NASA - Earth Observatory - The Global Spread of Bare Ground September 27, 2017

[Hillbilly Davis]

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 05:30:05 -0700 (PDT), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
says...

which means increase in land surface temps.

Yeah... FROM the Sun.

Gawd, yer stoopid.

NASA: Climate Lying
--
"NOAA And NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
Temperature Data"

"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"

"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"NASA And NOAA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"

"NASA/NOAA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

[Hillbilly Davis]

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:20:52 -0700 (PDT), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
says...

And has NOTHING to do with CO² -- Loading Image...

Absolutely correct !

Incoming solar warms the rocks, outgoing infrared is impeded by co2

How much? ONE molecule in 2500 can do all that? Riiiight.

Q:
I never understood the relationship between Infrared and Heat. Is IR
emitted when heat is generated, is heat generated when IR is made, and how
do the two relate?

A:
No, this isn't even technically a correct definition of heat. Heat can
only be defined when there is a movement of thermal energy, and IR cannot
be emitted from "anything above absolute zero" it must be emitted from a
system which has enough energy (and the correct transition rules) to
generate a photon in the IR region.

IR is NOT "light"; it is EM radiation. Anything above zero kelvins,
radiates EM energy, some will be IR, but not necessarily much. The
approximately 3k background radiation left over from the big bang, will
have a spectrum peaked at about 3,000 microns, or 3mm. So 98% of that
radiation energy lies between 1.5 mm and 24 mm in the microwave region. At
600 microns in the far IR, or 1/5th of the peak, the spectral radiant
emittance is down five orders of magnitude from the peak, and something
less than 10^-7 of the total energy is at shorter wavelengths;
undetectable; but it isn't zero.

NASA: Climate Lying
--
"NOAA And NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
Temperature Data"

"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"

"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"NASA And NOAA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"

"NASA/NOAA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

[Dhu on Gate]

and IR cannot be emitted from "anything above absolute zero"

Where'd you go to school? Time to demand your money back, dudette.

Dhu

[R Kym Horsell]

Post by Dhu on Gate

and IR cannot be emitted from "anything above absolute zero"

Where'd you go to school?

Objeksun! Assuming facts not in ev-dense.
--
[Miles out:]

Monckton's model provides better answers than the miles wide
IPC [sic] models do.
-- Ashton Crusher <***@moore.net>, 03 Jun 2015 15:58:41 -0700

While the observations track the median of published climate models, the
conf interval for Mockton et al's "simple model" hasn't bracketed real
world data since approx 1975.

<http://i1.wp.com/www.realsceptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Monckton-
model-comparison.png?resize=500%2C375>
Comparison between modelled and observed temperature anomaly from 1850.
Solid lines show temperature series HadCRUT4, Berkeley Earth (BEST) and
Cowtan and Way (CW14). The 5 %-95 % CMIP5 range and Monckton 2015 range are
shown as shaded areas as labelled in the caption. Top graphic shows how the
CMIP5 and Monckton performs to temperature measurements. Bottom graphic
shows performance of Monckton model with corrected input values.
-- Richardson et al, 2015

[Optimus Prime]

Post by R Kym Horsell

Post by Dhu on Gate

and IR cannot be emitted from "anything above absolute zero"

Where'd you go to school?

Objeksun! Assuming facts not in ev-dense.

Are you generally that doped up?

[Hillbilly Davis]

On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:34:40 -0000 (UTC), Dhu on Gate says...

Post by Dhu on Gate

and IR cannot be emitted from "anything above absolute zero"

Where'd you go to school? Time to demand your money back, dudette.
Dhu

Correct it, nerdette, then we'll connect with the author and BOTH debate
him.

[Dhu on Gate]

Post by Hillbilly Davis
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:34:40 -0000 (UTC), Dhu on Gate says...

Post by Dhu on Gate

and IR cannot be emitted from "anything above absolute zero"

Where'd you go to school? Time to demand your money back, dudette.
Dhu

Correct it, nerdette, then we'll connect with the author and BOTH debate
him.

Nope. I'm no paid to teach you shit. Your ignorance is your own problem.

Dhu

[Byker]

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 05:30:05 -0700 (PDT), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
says...

which means increase in land surface temps.

The Chinese seem to have gotten that licked:

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=china+turns+desert+into+farmland

[Gronk]

Post by Hillbilly Davis
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 05:30:05 -0700 (PDT), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
says...

which means increase in land surface temps.

http://youtu.be/cazVrq9v1mE
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=china+turns+desert+into+farmland

Ah, big government to the rescure.

[Sgt. Rock]

Post by Gronk
big government to the rescure.

I hope they have your lobotomy scheduled early.

[Hillbilly Davis]

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:26:10 -0700 (PDT), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
says...

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:33:17 -0700 (PDT), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
says...

if the atmosphere didnt limit the amount of outgoing IR

Thank you, water vapour.

Water vapor feedback has been found to be positive, enhancing the warming effect, thats in addition to the greenhouse effect from co2.

CO² = .04% of ATM and just 3.62% of greenhouse gases.

Please quantify what that 3.62% of the GHGs does vs. what NINETY-FIVE
PERCENT of GHGs (water vapour) does.

Show your work.

=====

Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change - NASA.gov

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes.
Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated.
The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may
not function in current web browsers. Visit NASA.gov for current
information.

They WON'T update it, because water vapour plays a HUGE$ role in Climate
Change and they don't want to update the site to reflect that.

Notice how NASA and other bullshit winger "climate" sites post such small
jpgs, you can't see what the fuck they're trying to hide.

Loading Image...

226 x 111 = Joke

https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html

NASA: Climate omitters

[Hillbilly Davis]

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:05:06 -0700 (PDT), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
whined and cried about the big bad bully Hillbilly Davis...

CO² = .04% of ATM and just 3.62% of greenhouse gases.

Please quantify what that 3.62% of the GHGs does vs. what NINETY-FIVE
PERCENT of GHGs (water vapour) does.

Show your work.

=====

Water Vapor Confirmed as Major Player in Climate Change - NASA.gov

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Disclaimer: This material is being kept online for historical purposes.
Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated.
The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may
not function in current web browsers. Visit NASA.gov for current
information.

They WON'T update it, because water vapour plays a HUGE$ role in Climate
Change and they don't want to update the site to reflect that.

Notice how NASA and other bullshit winger "climate" sites post such small
jpgs, you can't see what the fuck they're trying to hide.

https://www.nasa.gov/images/content/291246main_vapor_graph_226x111.jpg

226 x 111 = Joke

https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html

NASA: Climate omitters
--
"NOAA And NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
Temperature Data"

"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"

"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"NASA And NOAA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"

"NASA/NOAA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught

[Hillbilly Davis]

On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 06:53:27 -0700 (PDT), columbiaaccidentinvestigation
says...

So if we have a hotter ground, what do you think happens?

iHop pancake breakfast for all!!

NASA: Climate Lying At It's Worst:



"NASA Corrected Historical Temperature Data And Fabricated
Temperature Data"

"NASA Made Efforts To Discredit Their Own Satellite Data"

"NASA Refused To Give Data And Information Requested By The US
House Of Representatives Science, Space And Technology Committee"

"NASA Caught In Climate Data Manipulation"

"NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000"

"Spectacularly Poor Climate Science At NASA"

"NASA Mislead, Deceive and Lie About 'Hottest Year' Claim - Concede
2014 NOT "Hottest Year"

"Climate Fraud: NASA's Recent Global Warming "Corrections" Equal a +95.0°C
Per Century Trend"

https://www.google.com/#newwindow=1&q=noaa+nasa+caught