"Who Will You Meet In Hell?"--A Silly Question

[Clyde Armstrong]

At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the following
aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but there is a hell and we
are living in it now". Since there is no purpose of the universe, our earth,
or the living creatures on it (Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living", or Shakespeare--"Life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

[g***@gmail.com]

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the following
aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but there is a hell and we
are living in it now". Since there is no purpose of the universe, our earth,
or the living creatures on it (Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living", or Shakespeare--"Life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Kill yourself you resource using decrepit old fool.

[David Johnston]

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the
following aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but
there is a hell and we are living in it now". Since there is no
purpose of the universe, our earth, or the living creatures on it
(Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and
suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can
write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living",

Stop lying about Camus.

[M.I.Wakefield]

Post by David Johnston

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the
following aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but
there is a hell and we are living in it now". Since there is no
purpose of the universe, our earth, or the living creatures on it
(Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and
suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can
write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living",

Stop lying about Camus.

Lambourn thinks that because his life isn't worth living, no one's is.

[The Doctor]

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by David Johnston

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the
following aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but
there is a hell and we are living in it now". Since there is no
purpose of the universe, our earth, or the living creatures on it
(Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and
suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can
write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living",

Stop lying about Camus.

Lambourn thinks that because his life isn't worth living, no one's is.

The French Existentials are Atheists.

Secular humanism and atheism are the dehumanisation of human society.

[Roy]

Post by The Doctor

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by David Johnston

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the
following aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but
there is a hell and we are living in it now". Since there is no
purpose of the universe, our earth, or the living creatures on it
(Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and
suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can
write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living",

Stop lying about Camus.

Lambourn thinks that because his life isn't worth living, no one's is.

The French Existentials are Atheists.
Secular humanism and atheism are the dehumanisation of human society.
--
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Happy Christmas 2015 and Merry New Year 2016

You wouldn't know an atheist from a bedbug Doc...but they are human and many are a helluva lot smarter than you and your brainwashed flock of so-called Christians. Religious twits have brainwashed their children for eons because they are so scared that their precious religion might be questioned or dropped completely.
=====

[The Doctor]

Post by Roy

Post by The Doctor

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by David Johnston

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the
following aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but
there is a hell and we are living in it now". Since there is no
purpose of the universe, our earth, or the living creatures on it
(Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and
suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can
write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living",

Stop lying about Camus.

Lambourn thinks that because his life isn't worth living, no one's is.

The French Existentials are Atheists.
Secular humanism and atheism are the dehumanisation of human society.
--
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Happy Christmas 2015 and Merry New Year 2016

You wouldn't know an atheist from a bedbug Doc...but they are human and many are a helluva lot smarter than you and your brainwashed flock of so-called Christians. Religious twits have brainwashed their children for eons because they are so scared that their precious religion might be questioned or dropped completely.
=====

Roy is sounding insnane as simplicity.

[M.I.Wakefield]

Post by The Doctor
Roy is sounding insnane as simplicity.

I think you're wrong. You may believe them to be incorrect, but neither has
shown the sort of pathology that lands people in my kill-file.

[Wakefield's nemesis]

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by The Doctor
Roy is sounding insnane as simplicity.

I think you're wrong. You may believe them to be incorrect, but neither has
shown the sort of pathology that lands people in my kill-file.

As if *you* are someone whose choice of posters for your killfile matters . . . .

I notice that every other posting from you - no matter what the subject - ends up with you making remarks about 'Karen Gordon'. When will you realize that a killfile is for shutting people out of your reading list and out of your mind.

Or are you out of your mind - and that does not compute?

[The Right Point]

Post by Wakefield's nemesis

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by The Doctor
Roy is sounding insnane as simplicity.

I think you're wrong. You may believe them to be incorrect, but neither
has shown the sort of pathology that lands people in my kill-file.

As if *you* are someone whose choice of posters for your killfile matters . . . .
I notice that every other posting from you - no matter what the subject -
ends up with you making remarks about 'Karen Gordon'. When will you
realize that a killfile is for shutting people out of your reading list and
out of your mind.
Or are you out of your mind - and that does not compute?

Shut the fuck up Dobranski, or I'll ressurect Mark Hansel and he'll return
from that Lunatic Asylum in Mexico where he's been hiding out.

[Anarchore's ghost]

Post by The Right Point
Shut the fuck up Dobranski, or I'll ressurect Mark Hansel and he'll return
from that Lunatic Asylum in Mexico where he's been hiding out.

The Mexicans locked him up, too?

[M.I.Wakefield]

Post by Wakefield's nemesis

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by The Doctor
Roy is sounding insnane as simplicity.

I think you're wrong. You may believe them to be incorrect, but
neither has shown the sort of pathology that lands people in my
kill-file.

As if *you* are someone whose choice of posters for your killfile matters . . . .
I notice that every other posting from you - no matter what the
subject - ends up with you making remarks about 'Karen Gordon'.

Didn't mention you at all ... but it's good that you recognized yourself ...
that's the first step towards dealing with your problems.

Post by Wakefield's nemesis
When will you realize that a killfile is for shutting people out of your
reading list and out of your mind.

You'll come out of my kill-file, along with everybody else, on January 1st.
And you'll go back in when you post an insult, or one of your racist
screeds, or try to play your Name Game ... based on past performance, you'll
be lucky to make it until the first business day of 2016.

[b***@gmail.com]

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by Wakefield's nemesis
When will you realize that a killfile is for shutting people out of your
reading list and out of your mind.

You'll come out of my kill-file, along with everybody else, on January 1st.
And you'll go back in when you post an insult, or one of your racist
screeds, or try to play your Name Game ... based on past performance, you'll
be lucky to make it until the first business day of 2016.

Stop giving me hope . . . . Why don't you ignore me completely?

[E. Barry Bruyea]

Post by The Doctor

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by David Johnston

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the
following aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but
there is a hell and we are living in it now". Since there is no
purpose of the universe, our earth, or the living creatures on it
(Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and
suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can
write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living",

Stop lying about Camus.

Lambourn thinks that because his life isn't worth living, no one's is.

The French Existentials are Atheists.
Secular humanism and atheism are the dehumanisation of human society.

First, I doubt very much you understand what an 'existentialist'
really is and as for secular humanism being questioned by someone
representing 'religion', the cause of more inhuman suffering than
history can properly illustrate, that's a joke.

[The Doctor]

Post by E. Barry Bruyea

Post by The Doctor

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by David Johnston

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the
following aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but
there is a hell and we are living in it now". Since there is no
purpose of the universe, our earth, or the living creatures on it
(Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and
suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can
write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living",

Stop lying about Camus.

Lambourn thinks that because his life isn't worth living, no one's is.

The French Existentials are Atheists.
Secular humanism and atheism are the dehumanisation of human society.

First, I doubt very much you understand what an 'existentialist'
really is and as for secular humanism being questioned by someone
representing 'religion', the cause of more inhuman suffering than
history can properly illustrate, that's a joke.

Another nutbar that cannot separate Catholicism from REal Christianity.

[M.I.Wakefield]

Post by The Doctor
Another nutbar that cannot separate Catholicism from REal Christianity.

Every sect claims that it is the "real" christianity.

[The Doctor]

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by The Doctor
Another nutbar that cannot separate Catholicism from REal Christianity.

Every sect claims that it is the "real" christianity.

TEst the spirits.

[M.I.Wakefield]

Post by The Doctor

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by The Doctor
Another nutbar that cannot separate Catholicism from REal Christianity.

Every sect claims that it is the "real" christianity.

TEst the spirits.

There aren't any. Get over it.

[The Doctor]

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by The Doctor

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by The Doctor
Another nutbar that cannot separate Catholicism from REal Christianity.

Every sect claims that it is the "real" christianity.

TEst the spirits.

There aren't any. Get over it.

Looks like the wingnuts are finally coming out.

[E. Barry Bruyea]

Post by The Doctor

Post by E. Barry Bruyea

Post by The Doctor

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by David Johnston

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the
following aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but
there is a hell and we are living in it now". Since there is no
purpose of the universe, our earth, or the living creatures on it
(Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and
suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can
write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living",

Stop lying about Camus.

Lambourn thinks that because his life isn't worth living, no one's is.

The French Existentials are Atheists.
Secular humanism and atheism are the dehumanisation of human society.

First, I doubt very much you understand what an 'existentialist'
really is and as for secular humanism being questioned by someone
representing 'religion', the cause of more inhuman suffering than
history can properly illustrate, that's a joke.

Another nutbar that cannot separate Catholicism from REal Christianity.

Define "Real Christianity" and how it is different from Catholicism,
which, by the way, with few exceptions is the root of most branches of
so called Christianity.

[The Doctor]

Post by E. Barry Bruyea

Post by The Doctor

Post by E. Barry Bruyea

Post by The Doctor

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by David Johnston

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the
following aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but
there is a hell and we are living in it now". Since there is no
purpose of the universe, our earth, or the living creatures on it
(Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and
suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can
write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living",

Stop lying about Camus.

Lambourn thinks that because his life isn't worth living, no one's is.

The French Existentials are Atheists.
Secular humanism and atheism are the dehumanisation of human society.

First, I doubt very much you understand what an 'existentialist'
really is and as for secular humanism being questioned by someone
representing 'religion', the cause of more inhuman suffering than
history can properly illustrate, that's a joke.

Another nutbar that cannot separate Catholicism from REal Christianity.

Define "Real Christianity" and how it is different from Catholicism,
which, by the way, with few exceptions is the root of most branches of
so called Christianity.

Catholicism is rooted in Paganry.

[E. Barry Bruyea]

Post by The Doctor

Post by E. Barry Bruyea

Post by The Doctor

Post by E. Barry Bruyea

Post by The Doctor

Post by M.I.Wakefield

Post by David Johnston

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the
following aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but
there is a hell and we are living in it now". Since there is no
purpose of the universe, our earth, or the living creatures on it
(Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and
suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can
write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living",

Stop lying about Camus.

Lambourn thinks that because his life isn't worth living, no one's is.

The French Existentials are Atheists.
Secular humanism and atheism are the dehumanisation of human society.

First, I doubt very much you understand what an 'existentialist'
really is and as for secular humanism being questioned by someone
representing 'religion', the cause of more inhuman suffering than
history can properly illustrate, that's a joke.

Another nutbar that cannot separate Catholicism from REal Christianity.

Define "Real Christianity" and how it is different from Catholicism,
which, by the way, with few exceptions is the root of most branches of
so called Christianity.

Catholicism is rooted in Paganry.

And your religion is rooted in Catholicism. Welcome aboard the Pagan
Train.

[the nutcases]

Post by M.I.Wakefield
Lambourn thinks that because his life isn't worth living, no one's is.

Well, you and the schizo from the west coast seem to think *you're* contributing to society by your very existence. But you're not. Mayber Lambourn's reality is more accurate than yours.

[Clyde Armstrong]

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the following
aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but there is a hell and we
are living in it now". Since there is no purpose of the universe, our earth,
or the living creatures on it (Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living", or Shakespeare--"Life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

No one needs to kill themselves. Time will do that for them. "Life is trgic
because it ends with death".--Ernest Hemingway

[E. Barry Bruyea]

On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:52:53 -0800 (PST), Clyde Armstrong

Post by Clyde Armstrong

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the following
aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but there is a hell and we
are living in it now". Since there is no purpose of the universe, our earth,
or the living creatures on it (Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living", or Shakespeare--"Life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

No one needs to kill themselves. Time will do that for them. "Life is trgic
because it ends with death".--Ernest Hemingway

Not surprising when you consider life is a terminal condition.

Post by Clyde Armstrong
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[David Johnston]

Post by Clyde Armstrong

Post by Clyde Armstrong
At least according to existential philosophers. I take credit for the following
aphorism: "God does not exist; there is no heaven, but there is a hell and we
are living in it now". Since there is no purpose of the universe, our earth,
or the living creatures on it (Homo Sapiens predominant), our existence, accomplishments and suffering are all meaningless and absurd. This is why Camus can write:"It is common knowledge that life is not worth living", or Shakespeare--"Life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

No one needs to kill themselves. Time will do that for them. "Life is trgic
because it ends with death".--Ernest Hemingway

Knowing that people hold your ideas in contempt, you try to attach
them to famous names in the hopes that they'll somehow gain legitimacy.