Discussion:
Hitlery didnt know emails marked ?C? were confidential
Add Reply
AlleyCat
2017-05-17 00:14:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT), T says...
Democrats are all stupid lying douchbags...
[whining like a liberal bitch]

Nooooo... sheee wasss jussssst carrrrrelessss.

Comeeeeeey said soooo.
--
STILL can't understand why liberal Democrats are so in love with Muslims.
Muslims are against abortion, contraception, pre-marital sex, they kill
homosexuals BY LAW and they treat women as slaves and chattel. Their old
men rape little boys and get away with it... oh, and they HATE you. Am I
leaving anything else out that you just LOVE about them?
Alan Baker
2017-05-17 00:17:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT), T says...
Democrats are all stupid lying douchbags...
[whining like a liberal bitch]
Nooooo... sheee wasss jussssst carrrrrelessss.
Comeeeeeey said soooo.
There were precisely 3 emails out of 30,000 that were properly tagged as
classified.
AlleyCat
2017-05-17 00:57:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 16 May 2017 17:17:24 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT), T says...
Democrats are all stupid lying douchbags...
[whining like a liberal bitch]
Nooooo... sheee wasss jussssst carrrrrelessss.
Comeeeeeey said soooo.
There were precisely 3 emails out of 30,000 that were properly tagged as
classified.
Uhhh uhhh uhhh uhhh... BULLSHIT... or is it bullshit liberal semantics,
like Hillary tried to use, to no avail, like, "at the time"?

That shit backfired on her stupid ass, once Comey TOLD us the REAL story.

There were more emails marked TOP SECRET than just 3.

You are a fucking moron, sir, who must watch CNN ONLY and live UNDER
mommy's basement when not watching.

"From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110
(ONE HUNDRED AND TEN) e-mails in 52 (FIFTY-TWO) e-mail chains have been
determined by the owning agency to contain CLASSIFIED information at the
time they were sent or received."

Now would be the time to screech that they weren't "marked" as
"classified". LOL But they were.

"Eight of those chains contained information that was TOP SECRET at the
time they were sent; 36 chains contained SECRET information at the time;
and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of
classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were
"up-classified" to make them Confidential; the information in those had
not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent."

Do you want video?

People have been executed for doing less.
Alan Baker
2017-05-17 01:05:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 17:17:24 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT), T says...
Democrats are all stupid lying douchbags...
[whining like a liberal bitch]
Nooooo... sheee wasss jussssst carrrrrelessss.
Comeeeeeey said soooo.
There were precisely 3 emails out of 30,000 that were properly tagged as
classified.
Uhhh uhhh uhhh uhhh... BULLSHIT... or is it bullshit liberal semantics,
like Hillary tried to use, to no avail, like, "at the time"?
No. That's an actual fact. Sorry.
Post by AlleyCat
That shit backfired on her stupid ass, once Comey TOLD us the REAL story.
There were more emails marked TOP SECRET than just 3.
No. There weren't. There were some small number of emails that contained
classified information that weren't market as such.

But there were precisely THREE emails that were actually marked properly.
Post by AlleyCat
You are a fucking moron, sir, who must watch CNN ONLY and live UNDER
mommy's basement when not watching.
"From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110
(ONE HUNDRED AND TEN) e-mails in 52 (FIFTY-TWO) e-mail chains have been
determined by the owning agency to contain CLASSIFIED information at the
time they were sent or received."
Now would be the time to screech that they weren't "marked" as
"classified". LOL But they were.
No. They were not.
Post by AlleyCat
"Eight of those chains contained information that was TOP SECRET at the
time they were sent; 36 chains contained SECRET information at the time;
and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of
classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were
"up-classified" to make them Confidential; the information in those had
not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent."
None of that says they were marked as such at the time.
Post by AlleyCat
Do you want video?
People have been executed for doing less.
Keep deflecting.

Trump DELIBERATELY violated an agreement with an ally by revealing
codeword classified information to the Russians.
RW Maroon
2017-05-17 01:17:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 17:17:24 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT), T says...
Democrats are all stupid lying douchbags...
[whining like a liberal bitch]
Nooooo... sheee wasss jussssst carrrrrelessss.
Comeeeeeey said soooo.
There were precisely 3 emails out of 30,000 that were properly tagged as
classified.
Uhhh uhhh uhhh uhhh... BULLSHIT... or is it bullshit liberal semantics,
like Hillary tried to use, to no avail, like, "at the time"?
That shit backfired on her stupid ass, once Comey TOLD us the REAL story.
There were more emails marked TOP SECRET than just 3.
You are a fucking moron, sir, who must watch CNN ONLY and live UNDER
mommy's basement when not watching.
"From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110
(ONE HUNDRED AND TEN) e-mails in 52 (FIFTY-TWO) e-mail chains have been
determined by the owning agency to contain CLASSIFIED information at the
time they were sent or received."
The "c" with a circle does NOT mean "classified," you fucking moron. It
means "confidential," which is certainly not "classified." It means it's
not public. Since her emails weren't charged publicly until the GOP
released them, she violated nothing.
Post by AlleyCat
Now would be the time to screech that they weren't "marked" as
"classified". LOL But they were.
No, fuckwit. They were marked "confidential." There is no such designation
as "classified," you ignorant git.
Post by AlleyCat
"Eight of those chains contained information that was TOP SECRET at the
time they were sent; 36 chains contained SECRET information at the time;
and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of
classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were
"up-classified" to make them Confidential; the information in those had
not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent."
C
'Confidential is not "classified." There is no classification called
"classified."
Post by AlleyCat
Do you want video?
People have been executed for doing less.
No one has ever even spent time in jail for shit like this. Ever. You
fucking moron.
--
A Canyon is just a big hole.
AlleyCat
2017-05-17 01:41:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 17 May 2017 01:17:38 -0000 (UTC), RW Maroon says...
Post by RW Maroon
You
fucking moron.
Coming from someone who wrote, "The Clinton Foundation has provided needed
assistance for millions of people. Bill and Hillary are saints."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Why the nym-shift, Ted? Fucking crazy-ass loOnY liberal.
Alan Baker
2017-05-17 01:43:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by AlleyCat
On Wed, 17 May 2017 01:17:38 -0000 (UTC), RW Maroon says...
Post by RW Maroon
You
fucking moron.
Coming from someone who wrote, "The Clinton Foundation has provided needed
assistance for millions of people. Bill and Hillary are saints."
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Why the nym-shift, Ted? Fucking crazy-ass loOnY liberal.
I see you snipped all the factual points raised to focus on a strawman.

Great job!
m***@gmail.com
2017-05-17 20:12:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RW Maroon
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 17:17:24 -0700, Alan Baker says...
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT), T says...
Democrats are all stupid lying douchbags...
[whining like a liberal bitch]
Nooooo... sheee wasss jussssst carrrrrelessss.
Comeeeeeey said soooo.
There were precisely 3 emails out of 30,000 that were properly tagged as
classified.
Uhhh uhhh uhhh uhhh... BULLSHIT... or is it bullshit liberal semantics,
like Hillary tried to use, to no avail, like, "at the time"?
That shit backfired on her stupid ass, once Comey TOLD us the REAL story.
There were more emails marked TOP SECRET than just 3.
You are a fucking moron, sir, who must watch CNN ONLY and live UNDER
mommy's basement when not watching.
"From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110
(ONE HUNDRED AND TEN) e-mails in 52 (FIFTY-TWO) e-mail chains have been
determined by the owning agency to contain CLASSIFIED information at the
time they were sent or received."
The "c" with a circle does NOT mean "classified," you fucking moron. It
means "confidential," which is certainly not "classified." It means it's
not public. Since her emails weren't charged publicly until the GOP
released them, she violated nothing.
Post by AlleyCat
Now would be the time to screech that they weren't "marked" as
"classified". LOL But they were.
No, fuckwit. They were marked "confidential." There is no such designation
as "classified," you ignorant git.
Post by AlleyCat
"Eight of those chains contained information that was TOP SECRET at the
time they were sent; 36 chains contained SECRET information at the time;
and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of
classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were
"up-classified" to make them Confidential; the information in those had
not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent."
C
'Confidential is not "classified." There is no classification called
"classified."
Post by AlleyCat
Do you want video?
People have been executed for doing less.
No one has ever even spent time in jail for shit like this. Ever. You
fucking moron.
Shit Stain Baker suffers from Dunning-Kruger Syndrome.

The dumb, little shit thinks IT knows everything about everything. But IT don't know jack.
tRudy Crayola
2017-05-17 07:57:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT), T says...
Democrats are all stupid lying douchbags...
[whining like a liberal bitch]
Nooooo... sheee wasss jussssst carrrrrelessss.
Comeeeeeey said soooo.
There were precisely 3 emails out of 30,000 that were properly tagged as
classified.
It only takes one ..You stupid bastard! But there were lots more!
--
Rudy's Nut & Fruit farm- Sacramento
m***@gmail.com
2017-05-17 20:13:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by tRudy Crayola
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT), T says...
Democrats are all stupid lying douchbags...
[whining like a liberal bitch]
Nooooo... sheee wasss jussssst carrrrrelessss.
Comeeeeeey said soooo.
There were precisely 3 emails out of 30,000 that were properly tagged as
classified.
It only takes one ..You stupid bastard! But there were lots more!
Shit Stain Baker...so loved by so many, and, IT makes it look so easy.
Dhu on Gate
2017-05-18 00:36:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by tRudy Crayola
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT), T says...
Democrats are all stupid lying douchbags...
[whining like a liberal bitch]
Nooooo... sheee wasss jussssst carrrrrelessss.
Comeeeeeey said soooo.
There were precisely 3 emails out of 30,000 that were properly tagged as
classified.
It only takes one ..You stupid bastard! But there were lots more!
Shit Stain Baker...so loved by so many, and, IT makes it look so easy.
Pull your head out of your ass and the world will look different.

Dhu
--
Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglaise.
C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-)

http://babayaga.neotext.ca/PublicKeys/Duncan_Patton_a_Campbell_pubkey.txt
m***@gmail.com
2017-05-18 00:41:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Dhu on Gate
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by tRudy Crayola
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT), T says...
Democrats are all stupid lying douchbags...
[whining like a liberal bitch]
Nooooo... sheee wasss jussssst carrrrrelessss.
Comeeeeeey said soooo.
There were precisely 3 emails out of 30,000 that were properly tagged as
classified.
It only takes one ..You stupid bastard! But there were lots more!
Shit Stain Baker...so loved by so many, and, IT makes it look so easy.
Pull your head out of your ass and the world will look different.
Dhu
Kiss my ass.
Dhu on Gate
2017-05-18 00:53:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by Dhu on Gate
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by tRudy Crayola
Post by Alan Baker
Post by AlleyCat
On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT), T says...
Democrats are all stupid lying douchbags...
[whining like a liberal bitch]
Nooooo... sheee wasss jussssst carrrrrelessss.
Comeeeeeey said soooo.
There were precisely 3 emails out of 30,000 that were properly
tagged as classified.
It only takes one ..You stupid bastard! But there were lots more!
Shit Stain Baker...so loved by so many, and, IT makes it look so easy.
Pull your head out of your ass and the world will look different.
Dhu
Kiss my ass.
Sure. An' I like asshole _well_done_, thanks.

Dhu
--
Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglaise.
C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-)

http://babayaga.neotext.ca/PublicKeys/Duncan_Patton_a_Campbell_pubkey.txt
Topaz
2017-05-17 00:48:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:

"German women, German men !

It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.

The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.

The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.

It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.

The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.

A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.

The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.

German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.

A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.

We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."


www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Greg Carr
2017-05-17 17:26:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Topaz
"German women, German men !
It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.
The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.
The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.
It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.
The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.
A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.
The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.
German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.
A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.
We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."
www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Kenneth Strom of Alaska aka Topaz is a convicted child porn whacker. He says on his website that he has no job and is a 4th rate citizen. Kill yourself Nazi.
Loading...