Discussion:
Obama STILL Officially The Worst President Ever - When Obama White House EXPOSES a CIA Agent... It's a "Mistake"...
Add Reply
AlleyCat
2017-05-16 22:13:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
... when Trump's White House does it, it's a national security breach, but
will lead to nothing harmful to "source".

The Washington Post does an outstanding job of taking the Obama regime's
wishes to heart and covering for them.


White House "MISTAKENLY" Identifies CIA Chief In Afghanistan
By Greg Miller - The Washington Post - May 25, 2014

The CIA's top officer in Kabul was exposed Saturday by the White House
when his name was "INADVERTENTLY" included on a list provided to news
organizations of senior U.S. officials participating in President Obama's
surprise visit with U.S. troops.

The White House recognized the MISTAKE and quickly issued a revised list
that did not include the individual, who had been identified on the
initial release as the "Chief of Station" in Kabul, a designation used by
the CIA for its highest-ranking spy in a country.

The Post is withholding the name of the CIA officer at the REQUEST (LOL)
of Obama administration officials who warned that the officer and his
family could be at risk if the name were published. The CIA and the White
House declined to comment.

The CIA officer was one of 15 senior U.S. officials identified as taking
part in a military briefing for Obama at Bagram air base, a sprawling
military compound north of Kabul. Others included U.S. Ambassador to
Afghanistan James B. Cunningham and Marine Gen. Joseph F. Dunford, Jr.,
the commander of U.S. and coalition forces in the country.

Yup... a breach that could have gotten this CIA agent or members of his
family killed... and no one bats an eye.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
--
alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.republican,
alt.politics.trump, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics

STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Alan Baker
2017-05-16 22:16:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
... when Trump's White House does it, it's a national security breach, but
will lead to nothing harmful to "source".
The Washington Post does an outstanding job of taking the Obama regime's
wishes to heart and covering for them.
All the deflection in the world won't save your boy now...
AlleyCat
2017-05-16 23:21:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 16 May 2017 15:16:56 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
... when Trump's White House does it, it's a national security breach, but
will lead to nothing harmful to "source".
The Washington Post does an outstanding job of taking the Obama regime's
wishes to heart and covering for them.
All the deflection in the world won't save your boy now...
"(T)he president has the authority to disclose even the most highly
classified information at will." - The Washington Post
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Alan Baker
2017-05-16 23:23:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 15:16:56 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
... when Trump's White House does it, it's a national security breach, but
will lead to nothing harmful to "source".
The Washington Post does an outstanding job of taking the Obama regime's
wishes to heart and covering for them.
All the deflection in the world won't save your boy now...
"(T)he president has the authority to disclose even the most highly
classified information at will." - The Washington Post
Yup.

And yet abrogating international agreements to do so shows terminally
bad judgement...

...and attempting to get Comey to kill the investigation into Flynn's
dealings with Russia IS obstruction of justice.
AlleyCat
2017-05-16 23:27:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:23:19 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
...and attempting to get Comey to kill the investigation into Flynn's
dealings with Russia IS obstruction of justice.
Video and/or audio, please.
Alan Baker
2017-05-16 23:29:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:23:19 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
...and attempting to get Comey to kill the investigation into Flynn's
dealings with Russia IS obstruction of justice.
Video and/or audio, please.
LOL!
Rudy Canoza
2017-05-16 23:34:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:23:19 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
...and attempting to get Comey to kill the investigation into Flynn's
dealings with Russia IS obstruction of justice.
Video and/or audio, please.
LOL!
LOL indeed!

Mr. Comey wrote the memo detailing his conversation with the
president immediately after the meeting, which took place the day
after Mr. Flynn resigned, according to two people who read the memo.
The memo was part of a paper trail Mr. Comey created documenting
what he perceived as the president’s improper efforts to influence
an ongoing investigation. An *F.B.I. agent’s contemporaneous notes*
are *widely held up in court as credible evidence of conversations.*

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/16/us/politics/james-comey-trump-flynn-russia-investigation.html
Rudy Canoza
2017-05-16 23:35:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:23:19 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
...and attempting to get Comey to kill the investigation into Flynn's
dealings with Russia IS obstruction of justice.
Video and/or audio, please.
LOL!

Mr. Comey wrote the memo detailing his conversation with the
president immediately after the meeting, which took place the day
after Mr. Flynn resigned, according to two people who read the memo.
The memo was part of a paper trail Mr. Comey created documenting
what he perceived as the president’s improper efforts to influence
an ongoing investigation. An *F.B.I. agent’s contemporaneous notes*
are *widely held up in court as credible evidence of conversations*.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/16/us/politics/james-comey-trump-flynn-russia-investigation.html
b***@hotmail.com
2017-05-17 02:33:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
"(T)he president has the authority to disclose even the most highly
classified information at will." - The Washington Post
But surely it would take a total moron to go ahead and disclose "the most highly classified information" at will, during loose-lip chats with other leaders. People who do that are usually removed tout suite.
Siri Cruise
2017-05-17 03:35:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 15:16:56 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
... when Trump's White House does it, it's a national security breach, but
will lead to nothing harmful to "source".
The Washington Post does an outstanding job of taking the Obama regime's
wishes to heart and covering for them.
All the deflection in the world won't save your boy now...
"(T)he president has the authority to disclose even the most highly
classified information at will." - The Washington Post
I can imagine your howls of rage if Obama had declassified any secrets on
Clinton's server.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
AlleyCat
2017-05-17 05:32:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 16 May 2017 20:35:46 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 15:16:56 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
... when Trump's White House does it, it's a national security breach, but
will lead to nothing harmful to "source".
The Washington Post does an outstanding job of taking the Obama regime's
wishes to heart and covering for them.
All the deflection in the world won't save your boy now...
"(T)he president has the authority to disclose even the most highly
classified information at will." - The Washington Post
I can imagine your howls of rage if Obama had declassified any secrets on
Clinton's server.
Uhhh... Trump didn't "declassify" anything. The traitor who LEAKED it
kinda did.

Yet ANOTHER non sequitur.

What Trump talked about with the Russians is really no big deal. On a
scale of 1-10, it's a 2.

He wasn't divulging military secrets, dumb ass... he was discussing how
they can "defend" against terrorism and ISIS, in the realm of civilian
aviation. Ooooh... that HAS to be TOP SECRET, right? Wrong.

Gawd, can't you fucktards get that through your thick fucking skulls. No
"secrets" were divulged at all, except those needing to be kept from
TERRORISTS.

The LEAK is the problem here, Einstein... NOT what was discussed. Someone
needs to be shot for treason, even IF the information leaked to WaPo
wasn't a big deal. Back before FEEWINGS were being protected, when men
were men and didn't wear dresses out in public, whomever DID leak shit
like that, WOULD be shot.

Keep this in mind, moron... whomever DID leak the information, they
weren't Democrat. I don't care if it was the National Security Advisor, a
Republican, may I remind you... if he leaked, HE needs to leak, like this
Democrat:


--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Clave
2017-05-17 05:37:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 20:35:46 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 15:16:56 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
... when Trump's White House does it, it's a national security breach, but
will lead to nothing harmful to "source".
The Washington Post does an outstanding job of taking the Obama regime's
wishes to heart and covering for them.
All the deflection in the world won't save your boy now...
"(T)he president has the authority to disclose even the most highly
classified information at will." - The Washington Post
I can imagine your howls of rage if Obama had declassified any secrets on
Clinton's server.
Uhhh... Trump didn't "declassify" anything.
By communicating it to persons not authorized to know it, he did.
Alan Baker
2017-05-17 07:11:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 20:35:46 -0700, Siri Cruise says...
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 15:16:56 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
... when Trump's White House does it, it's a national security breach, but
will lead to nothing harmful to "source".
The Washington Post does an outstanding job of taking the Obama regime's
wishes to heart and covering for them.
All the deflection in the world won't save your boy now...
"(T)he president has the authority to disclose even the most highly
classified information at will." - The Washington Post
I can imagine your howls of rage if Obama had declassified any secrets on
Clinton's server.
Uhhh... Trump didn't "declassify" anything. The traitor who LEAKED it
kinda did.
Yet ANOTHER non sequitur.
What Trump talked about with the Russians is really no big deal. On a
scale of 1-10, it's a 2.
How do you know that?
Post by AlleyCat
He wasn't divulging military secrets, dumb ass... he was discussing how
they can "defend" against terrorism and ISIS, in the realm of civilian
aviation. Ooooh... that HAS to be TOP SECRET, right? Wrong.
He was divulging "codeword" classified intelligence received from
another government that didn't authorize this sharing.
Post by AlleyCat
Gawd, can't you fucktards get that through your thick fucking skulls. No
"secrets" were divulged at all, except those needing to be kept from
TERRORISTS.
The LEAK is the problem here, Einstein... NOT what was discussed. Someone
needs to be shot for treason, even IF the information leaked to WaPo
wasn't a big deal. Back before FEEWINGS were being protected, when men
were men and didn't wear dresses out in public, whomever DID leak shit
like that, WOULD be shot.
Keep this in mind, moron... whomever DID leak the information, they
weren't Democrat. I don't care if it was the National Security Advisor, a
Republican, may I remind you... if he leaked, HE needs to leak, like this
http://youtu.be/5q_5vIbsI3A
Siri Cruise
2017-05-17 02:39:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Alan Baker
All the deflection in the world won't save your boy now...
It depends on Republicans in Congress. As long as they keep their waggon hitched
to his star, Drumpf will continue. I can't help you with that: both our senators
are California Democrats, my representative is a California Democrat, and all
the nearby state and federal representatives are California Democrats. It's up
to poor widdle mistreated white dudes.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
b***@hotmail.com
2017-05-16 22:41:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 3:13:33 PM UTC-7, AlleyCat wrote:


Alleycat, what had you been drinking from the gutter when you wrote that nonsense?

Read this 2015 map:

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/24/7-charts-on-how-the-world-views-president-obama/ft_15-06-26_obamaconfidence_3/

Interestingly, now we know of Trump's underhand dealings with the commies ---- Russia expressed the lowest approval rating of President Obama.


In 2005, the nations of the world loathed George Bush; for instance
'viewed unfavorably' by 53% in Italy. Three-quarters of those in Spain, and more than 80% in France and Germany, had a negative view of President Bush's role in world affairs."

In Turkey, 72% of those polled said that Bush's reelection made them "feel worse about Americans".

Obama was liked and respected worldwide.

Trump is seen as a circus clown in big boots, whose laces he cannot even tie without help.
Siri Cruise
2017-05-17 02:36:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
... when Trump's White House does it, it's a national security breach, but
will lead to nothing harmful to "source".
The White House recognized the MISTAKE and quickly issued a revised list
Does Drumpf admit he made a mistake and tried to control any damage?
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.
Loading...