Discussion:
After I Showed My Mom These Facts Debunking "the Holocaust" She Realized it Was Only High Pitched Propaganda
(too old to reply)
Peter J Ross
2017-05-17 13:55:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
By Richard Edmonds

The facts on the "Holocaust" have been exposed years ago in a
trial in Toronto, Canada. The defendant in the dock was the
German-Canadian, Ernst Zundel, accused by the State prosecutor of
disputing the claim that during the Second World War the Germans had
murdered millions of Jews in purpose-built gas-chambers.

This trial, held in 1985 against Ernst Zundel, is of greatest
importance due to the evidence given at the court by an expert
witness. Professor Raul Hilberg of the University of Vermont, USA,
was recognized by the court to be the world expert on the alleged
"Holocaust". In open court and under oath, Professor Hilberg stated
that he knew of no independent, forensic scientific for the existence
anywhere of a gas-chamber, planned built and operated by the Germans
during the Second World War for the purpose of killing, murdering or
executing Jews or any other persons. Professor Hilberg further stated
that with regard to causes of death in the whole extent of
German-occupied Europe during the Second World War, he was unable to
supply the court with a single autopsy certificate, stating the cause
of death of a single individual to be due to poisoning by cyanide gas.
Cyanide gas was the highly toxic gas allegedly used in the alleged
German gas-chambers.

The origin of the "Holocaust" allegation is to be found in the
trial that the victorious Allies organized against the defeated
Germans foes in the years following the War, at the German city of
Nuremberg. The victorious allies were, of course, the United Stated of
America, the Soviet Union of Josef Stalin, Great Britain and France.
At this trial of the defeated German leaders, the Allies were
simultaneously Judge, Jury, Prosecutor, and Hangman in their own case
and in their own court. The Allies' Nuremberg trial was publicly
condemned at the time by principled, leading Americans. The Chief
Justice of the US Supreme Court, Judge Harlan F. Stone, condemned the
trial as a "lynching". US Senator Robert Taft condemned the Allies'
trial, as a "travesty and a perversion of justice". Taft described
America's participation as a blot on the honor of the United States.
Senator Taft predicted that in the future Europeans would condemn
America for its participation in a "lynching".

The standard rules of evidence were discarded. For example, the
Allies held that their allegations of German atrocities, printed and
published to saturation point in the Allies' war time-time press, were
to be accepted at face value as "Public Knowledge" and were of such a
notoriety that without any further independent, judicial
investigation, the Allies' court could accept them as of probative
value. If the Allies said it, then it could not be questioned.

To their undying shame, the Allies employed torture to extract
self-condemning confessions of guilt from their helpless prisoners. I
will present here two notorious examples of vicious torture.
We know that Rudolf Hoess, a former Kommandant at the Auschwitz was
captured by a special unit of the British Army at the end of the
Second World War, and we know that Hoess was tortured and beaten
almost to the point of death, and then given a choice: either to
confess to committing the murder of millions of Jews as Auschwitz, or
else, he and his family, wife and children would suffer the
consequences. Hoess' statement obtained under torture was presented
and accepted at the Allies' court as proving the claim that Auschwitz
in Poland is the location of the mass murder of millions. In response
to rumors of abuses inflicted on German prisoners of war held captive
by the US Army in post-War Germany, the American judge, Edward van
Roden was commissioned by the US Army to investigate the situation.
Van Roden examined German prisoners, and found that many had been
tortured; that more than a hundred had had their testicles crushed
beyond repair. These men had been tortured, as in the case of the
Auschwitz Kommandant Hoess, in order to extract from them the
self-condemning confessions of guilt that the Allies needed to
buttress their propaganda-lies. On his return to the USA, Judge van
Roden published his findings at press-conferences held in New York and
Chicago.

The "Holocaust" allegation is nothing but a propaganda-lie concocted
by the war- time Allies Nuremberg lynching by the cynical trampling on
all the principles of American and British jurisprudence.

The disgrace that remains is that 70 years later across most of
mainland Europe it is a criminal offense to question the findings of
the Allies Nuremberg trial.
--
PJR :)

τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον οἶδε καὶ τρυγῳδία.
- Aristophanes
Greg Carr
2017-05-18 17:11:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Peter J Ross
By Richard Edmonds
The facts on the "Holocaust" have been exposed years ago in a
trial in Toronto, Canada. The defendant in the dock was the
German-Canadian, Ernst Zundel, accused by the State prosecutor of
disputing the claim that during the Second World War the Germans had
murdered millions of Jews in purpose-built gas-chambers.
This trial, held in 1985 against Ernst Zundel, is of greatest
importance due to the evidence given at the court by an expert
witness. Professor Raul Hilberg of the University of Vermont, USA,
was recognized by the court to be the world expert on the alleged
"Holocaust". In open court and under oath, Professor Hilberg stated
that he knew of no independent, forensic scientific for the existence
anywhere of a gas-chamber, planned built and operated by the Germans
during the Second World War for the purpose of killing, murdering or
executing Jews or any other persons. Professor Hilberg further stated
that with regard to causes of death in the whole extent of
German-occupied Europe during the Second World War, he was unable to
supply the court with a single autopsy certificate, stating the cause
of death of a single individual to be due to poisoning by cyanide gas.
Cyanide gas was the highly toxic gas allegedly used in the alleged
German gas-chambers.
The origin of the "Holocaust" allegation is to be found in the
trial that the victorious Allies organized against the defeated
Germans foes in the years following the War, at the German city of
Nuremberg. The victorious allies were, of course, the United Stated of
America, the Soviet Union of Josef Stalin, Great Britain and France.
At this trial of the defeated German leaders, the Allies were
simultaneously Judge, Jury, Prosecutor, and Hangman in their own case
and in their own court. The Allies' Nuremberg trial was publicly
condemned at the time by principled, leading Americans. The Chief
Justice of the US Supreme Court, Judge Harlan F. Stone, condemned the
trial as a "lynching". US Senator Robert Taft condemned the Allies'
trial, as a "travesty and a perversion of justice". Taft described
America's participation as a blot on the honor of the United States.
Senator Taft predicted that in the future Europeans would condemn
America for its participation in a "lynching".
The standard rules of evidence were discarded. For example, the
Allies held that their allegations of German atrocities, printed and
published to saturation point in the Allies' war time-time press, were
to be accepted at face value as "Public Knowledge" and were of such a
notoriety that without any further independent, judicial
investigation, the Allies' court could accept them as of probative
value. If the Allies said it, then it could not be questioned.
To their undying shame, the Allies employed torture to extract
self-condemning confessions of guilt from their helpless prisoners. I
will present here two notorious examples of vicious torture.
We know that Rudolf Hoess, a former Kommandant at the Auschwitz was
captured by a special unit of the British Army at the end of the
Second World War, and we know that Hoess was tortured and beaten
almost to the point of death, and then given a choice: either to
confess to committing the murder of millions of Jews as Auschwitz, or
else, he and his family, wife and children would suffer the
consequences. Hoess' statement obtained under torture was presented
and accepted at the Allies' court as proving the claim that Auschwitz
in Poland is the location of the mass murder of millions. In response
to rumors of abuses inflicted on German prisoners of war held captive
by the US Army in post-War Germany, the American judge, Edward van
Roden was commissioned by the US Army to investigate the situation.
Van Roden examined German prisoners, and found that many had been
tortured; that more than a hundred had had their testicles crushed
beyond repair. These men had been tortured, as in the case of the
Auschwitz Kommandant Hoess, in order to extract from them the
self-condemning confessions of guilt that the Allies needed to
buttress their propaganda-lies. On his return to the USA, Judge van
Roden published his findings at press-conferences held in New York and
Chicago.
The "Holocaust" allegation is nothing but a propaganda-lie concocted
by the war- time Allies Nuremberg lynching by the cynical trampling on
all the principles of American and British jurisprudence.
The disgrace that remains is that 70 years later across most of
mainland Europe it is a criminal offense to question the findings of
the Allies Nuremberg trial.
--
PJR :)
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον οἶδε καὶ τρυγῳδία.
- Aristophanes
I doubt you have a clue who your prostitute mother is.

Loading...