if your neck stretches
appropriately.
Siri Cruise
2017-05-18 22:41:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by andy memory
Post by PIBB
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed
"sources" for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Read all the President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein were
dismissed by Republicans for using anonymous sources.
If it wasn't for Trump's considerable assistance by behaving so
badly, it wouldn't have been possible to appoint a special
prosecutor against the president within 110 days.
Well done Donald. Maybe you continue to shoot yourself in the
foot.
It was _always_ a foregone conclusion that the deep state operatives
would do everything to impeach him for threatening to "drain the swamp".
You do realize DC was BUILT on a swamp, yes?
Now ask yourself why you're in league with them.
No, no, no. I want even more incoherency in your paranoid rants.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
andy memory
2017-05-18 16:19:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed "sources"
for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
That is all of mankind, and you especially.
Post by Siri Cruise
Read all the
President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein were dismissed by Republicans for
using anonymous sources.
How many decades did it take to unmask that lawyer?

Nice to see you putting froth before findings again.
Siri Cruise
2017-05-18 22:40:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by andy memory
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed "sources"
for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
That is all of mankind, and you especially.
Post by Siri Cruise
Read all the
President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein were dismissed by Republicans for
using anonymous sources.
How many decades did it take to unmask that lawyer?
Nixon was unmasked within two years.
Post by andy memory
Nice to see you putting froth before findings again.
Nice to see your clairvoyance whether anything will come of it.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
Greg Carr
2017-05-18 17:02:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed "sources"
for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Read all the
President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein were dismissed by Republicans for
using anonymous sources.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
Deep Throat turned out to be the deputy head of the FBI Mark Felt.
Schuman
2017-05-18 18:03:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Greg Carr
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed "sources"
for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Read all the
President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein were dismissed by Republicans for
using anonymous sources.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
Deep Throat turned out to be the deputy head of the FBI Mark Felt.
Ding!

Nicely contexted, thank you.
AlleyCat
2017-05-18 22:13:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 18 May 2017 04:40:37 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed "sources"
for every one of their stories.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Read all the
President's Men and how Woodward and Bernstein were dismissed by Republicans for
using anonymous sources.
Their sources were legit and "unmasked" and history has proven that. So
far, ALL of the Washington Posts' and New York Times' men (sources) have
STAYED anonymous. I guess they're afraid of the Seth Rich treatment by the
Clintons, huh.

Bunch of butt-hurt sneaky little shits basically making shit up. What
Trump said was HIS prerogative and NO huge state secret. But does THAT
keep the media from having convulsions over something that is a non-story?

Obama gave Iran a quarter of a BILLION dollars

Obama exposed Valerie Plame, a covert CIA agent

Obama abandoned Sabrina De Sousa, ANOTHER CIA agent to be extradited to
Italy and jailed. Trump intervened and stopped it.

Obama unmasked Flynn, a FELONY.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Rudy Canoza
2017-05-18 16:56:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by NoBody
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:01:14 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 17:33:13 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr" them?
I've lost track: what's Drumpf latest story on why he canned Comey?
Same as the first and only.
So what do you claim that is?
I can see why you don't want to be specific. Anything you do
make concrete can easily be refuted by Trump's own statements,
or those of his mouthpieces.
Ahhhhh.... now it's his "mouthpieces" that matter. Sorry ...
Like we believe YOU over the Washington Post or New York Times
reports.
Ain't that the truth.
AlleyCat's psychotic ramblings are great for overwhelming a decent
debate with noise and perhaps providing him with something to ease
the boredom of his days but I doubt his bizarre reasoning has ever
persuaded a single person here to share his point of view.
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed "sources"
for every one of their stories.
Perfectly legitimate.
Schuman
2017-05-18 17:56:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by NoBody
As opposed to the media who can't seem to stop using unnamed "sources"
for every one of their stories.
Perfectly legitimate.
11 years ago, while posting under this current nym, Rudy Canoza, we had a
discussion about a revised marketing claim concerning grass-fed beef from
USDA. You claimed that you had written to and received a reply from
William T.
Sessions, Associate Deputy Administrator, Livestock and Seed Program. Here
below is the post you wrote using the nym Rudy Canoza containing your
correspondence with William Sessions.

[start- Jon to me]
Eat shit and bark at the moon, Dreck - the proposed
standard has NOT been adopted. I wrote to William
Sessions, the associate deputy administrator (how's
that for a title) at the Livestock and Seed Program at
USDA that is in charge of writing the standard for the
"meat marketing claims"; his name, title and e-mail
address are at a web page whose URL I gave yesterday,
http://www.fass.org/fasstrack/news_item.asp?news_id=1152

Here's his reply:

From: "Sessions, William" <***@usda.gov>
To: <jonball@[...]>
Mr. Ball: Thanks for your message. The marketing claim
standards are still under review by USDA. Accordingly, the
standards have not been published in a final form for use. I
hope this information is helpful.
Please let me know if further information is needed.
Thanks,
William T. Sessions
Associate Deputy Administrator
Livestock and Seed Program

-----Original Message-----
From: jonball@[...]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:38 AM
To: Sessions, William
Subject: 2003 proposed standards for meat marketing claims

I have read about the proposed standards, and I've seen
many of the public comments sent to USDA. I cannot find
anything to indicate if the standards were adopted.
Were the standards as proposed in 2003 adopted?

Thanks in advance.
Jonathan Ball
Pasadena, CA
___________________________________________________
Jonathan Ball aka Rudy Canoza 08 Sep 2005 http://bit.ly/2cYknsh
[end]

Jonathan Ball. Pasadena, CA. Priceless! That email, posted from Jonathan
Ball,
you, and the return email sent to Jonathan Ball proves beyond all doubt that
you are Jonathan Ball. Of course, you don't live in Pasadena since moving to
5327 Shepard Ave Sacramento, CA 95819-1731

Here's the proof Jonathan D Ball http://bit.ly/1LFy9t8
Post by Rudy Canoza
and I won't die soon.
Yeah you will. You're an old man who hasn't looked after himself. I wouldn't
go around goading people if I was as small and as puny as you are, liar Jon.
You ought to be very careful.
Post by Rudy Canoza
You certainly have no means to hasten my death.
Are you really serious, weed? you're just over 5 feet tall and 64 years old.
You'll be 65 on December 2nd. You've got to stop threatening people and
goading them to come after you. You're pathetic.
PIBB
2017-05-15 12:47:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article
Post by AlleyCat
On Sun, 14 May 2017 13:57:24 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself
just making up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt, he DIDN'T "orderr"
them?
I've lost track: what's Drumpf latest story on why he canned
Comey?
Trump brings his lying ways and underhand behavior from the
thoroughly disreputable world of construction to government.

Thing is that in government his pronouncements are subject to
scrutiny and fact checking which he's finding very awkward.
PIBB
2017-05-15 12:40:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
Crowd sizes are ALWAYS estimates.
Give it a rest.

Only a man with an ego complex like Trump would worry so much
about the size of inauguration crowd that he had to lie about it.

He's an unpopular president, so why should he expect a big crowd?
PIBB
2017-05-15 12:58:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by NoBody
Perhaps it's because he's tired of libs such as yourself just
making up claims out of thin air?
Obama personally orderred wiretaps on him?
He had a bigger inauguration crowd than Obama?
Obama approved Flynn so he didn't have to check him out?
Three million undocumented aliens voted against him?
Hey, I understand. Really. It's not the first time a white guy
with small hands felt inadequate next to a black man or a woman.
That white guy looks more like an orange guy. :)
AlleyCat
2017-05-13 22:12:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Trump Hid More Than $100 Million in Russian Income Since 2008
Nope. He did not "hide" it... he released a letter to Sen. Graham, that
LISTED the sale of a house. He sold a billionaire who HAPPENS to be a
Russian CITIZEN, not a Russian government entity, a house. Whoooooo.

Busted! Not.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
AlleyCat
2017-05-13 22:17:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
He previously said he had no Russian business dealings.
He didn't. Selling a house to a Russian citizen and making money off a
BEAUTY PAGEANT is NOT considered "dealings" with "Russia".

Fucking moron.

What he DID do with the Russian billionaire and whomever ran the Miss
Universe Pageant, is NOT illegal.

More bullshit liberal semantics.

[whining like a good liberal] Heee said heeee didn't havvvve any business
dealings with Russssssia.

He didn't. They were with PRIVATE citizens. Nothing illegal or unethical,
until of course, he won the Presidency from your loser fat ass, Hillary.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
PIBB
2017-05-15 12:56:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
says...
He previously said he had no Russian business dealings.
He didn't. Selling a house to a Russian citizen and making money
off a BEAUTY PAGEANT is NOT considered "dealings" with "Russia".
It's considered money laundering.

Laundering Russian money is even worse.
Post by AlleyCat
What he DID do with the Russian billionaire and whomever ran the
Miss Universe Pageant, is NOT illegal.
It is illegal if it breaks the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Undue
influence or laundering would be enough.
AlleyCat
2017-05-15 21:12:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 May 2017 13:56:49 +0100, PIBB says...
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
He previously said he had no Russian business dealings.
He didn't. Selling a house to a Russian citizen and making money
off a BEAUTY PAGEANT is NOT considered "dealings" with "Russia".
It's considered money laundering.
You're a fucking idiot.
Post by PIBB
Laundering Russian money is even worse.
You're a fucking idiot.
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
What he DID do with the Russian billionaire and whomever ran the
Miss Universe Pageant, is NOT illegal.
It is illegal if it breaks the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Undue
influence or laundering would be enough.
You're a fucking idiot.

Can you put his dick down long enough to tell me why it was illegal for
Trump to do business with Russia when he was a private citizen, but not
for THESE companies? THIS is a VERY short list. There are actually 100s of
AMERICAN companies doing business in Russia.

Pfizer
Boeing
Ford
Apple
Google
Pepsi
Procter&Gamble
McDonald's
Mondelez International
General Motors
Johnson & Johnson
Cargill
Alcoa
General Electric (GE)

Ever since the Democratic National Committee decided to turn their disdain
for Bernie Sanders into disdain for Russians and Donald Trump, the New
York billionaire has been seen as being in bed with Russian oligarchs and
longing to cut deals in Moscow. Since when was it so bad to want to do
business with the Russians?

It's politically correct to hate on Russia these days. To like Russia
even a bit means you support Vladimir Putin, or are impressed by the
Russian mafia and probably hate polar bears, or something.

If it is so bad to do business with the Russians, or even want to do
business with the Russians, then maybe these companies should cut and run
before the righteous threaten them with boycotts or defame their name in
the press.

Here's who's doing business with the bad guys.

On July 13, Pfizer closed a joint venture agreement with Russian
pharmaceutical company NovaMedica.

Boeing has been in Russia for decades. About five years ago, it announced
plans to invest $27 billion over the next 30 years. In July 2015, an
agreement was signed between Russian titanium manufacturer VSMPO-Avisma
Corporation, Boeing and the Ural Federal University for joint research and
development projects.

Ford has been in Russia for 13 years. In April 2015, the joint Russian-
American venture Ford Sollers launched the production of the Ford Transit.
The American brand launched four new vehicles in Russia last year,
including the Focus and Fiesta models sold here.

Apple and Google like him. Artem Kuharenko, co-founder of NTechLab in
Moscow. His app, FindFace, has been downloaded for free more than a
million times on Apple and Android since February, allowing users to
identify strangers from their smartphone cameras. (Photographer: Andrey
Rudakov/Bloomberg)

U.S. companies with an existing presence in Russia include, PepsiCo PEP +
0.91%, Procter&Gamble, McDonald's, Mondelez International, General Motors,
Johnson & Johnson, Cargill, Alcoa, and General Electric. GE recently
signed a joint venture with oil firm Rosneft in expectation that
Washington will actually one day lift sanctions on oil firms.

Morgan Stanley, not Trump International, is a yuuuuge American investor in
Russian real estate, according to Knight Frank. In April, a fund
controlled by Morgan Stanley began negotiations to acquire several
shopping centers in Moscow. That same month, their real estate investing
fund acquired the Metropolis in Moscow for $1.2 billion from Capital
Partners, a Kazakhstan developer.?
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
NoBody
2017-05-16 11:24:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by PIBB
Post by AlleyCat
He previously said he had no Russian business dealings.
He didn't. Selling a house to a Russian citizen and making money
off a BEAUTY PAGEANT is NOT considered "dealings" with "Russia".
It's considered money laundering.
It is? Perhaps you can back up your claim with a credible citation
that doesn't involve unnnamed sources?
Loading...